Under Progressives/Obama the riches got richer, poorest got poorer

[Stephanie]

 

[bedowin62]

so let's talk about who has the nerve to talk about their policies or claim they were sucessful ok?

you see people on the Left are too often likely to lie to themselves about the failed Left-wing agenda

This is the sort of post that is "I see this so I'm going to say this and ignore 99% of reality at the same time"

I can't believe this has got to ten pages.

Then again anything that is partisan bullsheet is popular.

HMMMMMMMMMMM

MAYBE IT GOT TO TEN PAGES; because of people making claims i "ignore 99% of reality" and offer EXACTLY NOTHING to prove that???

Maybe there are enough people who think your starting post was complete and utter bull then.... well, at least you know now.

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooorrrrrrr maybe you just missed another chance to say exactly what reality i'm ignoring????????????

good job leftard!

 

[BluesLegend]

There will never be income equality, sorry to burst your socialist bubble.

No one wants income equality, that's impossible and ridiculous, what we do want is to address the GROWING inequality.

Not possible, the more you try the harder I work and the more I will hoard my wealth and pass any increases on to the poor and middle class.

Wait, what? It is entirely possible to address growing inequality, people work hard their entire lives and don't move up, hard work is a ridiculous measurement.

Sucks to be them, work smart and hard. My point is there is nothing you can do to restrain top performers from continuing to climb and put distance between themselves and the rest of society income wise. So you can whine and complain about income inequality but there's nothing you can do about it.

 

[rdean]

I'm waiting for one RWer to name a rightwing policy that would narrow the gap between richer and poorer.

I've been waiting for a couple of years.

 

[rdean]

There will never be income equality, sorry to burst your socialist bubble.

No one wants income equality, that's impossible and ridiculous, what we do want is to address the GROWING inequality.

Not possible, the more you try the harder I work and the more I will hoard my wealth and pass any increases on to the poor and middle class.

Wait, what? It is entirely possible to address growing inequality, people work hard their entire lives and don't move up, hard work is a ridiculous measurement.

Sucks to be them, work smart and hard. My point is there is nothing you can do to restrain top performers from continuing to climb and put distance between themselves and the rest of society income wise. So you can whine and complain about income inequality but there's nothing you can do about it.

You can vote.

 

[bedowin62]

left-wing idiots; you'd think they'd practice some of that intellectual curiosity and critical-thinking they claim they have.

it is simply a fact that under Progressive-majority rule the very richest got richer and the poorest got poorer; and for those whining that this was always the case consider that under Progressives/obama the richest got richer and the poorest got poorer FASTER than they were getting under Bush/Republicans

so whatever you did or are doing that was different than what Republicans did (because it is also a fact Dems voted fro and continued nearly every Republican policy) yea whatever y ou did that was DIFFERENT, stop doing that!

 

[Maryland Patriot]

I'm waiting for one RWer to name a rightwing policy that would narrow the gap between richer and poorer.

how about an education and then work?
oh that's right, the liberals want every thing for free without any effort on their part.

 

[bedowin62]

I'm waiting for one RWer to name a rightwing policy that would narrow the gap between richer and poorer.

how about an education and then work?
oh that's right, the liberals want every thing for free without any effort on their part.

the fact that you even needed to bring this to light to a left-winger is so very revealing on so many levels.

first of all it shows you what the Left really believes about the people they pander to; that they are helpless and worthless without Progressives to "help" them and tell them what to do.
Second that all problems in society arent caused by individuals, or heavenn forbid anything Progressives did; but by mean ol people in the Party they want to keep power away from. The Left cant survive without demonizing people.

 

[bripat9643]

Did you really expect a government agency to claim government policies are harmful to society?

The IMF and all studies you disagree with are propaganda to you, even though they base there analysis in factual reality. What the fuck.

All studies that say socialism works are obvious propaganda because the proof that it doesn't work is so massive. What "facts" does the IMF use to support it's claim? Either they aren't facts or they don't support the case. In the first place, you can never use empirical data to prove an economic theory, so their claim is bogus on its face.

Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality : A Global Perspective
Dispute any of the facts.

More propaganda.

That's all you reply with? TYPICAL MORON.

Everything the IMF publishes is propaganda. I don't even need to read it to know that. I've read plenty of their drek in the past.

 

[bripat9643]

Now class......guess which slice of the pie Republicans want to get more money out of?

If you said the Bottom 40% that has two tenths a percent of the wealth.......YOU ARE CORRECT

would be nice to see an overlay of education levels on that chart.
I wonder if there would be anything obvious that would stand out.

Now class....guess which slice of the pie Democrats want to get more money out of?

If you said the top 5% that has 62% of the wealth....YOU ARE CORRECT

Thieves target the same slice and for the same reason. All you proved is that Democrats have the moral code of thieves.

Ever hear the phrase.....you can't get blood out of a Turnip?

I think that's the phrase thieves often say right before the rob some rich person.

 

[David_42]

The IMF and all studies you disagree with are propaganda to you, even though they base there analysis in factual reality. What the fuck.

All studies that say socialism works are obvious propaganda because the proof that it doesn't work is so massive. What "facts" does the IMF use to support it's claim? Either they aren't facts or they don't support the case. In the first place, you can never use empirical data to prove an economic theory, so their claim is bogus on its face.

Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality : A Global Perspective
Dispute any of the facts.

More propaganda.

That's all you reply with? TYPICAL MORON.

Everything the IMF publishes is propaganda. I don't even need to read it to know that. I've read plenty of their drek in the past.

Oh my fucking God. This shows the intelligence of the right wingers.

