Zone1 Should E. Jean Carroll Receive $83M?

I saw an interview and that woman is wayyyy out there.

If she was coming after a democrat politician she’d have been laughed out of court. But we are in the times of “anything to get Trump”.. and court judges will sacrifice their professional obligations just this once to get the guy they hate it seems
 
Absolutely. Most of that isn't for emotional damages, it's punative damages in order to force Trump to comply with the court decision. He went to court and the jury and the law found him liable for defamation. The purpose of the lawsuit and monetary damages beyond the harm his defamatory statements caused, is to compel Trump to stop his defamation. The lawyers for Carroll used Trump's own claims about his wealth and examples of his continued defamation of Carroll while the trial for damages was going on, as reasons for why the penalty needed to be that high in order to compel someone like Trump, with the resources he has, to desist with his defamation.
 
I saw an interview and that woman is wayyyy out there.

If she was coming after a democrat politician she’d have been laughed out of court. But we are in the times of “anything to get Trump”.. and court judges will sacrifice their professional obligations just this once to get the guy they hate it seems

Trump has bragged about assaulting women for 40 years. He thinks that makes him an alpha male. There's 15 hours of his oral diarrhea about his sex life on Howard Stern. He even humiliated Melania and Marla Maples with his bragging.

The man is a pig .. He doesn't even like women. Look at his most recent attack on Taylor Swift.
 
Trump has bragged about assaulting women for 40 years. He thinks that makes him an alpha male. There's 15 hours of his oral diarrhea about his sex life on Howard Stern. He even humiliated Melania and Marla Maples with his bragging.

The man is a pig .. He doesn't even like women. Look at his most recent attack on Taylor Swift.
I think he’s sleazy and immoral in his sex life. That doesn’t make him a criminal guilty of SA or rape, nor does it disqualify him from being president (Bill Clinton)
 
I think he’s sleazy and immoral in his sex life. That doesn’t make him a criminal guilty of SA or rape, nor does it disqualify him from being president (Bill Clinton)
Who said he was criminally guilty of rape? He was found civilly liable for lying about the victim of his sexual assault. Now while there is no law barring a civilly liable defamer of his own victim of sexual assault, it is a pretty clear indication of being a deplorable mutant to vote for that.
 
no

excessive

Depends.

Let's assume that FPOTUS#45 is a Billionare to the tune of $3,000,000,000.

Punitive damages are to cause the person not to repeat the action that caused the damage in the first place

The first trial had a $5M award ($2M in compensatory damages and $3M in punitive damages) that FPOTUS#45 ignored and continued to defame her. So the second awarded of $83M consisted of $18M in compensatory damages and $65M in punitive damages. The second compensatory damages was based on $6M in injuries and $12M based on expert testimony in the cost of repairing the damage at the national level. National level is important because FPOTUS#45 got to defame her at the national level through the office of the President.

So we can see the increase in damages is mostly due to the punitive damage increase because FPOTUS#45 ignored the first ruling.

To put this in perspective. $3M in punitive damages is 0.17% of net worth. $65M in punitive is 2.167% of net worth. To someone who makes $100,000, that is equivalent to punitive damages of $170 for the first ruling and $2,167 for the second ruling.

So the question becomes are punitive damages of 0.17% and 2.167% excessive?

WW
 
I think he’s sleazy and immoral in his sex life. That doesn’t make him a criminal guilty of SA or rape, nor does it disqualify him from being president (Bill Clinton)

How on earth can you compare Bill Clinton with Trump? Clinton was well spoken, well liked and a Rhodes scholar. Clinton couldn't keep it in his pants either, but women liked him.
 
How on earth can you compare Bill Clinton with Trump? Clinton was well spoken, well liked and a Rhodes scholar. Clinton couldn't keep it in his pants either, but women liked him.
Women obviously liked Trump over the years or he wouldn’t pull all the tail he did.

Trump was well liked as a New York Democrat, the elite media/leftist institutions only turned on him when he became a pro-USA Republican.

You’re trying to rewrite history to simplify things, but Trump was very well-liked by your heroes before. You can sell your BS to 20 year old morons, but most of us were there
 
How on earth can you compare Bill Clinton with Trump? Clinton was well spoken, well liked and a Rhodes scholar. Clinton couldn't keep it in his pants either, but women liked him.
Who raped numerous women…..
 
She lied about the clothes she was wearing. That alone will get the verdict tossed on appeal, and there are numerous other reason both verdicts will get tossed.

She's a liar and everyone knows it. Sue me, bitch.
 
No, she did not lie about her clothes. And Trump won't appeal because he does not want to post a bond for the entire amount as required by law. The law is what excalibur calls 'lawfare.' He does not like the law, because it holds us accountable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top