Simple Question for Those Who Subscribe to AGW....

Discussion in 'Environment' started by SSDD, Jul 2, 2019.

  1. Sunsettommy
    Offline

    Sunsettommy Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Messages:
    2,796
    Thanks Received:
    521
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Ratings:
    +3,013
    Once again YOU FAILED to present EMPIRICAL evidence, far into the future Modeling scenarios are NOT empirical, it is unverified pseudoscience.

    It is clear you don't know what the NULL hypothesis is and that the concept of The Scientific Method is foreign to you.

    Why is SSDD's Question so difficult for you to answer?
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2019 at 6:29 PM
  2. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    17,559
    Thanks Received:
    3,773
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +18,085
    That is all you are doing... You cant even tell me what the base line hypothesis is and how its supposed to be accomplished. Thus you dont have a fucking clue other than what your masters tell you to spout...
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    76,686
    Thanks Received:
    5,066
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +19,774
    Yes, you want evidence that isn't possible. But the fact is all the non empirical evidence suggests man caused global warming, and evolution. But you deny both right?

    Everything you say is right wing spin. Every argument you make, a scientist has explained the flaw in your thinking, but you keep thinking the same things. Fuck the facts right?

    If it was your love one who was murdered and they didn't have any empirical evidence you'd want the jury to convict if there were 1000 pieces of unempirical evidence right?
     
  4. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    76,686
    Thanks Received:
    5,066
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +19,774
    Yes, base line hypothesis This is the kind of shit a stupid Republican says that is typically an argument made in order to confuse and distract from all the real evidence.

    base line hypothesis? What is your base line hypotheis based on empirical evidence?

    And guess what? The scientists on this planet say you are wrong. Your reply back to that is that there is a vast scientific conspiracy among the scientific community. You're a fucking loon.
     
  5. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    76,686
    Thanks Received:
    5,066
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +19,774
    You and Trump sound just like the idiots on Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. YOUR Masters.

    Have you watched the movie about Fox News and Roger Ailes? They are lying to you dude. They invented that media to brainwash right wing fucktards in our society. They give you your talking points.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    17,559
    Thanks Received:
    3,773
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +18,085
    :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

    You are hilarious... There is ample empirically observed evidence that AGW is not happening. As all of your predictive models fail empirical review, you have no proof of anything and yet you want us to "believe"...

    A religion based on feelings... Nice... No thank You!
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  7. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    17,559
    Thanks Received:
    3,773
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +18,085
    Considering Trumps IQ is 182 and he is creating millions of jobs and cutting the red tape of Marxism you all are trying to employ, I will wear that as a badge of honor...
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    76,686
    Thanks Received:
    5,066
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +19,774
    Yes his IQ is 182 and he is 6'3 and 220 lbs. LOL
     
  9. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    76,686
    Thanks Received:
    5,066
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +19,774
    Sorry but since we lack empirical evidence I'm basing my belief on pure logic

    Empirical evidence is verifiable by observation rather than theory or logic.

    You don't have a theory or logic. You certainly don't have a scientific theory.

    The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is extremely likely (greater than 95 percent probability) to be the result of human activity since the mid-20th century and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented over decades to millennia.1

    Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. This body of data, collected over many years, reveals the signals of a changing climate.

    The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.2 Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.

    Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. Ancient evidence can also be found in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. This ancient, or paleoclimate, evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming.3

    The planet's average surface temperature has risen about 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.9 degrees Celsius) since the late 19th century, a change driven largely by increased carbon dioxide and other human-made emissions into the atmosphere.4 Most of the warming occurred in the past 35 years, with the five warmest years on record taking place since 2010. Not only was 2016 the warmest year on record, but eight of the 12 months that make up the year — from January through September, with the exception of June — were the warmest on record for those respective months.

    I could go on and on. This is all from NASA you schmuck. Flat earth mother fuckers.
     
  10. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    17,559
    Thanks Received:
    3,773
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +18,085
    Your IQ is <0 And your a dupe, useful Idiot... Nothing more..

    You still haven't explained the Hypothesis nor have you explained why all modeling fails... Why is that?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page