Upcoming Anniversary: October 1st Will Mark 18 Years Of No Global Warming…

[Billy_Bob]

This is why alarmist and their drivel is just that... Drivel... No concept of perspective on a geological scale.

 

[edthecynic]

This is why alarmist and their drivel is just that... Drivel... No concept of perspective on a geological scale.

Gee, to get that "geological" scale you had to combine the geological PROXY data with the direct instrument data, the very thing the deniers condemn Mann for doing with the hockey stick graph. Funny how it's OK for deniers but fraud for everyone else!!!!!

 

[Billy_Bob]

This is why alarmist and their drivel is just that... Drivel... No concept of perspective on a geological scale.

Gee, to get that "geological" scale you had to combine the geological PROXY data with the direct instrument data, the very thing the deniers condemn Mann for doing with the hockey stick graph. Funny how it's OK for deniers but fraud for everyone else!!!!!

How dishonest can a an alarmist get..... Please show us the math, method, and data that 1) shows the percentage of CO2 which is human caused. 2)how you derived that percentage. 3)How that percentage was shown to raise temperature 4) How you derived the amount of warming directly attributed to water vapor increase as a direct result of man induced CO2. 5)And the RULE OUT of all other potential causes for the warming you ascribe to CO2 and a positive feed back. AND YOU MUST INCLUDE THE NATURAL VARIATION RATE in all calculations.

 

[mamooth]

Billy, don't expect us to keep educating your welfare case lazy ass. We've already spend too much valuable time trying to help you, and you've responded to our grace by being a whiny little fukstain.

So, go find it yourself. It's there. That is, unless you're too chickenshit to look.

And always remember that your blubbering has zero bearing on what's true. Despite what your mummy and daddy told you, your little snowflake opinions are not speshul and unique and valuable. All opinions are not equal, especially yours, being you're such a raging dumbass.

 

[SSDD]

'Fess up, SSDD. You know nothing of those projects. You're cribbing from one of your kook cult liar blog sources. So which one was it?

Come on, everyone here knows you're a brainless Stalinist party hack, incapable of independent thought. What commie source are you copying?

In any case, it's interesting you claim Crick personally stopped the projects. You're hitting new heights of stupid.

Are you denying that environmentalists have bocked project after project all over the third world that would have provided accessible, inexpensive power to people who are now trying to survive without?

 

[Crick]

Why don't you spell that out with some examples? Where have I denied cheap energy to the third world? Who has suffered and died at my hands?

ahem.... where is your proof of the hundreds of million you claimed?

That's not an answer, is it jc.

The hundreds of millions are people in the future who will be suffering from global warming, rising sea level, melted glacial water supplies, crop failures and the like who will look around to see who it was that convinced humanity that none of that was going to take place - that global warming was a hoax, that increasing CO2 is good for us all.

See, you're just one nutjob on a message board picking a fight. And then stand there with no evidence of anything you shout about. You are LoSiNg. Just remember that. LoSiNg...

Wrong. I'm the one with an actual education who accepts mainstream science and the scientific method. People OPPOSING mainstream science, people like YOU, those are the "nutjobs" and those are the losers.

 

[Crick]

'Fess up, SSDD. You know nothing of those projects. You're cribbing from one of your kook cult liar blog sources. So which one was it?

Come on, everyone here knows you're a brainless Stalinist party hack, incapable of independent thought. What commie source are you copying?

In any case, it's interesting you claim Crick personally stopped the projects. You're hitting new heights of stupid.

Are you denying that environmentalists have bocked project after project all over the third world that would have provided accessible, inexpensive power to people who are now trying to survive without?

Name some of these many, third world power projects blocked by environmentalists. Diablo Canyon?

 

[jc456]

'Fess up, SSDD. You know nothing of those projects. You're cribbing from one of your kook cult liar blog sources. So which one was it?

Come on, everyone here knows you're a brainless Stalinist party hack, incapable of independent thought. What commie source are you copying?

In any case, it's interesting you claim Crick personally stopped the projects. You're hitting new heights of stupid.

wow, can you whine any louder? hahahaahaha, like I said sure is fun on here today. I love to show you LoSiNg so dramatically as I have today. Can you say LoSiNg? I knew you could. good little whiner!!!

 

[jc456]

Why don't you spell that out with some examples? Where have I denied cheap energy to the third world? Who has suffered and died at my hands?

ahem.... where is your proof of the hundreds of million you claimed?

That's not an answer, is it jc.

