We can't compromise! We can't collaborate! We can't cooperate!

[JoeB131]

I never read your fucking story, dumbass, the only post I ever read is you somehow claim you were fired because you got hurt or sick and the insurance company made them fire you. I’m not reading your silly story because you lie so damn much there is no truth in it and the other reason is, I don’t care, just like you don’t care.

Sure, buddy, you so don't care you and your girlfriend Kaz try to claim things I never said... that's how much you don't care.

 

[Lysistrata]

So what is your story? Come on. Explain patriarchal religions. The entire attack on PP is meant to establish a regime in which females either abstain from sexual activity until they enter a legal relationship in which they must have sex on command of a master and bear forth the sperm of this despicable individual or face the consequences. Please start explaining why you think that female humans are expendable.

You obviously do not believe in the concept of liberty among humans, even as you folks talk about "liberty" and "freedom." For yourselves only?

You're a bigot. You know nothing about Christians. You just hate them and make up stupid shit because you're an angry, hateful little girl

I not only was raised in one of the Christian faiths, of which there are many, I also majored in European history in college. Please state which of the Christian faiths you are from? Roman Catholic? Orthodox? Methodist? Lutheran? Episcopalian? Presbyterian? Quaker? Baptist (which conference)?

I notice, little boy, that you did not respond to the substance of my comment. Do some members of some of the religions that make up "Christianity" do these things or not? Guilty of what I said or not?

kaz: you're a little girl

Lysistrata: I've got nothing. I'm just going to repeat back to you what you said to me. You're a little boy ...

Stupid. You refuse to stand up and explain anything. This is what I was asking for. Got anything of substance? Do you want to explain marrying penis worship with a belief in a Supreme Being? Now is your chance.

You think all Christians are like the most extreme zealot of a Christian you can imagine in your feeble little mind. You think Christians have lizard tails and eat babies. They shoot hobos for fun and set birdhouses on fire.

Two words. You're a big-ot. And like all bigots, you're dumb as a brick. Hillary's right, at least about you. Let your husband do the thinking for you, you suck at it

This "you hate Christians and Christianity" thing is insane. I have repeatedly gone out of my way to separate the wide variety of Christian groups. Just last week on USMB, I wrote of my affection and respect for the Society of Friends, also known as "Quakers." A quick Google search shows that there are over 2 billion Christians in the world. In European history, there was much violence between groups, from the massacre of the Cathars, to the Inquisition, to the fallout in the wake of the Reformation. In Northern Ireland, they're still fighting among themselves.

I'm sort of fond of the current pope. I certainly was not fond of Ratzinger. I like the Archbishop of Canterbury. I am particularly fond of a retired Episcopalian archbishop and theologian who has written several books throughout his years, a man whom I had the pleasure of greeting some years back. I decidedly am not a fan of these "end times," LGBT-hating types, those "Christians" who run around declaring that Islam is not a religion, those morons who take the bible as infallible and inerrant.

With so many people being Christian, from the Pope to Al Sharpton, how can you make such comments? Try to be more clear as to what group/sect you are from.

 

[kaz]

You're a bigot. You know nothing about Christians. You just hate them and make up stupid shit because you're an angry, hateful little girl

I not only was raised in one of the Christian faiths, of which there are many, I also majored in European history in college. Please state which of the Christian faiths you are from? Roman Catholic? Orthodox? Methodist? Lutheran? Episcopalian? Presbyterian? Quaker? Baptist (which conference)?

I notice, little boy, that you did not respond to the substance of my comment. Do some members of some of the religions that make up "Christianity" do these things or not? Guilty of what I said or not?

kaz: you're a little girl

Lysistrata: I've got nothing. I'm just going to repeat back to you what you said to me. You're a little boy ...

Stupid. You refuse to stand up and explain anything. This is what I was asking for. Got anything of substance? Do you want to explain marrying penis worship with a belief in a Supreme Being? Now is your chance.

