Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Again, you DISHONEST Clown... you post the 1994 article as rebuttalfor 2016 Stats.Actually SPLC did debunk this study.
Based on a cursory examination of 1994 data about interracial crimes between whites and blacks — less than a sixth of all crimes committed that year — Taylor... Blacks, he claims, are vastly more likely to attack whites than vice versa and.. The reason, Taylor suggests amidst a blizzard of misleading statistics, is their blackness — something about black genes, or perhaps black culture, that endows African-Americans with a natural proclivity to criminality.
Mistaking Poverty for Race
But Taylor is plainly, demonstrably wrong.
Taylor u...
CongratsCDC: 40%+ of U.S. Babies Born to Unmarried Women for 8th Straight Year
Of the 3,977,745 babies born in the United States of America in 2015, 1,600,208 of them—or 40.2 percent--were born to unmarried mothers, according to data released this month by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
"CDC: 40%+ of U.S. Babies Born to Unmarried Women for 8th Straight Year"
In 2015 there were just over 415,000 babies born to unwed black moms. There were 3,977,745 babies born over all. So the percentage of unwed black babies born as a percentage of all babies was approximately 10,4 percent. Blacks had just over 500,000 babies total. Whites had over 1.9 million total and over 600,000 babies born to unwed moms or about 16 percent of all unwed births as a percentage of all births.
Table I–4. Births to unmarried women, by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, each state and territory, 2015, National Vital Statistics Reports, Volume 66, Number 1 ... - CDC
The reality of this information shows that whites actually had more unwed children than blacks had children. In 2015 blacks had just over 500,000 children total. Whites had over 620,000 unwed births. Now I'm sure the mathematical "geniuses" around here will try talking their usual trash, but the facts are as they are. The unwed birth percentage of blacks as opposed to the total number of births was just over 10 percent. By both number and percentage whites had more unwed births. Now you can argue the usual dumb white supremacist argument based only on the number of total black babies born and back babies born out of wedlock, but that paints a false picture and that's the picture whites gave been painting for 400 years.
First of all, whether they're murdering whites or blacks, how does that make them more or less violent?Per your source, Tim Wise:Originally published in 1999, The Color of Crime has been a staple of the white nationalist/alt-right movement for over a decade. It has also been subjected to several debunkings over the years. (See here and here. The book The Color of Justice is also a valuable resource.) Now Taylor is advertising the 2016 version of the booklet, and advertising it with the assistance of Vice Media co-founder and frequent Fox News guest Gavin McInnes.
Jared Taylor Touts Bogus ‘Color of Crime’ Report in an Awkward Interview with Gavin McInnes
The Color of Crime, a booklet by white separatist Jared Taylor, uses faulty analysis in its claims that whites are overwhelmingly victimized by blacks.
Color of Crime Booklet by Jared Taylor Popular on Radical Right
Nazis Can’t Do Math: Reflections on Racism, Crime and the Illiteracy of Right-Wing Statistical Analysis
the homicide offending rate for blacks is about 6.8 times higher than the rate for whites.
LOL!
But here is where the white racist argument falls apart.
The fact is, precisely because the black homicide offending rate is so much higher than the rate for whites (as noted above, 6.8 times higher), we should expect the black-on-white homicide numbers to be much higher than they were, relative to the white-on-black numbers.
If whites were (and we were) 63.7 percent of the population in 2010, population availability alone would suggest that we should have been as many as 63.7 percent of the victims of black murderers
I remember one of them coloureds was arguing that the Detroit bankruptcy caused Detroit's descent into crime, despite the descent happening years before the bankruptcy.Again, you DISHONEST Clown... you post the 1994 article as rebuttalfor 2016 Stats.Actually SPLC did debunk this study.
Based on a cursory examination of 1994 data about interracial crimes between whites and blacks — less than a sixth of all crimes committed that year — Taylor... Blacks, he claims, are vastly more likely to attack whites than vice versa and.. The reason, Taylor suggests amidst a blizzard of misleading statistics, is their blackness — something about black genes, or perhaps black culture, that endows African-Americans with a natural proclivity to criminality.
Mistaking Poverty for Race
But Taylor is plainly, demonstrably wrong.
Taylor u...
What DISHONEST JERK.
Further, SPLC does NOT dispute the Race and Crime numbers, just seeks to attribute them to 'poverty.'
And SPLC does NOT dispute the Total Minority Crime rates, just interracial ones.
You're a Dishonest Clocksetter and a typical 12 IQ.... Boy.
`
Again, you DISHONEST Clown... you post the 1994 article as rebuttalfor 2016 Stats.Actually SPLC did debunk this study.