The hundreds of millions are people in the future who will be suffering from global warming, rising sea level, melted glacial water supplies, crop failures and the like who will look around to see who it was that convinced humanity that none of that was going to take place - that global warming was a hoax, that increasing CO2 is good for us all.

See, you're just one nutjob on a message board picking a fight. And then stand there with no evidence of anything you shout about. You are LoSiNg. Just remember that. LoSiNg...

Wrong. I'm the one with an actual education who accepts mainstream science and the scientific method. People OPPOSING mainstream science, people like YOU, those are the "nutjobs" and those are the losers.

I love the song Dream On by Aerosmith, I see you love it as well. Keep dreaming. Dream until your dream comes true. Cause to date, it ain't. Let me know when you get that experiment dude/ dudette, what ever you are.

 

[Crick]

As usual, your response is meaningless and completely lacking in significance.

 

[jc456]

As usual, your response is meaningless and completely lacking in significance.

ditto

 

[Crick]

.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Billy, don't expect us to keep educating your welfare case lazy ass. We've already spend too much valuable time trying to help you, and you've responded to our grace by being a whiny little fukstain.

So, go find it yourself. It's there. That is, unless you're too chickenshit to look.

And always remember that your blubbering has zero bearing on what's true. Despite what your mummy and daddy told you, your little snowflake opinions are not speshul and unique and valuable. All opinions are not equal, especially yours, being you're such a raging dumbass.

Wow.. an asinine response from a left wit. I asked for proof and got an adhominum attack... its to lazy to do the work but not to lazy to lie about everything... You really are a worthless fuck stain..

 

[Crick]

How dishonest can a an alarmist get..... Please show us the math, method, and data that 1) shows the percentage of CO2 which is human caused. 2)how you derived that percentage. 3)How that percentage was shown to raise temperature 4) How you derived the amount of warming directly attributed to water vapor increase as a direct result of man induced CO2. 5)And the RULE OUT of all other potential causes for the warming you ascribe to CO2 and a positive feed back. AND YOU MUST INCLUDE THE NATURAL VARIATION RATE in all calculations.

That's one of the most thorough demonstrations of a lack of scientific comprehension we've seen in a long time. Line 5, for instance, is a perfect demonstration why you are all such idiots to demand proof in any discussion of natural sciences.

As to the amount of CO2 in the current atmosphere that originates from human combustion of fossil fuel:

Carbon Isotopes Prove Humans Have Caused Global Warming
Carbon Isotopes Prove Humans Have Caused Global Warming

How do we know that recent CO2 increases are due to human activities
RealClimate How do we know that recent CO2 increases are due to human activities

Monitoring the isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2: Measurements from the NOAA Global Air Sampling Network
Monitoring the isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2 Measurements from the NOAA Global Air Sampling Network - Trolier - 2012 - Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 1984 ndash 2012 - Wiley Online Library

A 1000-year high precision record of δ13C in atmospheric CO2
A 1000-year high precision record of delta 13C in atmospheric CO2 - FRANCEY - 2002 - Tellus B - Wiley Online Library

Using septum-capped vials with continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometric analysis of atmospheric CO2 for Keeling plot applications
Using septum-capped vials with continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometric analysis of atmospheric CO2 for Keeling plot applications - Tu - 2001 - Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry - Wiley Online Library

Modern Records of Carbon and Oxygen Isotopes in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Carbon-13 in Methane
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/co2/modern_isotopes.html

 

[Billy_Bob]

How dishonest can a an alarmist get..... Please show us the math, method, and data that 1) shows the percentage of CO2 which is human caused. 2)how you derived that percentage. 3)How that percentage was shown to raise temperature 4) How you derived the amount of warming directly attributed to water vapor increase as a direct result of man induced CO2. 5)And the RULE OUT of all other potential causes for the warming you ascribe to CO2 and a positive feed back. AND YOU MUST INCLUDE THE NATURAL VARIATION RATE in all calculations.

That's one of the most thorough demonstrations of a lack of scientific comprehension we've seen in a long time. Line 5, for instance, is a perfect demonstration why you are all such idiots to demand proof in any discussion of natural sciences.

