The Left Starts to Dump Obama

[Seawytch]

Bottom line, everything is worse than when he took office. EVERYTHING.

Oh? Do you know how many jobs we were losing when he took office? We aren't losing jobs anymore, but gaining jobs. Do you know that the DOW is double what it was when he took office.

having a republican congress works wonders for a democratic president doesn't it.

LOL...let me guess...you were one of those editing the wiki page for Bachman. Poor attempt at revision.

 

[Spoonman]

Oh? Do you know how many jobs we were losing when he took office? We aren't losing jobs anymore, but gaining jobs. Do you know that the DOW is double what it was when he took office.

having a republican congress works wonders for a democratic president doesn't it.

LOL...let me guess...you were one of those editing the wiki page for Bachman. Poor attempt at revision.

you chose poorly

 

[Seawytch]

Bottom line, everything is worse than when he took office. EVERYTHING.

Oh? Do you know how many jobs we were losing when he took office? We aren't losing jobs anymore, but gaining jobs. Do you know that the DOW is double what it was when he took office.

Whatever you do, don't look at those new jobless claims numbers!

Wall Street recovered, well what was I thinking?

Thinking we have massive unemployment, debt and a President who wants to tax our way out of it.

We went to "war" without paying for them. Revenue must be increased.

Regardless of the jobless numbers, we were losing 700,000 jobs a MONTH. We aren't anymore. Spin away...

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The president never said we'd peak at 8%

PolitiFact | Will: Obama said stimulus would cap unemployment at 8 percent

Bottom line, everything is worse than when he took office. EVERYTHING.

Oh? Do you know how many jobs we were losing when he took office? We aren't losing jobs anymore, but gaining jobs. Do you know that the DOW is double what it was when he took office.

a. Unemplyment is up.
b. Stock markt has gained very little ground in a decade.

 

[Seawytch]

Oh? Do you know how many jobs we were losing when he took office? We aren't losing jobs anymore, but gaining jobs. Do you know that the DOW is double what it was when he took office.

Actually, we are losing jobs. Just to break even, we need to create around 125,000 jobs a month. They last two months have been extremely dismal. That is why the unemployment rate is rising.

The stock market is experiencing a bubble due to quantitative easing. While the market is doing well, who mainly benefiting from it? The uber rich. That is why we have seen income inequalities grow during the Obama administration. Obama's economy is very favorable for the corporatists, bankers, and the MIC. It is very hostile to average working Americans.

What policies of the President or the Democrats are responsible? It sure as he'll isn't going to get better with a corporate tool GnOPer in office.

 

[saveliberty]

Oh? Do you know how many jobs we were losing when he took office? We aren't losing jobs anymore, but gaining jobs. Do you know that the DOW is double what it was when he took office.

Whatever you do, don't look at those new jobless claims numbers!

Wall Street recovered, well what was I thinking?

Thinking we have massive unemployment, debt and a President who wants to tax our way out of it.

We went to "war" without paying for them. Revenue must be increased.

Regardless of the jobless numbers, we were losing 700,000 jobs a MONTH. We aren't anymore. Spin away...

No we are still losing 400,000 a month, I see you concede that losses are still occuring. Spending needs to be cut in order to fall in line with revenues. Why haven't we ended the wars in the first eighteen months as promised?

 

[Seawytch]

Bottom line, everything is worse than when he took office. EVERYTHING.

Oh? Do you know how many jobs we were losing when he took office? We aren't losing jobs anymore, but gaining jobs. Do you know that the DOW is double what it was when he took office.

a. Unemplyment is up.
b. Stock markt has gained very little ground in a decade.

We aren't losing 700,000 jobs a month like we were AND the stock market has doubled since he took office. Sorry ODSers, ya can't spin that.

 

[saveliberty]

Yes, if you waste enough money on a stimulus plan, pass a bad health care reform measure and threaten tax increases in a bad economy, the numbers eventually start looking "better".

 

[Jarhead]

Oh? Do you know how many jobs we were losing when he took office? We aren't losing jobs anymore, but gaining jobs. Do you know that the DOW is double what it was when he took office.

a. Unemplyment is up.
b. Stock markt has gained very little ground in a decade.

