RWers...Get It Right. People Aren't Saying That The Party of Tea-Bags Are ALL Racists

We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

Hmmmmkay???

There is nothing racist about smaller government.
 
We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a more a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

Hmmmmkay???

There is an element of racism anywhere you go.
Supermnarket? Soemone is a racist.
Anti war rally Someone is a racist.
Congress? Betcha therre are several.

Million man march? You think there were no racists there?


So why is the tea party movement the one that gets the label?

good point

but i honestly thought dems had moved on from playing the intellectually bankrupt race card....seems it is the only argument and way to win is to simply call a group or someone a racist....not all dems though
 
That DOESN'T answer the question.

So can one check more than ONE box for RACE or not?

Again, what's stopping someone from checking more than one box? The secret census servers gonna come and force a do-over because you checked more than one box? What's the point of asking 'race' if you can only check one box? Is everyone in this country just one race? I think not.
I see...you're being wilfully obtuse.

OK, lets play it your way.

In the same manner that one MAY pick TWO, according to you, one MAY also choose one. It doesn't have to mean that one is rejecting the other, just CHOOSING to pick one.

I mean, usually one is EXPECTED to select just ONE not multiple, this is programmed into us from various tests we take in our lives from childhood. "Only One Can Be Correct."

Surely any thinking man would or could understand this.

?? Says who?

Father black, mother white = only black? only white?

Father white, mother asian = only white? only asian?

If you were half and half, which half would you put down? Why wouldn't you check two boxes? If you were bi-racial wouldn't you want both races counted? Why do they need to know race on the census anyway?
 
Again, what's stopping someone from checking more than one box? The secret census servers gonna come and force a do-over because you checked more than one box? What's the point of asking 'race' if you can only check one box? Is everyone in this country just one race? I think not.
I see...you're being wilfully obtuse.

OK, lets play it your way.

In the same manner that one MAY pick TWO, according to you, one MAY also choose one. It doesn't have to mean that one is rejecting the other, just CHOOSING to pick one.

I mean, usually one is EXPECTED to select just ONE not multiple, this is programmed into us from various tests we take in our lives from childhood. "Only One Can Be Correct."

Surely any thinking man would or could understand this.

?? Says who?

Father black, mother white = only black? only white?

Father white, mother asian = only white? only asian?

If you were half and half, which half would you put down? Why wouldn't you check two boxes? If you were bi-racial wouldn't you want both races counted? Why do they need to know race on the census anyway?

You are always free to check, "Other".
 
I see...you're being wilfully obtuse.

OK, lets play it your way.

In the same manner that one MAY pick TWO, according to you, one MAY also choose one. It doesn't have to mean that one is rejecting the other, just CHOOSING to pick one.

I mean, usually one is EXPECTED to select just ONE not multiple, this is programmed into us from various tests we take in our lives from childhood. "Only One Can Be Correct."

Surely any thinking man would or could understand this.

?? Says who?

Father black, mother white = only black? only white?

Father white, mother asian = only white? only asian?

If you were half and half, which half would you put down? Why wouldn't you check two boxes? If you were bi-racial wouldn't you want both races counted? Why do they need to know race on the census anyway?

You are always free to check, "Other".

Why would you check 'other' if you could check 'white' and also check 'black' and they'd get the idea that you were, you know . . . bi-racial?

Why do they need to know race for the census anyway?
 
Aha...now we reach to the crux of your argument.

YOU do not wan't to give out racial information and/or are against the collection of racial information.

Lemme ask you this...what would you THINK this question is for?
 
?? Says who?

Father black, mother white = only black? only white?

Father white, mother asian = only white? only asian?

If you were half and half, which half would you put down? Why wouldn't you check two boxes? If you were bi-racial wouldn't you want both races counted? Why do they need to know race on the census anyway?

You are always free to check, "Other".

Why would you check 'other' if you could check 'white' and also check 'black' and they'd get the idea that you were, you know . . . bi-racial?

Why do they need to know race for the census anyway?

The more knowledge a "responsible" government has about it's citizens, the better it can "serve". Remember, the government isn't made up of foreign Nazi Communists, no, it's made up of mostly good American Citizens who love their country. Only Republicans turn those good people into a dangerous threat.
 
We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

Hmmmmkay???


There are nut-cases within every single movement in this country. HOWEVER--the left wing media in this country along with certain democrat congressmen--have stated horrible things about normal--average--everyday Americans referring to the "TEA PARTY MOVEMENT in it's entireity as a bunch of white--racist EXTREMISTS>

You know it--I know it.

