RWers...Get It Right. People Aren't Saying That The Party of Tea-Bags Are ALL Racists

[WillowTree]

Of course you don't care about my opinion. There's no profit in it.

And if Bush was so despised, where on earth were all the folks rallying against him? Where were the signs showing Bush with a bone in his nose? Where were all the protesters? Where were they when Bush pushed the Medicare drug benefit? Where were they when Bush financed his wars with debt to communist China?

Were they blinded by Bush's milky white complexion?

Yeah. They were blinded by Bush's milky white complexion.

Did you not notice the moonbat left out protesting him every day? It's not like the guy was lacking for protesters.

It wasn't until Rick Santelli's rant on CNBC that the ball got rolling on tea parties. And his rant was about SPENDING, not about black presidents.

Obama's a total fuck-up... but it's not about him personally. He's just the straw that broke the camel's back. The long slide into Socialism has been happening at a slow rate for decades. It was simply his blatancy that shocked people into awareness of how far we've slid. He came along and made no bones about "redistributing the wealth".

obamalama isn't alone,, so it's more like a clusterfuck..

 

[Zoom-boing]

Crusader,

Please provide PROOF that Obama's a racist other than your demented ideological mindset.

Please and thanks.

Sincerely,
Marc

He denied his white half on the census; he just filled in the dot next to 'black'. Does that make him racist . . . or just ashamed of his white side?

What exact box should he have checked off then?

How bout the box that said 'black' and as well as the box that said 'white'? Seems pretty simple as that is exactly what makes up Obama's race. He isn't just black, he is bi-racial . . . he doesn't seem to see it that way though.

 

[Nonelitist]

Isn't it handy then that we don't care about your opinion?

Fact is... the first thing this administration did was to pass a grab-bag of gimmees to their cronies and supporters, which ends up costing 962 billion before interest. Then they turned around and passed an omnibus spending bill with 9000 earmarks just a couple of weeks after. All this on top of the 700 billion TARP under Bush. It's about SPENDING. And it's about BIG GOVERNMENT.

G.W. left office with a 34% approval rating. And according to polls, only about 20% of Americans self-identify as "liberal". So... don't hand us some rash of crap about how Bush wasn't taking any flak, because he was.

It doesn't even make any kind of rational sense that you expect your guy can come in and commit himself to MORE of all the things we already didn't like about George Bush and nobody'd have any criticism about it.

Be for real yo. In all seriousness and honesty, it was too little too late. All this "flak" you claim he received from the Right was only AFTER it was PROVEN beyond the shadow of a doubt how abysmal his leadership had been and even a donkey could see it as such. THEN we heard tepid reactions claiming Bush had to go. By then it was almost election time.

It's like a criminal who had week to turn himself in, but only after the cops hunted him down after a month and put the shackles on him did he claim to "give in." C'mon man, take yourself a bit more seriously.

yo yo yo... sheeeet dawg.... word.

 

[MarcATL]

We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

Hmmmmkay???

Wherever you find a large group of people, you will find racism.

You know, I forgot to include that as one of the default responses that the Right comes back with when obvious racist events occur at Tea-Bagging Movements and its called out.

Thanks!

 

[MarcATL]

He denied his white half on the census; he just filled in the dot next to 'black'. Does that make him racist . . . or just ashamed of his white side?

What exact box should he have checked off then?

How bout the box that said 'black' and as well as the box that said 'white'? Seems pretty simple as that is exactly what makes up Obama's race. He isn't just black, he is bi-racial . . . he doesn't seem to see it that way though.

So you're allowed to check MORE than ONE?

 

[Zoom-boing]

Where were the signs showing Bush with a bone in his nose?

No bone . . . but hey, a spear and a token Condi!

 

[Nonelitist]

see avatar

 

[Zoom-boing]

What exact box should he have checked off then?

How bout the box that said 'black' and as well as the box that said 'white'? Seems pretty simple as that is exactly what makes up Obama's race. He isn't just black, he is bi-racial . . . he doesn't seem to see it that way though.

So you're allowed to check MORE than ONE?

What's to stop you from checking more than one?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Ebonics Translator

OK, Denzel, I'll try to get a better handle on whatcha talking bout yo

And its not "whatcha," thats Palinomics, its "whatchu," as in...

If you gon' do it...do it right!

OK, that shut me up.

 

[Nonelitist]

How bout the box that said 'black' and as well as the box that said 'white'? Seems pretty simple as that is exactly what makes up Obama's race. He isn't just black, he is bi-racial . . . he doesn't seem to see it that way though.

So you're allowed to check MORE than ONE?

What's to stop you from checking more than one?

Pride in one heritage and not the other.

 

[MarcATL]

That DOESN'T answer the question.

