Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.None of this has been doneLOL... It is implied...Then you admit that there is no where in the constitution that a full house vote is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Thank you.
Says you, citing you.
No where in the constitution itself does it say that an impeachment inquiry requires a full vote of the House.
And the house isn't bound to what YOU insist the constitution is supposed to mean, and any extra-constittional requirement that you make up. Constitutionally, you're nobody, Billy.
Get used to the idea
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Impeachment is not only possible, its probable. The House is controlled by democrats. And support for impeachment is climbing rapidlyYou've been watching too many episodes of Law and Order.
The power to impeach lies solely with the House. The Senate gets no say whatsoever whether a President is impeached or not. There's no mention in the constitution for a 'motion to dismiss' anything. Let alone impeachment. Let alone the Senate.
The house sets up a trial
The senate decides who is guilty and will decide the house as guilty
No impeachment of the president will come
But trump may call out the military on the crooked congress and. Set up logic tests for voters
Call out the military and do what? Arrest congress for engaging in a constitutional process?
Good luck with that.
No impeachment from a crooked house would be recognized by the real power
Says you, citing you. Back in reality, the constitution grants the house sole authority over impeachment. If they vote to impeach, a president iis impeached.
Your 'recognition' is irrelevant.
The real power will recognize the house as guilty of high treason
Treason is the only crime defined by the constitution. And it has nothing to do with impeachment inquiries.
Again, you're just offering us meaningless pseudo-legal babble.
Treason is weakening our nation and making our enemies stronger.
Yes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.None of this has been doneLOL... It is implied...
Says you, citing you.
No where in the constitution itself does it say that an impeachment inquiry requires a full vote of the House.
And the house isn't bound to what YOU insist the constitution is supposed to mean, and any extra-constittional requirement that you make up. Constitutionally, you're nobody, Billy.
Get used to the idea
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
Yes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.None of this has been doneSays you, citing you.
No where in the constitution itself does it say that an impeachment inquiry requires a full vote of the House.
And the house isn't bound to what YOU insist the constitution is supposed to mean, and any extra-constittional requirement that you make up. Constitutionally, you're nobody, Billy.
Get used to the idea
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
You are wrong by the majority of americsn men
It doesn't have to say "The full House". It says "The House". It doesn't say "the Speaker and a highly partisan committee chairman". "The House" means "The House", ALL OF IT. I have no doubt the left will continue to ignore the Constitution anyway but if they think the American people won't object to their tactics, they're making a mistake and will pay dearly for it in 2020.I will repeat, the Constitution It is very explicit... THE HOUSE MUST ACT to do anything on impeachment.U.S. Senate Rejects The Impeachment from the House of Representatives due to the fact that it is Illegitimate because the House never held a vote...forces House Democrats - to include those 'vulnerable' - to either officially going on record as being for Impeachment or drop it....?!
And show us where in the constitution a full vote of the House is necessary to conduct an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Show us. Don't tell us.
Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states: "The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."
Read the Constitution, it explicitly states the "House of Representatives shall" and "sole power" not piglosie will...
There is nothing ambiguous about how it is written..
pay attention.. "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."
Now read it slowly.... If the House of Representatives has the sole power, how do they start?
Please tell me how you can start impeachment anything without the consent of the HOR.
DO YOU HAVE CONSENT OF THE HOR where SOLE POWER TO IMPEACH RESIDES?
Yes or No
Can you show us anywhere in the constitution where it says the full house must vote on an impeachment inquiry?
Yes or no?
You are right up to Dems losing power-there are too many of them to landslide over-maybe 20 seats lost at most.Senate "Motion To Dismiss" Impeachment....
Right off the top this is MY TAKE ON WHAT IS COMING..... THIS IS MY OPINION!
After talking with friends about this whole Impeachment circus I asked the question, What happens in the senate if this circus actually is voted into existence and sent to trial?
Here is what I think will happen. There will be a motion to dismiss as the Impeachment process was illegitimate in the House and no consent was given to proceed. The motion will be on Constitutional grounds and the denial of Democrats to afford republicans equal access to mount a defense of the president.
This motion will be sent to the presiding Judge, The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Of The Untied States who will call a vote of the Senate on the motion.
The Impeachment will be thrown out on grounds of improper process and killed..
The House will look like fools and there will be a media circus through the election showing the anti-republic democrats as the control fanatics they are.. They Will lose the house and have no seat of power.
It doesn't have to say "The full House". It says "The House". It doesn't say "the Speaker and a highly partisan committee chairman". "The House" means "The House", ALL OF IT. I have no doubt the left will continue to ignore the Constitution anyway but if they think the American people won't object to their tactics they're making a mistake and will pay dearly for it in 2020.I will repeat, the Constitution It is very explicit... THE HOUSE MUST ACT to do anything on impeachment.U.S. Senate Rejects The Impeachment from the House of Representatives due to the fact that it is Illegitimate because the House never held a vote...forces House Democrats - to include those 'vulnerable' - to either officially going on record as being for Impeachment or drop it....?!
