Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Here you go, cmike. This will help immensely. "You don't post accurately, and you are almost unintelligible in argument." Here, this will help: Purdue OWL
While I appluad your consistency,.... I dissagree with your premise that progressives don't like Obama,... as they are directly responsible for his being in office. Are you telling me that, Joel Rogers, Andy Stearn, Van Jones, Frank Lloyd, George Soros, SEIU, AFL CIO, are not proggresives??
Many progressives were duped into believing Obama would represent them because he both lied about his positions on the campaign trail (what politician doesn't? but still...) or remained intentionally vague enough that they could believe what they liked. It's their fault too to a large degree, many people projected onto Obama whatever they wanted out of a politician regardless of whether he embodied it or not.We won...you LOST!!!
Quit'cher whining & get-over-it.
exactly right. First paragraph. He is paid by Obama.The liberal method is that when the facts don't mesh with their agenda, they change them so that they
Says the guy who claimed:
Can you say "pot calling the kettle black"? Or is "hypocrite" simpler?
Hahaha. What a dishonest piece of work you are.
So then by your definition every Marine "works for the Obama administration." Every expert on dams consulted by the Army Corp of Engineers "works for the Obama administration." Every private-military contractor in Iraq "works for the Obama administration," since "Obama" (read: the U.S. government) pays their paycheck.
Well, your definition is wrong. The "Obama Administration" is the the Presidential Administration of Barack Obama, that's what those words mean. A Presidential Administration is comprised of the Executive, the Cabinet, and White House Offices. The military, special operations, Homeland Security, their employees and consultants are none of them a part of the "Obama Administration."
Moreover, you tried to avoid this one but: You called Malcolm Nance a politician. You said:
He is a politician. Figures. He works for the Obama administration.
As previously documented thoroughly now, he's not a politician at all. You're a liar. And he doesn't work for the Obama administration either. You've tried to dodge addressing the fact that you called him a politician and he's not a politician and the link you provided proves he's not a politician. You lied.
It's quite clear you were trying to draw a political connection between Nance and Obama to discredit Nance's expertise as simply toeing some party line or propagandizing for the Administration. But he has no connection to the Administration or Obama and is not a politician or spokesperson or employee of the Administration. For your statement to be true, Nance would have to be like a Van Jones or Rahm Emanuel, someone in any way connected to the Administration who is also a politician. He is neither. He's a student at Martyr Zarqawi Hall, a veteran of the military and intelligence community, a former Master SERE Instructor, and an expert consultant to intelligence and security agencies.
He's not a politician (respond to that lie) and he doesn't work for the Obama Administration, he only "works for Obama" to the extent that every single person who receives a paycheck from the Federal government from janitor of Congressional offices to Army recruiter to Republican Senator to profiling consultant to an FBI task force "works for Obama," which is they don't, they work for the government and that's not the same thing. And he doesn't even work for the government, he works for himself and consults with intelligence agencies, Homeland Security, and the military on intelligence acquisition.
You're being intentionally dishonest to intentionally paint an inaccurate picture and beyond that, you were 100% lying about him being a politician and were dumb enough to provide the evidence that demonstrated you were lying.
Name one thing I haven't posted accurately from the DOJ detailed memo?
You've moved goal posts many times because you've lied many times. But this is easy: you claimed:
This is the CIA criteria for waterboarding, which was done only 3 times.
The memo reveals it was done 266 times on two of the 3 detainees it identifies as being waterboarded. That's inaccurate.
You also haven't read the whole memo, or if you have you intentionally select only the pieces that seemingly bolster your claim (while directly contradicting previous government reports and announcements that discredit it) and not all the proof that what was done is legally defined as torture and therefore criminal. You would also know that it is not reporting things as fact or as a firsthand account or as the DOJ's official conclusions, the language of the memo in nearly all of what it says is "You have informed us..." and there's a key difference there and that's intentionally careful language. It's not a report of what the DOJ found after watching videotapes of the interrogations or anything else, it's a report on what some CIA guys who committed crimes told the Justice Department about how important it was they committed those crimes. It's a cover-your-ass document and that's pretty clear. That you choose to believe it and take those agents word as the Bible truth but totally dismiss or ignore the word of SERE instructors and the single most successful interrogator in the entire War on Terror who brought down the highest-value target of the whole decade clearly shows your agenda.
And we've many times backed up the fact that the Library Tower plot was already thwarted using official government documents released to the public, just like the DOJ memo, you just dismiss them because you want to justify torture, you don't care whether it really worked or not.
