Sarah Quits Again!

[daveman]

But you will insist on the proof, right?

It doesn't matter to me. I don't have an irrational emotional investment in "proving" anything about Palin.

You, on the other hand...

That's right - you will vote for anyone on the Right, regardless of whether they lie to you. In fact, you don't even want to find out if she lied to you. Irrelevant, right?

That's funny, coming from a mindless drone such as yourself.

You know why I vote Republican? Because they do marginally less damage to the nation than Democrats do.

 

[Synthaholic]

It doesn't matter to me. I don't have an irrational emotional investment in "proving" anything about Palin.

You, on the other hand...

That's right - you will vote for anyone on the Right, regardless of whether they lie to you. In fact, you don't even want to find out if she lied to you. Irrelevant, right?

That's funny, coming from a mindless drone such as yourself.

You know why I vote Republican? Because they do marginally less damage to the nation than Democrats do.

You mean like turning a surplus into massive, crushing debt?

Or did you mean squandering America's moral standing by resorting to torture?

Or maybe starting a war with a sovereign country based on lies and cherry-picked data?

Or perhaps, just ignoring imminent threats like "bin Laden determined to attack U.S.", and failing to protect 3,000 Americans?


Is that all "marginally less damage"?

You're a fucking idiot.

 

[Si modo]

That's right - you will vote for anyone on the Right, regardless of whether they lie to you. In fact, you don't even want to find out if she lied to you. Irrelevant, right?

That's funny, coming from a mindless drone such as yourself.

You know why I vote Republican? Because they do marginally less damage to the nation than Democrats do.

You mean like turning a surplus into massive, crushing debt?

....

You DO know the only reason we had a surplus, right? Let me refresh your memory - government shut-down in the 90s.

....
Or did you mean squandering America's moral standing by resorting to torture?

....

You have issues with knowing the difference between opinions and facts. Don't worry, though; many of your political leaning do. Well, let's change that - most partisans do.

....

Or maybe starting a war with a sovereign country based on lies and cherry-picked data?
....

You look more and more idiotic. As such, I suspect that you intend to do so.

....
Or perhaps, just ignoring imminent threats like "bin Laden determined to attack U.S.", and failing to protect 3,000 Americans?

....

If Clinton had done his job, there would have been no problem. He was a slacker.

....
Is that all "marginally less damage"?
....

That would make anyone of rational mind vote Republican.

 

[daveman]

That's right - you will vote for anyone on the Right, regardless of whether they lie to you. In fact, you don't even want to find out if she lied to you. Irrelevant, right?

That's funny, coming from a mindless drone such as yourself.

You know why I vote Republican? Because they do marginally less damage to the nation than Democrats do.

You mean like turning a surplus into massive, crushing debt?

Or did you mean squandering America's moral standing by resorting to torture?

Or maybe starting a war with a sovereign country based on lies and cherry-picked data?

Or perhaps, just ignoring imminent threats like "bin Laden determined to attack U.S.", and failing to protect 3,000 Americans?


Is that all "marginally less damage"?

You're a fucking idiot.

My goodness, you just believe any old thing you're told to, don't you?

 

[Synthaholic]

That's funny, coming from a mindless drone such as yourself.

You know why I vote Republican? Because they do marginally less damage to the nation than Democrats do.

You mean like turning a surplus into massive, crushing debt?

Or did you mean squandering America's moral standing by resorting to torture?

Or maybe starting a war with a sovereign country based on lies and cherry-picked data?

Or perhaps, just ignoring imminent threats like "bin Laden determined to attack U.S.", and failing to protect 3,000 Americans?


Is that all "marginally less damage"?

You're a fucking idiot.

My goodness, you just believe any old thing you're told to, don't you?

Are you saying that we didn't have a surplus? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying we didn't torture anybody? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying that we didn't attack a sovereign nation based on disputed intelligence? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying that the Bushies didn't get that memo in August, 2001? You probably are, because you're a fool.


Now turn around and claim I am disparaging your service. That seems to be the only thing you've got.

 

[FauxNews]

good, she is a moron

 

[Stephanie]

good, she is a moron

oh boy, dredge up a old thread just FOR THAT?
Like we haven't HEARD that one before.

 

[idb]

good, she is a moron

oh boy, dredge up a old thread just FOR THAT?
Like we haven't HEARD that one before.

...and he/she provided no link...!

 

[Stephanie]

good, she is a moron

oh boy, dredge up a old thread just FOR THAT?
Like we haven't HEARD that one before.

...and he/she provided no link...!

no kidding..

 

[Synthaholic]

good, she is a moron

oh boy, dredge up a old thread just FOR THAT?
Like we haven't HEARD that one before.

It's not an old thread - it's been in limbo, waiting for caveman to answer my last post. Which he can't, because he's a fool.

 

[Dot Com]

Is she doing jury duty yet? Any conservative here on her FB page?
Sarah Palin says jury duty comes before bus tour | Reuters

"The next leg of the tour continues when the time comes," she said in a message posted on Facebook. "In the meantime, no one should jump to conclusions -- certainly not the media with their long track record of getting things wrong or just making things up."

