We use to teach our children

[Uncensored2008]

One of my favorite movies.

I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum.

.

"I'll rip your head off and shit down your neck." - Best Rod Piper line from the film.

 

[OKTexas]

Did you read what you wrote?

If it is true individual freedom it needs no doctrine concerning it. Individual freedom is not a doctrinal subject.

Good example of what I mean about parroting without understanding.

Regards from Rosie

Our entire Constitution is all about individual freedom Rosie

And for that reason it is necessary for each generation to apply Constitutional principles to the lives and times of their world.

To insist that the Constitution is one-size-fits-all and the way it used to be is the only good way puts our progeny into an ideological and doctrinal straitjacket.

That is the opposite of individual freedom.

Regards from Rosie

Guess you've never heard of article 5.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Typical, everything or anything else, but not on the subject that was posted about ism.

Incorrect sentence structure. Is English your second language?

 

[peach174]

Did you read what you wrote?

If it is true individual freedom it needs no doctrine concerning it. Individual freedom is not a doctrinal subject.

Good example of what I mean about parroting without understanding.

Regards from Rosie

Our entire Constitution is all about individual freedom Rosie

And for that reason it is necessary for each generation to apply Constitutional principles to the lives and times of their world.

To insist that the Constitution is one-size-fits-all and the way it used to be is the only good way puts our progeny into an ideological and doctrinal straitjacket.

That is the opposite of individual freedom.

Regards from Rosie

That is what big government programs do Rosie,( One size fits all) and takes away our freedoms, not our Constitution.

 

[RosieS]

Typical, everything or anything else, but not on the subject that was posted about ism.

Incorrect sentence structure. Is English your second language?

Some advice DT? The RW's are already misconstruing "individual freedom" in this thread. Do I keep trying for clarity or cut my losses and move on?

Thx in advance!!

Regards from Rosie

 

[B. Kidd]

Typical, everything or anything else, but not on the subject that was posted about ism.

Incorrect sentence structure. Is English your second language?

New cop show......"Dick Tuck, Grammar P.I.".

 

[B. Kidd]

Our entire Constitution is all about individual freedom Rosie

And for that reason it is necessary for each generation to apply Constitutional principles to the lives and times of their world.

To insist that the Constitution is one-size-fits-all and the way it used to be is the only good way puts our progeny into an ideological and doctrinal straitjacket.

That is the opposite of individual freedom.

Regards from Rosie

That is what big government programs do Rosie,( One size fits all) and takes away our freedoms, not our Constitution.

It is impossible to teach the indoctrinated.

 

[eflatminor]

Did you read what you wrote?

If it is true individual freedom it needs no doctrine concerning it. Individual freedom is not a doctrinal subject.

Good example of what I mean about parroting without understanding.

Regards from Rosie

Our entire Constitution is all about individual freedom Rosie

And for that reason it is necessary for each generation to apply Constitutional principles to the lives and times of their world.

So propose an amendment.

To insist that the Constitution is one-size-fits-all

No libertarians suggests this. We believe in the amendment process. Progressives? Not so much.

...an ideological and doctrinal straitjacket.

Ironically, that's exactly what your unconstitutional federal level programs are. One size solution from the top. Never works like individual choice.

 

[Meathead]

you posted a cartoon. how serious do you want to be taken?

Ben Franklin took political cartoons seriously. But I'm sure you know better...

The First Political Cartoons in America | Archiving Early America

.

why should this cartoon be taken seriously? because it's old? because xenophobes agree with it? what is it that makes this cartoon a respectable source?

It should be taken seriously because it was prophetic.

 

[RosieS]

Our entire Constitution is all about individual freedom Rosie

And for that reason it is necessary for each generation to apply Constitutional principles to the lives and times of their world.

To insist that the Constitution is one-size-fits-all and the way it used to be is the only good way puts our progeny into an ideological and doctrinal straitjacket.

That is the opposite of individual freedom.

Regards from Rosie

That is what big government programs do Rosie,( One size fits all) and takes away our freedoms, not our Constitution.

It is what the governments did do in schools but no longer do because it no longer applies.

One size fits all teaching about what Americanism is DID take away our freedoms. THat America no longer exists.

The Constitution is a living document and NOT a doctrine. Freedom is NOT a doctrine. Pre-emptive invasion of a foreign land IS a doctrine.

Not being indoctrinated means being able to judge the correctness and fairness of any doctrine - any where, any time.

That is what educated, rather than indoctrinated, citizens can do.

And that is how individual freedom is promoted.

Regards from Rosie

 

[Uncensored2008]

Some advice DT? The RW's are already misconstruing "individual freedom" in this thread. Do I keep trying for clarity or cut my losses and move on?

Thx in advance!!

Regards from Rosie

Freedom through obedience, eh comrade?