And show us where in the constitution a full vote of the House is necessary to conduct an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Show us. Don't tell us.
Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states: "The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."
Read the Constitution, it explicitly states the "House of Representatives shall" and "sole power" not piglosie will...
There is nothing ambiguous about how it is written..
pay attention.. "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."
Now read it slowly.... If the House of Representatives has the sole power, how do they start?
Please tell me how you can start impeachment anything without the consent of the HOR.
DO YOU HAVE CONSENT OF THE HOR where SOLE POWER TO IMPEACH RESIDES?
Yes or No
Can you show us anywhere in the constitution where it says the full house must vote on an impeachment inquiry?
Yes or no?
Yes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.None of this has been done
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
You are wrong by the majority of americsn men
So that's a no on finding anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Thank you.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & ArchivesYes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.None of this has been doneLOL... It is implied...
Says you, citing you.
No where in the constitution itself does it say that an impeachment inquiry requires a full vote of the House.
And the house isn't bound to what YOU insist the constitution is supposed to mean, and any extra-constittional requirement that you make up. Constitutionally, you're nobody, Billy.
Get used to the idea
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
Yes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
You are wrong by the majority of americsn men
So that's a no on finding anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Thank you.
Again you are wrong what is the real law
One real law is men stopping women
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & ArchivesYes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.None of this has been doneSays you, citing you.
No where in the constitution itself does it say that an impeachment inquiry requires a full vote of the House.
And the house isn't bound to what YOU insist the constitution is supposed to mean, and any extra-constittional requirement that you make up. Constitutionally, you're nobody, Billy.
Get used to the idea
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry
Yes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
You are wrong by the majority of americsn men
So that's a no on finding anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Thank you.
Again you are wrong what is the real law
One real law is men stopping women
And by 'real law', you once again mean your imagination.
Alas, your imagination is constittutionally irrelevant as well.
Not irrelevant. If they dismiss the case it would correctly deem the charges NOT WORTHY of a trial, which they are not.The Senate has full power over an Impeachment TRIAL if this nonsense progresses that far. So If the Senate has FULL POWER over a trial, that would include the power to dismiss the case based on the charges not rising to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.You've been watching too many episodes of Law and Order.Senate "Motion To Dismiss" Impeachment....
Right off the top this is MY TAKE ON WHAT IS COMING..... THIS IS MY OPINION!
After talking with friends about this whole Impeachment circus I asked the question, What happens in the senate if this circus actually is voted into existence and sent to trial?
Here is what I think will happen. There will be a motion to dismiss as the Impeachment process was illegitimate in the House and no consent was given to proceed. The motion will be on Constitutional grounds and the denial of Democrats to afford republicans equal access to mount a defense of the president.
This motion will be sent to the presiding Judge, The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Of The Untied States who will call a vote of the Senate on the motion.
The Impeachment will be thrown out on grounds of improper process and killed..
The House will look like fools and there will be a media circus through the election showing the anti-republic democrats as the control fanatics they are.. They Will lose the house and have no seat of power.
The power to impeach lies solely with the House. The Senate gets no say whatsoever whether a President is impeached or not. There's no mention in the constitution for a 'motion to dismiss' anything. Let alone impeachment. Let alone the Senate.
The 'dismissal' would be irrelevant. Either they convict or they don't. Regardless of their decision, the President would remain impeached. And the senate either removes the president or they don't. Those are the only two options.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & ArchivesYes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.None of this has been done
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry
That's not the constitution of the United States. This is:
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Show me in the constitution where a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry
That comes from the house of representatives it's their words.Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & ArchivesYes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.None of this has been done
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry
That's not the constitution of the United States. This is:
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Show me in the constitution where a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry
Not at all. As the republican lead House demonstrated elegantly, investigations don't require votes.Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & ArchivesYes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry
That's not the constitution of the United States. This is:
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Show me in the constitution where a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry
Foolish person
For the house to do ANYTHING they must all vote
The full house has to vote
Not at all. As the republican lead House demonstrated elegantly, investigations don't require votes.Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & ArchivesYes there is a requirement for a vote of the whole house. I even provided the House source.
Not in the constitution there isn't. If you believe othewise, show us anywhere in the constitution that a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry.
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Go ahead. I'll wait.
Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry
That's not the constitution of the United States. This is:
Constitution of the United States - We the People
Show me in the constitution where a full vote of the House is required for an impeachment inquiry
Foolish person
For the house to do ANYTHING they must all vote
