RWers...Get It Right. People Aren't Saying That The Party of Tea-Bags Are ALL Racists

[Zoom-boing]

POTUS is a racist, Denzel

Yeah. But at least he's "light-skinned" with "no Negro dialect".

Pssst, I heard he was rather clean as well.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Crusader,

Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.

Please and thanks.

Sincerely,
Marc

He denied his white half on the census; he just filled in the dot next to 'black'. Does that make him racist . . . or just ashamed of his white side?

 

[MarcATL]

We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

And? There's a definite element of racism within the United States and there always will be.
And why are you even bothering bringing up racism if the majority are not racists? Why is the small percentage of racists that do exist within the Tea Party always the focus? It's not the point of the Tea Party . . . but you knew that.

You'd have an actual point if the element was truly miniscule.

Dude...the element seems to be quite large. And the leaders are encouraging it. And its well past being dangerous.

Be honest.

That's all I'd like to see in this thread...honesty. Not defense, not hemming and hawing, just honesty.

Thanks.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Crusader,

Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.

Please and thanks.

Sincerely,
Marc

Obama's SCOTUS pick think that her wise Latina experience gives her an edge over white males, does that mean she automatically has an edge over black males?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Crusader,

Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.

Please and thanks.

Sincerely,
Marc

He denied his white half on the census; he just filled in the dot next to 'black'. Does that make him racist . . . or just ashamed of his white side?

It depends on where he's campaigning

 

[Nosmo King]

We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

Hmmmmkay???

There are some facts that are just too hard for Tea Baggers to hide from.

Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.

Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.

In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.

Please show me any indication that other races (other than white) are not permitted to attend the tea parties.

Your post is infantile and your sentiments are an exam0le of why racism still exists in our country.

You, sir, call out racism strictly for your own personal reasons; to confirm you are right about a group of people that think differently than you.

Those that think like you are a root of the problem.

I did not say that people other than whites were/are excluded from the Tea Baggers. People of color just aren't interested in de-legitimizing the president as much as those white folks seem to be.

Exclusion by the group is one form of racism. The actions of that group which are working against the interests of other groups is yet another form of racism.

Your logic is specious. Try again.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

There are some facts that are just too hard for Tea Baggers to hide from.

Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.

Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.

In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.

Please show me any indication that other races (other than white) are not permitted to attend the tea parties.

Your post is infantile and your sentiments are an exam0le of why racism still exists in our country.

You, sir, call out racism strictly for your own personal reasons; to confirm you are right about a group of people that think differently than you.

Those that think like you are a root of the problem.

I did not say that people other than whites were/are excluded from the Tea Baggers. People of color just aren't interested in de-legitimizing the president as much as those white folks seem to be.

Exclusion by the group is one form of racism. The actions of that group which are working against the interests of other groups is yet another form of racism.

Your logic is specious. Try again.

Obama would say that's "Typical white behavior"

 

[Murf76]

Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.

Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.

In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.

Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?

Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.

G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.

It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.

 

[WillowTree]

There are some facts that are just too hard for Tea Baggers to hide from.

Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.

Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.

In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.

Please show me any indication that other races (other than white) are not permitted to attend the tea parties.

Your post is infantile and your sentiments are an exam0le of why racism still exists in our country.

You, sir, call out racism strictly for your own personal reasons; to confirm you are right about a group of people that think differently than you.

Those that think like you are a root of the problem.

I did not say that people other than whites were/are excluded from the Tea Baggers. People of color just aren't interested in de-legitimizing the president as much as those white folks seem to be.

Exclusion by the group is one form of racism. The actions of that group which are working against the interests of other groups is yet another form of racism.

Your logic is specious. Try again.

CBC case in point! Thank You vewy much.

 

[MarcATL]

Crusader,

Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.

Please and thanks.

Sincerely,
Marc

He denied his white half on the census; he just filled in the dot next to 'black'. Does that make him racist . . . or just ashamed of his white side?

What exact box should he have checked off then?

 

[Nosmo King]

Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.

Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.

In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.

Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?

Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.

G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.

It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.

Of course you don't care about my opinion. There's no profit in it.

And if Bush was so despised, where on earth were all the folks rallying against him? Where were the signs showing Bush with a bone in his nose? Where were all the protesters? Where were they when Bush pushed the Medicare drug benefit? Where were they when Bush financed his wars with debt to communist China?

Were they blinded by Bush's milky white complexion?

 

[MarcATL]

Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?

Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.

G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.