So can one check more than ONE box for RACE or not?

 

[Murf76]

Be for real yo. In all seriousness and honesty, it was too little too late. All this "flak" you claim he received from the Right was only AFTER it was PROVEN beyond the shadow of a doubt how abysmal his leadership had been and even a donkey could see it as such. THEN we heard tepid reactions claiming Bush had to go. By then it was almost election time.

It's like a criminal who had week to turn himself in, but only after the cops hunted him down after a month and put the shackles on him did he claim to "give in." C'mon man, take yourself a bit more seriously.

Puh-leeze. At his lowest point in September of 2008, Bush was only carrying 55% of Republicans. He averaged 29% approval in his last quarter at Gallup. He'd lost two-thirds of Independents and pretty much all of Democrats

This is NOT about racism. It's about exactly what tea partiers tell you it's about. If there's any racism... it's coming from the left. Let us not forget who it was who LIED about alleged racial bigotry at Capitol Hill when the Obamacare pile-o-crap was passed.

 

[MarcATL]

Murf, you're conflating 2 completely different issues here, one being support for Bush on the Con side and the other being racism within the Tea-Bag movement. I don't know why you're doing it, but it doesn't make much sense.

 

[Stephanie]

Man, this thread has been a hoot.

and poor MarcATL got his ass handed to him.

but do you think that will stop him and his fellow lefties of accusing all of the "TEA PARTY" of being racist? nnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaa

It's too good a "weapon" for them to try and make people shut up

 

[Zoom-boing]

That DOESN'T answer the question.

So can one check more than ONE box for RACE or not?

Again, what's stopping someone from checking more than one box? The secret census servers gonna come and force a do-over because you checked more than one box? What's the point of asking 'race' if you can only check one box? Is everyone in this country just one race? I think not.

 

[MarcATL]

That DOESN'T answer the question.

So can one check more than ONE box for RACE or not?

Again, what's stopping someone from checking more than one box? The secret census servers gonna come and force a do-over because you checked more than one box? What's the point of asking 'race' if you can only check one box? Is everyone in this country just one race? I think not.

I see...you're being wilfully obtuse.

OK, lets play it your way.

In the same manner that one MAY pick TWO, according to you, one MAY also choose one. It doesn't have to mean that one is rejecting the other, just CHOOSING to pick one.

I mean, usually one is EXPECTED to select just ONE not multiple, this is programmed into us from various tests we take in our lives from childhood. "Only One Can Be Correct."

Surely any thinking man would or could understand this.

 

[GHook93]

Wow that really clears it up! Your not saying they are racist, but they belong to a racist movement!

First, YOU are wrong, like usual, their is no racist motive in the tea party movement.
Second, there are racist in the tea party, but the same with the Democratic party, ACORN or any other organization. When a movement is big you can't get rid of the nutz!

We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

Hmmmmkay???

 

[California Girl]

We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

Hmmmmkay???

Wherever you find a large group of people, you will find racism.

You know, I forgot to include that as one of the default responses that the Right comes back with when obvious racist events occur at Tea-Bagging Movements and its called out.

Thanks!

See, here's my problem Marc. You start your thread like you're making an effort to be bipartisan, when, in fact.... you are your usual borglike self. If you could get past Obama's skin color and see him for the fucking asshole socialist bastard that he is, that would be bipartisan.

Instead, all you do is create yet another 'let's whine about TEA parties'.... again. You got nothing, boy.

 

[Murf76]

Murf, you're conflating 2 completely different issues here, one being support for Bush on the Con side and the other being racism within the Tea-Bag movement. I don't know why you're doing it, but it doesn't make much sense.

Not I'm not. What I'm saying is that the argument that the Tea Party must be about race and not spending because conservatives didn't have a problem with Bush is a FAIL. We most certainly did have a problem with Bush as witnessed by his lack of job approval.

The disapproval exploded because the SPENDING exploded... under Obama. The guy could have been green with purple polka-dots. He and his socialist dems have spent like kids in a candy store and the only job growth we've seen is in government bureaucracy!

 

[Stephanie]

Murf, you're conflating 2 completely different issues here, one being support for Bush on the Con side and the other being racism within the Tea-Bag movement. I don't know why you're doing it, but it doesn't make much sense.

Not I'm not. What I'm saying is that the argument that the Tea Party must be about race and not spending because conservatives didn't have a problem with Bush is a FAIL. We most certainly did have a problem with Bush as witnessed by his lack of job approval.

The disapproval exploded because the SPENDING exploded... under Obama. The guy could have been green with purple polka-dots. He and his socialist dems have spent like kids in a candy store and the only job growth we've seen is in government bureaucracy!

oh man, now you're gonna go and burst some lefties little bubbles.
excellent post.