 

[B. Kidd]

And for that reason it is necessary for each generation to apply Constitutional principles to the lives and times of their world.

To insist that the Constitution is one-size-fits-all and the way it used to be is the only good way puts our progeny into an ideological and doctrinal straitjacket.

That is the opposite of individual freedom.

Regards from Rosie

That is what big government programs do Rosie,( One size fits all) and takes away our freedoms, not our Constitution.

It is what the governments did do in schools but no longer do because it no longer applies.

One size fits all teaching about what Americanism is DID take away our freedoms. THat America no longer exists.

The Constitution is a living document and NOT a doctrine. Freedom is NOT a doctrine. Pre-emptive invasion of a foreign land IS a doctrine.

Not being indoctrinated means being able to judge the correctness and fairness of any doctrine - any where, any time.

That is what educated, rather than indoctrinated, citizens can do.

And that is how individual freedom is promoted.

Regards from Rosie

It's obvious that you never pledged allegiance to a country that promotes individual freedom.
Quite collectivist of you, dear.

 

[eflatminor]

The Constitution is a living document...

Can you please point to the wording in the law that supports this point?

Or are you suggesting we should not have federal laws that must be upheld...to be determined by whomever is in power?

My goodness, and you dare to call libertarians anarchists!

 

[Meathead]

Some advice DT? The RW's are already misconstruing "individual freedom" in this thread. Do I keep trying for clarity or cut my losses and move on?

Thx in advance!!

Regards from Rosie

Freedom through obedience, eh comrade?

You got that right. She has a master's in Urban Education.

 

[RosieS]

Our entire Constitution is all about individual freedom Rosie

And for that reason it is necessary for each generation to apply Constitutional principles to the lives and times of their world.

So propose an amendment.

To insist that the Constitution is one-size-fits-all

No libertarians suggests this. We believe in the amendment process. Progressives? Not so much.

...an ideological and doctrinal straitjacket.

Ironically, that's exactly what your unconstitutional federal level programs are. One size solution from the top. Never works like individual choice.

Ya doesn't need no stinkin' amendment. Ya just need a respect for real freedom. Let the people decide under the rule of law. The last thing needed are any more amendments. Respect for the applicability over differing times and differing needs of our Constitution is what is necessary.

That comes from a trusting heart and not. head full of crammed in indoctrinated "facts."

This Republic has survived every Constitutional crisis we have ever faced. Yet the flexibility and adaptability of the document is threatening to the RW.

That shows lack of history, lack of understanding and lack of ideals. The RW must indoctrinate freedom. Really??!!??

Perhaps you are born that way and can't help yourselves. Sad, that.

Regards from Rosie

 

[OKTexas]

And for that reason it is necessary for each generation to apply Constitutional principles to the lives and times of their world.

To insist that the Constitution is one-size-fits-all and the way it used to be is the only good way puts our progeny into an ideological and doctrinal straitjacket.

That is the opposite of individual freedom.

Regards from Rosie

That is what big government programs do Rosie,( One size fits all) and takes away our freedoms, not our Constitution.

It is what the governments did do in schools but no longer do because it no longer applies.

One size fits all teaching about what Americanism is DID take away our freedoms. THat America no longer exists.

The Constitution is a living document and NOT a doctrine. Freedom is NOT a doctrine. Pre-emptive invasion of a foreign land IS a doctrine.

Not being indoctrinated means being able to judge the correctness and fairness of any doctrine - any where, any time.

That is what educated, rather than indoctrinated, citizens can do.

And that is how individual freedom is promoted.

Regards from Rosie

So your saying the constitution is mearly a suggestion rather than the supreme law of the land? Tell me, why did they bother to write it down?

 

[peach174]

Yes, it's to bad that our schools are teaching socialism indoctrination instead of freedom from government.

 

[RosieS]

Some advice DT? The RW's are already misconstruing "individual freedom" in this thread. Do I keep trying for clarity or cut my losses and move on?

Thx in advance!!

Regards from Rosie

Freedom through obedience, eh comrade?

You got that right. She has a master's in Urban Education.

Must have been one who taught you to be honest in what to call yourself.

Regards from Rosie

 

[jillian]

The Constitution is a living document...

Can you please point to the wording in the law that supports this point?

Or are you suggesting we should not have federal laws that must be upheld...to be determined by whomever is in power?

My goodness, and you dare to call libertarians anarchists!

what does due process mean absent caselaw?
what does unreasonable search and seizure mean absent caselaw?
what is custodial interrogation absent caselaw defining custody and interrogation?
what limitations are there in the right of the federal government to regulate commerce among the several states absent caselaw?
what individual rights exist as a result of the bill of rights absent caselaw?

 

[jillian]

Yes, it's to bad that our schools are teaching socialism indoctrination instead of freedom from government.

how about you answer actual questions?

do you have children in school NOW?

what are you basing your nonsense on?