We aren't losing 700,000 jobs a month like we were AND the stock market has doubled since he took office. Sorry ODSers, ya can't spin that.

Gee...you are pleased with a recession recovery taking twice as long as it should despite spending 850 billion dollars?

And dont give me that "worst economy since the great depression" crap....I lived theorugh worse.....the market never crashed..interest rates were not at 20%....

This was your typical recession...and with or without Obama we should have recovered in 18 months...but with Obama it took nearly twice as long.

And you are proud of that?

Good for you. I have higher expectations of my law and policy makers.

 

[Antiderivative]

What policies of the President or the Democrats are responsible?

There are plenty of policies that one can point to. After all, it has been 2 1/2 years and trillions of dollars later and look at the results. The majority are struggling and/or remaining stagnant while the rich only get richer. Once again, economic growth is being mostly captured by a few at the top.

It sure as he'll isn't going to get better with a corporate tool GnOPer in office.

Sadly, this is the best thing Obama and the Dems have going for them.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The left knows this guy is done.... it's a done deal... the magic left about a year ago. He's a dud, an absolute failure at everything he has done. The trick bag is empty.. they're even talking about monetizing more debt now.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Constant fantasy on the right that the Left is going to bail on Obama.

While this is a cool fantasy, and I would dearly love it to happen, it is not how they roll.

They stuck with Clinton from felony to felony. They defended him beyond the last ditch.

The same Barney Frank and Anthony Weiner.

They invest too much of themselves in their furhers to turn on them even as the whole edifice crashes around them.

You come on this board, and November 10,2012 the lefties on this board will still insist he was right and will still insist he won re election even if he looses every single state and DC.

Agree it's a fantasy about the left bailing on Barry. But some, not many, will although not in numbers near enough to affect the election outcome per se. However, his downfall could be when those non-votes are combined with independents and others who don't support him next go-round.

I believe his biggest problem will be voter turnout.

Call me racist if you wish....but it is not that I am racist....I just refuse to be politically correct in a debate.


The first time around....

Many voted who normally dont so they can be part of history and say they voted for the first black President.

Many youngsters voted who normally wouldnt becuase of the "wave" that was created. Obama was hip and the young got caught up in the election. To many of them, he is now nothing more than the establishment.

Finally whereas the democratic candidate will always get 90+ percentage of the black vote (be him/her black or white), I believe the turnout of black voters will be smaller than last time around as it is no longer a history making election.

I believe if voter tunrout is normal, Obama will be voted out of office.

You're right about one thing here - if voter turnout is "normal" (which is very low), then Obama will probably lose. But if nothing else, Obama's campaign in 2008 brought a new level to the idea of a nationwide, grassroots GOTV campaign - and he's going to do it again.

Voter turnout is one of the easiest things to boost - a door-to-door canvass can increase turnout by a full 10% if you've got the money to do it right - and Obama certainly has the money.

 

[oreo]

Constant fantasy on the right that the Left is going to bail on Obama.

While this is a cool fantasy, and I would dearly love it to happen, it is not how they roll.

They stuck with Clinton from felony to felony. They defended him beyond the last ditch.

The same Barney Frank and Anthony Weiner.

They invest too much of themselves in their furhers to turn on them even as the whole edifice crashes around them.

You come on this board, and November 10,2012 the lefties on this board will still insist he was right and will still insist he won re election even if he looses every single state and DC.

NOPE--there are two things different between Clinton and Obama. Clinton never set out to destroy Capitalism--and Newt Gingrich was able to drag Clinton to the center isle and he stayed there--to win reelection. IOW--Clinton was never a socialist--he loves this country--and Obama is completely opposite of him.

And finally--it's the economy-- Americans tend to vote their wallets--meaning that not unless some miracle happens between now and mid-July 2012--with major job growth in this country--you could put Daffy Duck as a candidate and he would win against Obama.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Constant fantasy on the right that the Left is going to bail on Obama.

While this is a cool fantasy, and I would dearly love it to happen, it is not how they roll.

