Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,072
- 1,130
As some may have noticed I have been driving home the outright lie Mrs. Bosnia Clinton told about coming under sniper fire. I have also been pointing out the following which is from the following linked article:
I am recalling these two things for a reason. First, and even though I admit that I did once later misidentify a building in Sarajevo from a set of photographs, I can tell you for an absolute certainty that it would be quite impossible to imagine that one had undergone that experience at the airport if one actually had not. Yet Sen. Clinton, given repeated chances to modify her absurd claim to have operated under fire while in the company of her then-16-year-old daughter and a USO entertainment troupe, kept up a stone-faced and self-loving insistence that, yes, she had exposed herself to sniper fire in the cause of gaining moral credit and, perhaps to be banked for the future, national-security "experience." This must mean either a) that she lies without conscience or reflection; or b) that she is subject to fantasies of an illusory past; or c) both of the above. Any of the foregoing would constitute a disqualification for the presidency of the United States.
Read the article then ask yourself, both left and right, why is this women on a podium running for POTUS, can't America do better?.
Futher remember when a lying Bill Clinton waged his finger in our collective faces and lied his ass off? That is their nature that is what they do.
And it isn't just that she is a democrat, and certainly not because she is a woman. It is that she lies and CAN NOT BE TRUSTED, is why I bring this up. I have posted almost nothing about Sanders other then him being a old white socialist, to which I think he would agree. Mrs Clinton is something else, something that needs to not be in the national scene. Time to send her home to bake cookies and tea.
Hillary Clinton's Bosnian misadventure should disqualify her from the presidency, but the airport landing is the least of it.
I am recalling these two things for a reason. First, and even though I admit that I did once later misidentify a building in Sarajevo from a set of photographs, I can tell you for an absolute certainty that it would be quite impossible to imagine that one had undergone that experience at the airport if one actually had not. Yet Sen. Clinton, given repeated chances to modify her absurd claim to have operated under fire while in the company of her then-16-year-old daughter and a USO entertainment troupe, kept up a stone-faced and self-loving insistence that, yes, she had exposed herself to sniper fire in the cause of gaining moral credit and, perhaps to be banked for the future, national-security "experience." This must mean either a) that she lies without conscience or reflection; or b) that she is subject to fantasies of an illusory past; or c) both of the above. Any of the foregoing would constitute a disqualification for the presidency of the United States.
Read the article then ask yourself, both left and right, why is this women on a podium running for POTUS, can't America do better?.
Futher remember when a lying Bill Clinton waged his finger in our collective faces and lied his ass off? That is their nature that is what they do.
And it isn't just that she is a democrat, and certainly not because she is a woman. It is that she lies and CAN NOT BE TRUSTED, is why I bring this up. I have posted almost nothing about Sanders other then him being a old white socialist, to which I think he would agree. Mrs Clinton is something else, something that needs to not be in the national scene. Time to send her home to bake cookies and tea.
Hillary Clinton's Bosnian misadventure should disqualify her from the presidency, but the airport landing is the least of it.