You think all Christians are like the most extreme zealot of a Christian you can imagine in your feeble little mind. You think Christians have lizard tails and eat babies. They shoot hobos for fun and set birdhouses on fire.

Two words. You're a big-ot. And like all bigots, you're dumb as a brick. Hillary's right, at least about you. Let your husband do the thinking for you, you suck at it

This "you hate Christians and Christianity" thing is insane. I have repeatedly gone out of my way to separate the wide variety of Christian groups. Just last week on USMB, I wrote of my affection and respect for the Society of Friends, also known as "Quakers." A quick Google search shows that there are over 2 billion Christians in the world. In European history, there was much violence between groups, from the massacre of the Cathars, to the Inquisition, to the fallout in the wake of the Reformation. In Northern Ireland, they're still fighting among themselves.

I'm sort of fond of the current pope. I certainly was not fond of Ratzinger. I like the Archbishop of Canterbury. I am particularly fond of a retired Episcopalian archbishop and theologian who has written several books throughout his years, a man whom I had the pleasure of greeting some years back. I decidedly am not a fan of these "end times," LGBT-hating types, those "Christians" who run around declaring that Islam is not a religion, those morons who take the bible as infallible and inerrant.

With so many people being Christian, from the Pope to Al Sharpton, how can you make such comments? Try to be more clear as to what group/sect you are from.

Society of Friends

 

[Lysistrata]

I not only was raised in one of the Christian faiths, of which there are many, I also majored in European history in college. Please state which of the Christian faiths you are from? Roman Catholic? Orthodox? Methodist? Lutheran? Episcopalian? Presbyterian? Quaker? Baptist (which conference)?

I notice, little boy, that you did not respond to the substance of my comment. Do some members of some of the religions that make up "Christianity" do these things or not? Guilty of what I said or not?

kaz: you're a little girl

Lysistrata: I've got nothing. I'm just going to repeat back to you what you said to me. You're a little boy ...

Stupid. You refuse to stand up and explain anything. This is what I was asking for. Got anything of substance? Do you want to explain marrying penis worship with a belief in a Supreme Being? Now is your chance.

You think all Christians are like the most extreme zealot of a Christian you can imagine in your feeble little mind. You think Christians have lizard tails and eat babies. They shoot hobos for fun and set birdhouses on fire.

Two words. You're a big-ot. And like all bigots, you're dumb as a brick. Hillary's right, at least about you. Let your husband do the thinking for you, you suck at it

This "you hate Christians and Christianity" thing is insane. I have repeatedly gone out of my way to separate the wide variety of Christian groups. Just last week on USMB, I wrote of my affection and respect for the Society of Friends, also known as "Quakers." A quick Google search shows that there are over 2 billion Christians in the world. In European history, there was much violence between groups, from the massacre of the Cathars, to the Inquisition, to the fallout in the wake of the Reformation. In Northern Ireland, they're still fighting among themselves.

I'm sort of fond of the current pope. I certainly was not fond of Ratzinger. I like the Archbishop of Canterbury. I am particularly fond of a retired Episcopalian archbishop and theologian who has written several books throughout his years, a man whom I had the pleasure of greeting some years back. I decidedly am not a fan of these "end times," LGBT-hating types, those "Christians" who run around declaring that Islam is not a religion, those morons who take the bible as infallible and inerrant.

With so many people being Christian, from the Pope to Al Sharpton, how can you make such comments? Try to be more clear as to what group/sect you are from.

Society of Friends[/QUOTE
You certainly do not act like it. Which Yearly Meeting?

 

[kaz]

kaz: you're a little girl

Lysistrata: I've got nothing. I'm just going to repeat back to you what you said to me. You're a little boy ...

Stupid. You refuse to stand up and explain anything. This is what I was asking for. Got anything of substance? Do you want to explain marrying penis worship with a belief in a Supreme Being? Now is your chance.

You think all Christians are like the most extreme zealot of a Christian you can imagine in your feeble little mind. You think Christians have lizard tails and eat babies. They shoot hobos for fun and set birdhouses on fire.