They stuck with Clinton from felony to felony. They defended him beyond the last ditch.

The same Barney Frank and Anthony Weiner.

They invest too much of themselves in their furhers to turn on them even as the whole edifice crashes around them.

You come on this board, and November 10,2012 the lefties on this board will still insist he was right and will still insist he won re election even if he looses every single state and DC.

NOPE--there are two things different between Clinton and Obama. Clinton never set out to destroy Capitalism--and Newt Gingrich was able to drag Clinton to the center isle and he stayed there--to win reelection. IOW--Clinton was never a socialist--he loves this country--and Obama is completely opposite of him.

And finally--it's the economy-- Americans tend to vote their wallets--meaning that not unless some miracle happens between now and mid-July 2012--with major job growth in this country--you could put Daffy Duck as a candidate and he would win against Obama.

For all intents and purposes, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and Obama are the same people.

Obama is a corporate pawn, just like the others. He's not a "socialist", and he didn't "set out to destroy capitalism". You guys sound more hysterical by the day.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Oh? Do you know how many jobs we were losing when he took office? We aren't losing jobs anymore, but gaining jobs. Do you know that the DOW is double what it was when he took office.

a. Unemplyment is up.
b. Stock markt has gained very little ground in a decade.

We aren't losing 700,000 jobs a month like we were AND the stock market has doubled since he took office. Sorry ODSers, ya can't spin that.

There's really nothing to spin. These are the ugly facts. Unemployment is headed north at 9.2, other measures have it higher, oil markets are way up, commodoties are way up, groceries are way up, spending is way up, we're broke as hell.....etc......and so on and so forth. Is this the paradise utopia that the O imagined or y'all had in mind?

 

[Mr.Nick]

July 12, 2011
By J.R. Dunn
American Thinker


Excerpt:

The explanation for this is quite simple: Obama has failed, but the ideology must go on. Obama's biggest achievement was kicking off the Tea Parties, possibly the most serious threat to left-liberalism of the past thirty years. Movement conservatism has always been limited by its connection with Northeastern elitists, while the Neocons, though much more effective, appealed to an urban university-oriented following. But here we have an actual middle-class, middle-American movement, enlightened, informed, and outraged -- the darkest nightmare of any thinking leftist. And who created it? Obama and none other. It would take a lot of accomplishments to outweigh that single error, and Obama can't show any. His gimcrack auto company scheme worked only with aid of bogus paperwork. His "health-care reform" will not outlast judicial testing. His attempt to revive the New Deal as a solution to 21st-century problems is a sour joke to millions of unemployed. He is racing for the exits in Afghanistan, the leftist "good war," like a scalded rat. And now his deeply corrupt Justice Department is blowing up in his face. I've said all along that he would spend his last two years overwhelmed by the problems he created in his first two, and it is coming to pass in detail.​

LINK


Brilliant analysis. A must read.

Obama's leftist special interest voting base desires socialism - thats something he cannot give them, especially with all these American patriots devoted to defending our Constitution.

For example: gays expect Obama to pander to their agenda, however the blacks whom the strong majority voted for Obama are generally anti-gay. So of course Obama will take the 12% of blacks that will vote for him over the 2% of gays, or even less than that who are democrats who want their agenda to be progressed.

Obama is not a man of morals, ethics or principals - hes a clown that panders for popularity, to appease all that he can..

The guy isn't president to lead our country - hes president because it was a personal goal, which is why hes such a bad president... He reached the top now hes clueless...

 

[Zoom-boing]

Barring a miracle, Obama's toast. And I think also so is the Marxist stranglehold n the Senate.

I wonder if Obama is planning on canceling the Nov 2012 elections, nothing else makes sense

and this is why you are a fucking hack. You know who said this? Liberals during Bush.
Yes thats right, you share the same seat as them....

You don't know Frank very well.

tff

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I wonder if Obama is planning on canceling the Nov 2012 elections, nothing else makes sense

and this is why you are a fucking hack. You know who said this? Liberals during Bush.
Yes thats right, you share the same seat as them....