And here is a prime example of that with TENN. Democrat Steve Cohen statement that the tea--partiers are just KKK without robes.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFdXi3wnXyk[/ame]
 
Last edited:
We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

The more you focus on these trivial people within the tea party, the more small and insignificant your argument becomes.

Let's work on rooting stupidity and racist outlooks out from you.

As impossible as it may be, there's always hope.
 
Aha...now we reach to the crux of your argument.

YOU do not wan't to give out racial information and/or are against the collection of racial information.

Lemme ask you this...what would you THINK this question is for?

I KNOW...I KNOW!!!

Its throwing away the crutch that the dems always reach for, the race card, the affirmative action card, the "some people are more equal than others" card. When there is no racial info, then we are color-blind and get jobs based on test scores, not quotas.
 
Aha...now we reach to the crux of your argument.

YOU do not wan't to give out racial information and/or are against the collection of racial information.

Lemme ask you this...what would you THINK this question is for?

So the current administration can use it to redraw Congressional districts to favor White Democrat politicians by placing more minorities in their district and then once again screwing them out of coming to power.
 
Avatar, surely even you realize when you speak like that you speak like a fool...don't you?

You know full-well that the race question did NOT begin with this current administration.

So why are the words "so that this current administration" even in your sentence?

You are really telling on yourself in the worst possible way.
 
We're saying that there is a DEFINITE element of racism WITHIN that so-called movement.

Whenever something obviously racist comes from one of their events, you run back screaming nonsense like "a Dem plant" or "you Dems do it too" or "the REAL racists were Democrats....50 years ago" or "its really not happening" or "you are too thin skinned" or "whenever you get people angry things like this happen" or whatever NONSENSICAL BS defense you come up with, you know what you're doing.

The more you people try and defend the indefensible, the more you PROVE it to be true.

So lets just stop for a moment, acknowledge the truth and work on ROOTING it OUT from among you.

Hmmmmkay???
There are some facts that are just too hard for Tea Baggers to hide from.

Fact: The Tea baggers were unheard of, hell, INVISIBLE during the Bush years. This in spite of their contention that their 'outrage' is focused on run-a-way government spending. No one heard of a Tea Bagger until after the McCain concession speech.

Fact: The demographics of the Tea Bag movement suggest a firm hold on white women with little or no higher education. There is precious little diversity among these folks.

In my opinion the Tea Bag movement uses racism as the fulcrum to rest the lever of the effort to de-legitimize the first Black president. It's transparent.

So because the Tea Party movement didn't organize until AFTER the election of the chosen one, it's somehow insignificant?

Please explain how you came up with the assumption that the majority of Tea Party members are uneducated white women. Sounds like an incredibly elitist position. Which is WORSE than being racist...elitists don't look down on others of a different race, they look down on ALL people who they consider to be beneath them.

Oh, and finally, the first Black president doesn't need any racists to de-legitimize him... he's doing a FINE job of that on his own. The irony is that you used the word TRANSPARENT...something he ran his campaign on and has yet to make good on it.
 
You are always free to check, "Other".

Why would you check 'other' if you could check 'white' and also check 'black' and they'd get the idea that you were, you know . . . bi-racial?

Why do they need to know race for the census anyway?

The more knowledge a "responsible" government has about it's citizens, the better it can "serve". Remember, the government isn't made up of foreign Nazi Communists, no, it's made up of mostly good American Citizens who love their country. Only Republicans turn those good people into a dangerous threat.


:lol::lol::lol: They are a DANGEROUS threat!

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under
the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist
program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without
knowing how it happened."


by: Norman Thomas
(1884-1968) six-time U.S. Presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America
Source: 1948 - from an interview during the presidential campaign,

[Ed. note: Norman Thomas and Gus Hall, the U.S. Communist Party
Candidate, both quit American politics, agreeing that the Republican
and Democratic parties had adopted every plank on the
Communist/Socialist and they no longer had an alternate party platform
on which to run.]
 
I am constantly amazed at how whites are the only ones condemned for being racists.
 
I bet you'd be constantly amazed at the most basic words in the English dictionary as well.
 
I bet you'd be constantly amazed at the most basic words in the English dictionary as well.

I'm constantly amazed that you never have a decent comeback when you've been called out as the phony bullshit artist that you are.

Were you dropped on your head as a child?
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top