Two words. You're a big-ot. And like all bigots, you're dumb as a brick. Hillary's right, at least about you. Let your husband do the thinking for you, you suck at it

This "you hate Christians and Christianity" thing is insane. I have repeatedly gone out of my way to separate the wide variety of Christian groups. Just last week on USMB, I wrote of my affection and respect for the Society of Friends, also known as "Quakers." A quick Google search shows that there are over 2 billion Christians in the world. In European history, there was much violence between groups, from the massacre of the Cathars, to the Inquisition, to the fallout in the wake of the Reformation. In Northern Ireland, they're still fighting among themselves.

I'm sort of fond of the current pope. I certainly was not fond of Ratzinger. I like the Archbishop of Canterbury. I am particularly fond of a retired Episcopalian archbishop and theologian who has written several books throughout his years, a man whom I had the pleasure of greeting some years back. I decidedly am not a fan of these "end times," LGBT-hating types, those "Christians" who run around declaring that Islam is not a religion, those morons who take the bible as infallible and inerrant.

With so many people being Christian, from the Pope to Al Sharpton, how can you make such comments? Try to be more clear as to what group/sect you are from.

Society of Friends

You certainly do not act like it. Which Yearly Meeting?

If you want to be judged, run to a leftist, you'll be glad to do the job. Now that's inconsistent with the society of friends.

Believing in personal liberty and personal responsibility isn't consistent with the Society of Friends? Where do you get that idea?

I actually was raised in the Church of the Brethren. We were close to a Quaker Church and met together in summers when attendance was down in both churches. As an adult, I've lived in 10 States. The Brethren is a more regional Church, there are Quaker Churches across the country so I just started looking for Quaker Churches.

So to be more clear, what idea that I have to you believe is inconsistent with the society of friends?

1) We WAY overuse the military and need to withdraw all bases in foreign countries

2) Communities should take the lead on helping those who need help, not the government

3) We should end the death penalty

4) Churches should be teaching morality, morality shouldn't come from government guns.

So?

 

[Manonthestreet]

Find the compromise position.....and go

 

[John Shaw]

Holy shit, Lysistrata is a fucking nutjob. I wonder what turns a person into something like that ...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Find the compromise position.....and go

Here is the compromise:

That meme is fake, and we happily live next to crazy people who will believe anything, like you.

 

[Papageorgio]

Find the compromise position.....and go

Here is the compromise:

That meme is fake, and we happily live next to crazy people who will believe anything, like you.

How in the world is his meme any different than the left nuts claiming the Republicans want dirty water, dirty air, hate women, hate blacks, hate gays, hate democracy, hate government, hate the poor, hate children, come on there is a compromise isn’t there?

Maybe both sides could agree to being stupid and making these ridiculous claims.

 

[kaz]

Find the compromise position.....and go

Here is the compromise:

That meme is fake, and we happily live next to crazy people who will believe anything, like you.

Reading the list, everything on that list is solidly the Democrat party position

 

[kaz]

Find the compromise position.....and go

Here is the compromise:

That meme is fake, and we happily live next to crazy people who will believe anything, like you.

How in the world is his meme any different than the left nuts claiming the Republicans want dirty water, dirty air, hate women, hate blacks, hate gays, hate democracy, hate government, hate the poor, hate children, come on there is a compromise isn’t there?

Maybe both sides could agree to being stupid and making these ridiculous claims.

I'm not with you on that, my friend. What on this list is not true about Democrats?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How in the world is his meme any different than the left nuts claiming the Republicans want dirty water, dirty air, hate women, hate blacks, hate gays, hate democracy, hate government, hate the poor, hate children, come on there is a compromise isn’t there?

I don't claim any of those things. I think that sort of rhetoric is counter productive. You can easily find it on both sides.

 

[Papageorgio]

How in the world is his meme any different than the left nuts claiming the Republicans want dirty water, dirty air, hate women, hate blacks, hate gays, hate democracy, hate government, hate the poor, hate children, come on there is a compromise isn’t there?