 

[idb]

Is she doing jury duty yet? Any conservative here on her FB page?
Sarah Palin says jury duty comes before bus tour | Reuters

"The next leg of the tour continues when the time comes," she said in a message posted on Facebook. "In the meantime, no one should jump to conclusions -- certainly not the media with their long track record of getting things wrong or just making things up."

Why does Sarah hate the media so?

 

[daveman]

You mean like turning a surplus into massive, crushing debt?

Or did you mean squandering America's moral standing by resorting to torture?

Or maybe starting a war with a sovereign country based on lies and cherry-picked data?

Or perhaps, just ignoring imminent threats like "bin Laden determined to attack U.S.", and failing to protect 3,000 Americans?


Is that all "marginally less damage"?

You're a fucking idiot.

My goodness, you just believe any old thing you're told to, don't you?

Are you saying that we didn't have a surplus? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying we didn't torture anybody? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying that we didn't attack a sovereign nation based on disputed intelligence? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying that the Bushies didn't get that memo in August, 2001? You probably are, because you're a fool.


Now turn around and claim I am disparaging your service. That seems to be the only thing you've got.

No, in THIS post, you're not disparaging my service. You're just being a fucking idiot.

 

[daveman]

good, she is a moron

oh boy, dredge up a old thread just FOR THAT?
Like we haven't HEARD that one before.

It's not an old thread - it's been in limbo, waiting for caveman to answer my last post. Which he can't, because he's a fool.

 

[Dot Com]

GET BACK TO SHAMELESS, SELF-PROMOTION.....errr.....WORK SARAH!!!

 

[Synthaholic]

My goodness, you just believe any old thing you're told to, don't you?

Are you saying that we didn't have a surplus? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying we didn't torture anybody? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying that we didn't attack a sovereign nation based on disputed intelligence? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying that the Bushies didn't get that memo in August, 2001? You probably are, because you're a fool.


Now turn around and claim I am disparaging your service. That seems to be the only thing you've got.

No, in THIS post, you're not disparaging my service. You're just being a fucking idiot.

Running from my questions again? Great way to put your honor on display.

 

[daveman]

Are you saying that we didn't have a surplus? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying we didn't torture anybody? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying that we didn't attack a sovereign nation based on disputed intelligence? You probably are, because you're a fool.

Are you saying that the Bushies didn't get that memo in August, 2001? You probably are, because you're a fool.


Now turn around and claim I am disparaging your service. That seems to be the only thing you've got.

No, in THIS post, you're not disparaging my service. You're just being a fucking idiot.

Running from my questions again? Great way to put your honor on display.

Let me give an answer that you'll accept:

Bush is Hitler!!


There, happy now, you fucking idiot moonbat?


Say...what did you do in the desert, Synthia?

 

[Synthaholic]

No, in THIS post, you're not disparaging my service. You're just being a fucking idiot.

Running from my questions again? Great way to put your honor on display.

Let me give an answer that you'll accept:

Bush is Hitler!!


There, happy now, you fucking idiot moonbat?


Say...what did you do in the desert, Synthia?

Nope. I won't be happy until you man up, grow some balls, get a spine, and answer these questions:


Are you saying that we didn't have a surplus?

Are you saying we didn't torture anybody?

Are you saying that we didn't attack a sovereign nation based on disputed intelligence?

Are you saying that the Bushies didn't get that memo in August, 2001?

 

[daveman]

Running from my questions again? Great way to put your honor on display.

Let me give an answer that you'll accept:

Bush is Hitler!!


There, happy now, you fucking idiot moonbat?


Say...what did you do in the desert, Synthia?

Nope. I won't be happy until you man up, grow some balls, get a spine, and answer these questions:


Are you saying that we didn't have a surplus?

Are you saying we didn't torture anybody?

Are you saying that we didn't attack a sovereign nation based on disputed intelligence?

Are you saying that the Bushies didn't get that memo in August, 2001?

My, aren't you a petulant little bitch.

But I'll play your stupid little game, although I warn you, you'll like my "Bush is Hitler!" answer a lot better.

We didn't have a surplus.

We didn't torture anybody.

We didn't attack a sovereign nation based on intelligence disputed at the time.

The Bush Administration got a memo, but it was so vague as to be meaningless.

See? You shoulda stuck with "Bush is Hitler!" It's more in line with your worldview and your intelligence.

Stupid fucking moonbat.

 

[Dot Com]

Running from my questions again? Great way to put your honor on display.

Let me give an answer that you'll accept:

Bush is Hitler!!


There, happy now, you fucking idiot moonbat?


Say...what did you do in the desert, Synthia?

Nope. I won't be happy until you man up, grow some balls, get a spine, and answer these questions:


Are you saying that we didn't have a surplus?

Are you saying we didn't torture anybody?

Are you saying that we didn't attack a sovereign nation based on disputed intelligence?

Are you saying that the Bushies didn't get that memo in August, 2001?

daveman is a lock-step conservative. Facts are an annoyance to him.