Based on a cursory examination of 1994 data about interracial crimes between whites and blacks — less than a sixth of all crimes committed that year — Taylor... Blacks, he claims, are vastly more likely to attack whites than vice versa and.. The reason, Taylor suggests amidst a blizzard of misleading statistics, is their blackness — something about black genes, or perhaps black culture, that endows African-Americans with a natural proclivity to criminality.
Mistaking Poverty for Race
But Taylor is plainly, demonstrably wrong.
Taylor u...
What DISHONEST JERK.
Further, SPLC does NOT dispute the Race and Crime numbers, just seeks to attribute them to 'poverty.'
And SPLC does NOT dispute the Total Minority Crime rates, just interracial ones.
You're a Dishonest Clocksetter and a typical 12 IQ.... Boy.
`
I remember one of them coloureds was arguing that the Detroit bankruptcy caused Detroit's descent into crime, despite the descent happening years before the bankruptcy.Again, you DISHONEST Clown... you post the 1994 article as rebuttalfor 2016 Stats.Actually SPLC did debunk this study.
Based on a cursory examination of 1994 data about interracial crimes between whites and blacks — less than a sixth of all crimes committed that year — Taylor... Blacks, he claims, are vastly more likely to attack whites than vice versa and.. The reason, Taylor suggests amidst a blizzard of misleading statistics, is their blackness — something about black genes, or perhaps black culture, that endows African-Americans with a natural proclivity to criminality.
Mistaking Poverty for Race
But Taylor is plainly, demonstrably wrong.
Taylor u...
What DISHONEST JERK.
Further, SPLC does NOT dispute the Race and Crime numbers, just seeks to attribute them to 'poverty.'
And SPLC does NOT dispute the Total Minority Crime rates, just interracial ones.
You're a Dishonest Clocksetter and a typical 12 IQ.... Boy.
`
You not liking it doesn't constitute it being debunked. You have a bad habit of making retarded proclaimations, believing them. Then expecting others to do so as well... Like your "degree" for example...Color of Crime update/summary excerpts
The Color of Crime
Crime rates
There are dramatic race differences in crime rates.
Asians have the Lowest rates, followed by Whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates.
This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups. In 2013, a black was Six times more likely than a non-black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.
......
Urban centers
In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for Murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting”— defined as firing a bullet that hits someone —a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.
If New York City were All white, the murder rate would drop by 91%, the robbery rate by 81%, and the shootings rate by 97%.
In an All-white Chicago, murder would decline 90%, rape by 81%, and robbery by 90%.
......
`
`
The color of crime us a debunked fake study done by a racist named Jared Taylor,
Again, you DISHONEST Clown... you post the 1994 article as rebuttalfor 2016 Stats.Actually SPLC did debunk this study.
Based on a cursory examination of 1994 data about interracial crimes between whites and blacks — less than a sixth of all crimes committed that year — Taylor... Blacks, he claims, are vastly more likely to attack whites than vice versa and.. The reason, Taylor suggests amidst a blizzard of misleading statistics, is their blackness — something about black genes, or perhaps black culture, that endows African-Americans with a natural proclivity to criminality.
Mistaking Poverty for Race
But Taylor is plainly, demonstrably wrong.
Taylor u...
What DISHONEST JERK.
Further, SPLC does NOT dispute the Race and Crime numbers, just seeks to attribute them to 'poverty.'
And SPLC does NOT dispute the Total Minority Crime rates, just interracial ones.
You're a Dishonest Clocksetter and a typical 12 IQ.... Boy.
`
Actually recycling a debunked study is dishonest.
Whites commit more rapes, aggravated assaults, burglaries, vandalism, arson, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, crimes against property, violent crime, forgery, counterfeiting, buying, receiving selling and possessing stolen property, illegal weapons possession, prostitution, commercialized vice, sex offenses, drug violations, drunk driving, offenses involving family and children, driving under the influence, liquor laws, drunkenness, vagrancy, curfew and loitering, and all other offenses excluding traffic, disorderly conduct and suspicion.
That is the truth. Jared Taylor is a joke who was long ago debunked by respectable professionals in the field.
That makes you a joke also.
No it hasn’t been “debunked”. This is one of those proclamations I was referring to. As for debate... You can’t even defend your positions on an Internet forum, much less an actual debate, Boy...You not liking it doesn't constitute it being debunked. You have a bad habit of making retarded proclaimations, believing them. Then expecting others to do so as well... Like your "degree" for example...Color of Crime update/summary excerpts
The Color of Crime
Crime rates
There are dramatic race differences in crime rates.
Asians have the Lowest rates, followed by Whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates.
This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups. In 2013, a black was Six times more likely than a non-black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.
......
Urban centers
In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for Murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting”— defined as firing a bullet that hits someone —a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.
If New York City were All white, the murder rate would drop by 91%, the robbery rate by 81%, and the shootings rate by 97%.
