Sarah Quits Again!

[Dr.House]

Uninformed sources claim that Palin gassed up at BP!!!!!!!!*

OMFG!!!

If this is true!!!!!!!

ZOMG!!!


*I have no information on where the Palin bus buys there's gas, but if she did buy gas at BP well, that's front page news!

That's where 0bama's Car Force One fuled up in England too...

True story...

 

[oreo]

Sarah Palin Reportedly Quits Bus Tour Halfway Through


Former half-term Gov. Sarah Palin has reportedly packed in her bus tour...halfway through.

Real Clear Politics is reporting that Palin and her family have returned to Alaska from their "One Nation" bus tour, despite tentatively scheduled stops in Iowa and South Carolina.

From Scott Conroy at RCP:

Though Palin and her staff never announced a timeline for the remaining legs of her trip, aides had drafted preliminary itineraries that would have taken her through the Midwest and Southeast at some point this month. But those travel blueprints are now in limbo, RCP has learned, as Palin and her family have reverted to the friendly confines of summertime Alaska, where the skies are currently alight for over 19 hours a day and the Bristol Bay salmon fishing season is nearing its peak.​

Palin's intent to visit Iowa and South Carolina, as well as one stop in New Hampshire, caused some speculation that she was starting to get serious about a run for president in 2012.

The bus tour was launched over Memorial Day weekend, and was particularly scrutinized after one event in Boston where Palin badly flubbed the story behind Paul Revere's ride.

How do you know that Palin quit the tour early--she didn't give ANYONE her itinerary?

 

[oldsalt]

Sarah Palin Reportedly Quits Bus Tour Halfway Through


Former half-term Gov. Sarah Palin has reportedly packed in her bus tour...halfway through.

Real Clear Politics is reporting that Palin and her family have returned to Alaska from their "One Nation" bus tour, despite tentatively scheduled stops in Iowa and South Carolina.

From Scott Conroy at RCP:

Though Palin and her staff never announced a timeline for the remaining legs of her trip, aides had drafted preliminary itineraries that would have taken her through the Midwest and Southeast at some point this month. But those travel blueprints are now in limbo, RCP has learned, as Palin and her family have reverted to the friendly confines of summertime Alaska, where the skies are currently alight for over 19 hours a day and the Bristol Bay salmon fishing season is nearing its peak.​

Palin's intent to visit Iowa and South Carolina, as well as one stop in New Hampshire, caused some speculation that she was starting to get serious about a run for president in 2012.

The bus tour was launched over Memorial Day weekend, and was particularly scrutinized after one event in Boston where Palin badly flubbed the story behind Paul Revere's ride.

How do you know that Palin quit the tour early--she didn't give ANYONE her itinerary?

Yeah! She's coming back to watch her beloved documentary 'Undefeated' in IA....

 

[Si modo]

So, if one makes tentative arrangements and can't or won't confirm them, they are quitting.

Funny how the mind of the left operates.

 

[oldsalt]

So, if one makes tentative arrangements and can't or won't confirm them, they are quitting.

Funny how the mind of the left operates.

Defending palin's nonsense makes you look the fool.

 

[Si modo]

So, if one makes tentative arrangements and can't or won't confirm them, they are quitting.

Funny how the mind of the left operates.

Defending palin's nonsense makes you look the fool.

See, I don't like Palin much at all and most posters who pay attention know that. I don't really care what an anonymous poster on a message board thinks of me or not. Just in case you care, I am pretty sure you look foolish now. Just FYI.

I do know that I am mostly an objective person and use objective arguments. So, you might want to give it a try. Of course, that may fuck with the silly premise of this thread, so I can understand your resistance to do so.

 

[Synthaholic]

So, if one makes tentative arrangements and can't or won't confirm them, they are quitting.

Funny how the mind of the left operates.

Did she make "tentative arrangements" to serve as Governor?

 

[Si modo]

So, if one makes tentative arrangements and can't or won't confirm them, they are quitting.

Funny how the mind of the left operates.

Did she make "tentative arrangements" to serve as Governor?

Nope. But what does that have to do with your topic?









Idiot.

 

[Synthaholic]

So, if one makes tentative arrangements and can't or won't confirm them, they are quitting.

Funny how the mind of the left operates.

Did she make "tentative arrangements" to serve as Governor?

Nope. But what does that have to do with your topic?









Idiot.

Then you agree that she is a quitter?

 

[Si modo]

Did she make "tentative arrangements" to serve as Governor?

Nope. But what does that have to do with your topic?









Idiot.

Then you agree that she is a quitter?

She quit the governorship.

But, I don't agree that she is a quitter. I would need some sort of established pattern of quitting to generalize any person as a quitter. One example does not establish a pattern of behavior. And this thread does nothing to demonstrate any pattern to do so.