I don't claim any of those things. I think that sort of rhetoric is counter productive. You can easily find it on both sides.

Yep, but do you bitch about both sides doing it or just one side?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How in the world is his meme any different than the left nuts claiming the Republicans want dirty water, dirty air, hate women, hate blacks, hate gays, hate democracy, hate government, hate the poor, hate children, come on there is a compromise isn’t there?

I don't claim any of those things. I think that sort of rhetoric is counter productive. You can easily find it on both sides.

Yep, but do you bitch about both sides doing it or just one side?

Both sides...why?

 

[JoeB131]

How in the world is his meme any different than the left nuts claiming the Republicans want dirty water, dirty air, hate women, hate blacks, hate gays, hate democracy, hate government, hate the poor, hate children, come on there is a compromise isn’t there?

Well, you know, maybe you could stop doing that stuff.. that would be a good start.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I will walk you though this slowly, using small words, as though you are a dim witted child.

No. You won't. You aren't qualified to extract air from a paper bag, jethro. Your adolescent partisan cheer leading has grown tiresome. Nothing coming out of your uneducated maw concerns me. Do you get it now, Sally? Or shall I draw pictures in crayon (more your speed, I'm sure)?

1. You claimed that the jobs would not, could not come back, because those jobs were lost to automation.

No, I did not claim anything of the sort, you lying maggot. I stated that while output in manufacturing jobs is up, that actual jobs are at 1940s levels. This is due to automation. A fact. I even provided a link to support it. If you continue to be disingenuous and stupid, off to ignoreville you go. I have better people to converse with.

2. I pointed to an example of another First World nation, that has twice the level of those jobs than we do.

No, you used 'whataboutism', the only move from supporters of the cult of The Orange Virus when the ridiculousness of this administration's policies is pointed out.

3. That disproves your claim. That is why it is relevant.

You've disproved nothing, especially facts. Stop lying.

4. That you had to have this explained to you, shows you to be incredibly dense.

Now you're a lying troll. Go away.

Explain why Germany can have twice the level of manufacturing employment that we do, in the environment of automation.

They pay them twice as much. Duh. You don't seem to understand too much about manufacturing.

 

[Correll]

I will walk you though this slowly, using small words, as though you are a dim witted child.

No. You won't. You aren't qualified to extract air from a paper bag, jethro. Your adolescent partisan cheer leading has grown tiresome. Nothing coming out of your uneducated maw concerns me. Do you get it now, Sally? Or shall I draw pictures in crayon (more your speed, I'm sure)?

1. You claimed that the jobs would not, could not come back, because those jobs were lost to automation.

No, I did not claim anything of the sort, you lying maggot. I stated that while output in manufacturing jobs is up, that actual jobs are at 1940s levels. This is due to automation. A fact. I even provided a link to support it. If you continue to be disingenuous and stupid, off to ignoreville you go. I have better people to converse with.

2. I pointed to an example of another First World nation, that has twice the level of those jobs than we do.

No, you used 'whataboutism', the only move from supporters of the cult of The Orange Virus when the ridiculousness of this administration's policies is pointed out.

3. That disproves your claim. That is why it is relevant.

You've disproved nothing, especially facts. Stop lying.

4. That you had to have this explained to you, shows you to be incredibly dense.

Now you're a lying troll. Go away.

Explain why Germany can have twice the level of manufacturing employment that we do, in the environment of automation.

They pay them twice as much. Duh. You don't seem to understand too much about manufacturing.

Nothing in that article explained any cause and effect.


Are you able to expand on that, or was that just something you were told to post, with no actual understanding of the content?

 

[DOTR]

I'm sure glad these guys didn't say what today's parties are saying.
.

Not one of them promoted abortion or demanded gay marriage. None of them tried to take guns or went after the established churches in their states. None of them objected to prayers or apologized for the US existing or siuded with "merciless Indian savages". No man in that picture talked of "hate speech". Not one of the guys above tried to take money from some and hand it to others for not working. No man in that picture ever thought that Islam was suitable for America...or even atheism. They made sure our national birth certificate was Christian.
And every one of them would have banned from the internet as the elites tried to shut down their ideas.