You don't know Frank very well.

tff

He doesn't know much very well.

 

[saveliberty]

July 12, 2011
By J.R. Dunn
American Thinker


Excerpt:

The explanation for this is quite simple: Obama has failed, but the ideology must go on. Obama's biggest achievement was kicking off the Tea Parties, possibly the most serious threat to left-liberalism of the past thirty years. Movement conservatism has always been limited by its connection with Northeastern elitists, while the Neocons, though much more effective, appealed to an urban university-oriented following. But here we have an actual middle-class, middle-American movement, enlightened, informed, and outraged -- the darkest nightmare of any thinking leftist. And who created it? Obama and none other. It would take a lot of accomplishments to outweigh that single error, and Obama can't show any. His gimcrack auto company scheme worked only with aid of bogus paperwork. His "health-care reform" will not outlast judicial testing. His attempt to revive the New Deal as a solution to 21st-century problems is a sour joke to millions of unemployed. He is racing for the exits in Afghanistan, the leftist "good war," like a scalded rat. And now his deeply corrupt Justice Department is blowing up in his face. I've said all along that he would spend his last two years overwhelmed by the problems he created in his first two, and it is coming to pass in detail.​

LINK


Brilliant analysis. A must read.

Obama's leftist special interest voting base desires socialism - thats something he cannot give them, especially with all these American patriots devoted to defending our Constitution.

For example: gays expect Obama to pander to their agenda, however the blacks whom the strong majority voted for Obama are generally anti-gay. So of course Obama will take the 12% of blacks that will vote for him over the 2% of gays, or even less than that who are democrats who want their agenda to be progressed.

Obama is not a man of morals, ethics or principals - hes a clown that panders for popularity, to appease all that he can..

The guy isn't president to lead our country - hes president because it was a personal goal, which is why hes such a bad president... He reached the top now hes clueless...

I would hope your wrong Nick, but I confess to thinking what you said a time or two.

 

[Mr.Nick]

July 12, 2011
By J.R. Dunn
American Thinker


Excerpt:

The explanation for this is quite simple: Obama has failed, but the ideology must go on. Obama's biggest achievement was kicking off the Tea Parties, possibly the most serious threat to left-liberalism of the past thirty years. Movement conservatism has always been limited by its connection with Northeastern elitists, while the Neocons, though much more effective, appealed to an urban university-oriented following. But here we have an actual middle-class, middle-American movement, enlightened, informed, and outraged -- the darkest nightmare of any thinking leftist. And who created it? Obama and none other. It would take a lot of accomplishments to outweigh that single error, and Obama can't show any. His gimcrack auto company scheme worked only with aid of bogus paperwork. His "health-care reform" will not outlast judicial testing. His attempt to revive the New Deal as a solution to 21st-century problems is a sour joke to millions of unemployed. He is racing for the exits in Afghanistan, the leftist "good war," like a scalded rat. And now his deeply corrupt Justice Department is blowing up in his face. I've said all along that he would spend his last two years overwhelmed by the problems he created in his first two, and it is coming to pass in detail.​

LINK


Brilliant analysis. A must read.

Obama's leftist special interest voting base desires socialism - thats something he cannot give them, especially with all these American patriots devoted to defending our Constitution.

For example: gays expect Obama to pander to their agenda, however the blacks whom the strong majority voted for Obama are generally anti-gay. So of course Obama will take the 12% of blacks that will vote for him over the 2% of gays, or even less than that who are democrats who want their agenda to be progressed.

Obama is not a man of morals, ethics or principals - hes a clown that panders for popularity, to appease all that he can..

The guy isn't president to lead our country - hes president because it was a personal goal, which is why hes such a bad president... He reached the top now hes clueless...

I would hope your wrong Nick, but I confess to thinking what you said a time or two.

I wish I I'm/was wrong as well, however I wish these present politicians were more honest.

All these clowns pander for votes, and its not only democrats its republicans too.

The sad part is that people just go with the flow and select those who offer them the most without thinking about others, and the majority of that burden falls on the democrats, in which only care about the present but don't think (or care) about the future.