Top answer from Tea Party of why they don't like the President.

[Uncensored2008]

Ted Cruz, Tim Scott, Benjamin Carson, Herman Cain, and Allen West don't like Obama because he's black? Liberals are stupid as he'll if they actually believe that.



.

Let's just leave it at "leftists are stupid as hell...."

 

[ClosedCaption]

HAR HAR HAR...I guess you hate the supreme court and Bush too then...Or did you blow you wad all on Obama.

"Hate" is the domain of you Khmer Rouge democrats.

..

I'm sorry...I didnt know you were crazy...Carry on

 

[ArmyCowboy]

I might believe that if it weren't for the fact that there are policies that were suggested by members of the GOP that Obama thought were pretty decent as well, and the second Obama got behind those policies, the GOP disavowed them, and then went further right.

Matter of fact, Obamacare is based on what Mittens did in MA, and it worked there, so why won't it work for the whole nation?

so why did the democrats trash mitt for his healthcare plan?

Because Mitt was white, and they HATE whites!

Racist

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm sorry...I didnt know you were crazy...Carry on

 

[Uncensored2008]

Racist

Go get your treat now..

 

[Vandalshandle]

The Tea Party is angry, because they can not, and never will, win any significant elections, thus relagating themselves to the roll as "spoilers" for the republican party. Don't think that us democrats are not grateful!

They don't have candidates numb nuts.

Too bad. That would divide the Right even futher than it is now!

 

[Vandalshandle]

The Tea Party is angry, because they can not, and never will, win any significant elections, thus relagating themselves to the roll as "spoilers" for the republican party. Don't think that us democrats are not grateful!

You democrats need all the help you can get. The Republicans did not lose the last two presidential elections because the candidates were too conservative, but because they were not conservative enough. The overall results at the state level is a pretty good indication that true conservative principles will win elections.

So, in your math book, one must subtract, in order to add.....

OoooKAY!

I am courious, though. If the Tea Party people did not vote for the Republicans, who got their votes instead? I'm pretty sure that there were not enough votes cast for all candidates other than R and D add up to didely squat. In short, by moving the Republicans to the Right, you are not adding any more votes, but are subtracting the Republican moderates.

 

[emilynghiem]

Matter of fact, Obamacare is based on what Mittens did in MA, and it worked there, so why won't it work for the whole nation?

Hi ABS: There is a HUGE difference Constitutionally between federal jurisdiction and state's rights.

for example, states are able to implement laws that touch on religious issues provided it represents the public (from marriage laws, to the death penalty, and the issue of health care and prochoice/prolife views that are affected by the funding and policies). because the people can vote and represent their views on a state level, that is the proper venue for making such policies, not the federal level where people don't have as direct representation and the states may have diverse conditions that the federal govt cannot legislate for the whole nation. The immigration policies pose a problem because it is federal jurisdiction, but certain states have more security issues and costs than others (like CA, TX, NM, AZ FL).

it is where the state laws are challenged constitutionally that the federal govt may overrule a law as unconstitutional (as with Roe v Wade where "due process" was violated for women at risk of being penalized for abortion without considering the mitigating circumstances.)

however, this does not give federal govt license to make laws FOR states in areas such as health care or marriage that involve religious beliefs that cannot be regulated by fed govt.

if people/states AGREE to pass a law for the whole nation, instead of localizing state by state, then it is possible to represent that through Congress and pass federal laws for all.
(ex: Code of Ethics for Govt Service, public law 96-303 was passed unanimously in 1980
as an example of good laws that everyone can agree should be enforced globally)

but clearly with the ACA, there was division by party and this bill did not represent the interests of the nation and of the states which contest it. It does not meet the constitutional standards of federal govt not interfering with states and with religious matters, such as the preference of people to only fund pro-choice or pro-life services and policies, or the issue of spiritual healing which cannot be regulated or legislated by govt, the exemptions based on narrow definitions that discriminate by religion where the federal govt is basically regulating whether people are required to pay or not based on meeting religious requirements.

there are major conflicts with this bill, and it should have been decided by states.
the most I think the federal govt could have ruled is that no person or party can charge their medical costs to other taxpayers or parties who don't consent to pay for that.
but as for HOW people or states set up health care to be paid for willingly, and without denying equal protection to people who should all have access to a group or system that meets THEIR standards of health care and social and financial responsibility, federal govt is not in a position to DICTATE how this is to be done.

