Study: No, there is no "pause" in Global warming

[A Perez]

Nobody noticed the OP mentions short time spans and the GW cult bases everything off of 150 year models?

150 years is not a short period, dummy.

 

[September]

Nobody noticed the OP mentions short time spans and the GW cult bases everything off of 150 year models?

150 years is not a short period, dummy.

Compared to the lifetime of the Earth, yes it is​

 

[JimBowie1958]

Nobody noticed the OP mentions short time spans and the GW cult bases everything off of 150 year models?

150 years is not a short period, dummy.

It is in geological terms, dummy.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Regardless, one thing is for certain. Humanity is a plague upon the Earth and our continued presence here is destroying the planet.​

Sock accounts are destroying USMB

 

[mudwhistle]

Scientists explain how global warming deniers use short periods of time to prove that the planet has ceased to warm. They explain that when sufficiently long periods are examined, the warming trend always holds.


The study is a blow to conservatives who claim global warming stopped.

Link

New study finds ‘no substantive evidence’ of a global warming ‘pause’

STILL Epic Fail: 73 Climate Models vs. Measurements, Running 5-Year Means
June 6th, 2013 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
In response to those who complained in my recent post that linear trends are not a good way to compare the models to observations (even though the modelers have claimed that it’s the long-term behavior of the models we should focus on, not individual years), here are running 5-year averages for the tropical tropospheric temperature, models versus observations (click for full size):

In this case, the models and observations have been plotted so that their respective 1979-2012 trend lines all intersect in 1979, which we believe is the most meaningful way to simultaneously plot the models’ results for comparison to the observations.

In my opinion, the day of reckoning has arrived. The modellers and the IPCC have willingly ignored the evidence for low climate sensitivity for many years, despite the fact that some of us have shown that simply confusing cause and effect when examining cloud and temperature variations can totally mislead you on cloud feedbacks (e.g. Spencer & Braswell, 2010). The discrepancy between models and observations is not a new issue…just one that is becoming more glaring over time.

It will be interesting to see how all of this plays out in the coming years. I frankly don’t see how the IPCC can keep claiming that the models are “not inconsistent with” the observations. Any sane person can see otherwise.

If the observations in the above graph were on the UPPER (warm) side of the models, do you really believe the modelers would not be falling all over themselves to see how much additional surface warming they could get their models to produce?

Hundreds of millions of dollars that have gone into the expensive climate modelling enterprise has all but destroyed governmental funding of research into natural sources of climate change. For years the modelers have maintained that there is no such thing as natural climate change…yet they now, ironically, have to invoke natural climate forces to explain why surface warming has essentially stopped in the last 15 years!

Forgive me if I sound frustrated, but we scientists who still believe that climate change can also be naturally forced have been virtually cut out of funding and publication by the ‘humans-cause-everything-bad-that-happens’ juggernaut. The public who funds their work will not stand for their willful blindness much longer.

STILL Epic Fail: 73 Climate Models vs. Measurements, Running 5-Year Means « Roy Spencer, PhD


Actually, the Earth has cooled 1degree in the the time so-called scientists claim that the Earth has warmed 1degree. My Global Warming Skepticism, for Dummies « Roy Spencer, PhD

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why does the AGWCult even bother with data? If you have Faith in AGW, you don't need data

 

[Wyatt earp]

Nobody noticed the OP mentions short time spans and the GW cult bases everything off of 150 year models?

150 years is not a short period, dummy.

Yes it is idiot when you are dealing with 4.5 billion years.

Using proxys they can not narrow it down to a hundred years it's a blip on a horses ass.

 

[TNHarley]

Nobody noticed the OP mentions short time spans and the GW cult bases everything off of 150 year models?

150 years is not a short period, dummy.

Wow and you call me the dummy

 

[waltky]

What may be confusing people is that currently the earth is experiencing the nadir of the solar cycle.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What may be confusing people is that currently the earth is experiencing the nadir of the solar cycle.

And by 'Confusing" you mean that's what causing the AGWCult to alter data, right?

 

[skookerasbil]

The Global Warming Statistical Meltdown

duh

rigging the data is ghey.