In an All-white Chicago, murder would decline 90%, rape by 81%, and robbery by 90%.
......
`
`
The color of crime us a debunked fake study done by a racist named Jared Taylor,
The fact it has been debunked does. And just like the other dumb asses I could tale you to a debate stage and we debate these issues then shut you up in less than 10 minutes. Stay in your lane boy.
No it hasn’t been “debunked”. This is one of those proclamations I was referring to. As for debate... You can’t even defend your positions on an Internet forum, much less an actual debate, Boy...You not liking it doesn't constitute it being debunked. You have a bad habit of making retarded proclaimations, believing them. Then expecting others to do so as well... Like your "degree" for example...Color of Crime update/summary excerpts
The Color of Crime
Crime rates
There are dramatic race differences in crime rates.
Asians have the Lowest rates, followed by Whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates.
This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups. In 2013, a black was Six times more likely than a non-black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.
......
Urban centers
In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for Murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting”— defined as firing a bullet that hits someone —a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.
If New York City were All white, the murder rate would drop by 91%, the robbery rate by 81%, and the shootings rate by 97%.
In an All-white Chicago, murder would decline 90%, rape by 81%, and robbery by 90%.
......
`
`
The color of crime us a debunked fake study done by a racist named Jared Taylor,
The fact it has been debunked does. And just like the other dumb asses I could tale you to a debate stage and we debate these issues then shut you up in less than 10 minutes. Stay in your lane boy.
It just came out yet again in currently revised statistical format. Using verifiable data. So much for your empty proclamation. (Yet again.) You still fail to verify any of your claims. To date the only thing you’ve been beating is your meat. This ain’t “the hood”, negro. Shit talking doesn’t impress anyone. Data does. And you don’t have any...No it hasn’t been “debunked”. This is one of those proclamations I was referring to. As for debate... You can’t even defend your positions on an Internet forum, much less an actual debate, Boy...You not liking it doesn't constitute it being debunked. You have a bad habit of making retarded proclaimations, believing them. Then expecting others to do so as well... Like your "degree" for example...Color of Crime update/summary excerpts
The Color of Crime
Crime rates
There are dramatic race differences in crime rates.
Asians have the Lowest rates, followed by Whites, and then Hispanics. Blacks have notably high crime rates.
This pattern holds true for virtually all crime categories and for virtually all age groups. In 2013, a black was Six times more likely than a non-black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.
......
Urban centers
In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for Murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting”— defined as firing a bullet that hits someone —a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.
If New York City were All white, the murder rate would drop by 91%, the robbery rate by 81%, and the shootings rate by 97%.
In an All-white Chicago, murder would decline 90%, rape by 81%, and robbery by 90%.
......
`
`
The color of crime us a debunked fake study done by a racist named Jared Taylor,
The fact it has been debunked does. And just like the other dumb asses I could tale you to a debate stage and we debate these issues then shut you up in less than 10 minutes. Stay in your lane boy.
It has, almost 20 years ago. I beat your ass at will. I'd embarrass your racist white ass in a debate.
Yeah I'm too damn white to understand how the cause can occur after the effect.I remember one of them coloureds was arguing that the Detroit bankruptcy caused Detroit's descent into crime, despite the descent happening years before the bankruptcy.Again, you DISHONEST Clown... you post the 1994 article as rebuttalfor 2016 Stats.Actually SPLC did debunk this study.
Based on a cursory examination of 1994 data about interracial crimes between whites and blacks — less than a sixth of all crimes committed that year — Taylor... Blacks, he claims, are vastly more likely to attack whites than vice versa and.. The reason, Taylor suggests amidst a blizzard of misleading statistics, is their blackness — something about black genes, or perhaps black culture, that endows African-Americans with a natural proclivity to criminality.
Mistaking Poverty for Race
But Taylor is plainly, demonstrably wrong.
Taylor u...
What DISHONEST JERK.
Further, SPLC does NOT dispute the Race and Crime numbers, just seeks to attribute them to 'poverty.'
And SPLC does NOT dispute the Total Minority Crime rates, just interracial ones.
You're a Dishonest Clocksetter and a typical 12 IQ.... Boy.
`
You're too damn dumb to understand such complex issues.
Whites commit more rapes, aggravated assaults, burglaries, vandalism, arson, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, crimes against property, violent crime, forgery, counterfeiting, buying, receiving selling and possessing stolen property, illegal weapons possession, prostitution, commercialized vice, sex offenses, drug violations, drunk driving, offenses involving family and children, driving under the influence, liquor laws, drunkenness, vagrancy, curfew and loitering, and all other offenses excluding traffic, disorderly conduct and suspicion.
That's what the UCR shows and what's worse for you is that's what it shows every single year.