So that is where I agree that the jurisdiction belongs to the states, and if people cannot agree per state, then it should be done by PARTY so people can represent their own financial political and religious interests and fund those policies not impose on other views.

It should be kept out of federal govt whose only role should have been to protect people from either imposing on others of different views, or denying access to a group or system that would have been able to support care for those constituents. But you can't force people to pay for insurance into a group if they don't consent to that system; there are other ways to set up health care and this should be left to people, states, businesses, nonprofits or parties to organize and not try to legislate, regulate or dictate through federal govt.

 

[emilynghiem]

The main reason they don't like him, is because there's a black man in the White House.

Ted Cruz, Tim Scott, Benjamin Carson, Herman Cain, and Allen West don't like Obama because he's black? Liberals are stupid as he'll if they actually believe that.

Don't forget to leave out and completely ignore
* Dr. Cornell West, outspoken African American advocate for civil rights,
who criticized Obama for swearing in on MLK's Bible and spending 6 billion on re-election
while constituents are still suffering economic setbacks without any relief or solutions
* Coalition of African-American Pastors who denounced Obama's push for gay marriage

and as for "white" people:
* Obama's cousin Dr. Milton Wolf who has spoken out against the ACA as a failed
approach to health care reform, including the fact it doesn't create more health care
providers for the increase in people accessing insurance. so please pretend this guy and his professional opinion as a doctor doesn't exist, unless you plan to argue this man is racist against his own family by marriage, that's fine.
* Ted Nugent who credits his career to Black legends in music, while criticizing Democrats
including Obama for pushing policies that keep Blacks in poverty depending on govt welfare.
* John Cusack who has come out in opposition to Obama selling out the Democrat principles for politics

be sure to paint all these people with the same broad "racist" brush

Oh, and I'm Asian American, working 3 jobs to fix the damage to a national historic African American church community in Houston, destroyed under Democrat administrations sold out to politics as usual. So you can count me as racist also for appealing to fellow Democrats to help restore Constitutional protections, including the right to assemble and petition that was censored by abuse of govt resources to evict and demolish the plans of residents to save national history.

Constitutionalism doesn't count as a valid argument, so go ahead and blame it on racism.
Never mind the Black Democrat leaders who sold out their own constituents to get elected.
that doesn't quite fit the picture you are painting, so just crop that part out!

 

[Zarius]

They just dont like him. I wonder what that means?

Just kidding, I know. And so do you.

Tea Party Supporters: Who They Are and What They Believe - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

welcome. Tea Party Lunacy is alive and well at USMB

not quite accurate, what you should have said is that the lunacy ABOUT the tea party is alive and well at USMB.

you libtards know nothing about what real tea party members believe and advocate. How about individual freedom and responsibility? how about smaller, less intrusive federal government? like the original tea party in boston harbor, its about FREEDOM from oppressive government.

But I guess that concept is too tough for you who want to be slaves to the government in exchange for "free" phones and medical care. BTW, it isn't free.

And who in your mind is getting this stuff? Be honest. Who does a tea party member think of when they think of entitlements?

 

[Zarius]

The Tea Party is angry, because they can not, and never will, win any significant elections, thus relagating themselves to the roll as "spoilers" for the republican party. Don't think that us democrats are not grateful!

They don't have candidates numb nuts.

Bullshit they dont!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDeNBsD8iRc]David Duke Speaks to the Tea Party - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Zarius]

???

Can you show the Tea Party promoting a merger of the Federal Government and well connected corporations like Blue Cross and Kaiser PRIOR to your little tin god taking office?

Yet, in your diseased mind, the ONLY reason anyone would oppose the mandates of your god is race...



BUT, our GLORIOUS RULER may declare the tenets of your faith null and void if they fail to coincide with your fascist ambitions, as he did with the Catholic prohibition of birth control.

Is Obama the new Pope?



