Simple Question for Those Who Subscribe to AGW....

Discussion in 'Environment' started by SSDD, Jul 2, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    16,382
    Thanks Received:
    1,776
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +10,070
    What physical evidence supports the contention that carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels are the principal cause of global warming since 1970?

    If you have it....lets see it. If you don't....then lets hear your best excuse for not providing it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Fort Fun Indiana
    Online

    Fort Fun Indiana Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    33,075
    Thanks Received:
    2,094
    Trophy Points:
    1,155
    Ratings:
    +14,968
    Simple Question for Those Who Subscribe to AGW....

    I.E., the global scientific community. But you dont ply your nonsense with them, necause you qould get laughed out of the room. By the way, they are the ones who have the evidence.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. bear513
    Offline

    bear513 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    58,132
    Thanks Received:
    7,395
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +38,495
    Any links ?


    .
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
  4. Sunsettommy
    Online

    Sunsettommy Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Messages:
    3,226
    Thanks Received:
    649
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +3,731
    There is no such published paper of EMPIRICAL based research to support it. If there were, there wouldn't be HUNDREDS of NEW climate models, with NEW emission scenarios be published every 5 years in the IPCC report.

    There are many published papers using a lot of unverified modeling constructs, which means a lot of assumption, Kridging and infilling to make a half baked premise that CO2 is the dominant source of warming since the 1970's. It is IMPOSSIBLE since the increase of energy outflow from the planet always exceeds the postulated warm forcing increase of CO2.

    CO2 absorb and release IR energy, no heat is produced in the process, no change at all in its energy state if it emitted the same way it was absorbed.

    Climate models do NOT have demonstrated forecast skill, which is why every 5 years we get a new 100 + climate models in the IPCC report, it has become a waste of time continuing this line of failures. It is now a money trail and nothing more.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. Sunsettommy
    Online

    Sunsettommy Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Messages:
    3,226
    Thanks Received:
    649
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +3,731
    :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

    That was YOUR excuse for not providing the "physical evidence", which means you have nothing as usual.

    :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. MisterBeale
    Offline

    MisterBeale Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    21,629
    Thanks Received:
    4,230
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +18,364


    First, it is a bit disingenuous to say, "the global scientific community," because I don't really think they all subscribe to the belief that humans are the primary driver,

    Earth Science | Climate Change | Global Warming | Renewable Energy | Pollution Treatment | Renewable Energy | USA | Asia | Middle East| Lisbon | Portugal
    PLANETOPHYSICAL STATE OF THE EARTH AND LIFE
    Has Polar Shift caused Global Warming and Climate Change? | PSI Intl

    and,

    Second, has the scientific community always been completely accurate in all of it's hypothesis's?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    19,974
    Thanks Received:
    4,313
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +22,105
    Right out of the gate is an APPEAL TO AUTHORITY (based on failed modeling) and not one lick of empirical evidence... Bravo... You sir, are an idiot..
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  8. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    16,382
    Thanks Received:
    1,776
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +10,070
    Since there has never been a paper published in which the claimed warming has been empirically measured, quantified, and ascribed to greenhouse gasses...I will ask again...what physical evidence supports the claim that our CO2 emissions are the principle, or even a significant cause of global warming?

    Why not simply admit that you simply can't produce any evidence to support the claim because none exists...consensus is hardly evidence of anything scientific.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  9. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    16,382
    Thanks Received:
    1,776
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +10,070
    Anyone ever notice how alarmists tend to avoid any discussion that involves actual evidence like it was the plague?....and those who don't, offer up the same old logical fallacies that they believe represent something like evidence?...

    Consensus...as if that were imperial evidence of anything more than group think when it exists in the absence of an overwhelming body of observed, measured, incontrovertible evidence.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  10. jc456
    Offline

    jc456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    77,033
    Thanks Received:
    5,380
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +29,441
    No, no, their claim is CO2 adds energy. Your point is it doesn’t. You think one of these punks can prove just that?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page