 

[Synthaholic]

Nope. But what does that have to do with your topic?









Idiot.

Then you agree that she is a quitter?

She quit the governorship.

But, I don't agree that she is a quitter. I would need some sort of established pattern of quitting to generalize any person as a quitter. One example does not establish a pattern of behavior. And this thread does nothing to demonstrate any pattern to do so.

Hmmm....how about a rapist? Do you need to see a pattern of rapes first?

 

[Si modo]

Then you agree that she is a quitter?

She quit the governorship.

But, I don't agree that she is a quitter. I would need some sort of established pattern of quitting to generalize any person as a quitter. One example does not establish a pattern of behavior. And this thread does nothing to demonstrate any pattern to do so.

Hmmm....how about a rapist? Do you need to see a pattern of rapes first?

No, but I'm not an idiot who equates rape with quitting a job, either.

 

[Synthaholic]

She quit the governorship.

But, I don't agree that she is a quitter. I would need some sort of established pattern of quitting to generalize any person as a quitter. One example does not establish a pattern of behavior. And this thread does nothing to demonstrate any pattern to do so.

Hmmm....how about a rapist? Do you need to see a pattern of rapes first?

No, but I'm not an idiot who equates rape with quitting a job, either.

I'm not equating them, I'm asking you why one needs a pattern and the other doesn't?

 

[Si modo]

Hmmm....how about a rapist? Do you need to see a pattern of rapes first?

No, but I'm not an idiot who equates rape with quitting a job, either.

I'm not equating them, I'm asking you why one needs a pattern and the other doesn't?

Because one rape makes a rapist just as one murder makes a murderer. It's that silly thing called the law.

Quitting a job is not against the law, unless you want to bring back indentured servitude.

But, you certainly have established a pattern of idiotic posts. So..............





Idiot.

(But, honestly, this is one of your higher moments. I give credit where it is due, no matter how inconsequential the point may be.)

 

[Synthaholic]

No, but I'm not an idiot who equates rape with quitting a job, either.

I'm not equating them, I'm asking you why one needs a pattern and the other doesn't?

Because one rape makes a rapist just as one murder makes a murderer. It's that silly thing called the law.

Quitting a job is not against the law, unless you want to bring back indentured servitude.

But, you certainly have established a pattern of idiotic posts. So..............





Idiot.

(But, honestly, this is one of your higher moments. I give credit where it is due, no matter how inconsequential the point may be.)

So...if it's a law, then it's OK to label someone after a first offense.

Is that correct?

 

[Moonglow]

I'm not equating them, I'm asking you why one needs a pattern and the other doesn't?

Because one rape makes a rapist just as one murder makes a murderer. It's that silly thing called the law.

Quitting a job is not against the law, unless you want to bring back indentured servitude.

But, you certainly have established a pattern of idiotic posts. So..............





Idiot.

(But, honestly, this is one of your higher moments. I give credit where it is due, no matter how inconsequential the point may be.)

So...if it's a law, then it's OK to label someone after a first offense.

Is that correct?

some rats do not like to be cornered in a maze of truth

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

She quit the governorship.

But, I don't agree that she is a quitter.

Remarkable and telling the right’s blind defense of a someone clearly unqualified to hold national office.

 

[Si modo]

I'm not equating them, I'm asking you why one needs a pattern and the other doesn't?

Because one rape makes a rapist just as one murder makes a murderer. It's that silly thing called the law.

Quitting a job is not against the law, unless you want to bring back indentured servitude.

But, you certainly have established a pattern of idiotic posts. So..............





Idiot.

(But, honestly, this is one of your higher moments. I give credit where it is due, no matter how inconsequential the point may be.)

So...if it's a law, then it's OK to label someone after a first offense.

Is that correct?

Legal definitions.

But according to you, anyone who has quit a job is a quitter.

 

[Warrior102]

She quit the governorship.

But, I don't agree that she is a quitter.

Remarkable and telling the right’s blind defense of a someone clearly unqualified to hold national office.

Biden and Obama quit. You didn't have a problem with that?

 

[Synthaholic]

Because one rape makes a rapist just as one murder makes a murderer. It's that silly thing called the law.

Quitting a job is not against the law, unless you want to bring back indentured servitude.

But, you certainly have established a pattern of idiotic posts. So..............





Idiot.

(But, honestly, this is one of your higher moments. I give credit where it is due, no matter how inconsequential the point may be.)

So...if it's a law, then it's OK to label someone after a first offense.

Is that correct?

Legal definitions.

But according to you, anyone who has quit a job is a quitter.

When they committed to a certain time frame, yes.

And that's the heart of it. She cannot be counted upon, and she cannot be trusted.