Unemployed need not apply

Private money cannot influence our national economy enough; they tried in 1929.

However, regulating private money can be difficult since even Monopoly money can be used as credit instruments if honored by the other private party.
 
Private money cannot influence our national economy enough; they tried in 1929.

However, regulating private money can be difficult since even Monopoly money can be used as credit instruments if honored by the other private party.

anybody know what this liberal illiterate is trying to say???
 
Private money cannot influence our national economy enough; they tried in 1929.

However, regulating private money can be difficult since even Monopoly money can be used as credit instruments if honored by the other private party.

anybody know what this liberal illiterate is trying to say???

It sounds like he knows a bit more about money supply than you.
Ironic.
 
Private money cannot influence our national economy enough; they tried in 1929.

However, regulating private money can be difficult since even Monopoly money can be used as credit instruments if honored by the other private party.

anybody know what this liberal illiterate is trying to say???
merely that fine Persons of capital can even use Monopoly Money as credit. How do you regulate that among private Individuals and Society anonymous purposes?
 
Private money cannot influence our national economy enough; they tried in 1929.

However, regulating private money can be difficult since even Monopoly money can be used as credit instruments if honored by the other private party.

anybody know what this liberal illiterate is trying to say???
merely that fine Persons of capital can even use Monopoly Money as credit. How do you regulate that among private Individuals and Society anonymous purposes?

anybody know what this illiterate liberal is trying to say?
 
Private money cannot influence our national economy enough; they tried in 1929.

However, regulating private money can be difficult since even Monopoly money can be used as credit instruments if honored by the other private party.

anybody know what this liberal illiterate is trying to say???
merely that fine Persons of capital can even use Monopoly Money as credit. How do you regulate that among private Individuals and Society anonymous purposes?

anybody know what this illiterate liberal is trying to say?
merely that you need a clue and a Cause, dear.
 
Private money cannot influence our national economy enough; they tried in 1929.

However, regulating private money can be difficult since even Monopoly money can be used as credit instruments if honored by the other private party.

anybody know what this liberal illiterate is trying to say???
merely that fine Persons of capital can even use Monopoly Money as credit. How do you regulate that among private Individuals and Society anonymous purposes?

anybody know what this illiterate liberal is trying to say?
merely that you need a clue and a Cause, dear.

merely that fine Persons of capital can even use Monopoly Money as credit. How do you regulate that among privateIndividuals and Society anonymous purposes?

anybody know what this idiot means?????
 
Private money cannot influence our national economy enough; they tried in 1929.

However, regulating private money can be difficult since even Monopoly money can be used as credit instruments if honored by the other private party.

anybody know what this liberal illiterate is trying to say???
merely that fine Persons of capital can even use Monopoly Money as credit. How do you regulate that among private Individuals and Society anonymous purposes?

anybody know what this illiterate liberal is trying to say?
merely that you need a clue and a Cause, dear.

merely that fine Persons of capital can even use Monopoly Money as credit. How do you regulate that among privateIndividuals and Society anonymous purposes?

anybody know what this idiot means?????

Yes, it means that the Fed doesn't control the money supply.
 
Yes, it means that the Fed doesn't control the money supply.
yes its the Girl Scouts

That stupid remark sounded very liberal.

Why are you a stupid liberal?
dear you said the Fed does not control the money supply but were afraid to tell us who does? What do you learn from your fear??

dear you said the Fed does not control the money supply

Dear, you were too stupid to understand.

but were afraid to tell us who does?

It should be obvious to all but the low IQ liberals.
No one controls the money supply.
 
No one controls the money supply.

so then what stops it from increasing or decreasing 10,000%

Well, as you know, banks increase the money supply when they make loans.
Banks have reserve requirements and capital requirements that limit their ability to increase the money supply.

And, of course, nothing can decrease by more than 100%.
 
Banks have reserve requirements and capital requirements that limit their ability to increase the money supply.

got it so now you are admitting that Fed requirements do control the size of the money supply??

You think Fed requirements control the money supply? LOL!
You should just quit while you're behind.

Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
Are you afraid your explanation would highlight your ignorance?
 

Forum List

Back
Top