Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's the difference? LOL!
I'll try to explain down to your room temperature IQ.
When you increase the cost of something, people tend to buy less of that good or service.
Obama wants to hike the cost of carbon, to save the Earth, because people will use less carbon.
If you increase the cost of your unskilled labor, businesses will use less unskilled labor.
You see they can invest capital in technology to replace that unskilled labor.
Now if you reduce the tax burden on labor, by cutting taxes, people have an incentive to work more.
For example, if a second wage earner in the home has a tax burden of 50%, they'll be more likely to work part time rather than full time.
The lower after tax income might even cause them to prefer not to work at all.
Cut that tax burden, the incentive shifts toward work.
The cost of not working increases as taxes drop.
Let me know if there is anything else I can clear up for you.
I'm always happy to educate an ignorant liberal.
Whatever that gibberish is supposed to mean notwithstanding,
what's the difference between a 100 dollar a week tax cut and a 100 dollar a week wage increase?
what's the difference between a 100 dollar a week tax cut and a 100 dollar a week wage increase?
you get less money in your pocket with the wage increase verse a a tax cut
If raising the minimum wage costs jobs somewhere, so does cutting taxes.
More retarded straw-man idiocy from retards who have nothing.
$100/hr is a bad idea? Why?
For the same reason that just because lowering taxes might be economically beneficial, lowering taxes to zero and collected no revenue whatsoever for the government to operate might be stupid.
Obama Quietly Sends $1.6 Billion to Pakistan » The Free PatriotBarack Obama personally slashed the annual pay raise for the members of the Armed Forces almost in half last month from 1.8 percent to 1.0 percent. Citing serious economic conditions affecting the general welfare of the nation as his rationale, seven weeks later the same Obama Administration was able to release $1,600,000,000 worth of American taxpayer money to Pakistan, as reported by ABC News on Oct. 19, 2013.
Whatever that gibberish is supposed to mean notwithstanding,
what's the difference between a 100 dollar a week tax cut and a 100 dollar a week wage increase?
what's the difference between a 100 dollar a week tax cut and a 100 dollar a week wage increase?
you get less money in your pocket with the wage increase verse a a tax cut
A tax cut spikes deficit spending, inflation, prices, poverty, job loss, unemployment, more population on government dole, which leads to higher taxes.
A wage minimum increase gets people off government dole, shrinks government services, lowers taxes, increases jobs, lowers deficit spending, lowers inflation.
what's the difference between a 100 dollar a week tax cut and a 100 dollar a week wage increase?
you get less money in your pocket with the wage increase verse a a tax cut
A tax cut spikes deficit spending, inflation, prices, poverty, job loss, unemployment, more population on government dole, which leads to higher taxes.
A wage minimum increase gets people off government dole, shrinks government services, lowers taxes, increases jobs, lowers deficit spending, lowers inflation.
stop it
do the math if your taxes are cut by a 100 dollars
you have a extra 100 dollars in your pocket
if you get a raise of a 100 dollars
uncle sam and others take a cut of it 15 percent or more
in a tax cut = 100 dollars
in a raise = 85 dollars or less after taxes
oh DARN say it ain't so
SNIP:
SeaTac workers not happy with $15 min. wage
Published May 28, 2014
sea tac
Last January, SeaTac implemented a $15 per hour minimum wage for hospitality and transportation workers. The consequences to the drastic hike in wages are just beginning to be realizedand its not pretty.
A writer for NW Asian Weekly recently blogged about her experience attending an event at a SeaTac hotel. She asked employees if they were happy with the $15 wage. The ensuing conversations,
It sounds good, but its not good, the woman said.
Why? I asked.
I lost my 401k, health insurance, paid holiday, and vacation, she responded. No more free food, she added.
The hotel used to feed her. Now, she has to bring her own food. Also, no overtime, she said. She used to work extra hours and received overtime pay.
What else? I asked.
I have to pay for parking, she said.
I then asked the part-time waitress, who was part of the catering staff.
Yes, Ive got $15 an hour, but all my tips are now much less, she said. Before the new wage law was implemented, her hourly wage was $7. But her tips added to more than $15 an hour. Yes, she used to receive free food and parking. Now, she has to bring her own food and pay for parking.
FROM:
SeaTac workers ?not happy? with $15 min. wage
oh DARN say it ain't so
SNIP:
SeaTac workers “not happy” with $15 min. wage
Published May 28, 2014
sea tac
Last January, SeaTac implemented a $15 per hour minimum wage for hospitality and transportation workers. The consequences to the drastic hike in wages are just beginning to be realized—and it’s not pretty.
A writer for NW Asian Weekly recently blogged about her experience attending an event at a SeaTac hotel. She asked employees if they were “happy with the $15 wage.” The ensuing conversations,
“It sounds good, but it’s not good,” the woman said.
“Why?” I asked.
“I lost my 401k, health insurance, paid holiday, and vacation,” she responded. “No more free food,” she added.
“The hotel used to feed her. Now, she has to bring her own food. Also, no overtime, she said. She used to work extra hours and received overtime pay.