As to the amount of CO2 in the current atmosphere that originates from human combustion of fossil fuel:

Carbon Isotopes Prove Humans Have Caused Global Warming
Carbon Isotopes Prove Humans Have Caused Global Warming

How do we know that recent CO2 increases are due to human activities
RealClimate How do we know that recent CO2 increases are due to human activities

Monitoring the isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2: Measurements from the NOAA Global Air Sampling Network
Monitoring the isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2 Measurements from the NOAA Global Air Sampling Network - Trolier - 2012 - Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 1984 ndash 2012 - Wiley Online Library

A 1000-year high precision record of δ13C in atmospheric CO2
A 1000-year high precision record of delta 13C in atmospheric CO2 - FRANCEY - 2002 - Tellus B - Wiley Online Library

Using septum-capped vials with continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometric analysis of atmospheric CO2 for Keeling plot applications
Using septum-capped vials with continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometric analysis of atmospheric CO2 for Keeling plot applications - Tu - 2001 - Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry - Wiley Online Library

Modern Records of Carbon and Oxygen Isotopes in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Carbon-13 in Methane
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/co2/modern_isotopes.html

Crick the fucking moron.. I set out the very basic questions to prove or disprove AGW and all i got was a wall -o-crap... Standard issue bull shit from the warmist crowd. And every single paper is older than 1995 because since then the crap has been debunked.

 

[Billy_Bob]

You see we are in a sinodal pattern and just as it should we are cooling and will continue to cool for some time. The Peak, which alarmists have been touting as "unprecedented" is simply bull shit as it has happened before millions of times. If you simply take the patterns out to their logical ends you will find the cyclical earth in all of its controlled glory.

The historical plot, as above, takes all those papers the warmist tout and throws them in the round file. All of their screams about CO2 are laid waste as lies. Yet they want to deprive millions of rights and the ability to feed and care for themselves to institute a command and control Communists style government.. under the guise of saving the planet..

Only Fools still believe the garbage of these marxist/socialist/communists pieces of trash.

 

[Crick]

Your graph states that it is 2008 minus 2014. The graph is negative throughout with a minimum at approximately 1900. The negative value means that the 2008 was LESS than 2014. That would mean that adjustments RAISED temperatures in the past - by the greatest amount in about 1900 and by zero in more contemporary times. This is precisely the opposite of the charge you and yours have been making all along.

Funny, that. Will that error cause you to rethink your infantile charge that NOAA is filled with Marxist/socialist/communists? I'm betting it won't.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Your graph states that it is 2008 minus 2014. The graph is negative throughout with a minimum at approximately 1900. The negative value means that the 2008 was LESS than 2014. That would mean that adjustments RAISED temperatures in the past - by the greatest amount in about 1900 and by zero in more contemporary times. This is precisely the opposite of the charge you and yours have been making all along.

Funny, that. Will that error cause you to rethink your infantile charge that NOAA is filled with Marxist/socialist/communists? I'm betting it won't.

When faced with loosing your job and your lively hood many succumb to the lies they are told to purport. The facts are there and they are trying like hell to keep them from the public at large. Why would any government agency hide the truth from those they are tasked to serve? There is only one reason and that is tyranny. So Crick i take it you support tyranny to get to what you want. The FACTS say Crick and his merry band of commies are liars!

 

[Crick]

Your graph states that it is 2008 minus 2014. The graph is negative throughout with a minimum at approximately 1900. The negative value means that the 2008 was LESS than 2014. That would mean that adjustments RAISED temperatures in the past - by the greatest amount in about 1900 and by zero in more contemporary times. This is precisely the opposite of the charge you and yours have been making all along.

Funny, that. Will that error cause you to rethink your infantile charge that NOAA is filled with Marxist/socialist/communists? I'm betting it won't.

When faced with loosing your job and your lively hood many succumb to the lies they are told to purport. The facts are there and they are trying like hell to keep them from the public at large. Why would any government agency hide the truth from those they are tasked to serve? There is only one reason and that is tyranny.

Wow.... you've got some serious mental issues dude. You put up a graph about which you rant almost incomprehensibly. When I point out that the graph, if accurate and accurately labeled, DISPROVES what you and your denier buddies have been arguing for months now, what is your response? A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT and COMPLETELY DISCONNECTED rant on some other incomprehensible topic altogether.

I am not faced with losing (note the spelling) my job or my livelihood. Are you? I am not succumbing to lies and no one is telling me what I should "purport". The facts ARE there and they tell us that you're a complete whack job, that you don't have the faintest fuck of an idea what you're talking about and that you lie more often and more profoundly than anyone I think I've ever met.

So Crick i take it you support tyranny to get to what you want. The FACTS say Crick and his merry band of commies are liars!

You are so fucking lost you couldn't get back home if the tracks for the Cannonball Express went straight to your front door.