Those guys were all Americans and had America's interests at heart. Big difference.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I will walk you though this slowly, using small words, as though you are a dim witted child.

No. You won't. You aren't qualified to extract air from a paper bag, jethro. Your adolescent partisan cheer leading has grown tiresome. Nothing coming out of your uneducated maw concerns me. Do you get it now, Sally? Or shall I draw pictures in crayon (more your speed, I'm sure)?

1. You claimed that the jobs would not, could not come back, because those jobs were lost to automation.

No, I did not claim anything of the sort, you lying maggot. I stated that while output in manufacturing jobs is up, that actual jobs are at 1940s levels. This is due to automation. A fact. I even provided a link to support it. If you continue to be disingenuous and stupid, off to ignoreville you go. I have better people to converse with.

2. I pointed to an example of another First World nation, that has twice the level of those jobs than we do.

No, you used 'whataboutism', the only move from supporters of the cult of The Orange Virus when the ridiculousness of this administration's policies is pointed out.

3. That disproves your claim. That is why it is relevant.

You've disproved nothing, especially facts. Stop lying.

4. That you had to have this explained to you, shows you to be incredibly dense.

Now you're a lying troll. Go away.

Explain why Germany can have twice the level of manufacturing employment that we do, in the environment of automation.

They pay them twice as much. Duh. You don't seem to understand too much about manufacturing.

Nothing in that article explained any cause and effect.


Are you able to expand on that, or was that just something you were told to post, with no actual understanding of the content?

At the end of the day, yes, I AM able to expand upon that. But honestly, your response is so ignorant that I will refrain from doing so because since you are resembling a compulsively partisan, toxic individual to me, I'm going to allow your complete ignorance of this subject to reign free. Honestly, your response is so ignorant that I'm convinced America is addicted to stupid pills. Keep on Truckin'.

 

[Correll]

I will walk you though this slowly, using small words, as though you are a dim witted child.

No. You won't. You aren't qualified to extract air from a paper bag, jethro. Your adolescent partisan cheer leading has grown tiresome. Nothing coming out of your uneducated maw concerns me. Do you get it now, Sally? Or shall I draw pictures in crayon (more your speed, I'm sure)?

1. You claimed that the jobs would not, could not come back, because those jobs were lost to automation.

No, I did not claim anything of the sort, you lying maggot. I stated that while output in manufacturing jobs is up, that actual jobs are at 1940s levels. This is due to automation. A fact. I even provided a link to support it. If you continue to be disingenuous and stupid, off to ignoreville you go. I have better people to converse with.

2. I pointed to an example of another First World nation, that has twice the level of those jobs than we do.

No, you used 'whataboutism', the only move from supporters of the cult of The Orange Virus when the ridiculousness of this administration's policies is pointed out.

3. That disproves your claim. That is why it is relevant.

You've disproved nothing, especially facts. Stop lying.

4. That you had to have this explained to you, shows you to be incredibly dense.

Now you're a lying troll. Go away.

Explain why Germany can have twice the level of manufacturing employment that we do, in the environment of automation.

They pay them twice as much. Duh. You don't seem to understand too much about manufacturing.

Nothing in that article explained any cause and effect.


Are you able to expand on that, or was that just something you were told to post, with no actual understanding of the content?

At the end of the day, yes, I AM able to expand upon that. But honestly, your response is so ignorant that I will refrain from doing so because since you are resembling a compulsively partisan, toxic individual to me, I'm going to allow your complete ignorance of this subject to reign free. Honestly, your response is so ignorant that I'm convinced America is addicted to stupid pills. Keep on Truckin'.

Got it. YOu cannot explain who paying more leads to higher employment.


I didn't think that you could.


THe obvious answer is that their predatory trade policy enables them to pay more, at the expense of other nations.