Biden's support of EV transitioning due to Co2 emissions is so uninformed! He now blames high temperatures on Climate change!

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nope foolish.
Thats how Exxon increases the value of their stock. It’s called, a smart investment. You’re an idiot if you think they will continue to use their own product for electricity when renewables are cheaper.

If the government is going to hand them free money
to do something with renewables, they'll do it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You’re the fking moron. That’s from a blog post stupid.
No science involved foolish. You’re really being a dweeb.
You've produced no contrary evidrnce to the EPA estimate..

Your source that disproves your claim was a blog post? LOL!

It says the source is the DOE.

 

[Dagosa]

Your source that disproves your claim was a blog post? LOL!

It says the source is the DOE.

You’re all over the place…move on. You’re wrong again.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You’re all over the place…move on. You’re wrong again.

I used your source to show your claim was wrong.

And that confused you.

You're fucking hilarious!

 

[Dagosa]

I used your source to show your claim was wrong.

And that confused you.

You're fucking hilarious!

No you did not. The author was an effin blog

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No you did not. The author was an effin blog

Fucktard claim...

Fucktard links.....

Fucktard's linked blog....

Fucktard's link disproved fucktard's claim.

If the fucktard has a link that actually helps his claim, the fucktard
should post it......LOL......Fucktard.

 

[Dagosa]

I used your source to show your claim was wrong.

And that confused you.

You're fucking hilarious!

You are confused. You couldn’t refute that the amount of electricity used to refine a gallon of gasoline is enough to drive an EV farther then you can drive and ice on a gallon, to trying to show stupidly that it doesn't cost more to drive an EV the same number of miles as an ice car.
you’re effin wrong on both counts…..by a lot.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You are confused. You couldn’t refute that the amount of electricity used to refine a gallon of gasoline is enough to drive an EV farther then you can drive and ice on a gallon, to trying to show stupidly that it doesn't cost more to drive an EV the same number of miles as an ice car.
you’re effin wrong on both counts…..by a lot.

You couldn’t refute that the amount of electricity used to refine a gallon of gasoline is enough to drive an EV farther then you can drive and ice on a gallon,


This is consistent with refinery data. The Department of Energy estimates that refiners used 47 TWh of electricity in 2001 to produce refined products from 5.3 billion barrels of oil. Assuming that you get 42 gallons of refined products from each barrel of oil, this works out to about 0.2 kilowatt hours of electricity used for each gallon of gasoline produced.

DURR

 

[healthmyths]

I know that post made sense to you, but only you bubba. Over 90% of all ev charging is done at home idiot.

And where does the electricity come from that at home EV charging uses?

 

[Dagosa]

And where does the electricity come from that at home EV charging uses?

It doesn’t matter dufus. Even electricity from coal pollutes less than driving an ice car for ten years. You don‘t get it do you ? The US is simply replacing fossil fuel plants as their licensees run out. If you think EVs won’t ultimately replace ICE cars for personal transportation, you‘re Stupid.

 

[Dagosa]

Fucktard claim...

View attachment 838723


Fucktard links.....

View attachment 838725


Fucktard's linked blog....

View attachment 838726


Fucktard's link disproved fucktard's claim.

If the fucktard has a link that actually helps his claim, the fucktard
should post it......LOL......Fucktard.p

So you’re using the department of energy as your source ? Yes or No

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So you’re using the department of energy as your source ? Yes or No

If you don't like your sources refuting your claim, you should do better.

 

[Dagosa]

If you don't like your sources refuting your claim, you should do better.

Yes or no…are you using Joe Biden’s depart of energy as your source ? The one that is promoting climate change and agw…yes or no.

 

[Dagosa]

I used your source to show your claim was wrong.

And that confused you.

You're fucking hilarious!

You’re the one fked up. You used the department of energy as your source. You know, the one promotin* climate change….fk8ng * hypocrite.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes or no…are you using Joe Biden’s depart of energy as your source ? The one that is promoting climate change and agw…yes or no.

Are you disavowing your own source?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes or no…are you using Joe Biden’s depart of energy as your source ? The one that is promoting climate change and agw…yes or no.

Even Joe Biden’s department of energy thinks you're retarded.

 

[Dagosa]

Even Joe Biden’s department of energy thinks you're retarded.

Impossible. I do everything perfect. You’re a loser.

 

[Dagosa]

View attachment 838757

Are you disavowing your own source?

That’s you. Your own source calls CO2 a pollutant. Your own source promotes EVs as a cheaper pollution free alternative to ICE cars. The-only sources you can find are the prevarications of made up shit.

 

[Dagosa]

Even Joe Biden’s department of energy thinks you're retarded.

Gee, Joe’s department thinks climate change deniers are retards. Tell us again that you think co2 is not a pollutant. But what ever you do, don’t use any real science as a reference.

 

[Dagosa]

If the government is going to hand them free money
to do something with renewables, they'll do it.

And a lot more free money then they hand the EV makers.