It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.

Be for real yo. In all seriousness and honesty, it was too little too late. All this "flak" you claim he received from the Right was only AFTER it was PROVEN beyond the shadow of a doubt how abysmal his leadership had been and even a donkey could see it as such. THEN we heard tepid reactions claiming Bush had to go. By then it was almost election time.

It's like a criminal who had week to turn himself in, but only after the cops hunted him down after a month and put the shackles on him did he claim to "give in." C'mon man, take yourself a bit more seriously.

 

[Hellokitty]

Crusader,

Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.

Please and thanks.

Sincerely,
Marc

As long as we can use the same rules that are being applied to members of the tea party then I can and by a left leaning group.

The SPLC list the Nation of Islam as a hate group. Farrakhan is the leader of the Nation of Islam. Obama participated in the million man march organized by Farrakhan. Wright is also a BFF of Farrakhan's and Obama was a member of Wrights church for over 20 years. The only difference is people involved in the tea party movement have no idea who the occasional nut job is that shows up with a sign or shouts out in a crow. Obama on the other hand knows exactly what Wright and Farrakhan represent.

 

[MarcATL]

Crusader,

Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.

Please and thanks.

Sincerely,
Marc

As long as we can use the same rules that are being applied to members of the tea party then I can and by a left leaning group.

The SPLC list the Nation of Islam as a hate group. Farrakhan is the leader of the Nation of Islam. Obama participated in the million man march organized by Farrakhan. Wright is also a BFF of Farrakhan's and Obama was a member of Wrights church for over 20 years. The only difference is people involved in the tea party movement have no idea who the occasional nut job is that shows up with a sign or shouts out in a crow. Obama on the other hand knows exactly what Wright and Farrakhan represent.

I do not like Farrakhan, but for reasons that I KNOW are different than yours. With that said, what do they represent?

I don't see anything wrong at all with Wright...Farrakhan...another story, but again, for vastly different reasons than you think.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?

Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.

G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.

It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.

Be for real yo. In all seriousness and honesty, it was too little too late. All this "flak" you claim he received from the Right was only AFTER it was PROVEN beyond the shadow of a doubt how abysmal his leadership had been and even a donkey could see it as such. THEN we heard tepid reactions claiming Bush had to go. By then it was almost election time.

It's like a criminal who had week to turn himself in, but only after the cops hunted him down after a month and put the shackles on him did he claim to "give in." C'mon man, take yourself a bit more seriously.

Be for real yo?

Seriously?

 

[MarcATL]

Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?

Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.

G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.

It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.

Be for real yo. In all seriousness and honesty, it was too little too late. All this "flak" you claim he received from the Right was only AFTER it was PROVEN beyond the shadow of a doubt how abysmal his leadership had been and even a donkey could see it as such. THEN we heard tepid reactions claiming Bush had to go. By then it was almost election time.

It's like a criminal who had week to turn himself in, but only after the cops hunted him down after a month and put the shackles on him did he claim to "give in." C'mon man, take yourself a bit more seriously.

Be for real yo?

Seriously?

Darn tootin'...you betcha!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Ebonics Translator

OK, Denzel, I'll try to get a better handle on whatcha talking bout yo

 

[Murf76]

Of course you don't care about my opinion. There's no profit in it.

And if Bush was so despised, where on earth were all the folks rallying against him? Where were the signs showing Bush with a bone in his nose? Where were all the protesters? Where were they when Bush pushed the Medicare drug benefit? Where were they when Bush financed his wars with debt to communist China?

Were they blinded by Bush's milky white complexion?

Yeah. They were blinded by Bush's milky white complexion.

Did you not notice the moonbat left out protesting him every day? It's not like the guy was lacking for protesters.

It wasn't until Rick Santelli's rant on CNBC that the ball got rolling on tea parties. And his rant was about SPENDING, not about black presidents.

Obama's a total fuck-up... but it's not about him personally. He's just the straw that broke the camel's back. The long slide into Socialism has been happening at a slow rate for decades. It was simply his blatancy that shocked people into awareness of how far we've slid. He came along and made no bones about "redistributing the wealth".

 

[MarcATL]

Ebonics Translator

OK, Denzel, I'll try to get a better handle on whatcha talking bout yo

And its not "whatcha," thats Palinomics, its "whatchu," as in...

If you gon' do it...do it right!

 

[California Girl]

We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

Hmmmmkay???

Wherever you find a large group of people, you will find racism.