The self described stable genius needs a time out.

[BackAgain]

If there was no evidence of crime(s) being committed the prosecutor in this or any case would not have gone to a grand jury seeking an indictment.

And yet, he did.

That's what Jack Smith & Fani Willis did.

No. What they’ve done is to serve partisan politics over and far above justice.

And the indictments would have didmissed by a judge.

Because judges never make mistakes?

They have not & they won't be.

At this point, I don’t expect judges at the mere trial level to do the right thing for the most part. Instead, I predict these silly “cases” will go to trial. Then, I predict that they be or more convictions will occur. Then, the cases go to appellate courts. At some point, in the appellate process, the cases will all get properly shit-canned.

Have another shit sammich,

Nah. I don’t share your perverse appetite, ass licker.

.

;

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

But it remains true that an indictment is not evidence of guilt.

Pathetic crybaby plays with his strawman dolly.

Normal people understand the evidence spelled out in the indictments is evidence of guilt.

But you are too terrified to read them. So there you sit, vomiting stupid things and whining.

 

[berg80]

Sure. A bunch of deep state assholes at whose feet and groins you worship.

Seriously. Vermin like you actually trust them.

Gee, it didn't take you long to adopt "vermin" in to your vernacular. It was one of Hitler's favorite words so no big surprise.

 

[CowboyTed]

Former President Trump railed against reports President Biden won’t be charged in the special counsel probe into his handling of classified documents, taking to social media Friday morning to complain of what he considers “prosecutorial misconduct.”

Special counsel Robert Hur is expected to put together a critical report of Biden’s conduct but its not likely to result in criminal charges, the Wall Street Journal first reported Thursday.

Trump rails against reports Biden won’t be charged over classified documents

Former President Trump railed against reports President Biden won’t be charged in the special counsel probe into his handling of classified documents, taking to social media Friday morning to compl…

thehill.com

The WSJ's reporting sounds vaguely like the FBI's determination of Hillary's carelessness regarding dubiously classified e-mails. Naturally, the MAGA king will play it for all its worth. Ginning up outrage among the base fueled by the complicity of RWM. Batten down the hatches, there's a verbal shitstorm of grievance and false equivalences coming.

Read the charges for Trump's documents case

Trump (37 counts):[1]

• 31 counts of retaining and failing to deliver national defense documents under the Espionage Act.

Each of these charges is for possession of a separate, specific document. Ten of these documents were handed over to the government in June 2022, and the other 21 were recovered in the August 2022 search.[30] According to the indictment, the 31 documents describe U.S. nuclear weapons; foreign military attacks, plans, capabilities, and effects on U.S. interests; foreign nuclear capabilities; foreign support for terrorist activity; communications with foreign leaders; U.S. military activities; White House daily foreign intelligence briefings; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.[31]

• 5 counts relating to conspiracy to obstruct justice and withholding documents and records[1]
• 1 count of making false statements.

The first 31 charges are about knowingly retaining national defence documents he doesn't own. Trump, Biden or Pence didn't pack the documents which ended up under their possession, a federal employee did. There is no place we can find where Trump, Biden or Pence asked for national defence documents to be taken.

So Trump is not being charged for taking these documents and being in possession unknowingly.

The problem is Trump admitted that he knew these documents were under his possession. He said on TV that he owned them (which he doesn't) and he then hid them from the US Government and then lied about having them

 

[Lesh]

Read the charges for Trump's documents case

Trump (37 counts):[1]

• 31 counts of retaining and failing to deliver national defense documents under the Espionage Act.

Each of these charges is for possession of a separate, specific document. Ten of these documents were handed over to the government in June 2022, and the other 21 were recovered in the August 2022 search.[30] According to the indictment, the 31 documents describe U.S. nuclear weapons; foreign military attacks, plans, capabilities, and effects on U.S. interests; foreign nuclear capabilities; foreign support for terrorist activity; communications with foreign leaders; U.S. military activities; White House daily foreign intelligence briefings; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.[31]

• 5 counts relating to conspiracy to obstruct justice and withholding documents and records[1]
• 1 count of making false statements.

The first 31 charges are about knowingly retaining national defence documents he doesn't own. Trump, Biden or Pence didn't pack the documents which ended up under their possession, a federal employee did. There is no place we can find where Trump, Biden or Pence asked for national defence documents to be taken.

So Trump is not being charged for taking these documents and being in possession unknowingly.

The problem is Trump admitted that he knew these documents were under his possession. He said on TV that he owned them (which he doesn't) and he then hid them from the US Government and then lied about having them

So KNOWLEDGE and INTENT are key components in both cases?

 

[BackAgain]

Pathetic crybaby plays with his strawman dolly.

Well then, stop. You're making an even bigger fool of yourself.

Normal people understand the evidence spelled out in the indictments is evidence of guilt.

Wrong. Normal people (a group you have no connection to) understand that evidence supposedly sufficient to accuse isn’t the same thing as evidence sufficient to convict.

But you are too terrified to read them. So there you sit, vomiting stupid things and whining.

Zzz. Unlike you, be read the charges and understood them for what they are. Bullshit.

 

[cnm]

Speaking for myself none of that matters

So you ask for sources and links even though none of it matters.

You must be a Trump voter.

 

[Concerned American]

Gee, it didn't take you long to adopt "vermin" in to your vernacular. It was one of Hitler's favorite words so no big surprise.

He didn't say Ungeziefer

 

[the other mike]

So you ask for sources and links even though none of it matters.

You must be a Trump voter.

I've been a trump supporter since 2017 when I started looking into how corrupt the Deep state is and the Democratic Party

 

[Nostra]

Eat shit, stalker.

Seek help soon, vermin. You need it, BIGLY.

 

[Nostra]

Gee, it didn't take you long to adopt "vermin" in to your vernacular. It was one of Hitler's favorite words so no big surprise.

Go get your crayons and find your safe space, VERMIN.

 

[Clipper]

Seek help soon, vermin. You need it, BIGLY.

Choke on a turkey wishbone, stalker.