“What else? I asked.
“I have to pay for parking,” she said.
“I then asked the part-time waitress, who was part of the catering staff.
“Yes, I’ve got $15 an hour, but all my tips are now much less,” she said. Before the new wage law was implemented, her hourly wage was $7. But her tips added to more than $15 an hour. Yes, she used to receive free food and parking. Now, she has to bring her own food and pay for parking.”
FROM:
SeaTac workers ?not happy? with $15 min. wage
None of this is a surpirse.
oh DARN say it ain't so
SNIP:
SeaTac workers not happy with $15 min. wage
Published May 28, 2014
sea tac
Last January, SeaTac implemented a $15 per hour minimum wage for hospitality and transportation workers. The consequences to the drastic hike in wages are just beginning to be realizedand its not pretty.
A writer for NW Asian Weekly recently blogged about her experience attending an event at a SeaTac hotel. She asked employees if they were happy with the $15 wage. The ensuing conversations,
It sounds good, but its not good, the woman said.
Why? I asked.
I lost my 401k, health insurance, paid holiday, and vacation, she responded. No more free food, she added.
The hotel used to feed her. Now, she has to bring her own food. Also, no overtime, she said. She used to work extra hours and received overtime pay.
What else? I asked.
I have to pay for parking, she said.
I then asked the part-time waitress, who was part of the catering staff.
Yes, Ive got $15 an hour, but all my tips are now much less, she said. Before the new wage law was implemented, her hourly wage was $7. But her tips added to more than $15 an hour. Yes, she used to receive free food and parking. Now, she has to bring her own food and pay for parking.
FROM:
SeaTac workers ?not happy? with $15 min. wage
I don't think they want to discuss unions driving businesses out of business, Mr. Toddsterpatriot.Increasing minimum wage increases jobs & lowers unemployment rates.
Good to know.
Let's raise it to $100/hr.
When reality is an argument you can't win, create a fantasy argument.
$100/hr is a fantasy? Why?
Imagine all the demand that will be created.
And the tax revenues for government? Incredible!!!
Make it happen.
What's the difference? If a tax cut gave me an extra hundred dollars a week, or a wage increase gave me an extra hundred dollars a week...
What's the difference? LOL!
I'll try to explain down to your room temperature IQ.
When you increase the cost of something, people tend to buy less of that good or service.
Obama wants to hike the cost of carbon, to save the Earth, because people will use less carbon.
If you increase the cost of your unskilled labor, businesses will use less unskilled labor.
You see they can invest capital in technology to replace that unskilled labor.
Now if you reduce the tax burden on labor, by cutting taxes, people have an incentive to work more.
For example, if a second wage earner in the home has a tax burden of 50%, they'll be more likely to work part time rather than full time.
The lower after tax income might even cause them to prefer not to work at all.
Cut that tax burden, the incentive shifts toward work.
The cost of not working increases as taxes drop.
Let me know if there is anything else I can clear up for you.
I'm always happy to educate an ignorant liberal.
Whatever that gibberish is supposed to mean notwithstanding,
what's the difference between a 100 dollar a week tax cut and a 100 dollar a week wage increase?
More retarded straw-man idiocy from retards who have nothing.
$100/hr is a bad idea? Why?
For the same reason that just because lowering taxes might be economically beneficial, lowering taxes to zero and collected no revenue whatsoever for the government to operate might be stupid.
You are having the government artificially increase the cost of labor. What happens when you raise prices? People stop purchasing that product or service.
It's basic economics.
You might as well be saying that regulating immigration is a case of the government artificially increasing the cost of labor because in a free market the free flow of labor across the border would drive down wages.
A tax cut spikes deficit spending, inflation, prices, poverty, job loss, unemployment, more population on government dole, which leads to higher taxes.
A wage minimum increase gets people off government dole, shrinks government services, lowers taxes, increases jobs, lowers deficit spending, lowers inflation.
stop it
do the math if your taxes are cut by a 100 dollars
you have a extra 100 dollars in your pocket
if you get a raise of a 100 dollars
uncle sam and others take a cut of it 15 percent or more
in a tax cut = 100 dollars
in a raise = 85 dollars or less after taxes
You are math clueless. Deficit spending under Bush tax cut took gas price up 600%, Food up 400%, Housing up 400%, Gold up 600%, Land up 400%, Oil up 1000%, Utilities up 400%, etc.
So right wingers are going to abandon Seattle because the burgers cost a dollar more? Better start this in solid Democrat states then.
stop it
do the math if your taxes are cut by a 100 dollars
you have a extra 100 dollars in your pocket
if you get a raise of a 100 dollars
uncle sam and others take a cut of it 15 percent or more
in a tax cut = 100 dollars
in a raise = 85 dollars or less after taxes
You are math clueless. Deficit spending under Bush tax cut took gas price up 600%, Food up 400%, Housing up 400%, Gold up 600%, Land up 400%, Oil up 1000%, Utilities up 400%, etc.
That's awful (and really bad math), but Obama's deficit spending has been much higher than Bush's deficit spending.