 

[bripat9643]

All studies that say socialism works are obvious propaganda because the proof that it doesn't work is so massive. What "facts" does the IMF use to support it's claim? Either they aren't facts or they don't support the case. In the first place, you can never use empirical data to prove an economic theory, so their claim is bogus on its face.

Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality : A Global Perspective
Dispute any of the facts.

More propaganda.

That's all you reply with? TYPICAL MORON.

Everything the IMF publishes is propaganda. I don't even need to read it to know that. I've read plenty of their drek in the past.

Oh my fucking God. This shows the intelligence of the right wingers.

Yeah, right, and I'll bet you read the National Review everyday. Right?

 

[bedowin62]

All studies that say socialism works are obvious propaganda because the proof that it doesn't work is so massive. What "facts" does the IMF use to support it's claim? Either they aren't facts or they don't support the case. In the first place, you can never use empirical data to prove an economic theory, so their claim is bogus on its face.

Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality : A Global Perspective
Dispute any of the facts.

More propaganda.

That's all you reply with? TYPICAL MORON.

Everything the IMF publishes is propaganda. I don't even need to read it to know that. I've read plenty of their drek in the past.

Oh my fucking God. This shows the intelligence of the right wingers.

the Left is chock-full of intellectual cowards that cant admit they are being spoon-fed AND, are trying to get others to swallow what they are regurgitating

 

[David_42]

Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality : A Global Perspective
Dispute any of the facts.

More propaganda.

That's all you reply with? TYPICAL MORON.

Everything the IMF publishes is propaganda. I don't even need to read it to know that. I've read plenty of their drek in the past.

Oh my fucking God. This shows the intelligence of the right wingers.

Yeah, right, and I'll bet you read the National Review everyday. Right?

No, I don't. I can care less what the source is, I LISTEN TO THE INFORMATION.

 

[bripat9643]

More propaganda.

That's all you reply with? TYPICAL MORON.

Everything the IMF publishes is propaganda. I don't even need to read it to know that. I've read plenty of their drek in the past.

Oh my fucking God. This shows the intelligence of the right wingers.

Yeah, right, and I'll bet you read the National Review everyday. Right?

No, I don't. I can care less what the source is, I LISTEN TO THE INFORMATION.

You just admitted you don't read the National Review, so you obviously do care what the source is.

If the IMF ever manages to post something true, it's purely accidental. So why bother to read it?

 

[David_42]

That's all you reply with? TYPICAL MORON.

Everything the IMF publishes is propaganda. I don't even need to read it to know that. I've read plenty of their drek in the past.

Oh my fucking God. This shows the intelligence of the right wingers.

Yeah, right, and I'll bet you read the National Review everyday. Right?

No, I don't. I can care less what the source is, I LISTEN TO THE INFORMATION.

You just admitted you don't read the National Review, so you obviously do care what the source is.

If the IMF ever manages to post something true, it's purely accidental. So why bother to read it?

Oh dear lord.. I don't regularly go to the national review like I would the bbc or aljazeera, doesn't mean I completely ignore it. You are a proclaimed genius who believes he knows more then the IMF's study done based on factual information. People like you are literally stupid.

 

[bripat9643]

Everything the IMF publishes is propaganda. I don't even need to read it to know that. I've read plenty of their drek in the past.

Oh my fucking God. This shows the intelligence of the right wingers.

Yeah, right, and I'll bet you read the National Review everyday. Right?

No, I don't. I can care less what the source is, I LISTEN TO THE INFORMATION.

You just admitted you don't read the National Review, so you obviously do care what the source is.

If the IMF ever manages to post something true, it's purely accidental. So why bother to read it?

Oh dear lord.. I don't regularly go to the national review like I would the bbc or aljazeera, doesn't mean I completely ignore it. You are a proclaimed genius who believes he knows more then the IMF's study done based on factual information. People like you are literally stupid.

When did I ever proclaim myself to be a genius?

What proof do you have that their information is "factual?" Even if it was "factual," that doesn't mean it proves their theory. Economic theories can't be proven empirically.

 

[David_42]

Oh my fucking God. This shows the intelligence of the right wingers.

Yeah, right, and I'll bet you read the National Review everyday. Right?

No, I don't. I can care less what the source is, I LISTEN TO THE INFORMATION.

You just admitted you don't read the National Review, so you obviously do care what the source is.

If the IMF ever manages to post something true, it's purely accidental. So why bother to read it?

Oh dear lord.. I don't regularly go to the national review like I would the bbc or aljazeera, doesn't mean I completely ignore it. You are a proclaimed genius who believes he knows more then the IMF's study done based on factual information. People like you are literally stupid.

When did I ever proclaim myself to be a genius?

It's obvious to anyone, hell, you're claiming anything you disagree with is propaganda. You claim to know more then the IMF on an analysis you haven't even looked at.

 

[bedowin62]

Yeah, right, and I'll bet you read the National Review everyday. Right?

No, I don't. I can care less what the source is, I LISTEN TO THE INFORMATION.

You just admitted you don't read the National Review, so you obviously do care what the source is.

If the IMF ever manages to post something true, it's purely accidental. So why bother to read it?

Oh dear lord.. I don't regularly go to the national review like I would the bbc or aljazeera, doesn't mean I completely ignore it. You are a proclaimed genius who believes he knows more then the IMF's study done based on factual information. People like you are literally stupid.

When did I ever proclaim myself to be a genius?

It's obvious to anyone, hell, you're claiming anything you disagree with is propaganda. You claim to know more then the IMF on an analysis you haven't even looked at.

^^^^ sometimes it's hard to believe you are debating morons who assume Republicans are racist without backing that up, that Bush "stole an election" without backing that up, that Bush "knew about or planned 9-11" without backing that up....etc

 

[rightwinger]

If $100 were divided between 100 people