It's also quite telling that you repeatedly applaud the CIA Agents who waterboarded detainees which you claimed led to the disrupting of an already thwarted plot, but you insult as a "douchebag" the interrogator responsible for taking down the highest value target in the entire War on Terror and saving thousands of lives, allowing for the Sunni Awakening that turned the tide in the war because he didn't torture. What that proves is that you could give a shit, disrespect even, the ability to extract critical and life-saving information and have no regard or the hard-working men who do that, you simply like torture for torture's sake and think those who practice it, not who save lives, are heroes.
Here you go, cmike. This will help immensely. "You don't post accurately, and you are almost unintelligible in argument." Here, this will help: Purdue OWL
Really? What part of the DOJ memo and my summary of them were not not capable of understanding?
Wow, I did not know that Bush could be impeached for running the war. Learn something every day.
.................it was always hysterical back in those days. And to think, how hard is Dick Cheney laughing now??
Hahaha. What a dishonest piece of work you are.
So then by your definition every Marine "works for the Obama administration." Every expert on dams consulted by the Army Corp of Engineers "works for the Obama administration." Every private-military contractor in Iraq "works for the Obama administration," since "Obama" (read: the U.S. government) pays their paycheck.
Well, your definition is wrong. The "Obama Administration" is the the Presidential Administration of Barack Obama, that's what those words mean. A Presidential Administration is comprised of the Executive, the Cabinet, and White House Offices. The military, special operations, Homeland Security, their employees and consultants are none of them a part of the "Obama Administration."
Moreover, you tried to avoid this one but: You called Malcolm Nance a politician. You said:
As previously documented thoroughly now, he's not a politician at all. You're a liar. And he doesn't work for the Obama administration either. You've tried to dodge addressing the fact that you called him a politician and he's not a politician and the link you provided proves he's not a politician. You lied.
is you by claiming that he is independent.You're being intentionally dishonest to intentionally paint an inaccurate picture and beyond that, you were 100% lying about him being a politician and were dumb enough to provide the evidence that demonstrated you were lying.
This is the CIA criteria for waterboarding, which was done only 3 times.
The memo reveals it was done 266 times on two of the 3 detainees it identifies as being waterboarded. That's inaccurate.
That's a good one. You said you don't believe the DOJ memo. Therefore, how do you know how many times he was waterboarded? You can't credibly cherry pick it. What proof do you have how many times they were waterboarded?You also haven't read the whole memo, or if you have you intentionally select only the pieces that seemingly bolster your claim (while directly contradicting previous government reports and announcements that discredit it) and not all the proof that what was done is legally defined as torture and therefore criminal. You would also know that it is not reporting things as fact or as a firsthand account or as the DOJ's official conclusions, the language of the memo in nearly all of what it says is "You have informed us..." and there's a key difference there and that's intentionally careful language. It's not a report of what the DOJ found after watching videotapes of the interrogations or anything else, it's a report on what some CIA guys who committed crimes told the Justice Department about how important it was they committed those crimes.
It's a cover-your-ass document and that's pretty clear. That you choose to believe it and take those agents word as the Bible truth but totally dismiss or ignore the word of SERE instructors and the single most successful interrogator in the entire War on Terror who brought down the highest-value target of the whole decade clearly shows your agenda.
And we've many times backed up the fact that the Library Tower plot was already thwarted using official government documents released to the public, just like the DOJ memo, you just dismiss them because you want to justify torture, you don't care whether it really worked or not.
You are so pathetic, you can offer zero substance.Here you go, cmike. This will help immensely. "You don't post accurately, and you are almost unintelligible in argument." Here, this will help: Purdue OWL
Really? What part of the DOJ memo and my summary of them were not not capable of understanding?
mikey, the point is that you don't understand. That's the sadness of you.
You are so pathetic, you can offer zero substance.Really? What part of the DOJ memo and my summary of them were not not capable of understanding?
mikey, the point is that you don't understand. That's the sadness of you.
Let you in on a secret. Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld are not immune from war crimes charges. Why do you think none of the fly to Europe?
You are so pathetic, you can offer zero substance.mikey, the point is that you don't understand. That's the sadness of you.
Big tough Amway salesman
Loves to pick what others must endure
You are so pathetic, you can offer zero substance.
Big tough Amway salesman
Loves to pick what others must endure
Big tough Amway salesman
Loves to pick what others must endure
Amway salesmen are so tough about what is really torture. What should be done to others
Fucking pussy
Let you in on a secret. Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld are not immune from war crimes charges. Why do you think none of the fly to Europe?
