SCOTUS Why Breyer is Wrong

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Annie, Jan 13, 2005.

  1. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
  2. Hobbit
    Offline

    Hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    5,099
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Near Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +421
    What about the Constitution? What about the legislature? What about the FRICKIN PEOPLE?! Did I miss something or did he just admit the Supreme Court does whatever the Hell it wants? I think this guy needs a reminder of where power is ultimately derived, the people. We should just impeach him and be done with it. Make an example of him. While I do believe the Supreme Court seats shouldn't just change hands, we need to reign in their power.
     
  3. Merlin1047
    Offline

    Merlin1047 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    3,500
    Thanks Received:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    AL
    Ratings:
    +450
    I'll say it again - judges at ALL levels need to be elected by the people not appointed by politicians. Supreme court and federal district court judges need to be limited to serve not more than 10 years.

    We the people need to get control of the rogue liberals who sit on the benches of our courts and pull rulings out of their butts like so many rabbits out of a magician's hat.
     
  4. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    12,887
    Thanks Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,159
    Thank God for Scalia. We need a dozen more just like him.

    We also need to kick out Ruth Bader-Ginsberg, former ACLU communist, who is actively leading the Court into the swamp of international law which will have the ultimate result of destroying our Sovereignty and thus our Constitution as the highest law of our land.
     
  5. pegwinn
    Offline

    pegwinn Top of the Food Chain

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,549
    Thanks Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +329
    I think that judges at the local level should be elected. I think that judges at the Federal Level should be appointed and confirmed like today. I think the USSC should be appointed by the president, debated by congress and then confirmed by the STATES. And it should be for life. Life appointments assure that the process is very well scrutinized. Anyone other than the USSC should be limited to reconfirming every few years or so. But who am I kidding, we can't get term limits for our own congress.
     
  6. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    I would like some limitations considered, but I would come out against electing judges. Very few people ever have dealings with the courts; understand the adversarial system, much less the Constitution; or have even an inkling of interest in decisions.

    The worst judges are the elected ones, already done at most local levels.

    Just my opinion.
     
  7. Merlin1047
    Offline

    Merlin1047 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    3,500
    Thanks Received:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    AL
    Ratings:
    +450
    I hardly think that statement is either fair or accurate. Why would you suggest that a person appointed by a politician is somehow a better judge than a person elected by the people?
     
  8. pegwinn
    Offline

    pegwinn Top of the Food Chain

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,549
    Thanks Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +329
    Just my two cents but I think she is alluding to the part time judge / full time politician syndrome. Personally I think local judges are more in tune with the locals who voted em in. Meaning that tarant county texas judges know the voters are tough on crime and if the judge wants to continue being a judge, he better be as well.
     
  9. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Merlin, what I've noticed is that the 'pols' are picking the slate of judges, making them much more open to pandering and such.

    I agree that the appointments have their problems also, such as payback for favors, but seems to happen less, due to legislature balance-'advise & consent'. The executive wants to be able to 'brag' on bar approval and such.

    It could just be that I'm from 'Chicago' area.
     

Share This Page