 

[skookerasbil]

And lets face it.......in 2015, nobody gives a rats ass about global warming. In 2014 in the mid-terms, every Dum candidate that ran on a climate change platform got their clock cleaned. Go check the record...........

Since 2008, this whole climate change ruse has been imploding, thus..............


[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/pew-report-climate-change_1.jpg.html][/URL]


The only people caring are the hard core alarmist nutters and the hopelessly duped.

 

[skookerasbil]

duh............

The fix is in s0ns........as it has always been for anybody who can connect the dots.

Capitulate to the Obama consensus or you will not be getting any federal funding s0ns!!

 

[jc456]

Nobody noticed the OP mentions short time spans and the GW cult bases everything off of 150 year models?

150 years is not a short period, dummy.

huh?

 

[skookerasbil]

Scientists explain how global warming deniers use short periods of time to prove that the planet has ceased to warm. They explain that when sufficiently long periods are examined, the warming trend always holds.


The study is a blow to conservatives who claim global warming stopped.

Link

New study finds ‘no substantive evidence’ of a global warming ‘pause’

"blow to conservatives"

No its not.......actually, far from it.

In 2015, nobody cares about the science ( see posts on this page ). Its not mattering in the real world. Maybe in the realm of the internet discourse but nowhere else. In other words, the "science" is having zero impact in the real world, most evidenced that renewable energy is still a joke with well less than 1% of electricity coming from solar and about 3% from wind. And all projections, including by the Obama Energy Information Agency, out to 2050 show renewables being just 10%. In other words, fossil fuels will DOMINATE well into this century = the science isn't mattering.

And China...............lmao..........China will be increasing its coal production 50% in the next 30 years!!

China’s Growing Coal Use Is World’s Growing Problem


duh

The folks aren't going to want to have their electricity rates DOUBLE in the next 5 years because some bozo in the White House is in debt to the green idiots.

 

[skookerasbil]

[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/China%20coal.gif.html][/URL]

The environmental k00ks.......cant connect the dots. Would prefer to self-insert the knobby cucumber because its the feel good thing to do.

Thank God there are enough reasoned people in America to recognize this ruse.

 

[Freewill]

Regardless, one thing is for certain. Humanity is a plague upon the Earth and our continued presence here is destroying the planet.​

You can't destroy the planet, unless it was blown up into little pieces.

That is entirely untrue. One does not have to blow up a canvas into tiny pieces to destroy a beautiful painting.​

Regardless, one thing is for certain. Humanity is a plague upon the Earth and our continued presence here is destroying the planet.​

Well then why dont you lead by example and remove yourself then, dear?

Suicide will never be as effective as genocide. The Earth needs a mass culling, by nature itself or by those in power.

​

the EARTH doesn't care, there is no EARTH as a person.

It doesn't matter. So many places that were once beautiful and thriving nature are now covered in roads and cities and trash or just completely destroyed. Pollution everywhere... in the cities, in the sky, in many places out in the wild, in the oceans, in space. Junk and trash and oil in the ocean and in lakes and rivers, nuclear waste dumbed into nature, Fukashima in Japan doing who knows what to the ocean and wildlife around it, discarded space junk in orbit around Earth, the destruction of beautiful ancient rain forests and entire ecosystems, the extinction of various beautiful animals due to Man's continued presence, the complete and utter defilement and desecration of nature.

Man likes to think of itself as the greatest creature to ever exist on this Earth. No... Man is the worst. That's just now. What will our planet look like a thousand years from now? Two thousand? Ten thousand? If in just the tiny window of time Man has existed it has already done all this and worse to the Earth, to its wildlife, and to each other, how then will Man exploit and trash the cosmos? Are other planets and solar systems destined to be infected with humanity and trashed, defiled and destroyed like Earth?

​

The painting is only beautiful because you or I say it is. Without us it might as well be dust.

 

[Freewill]

The environmental k00ks.......cant connect the dots. Would prefer to self-insert the knobby cucumber because its the feel good thing to do.

Thank God there are enough reasoned people in America to recognize this ruse.

Damn you chinesephobes, using facts and all.