Whites commit more rapes, aggravated assaults, burglaries, vandalism, arson, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, crimes against property, violent crime, forgery, counterfeiting, buying, receiving selling and possessing stolen property, illegal weapons possession, prostitution, commercialized vice, sex offenses, drug violations, drunk driving, offenses involving family and children, driving under the influence, liquor laws, drunkenness, vagrancy, curfew and loitering, and all other offenses excluding traffic, disorderly conduct and suspicion.
That's what the UCR shows and what's worse for you is that's what it shows every single year.
How many out of 100,000 for each offense and each race? That's what is important and what could lead to a solution.
Why do you not want a solution? To keep them under your thumb?
It just came out yet again in currently revised statistical format. Using verifiable data. So much for your empty proclamation. (Yet again.) You still fail to verify any of your claims. To date the only thing you’ve been beating is your meat. This ain’t “the hood”, negro. Shit talking doesn’t impress anyone. Data does. And you don’t have any...No it hasn’t been “debunked”. This is one of those proclamations I was referring to. As for debate... You can’t even defend your positions on an Internet forum, much less an actual debate, Boy...You not liking it doesn't constitute it being debunked. You have a bad habit of making retarded proclaimations, believing them. Then expecting others to do so as well... Like your "degree" for example...The color of crime us a debunked fake study done by a racist named Jared Taylor,
The fact it has been debunked does. And just like the other dumb asses I could tale you to a debate stage and we debate these issues then shut you up in less than 10 minutes. Stay in your lane boy.
It has, almost 20 years ago. I beat your ass at will. I'd embarrass your racist white ass in a debate.
You got nothing but the habit of repeating yourself... That’s a negro habit... You got nothing of merit, as usual...It just came out yet again in currently revised statistical format. Using verifiable data. So much for your empty proclamation. (Yet again.) You still fail to verify any of your claims. To date the only thing you’ve been beating is your meat. This ain’t “the hood”, negro. Shit talking doesn’t impress anyone. Data does. And you don’t have any...No it hasn’t been “debunked”. This is one of those proclamations I was referring to. As for debate... You can’t even defend your positions on an Internet forum, much less an actual debate, Boy...You not liking it doesn't constitute it being debunked. You have a bad habit of making retarded proclaimations, believing them. Then expecting others to do so as well... Like your "degree" for example...
The fact it has been debunked does. And just like the other dumb asses I could tale you to a debate stage and we debate these issues then shut you up in less than 10 minutes. Stay in your lane boy.
It has, almost 20 years ago. I beat your ass at will. I'd embarrass your racist white ass in a debate.
I have plenty and the color of crime isn't it. I was debunked 20 years ago, revising a debunked theory 20 years later doesn't change the fact it has no merit. This ain't the farm white boy and bullshit don't cut it.. You need data and data from respected sources not known white supremacists.
Whites commit more rapes, aggravated assaults, burglaries, vandalism, arson, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, crimes against property, violent crime, forgery, counterfeiting, buying, receiving selling and possessing stolen property, illegal weapons possession, prostitution, commercialized vice, sex offenses, drug violations, drunk driving, offenses involving family and children, driving under the influence, liquor laws, drunkenness, vagrancy, curfew and loitering, and all other offenses excluding traffic, disorderly conduct and suspicion.
That's what the UCR shows and what's worse for you is that's what it shows every single year.
How many out of 100,000 for each offense and each race? That's what is important and what could lead to a solution.
Why do you not want a solution? To keep them under your thumb?
What's important is for whites shut up and fix the larger crime problem in your own community. We know what the solutions are for us and they have nothing to do with a per 100,000 estimation.
It's a Russian troll. His window with Google Translate must have froze so he keeps unknowingly copying and pasting the same translation over and over again.You got nothing but the habit of repeating yourself... That’s a negro habit... You got nothing of merit, as usual...It just came out yet again in currently revised statistical format. Using verifiable data. So much for your empty proclamation. (Yet again.) You still fail to verify any of your claims. To date the only thing you’ve been beating is your meat. This ain’t “the hood”, negro. Shit talking doesn’t impress anyone. Data does. And you don’t have any...No it hasn’t been “debunked”. This is one of those proclamations I was referring to. As for debate... You can’t even defend your positions on an Internet forum, much less an actual debate, Boy...The fact it has been debunked does. And just like the other dumb asses I could tale you to a debate stage and we debate these issues then shut you up in less than 10 minutes. Stay in your lane boy.
It has, almost 20 years ago. I beat your ass at will. I'd embarrass your racist white ass in a debate.
I have plenty and the color of crime isn't it. I was debunked 20 years ago, revising a debunked theory 20 years later doesn't change the fact it has no merit. This ain't the farm white boy and bullshit don't cut it.. You need data and data from respected sources not known white supremacists.