As Nakoula Nakoula found out when he insulted Muhammad. You can ask him yourself - oh wait, our king had him put in prison....



While Obama and the Khmer Rouge democrats work to undermine civil rights.



Not even close, skippy.

Deny all you want but the proof is in the pudding. Nobody but the few naive enough to be in the tea and are not racist believe that this group is anything but a more organized KKK

black tea party members would disagree with you. But you don't care about those "uncle toms" who actually think for themselves do you? they are traitors to their race, right?

you liberals are the most racist people on the planet

Black tea members are fools. They will see soon enough that it was all about President Obama and nothing else. When they are standing alone with signs about taxes and freedom they will know. When will that be? 2017. January.

 

[rdean]

We just don't like him???? Number one?

 

[Zarius]

The Tea Party is angry, because they can not, and never will, win any significant elections, thus relagating themselves to the roll as "spoilers" for the republican party. Don't think that us democrats are not grateful!

You democrats need all the help you can get. The Republicans did not lose the last two presidential elections because the candidates were too conservative, but because they were not conservative enough. The overall results at the state level is a pretty good indication that true conservative principles will win elections.

You see this GOP. Get rid of the ones like this^^^^^^you might stand a chance.

 

[Harry Dresden]

We just don't like him???? Number one?

no its because he is black.....pay attention Dean.....you should know this.....christ you are the head cheerleader on this.....your head still clogged?....

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

My favorite part of the article:

An overwhelming majority of Tea Party supporters, 84 percent, say the views of the Tea Party movement reflect the views of most Americans. But Americans overall disagree: Just 25 percent say the Tea Party movement reflects their beliefs, while 36 percent say it does not.

Remarkable.

They are indeed just republicans, cut off from reality in the same bubble of denial and fantasy.

 

[blackhawk]

Wow the Op linked a B.S. story from 2010 and dusted off their race card not impressed.

 

[rdean]

We just don't like him???? Number one?

no its because he is black.....pay attention Dean.....you should know this.....christ you are the head cheerleader on this.....your head still clogged?....

If you are sick of people calling you a racist because they are constantly calling you a racist, then you might actually be a racist and are only sick of being called what you are.

 

[ABikerSailor]

We just don't like him???? Number one?

no its because he is black.....pay attention Dean.....you should know this.....christ you are the head cheerleader on this.....your head still clogged?....

If you are sick of people calling you a racist because they are constantly calling you a racist, then you might actually be a racist and are only sick of being called what you are.

Yanno......................CPAC had a session on this....................

The tea-party sponsored a panel called “Trump The Race Card: Are You Sick And Tired Of Being Called A Racist When You Know You’re Not One?”

The short answer was provided by this panel, which was run by KCarl Smith, an African American father and grandfather who started the ConservativeMESSENGER in 2009 and who has appeared on the “700 Club” and the “Huckabee Show.” He is a dynamic speaker. The following are highlights from the panel, which I suspect is on video somewhere already, because it is hard to convey in words alone.

Do you want to know how to trump the race card and talk to your family members without fear of being called a racist? he asked. Tell them you are a “Frederick Douglass Republican.”

It is that simple. Also, he has two books available that you should buy. Let him explain.

Frederick Douglass is the key to appealing to “blacks, Latinos, women, young people.” How?

He offers the “answer to the diversity inclusion problem, a way to defeat vile and malicious attacks of the left’s propaganda machine. They call us a racist, we back up…. They want to humiliate us. They want to intimidate us.”

How Not To Sound Racist: The most awkward CPAC panel ever

 

[Harry Dresden]

We just don't like him???? Number one?

no its because he is black.....pay attention Dean.....you should know this.....christ you are the head cheerleader on this.....your head still clogged?....

If you are sick of people calling you a racist because they are constantly calling you a racist, then you might actually be a racist and are only sick of being called what you are.

the only people that said i was a racist is you and your left nut Lakota just because i disagreed with an Obama policy.....i guess to you two that means you are against the man because he is black......heaven forbid you disagree with one of his policies.....
ok.....so now when are you going to stop mentioning skin color like you do in 90% of your posts?....