Romney needs to withdraw. open the convention.

It only makes sense, which isn't something I would accuse obama of having.

Success is bad. Wealth is bad. After relying on this mantra, obama's donors are becoming introspective. They are successful and wealthy, does obama think they are bad too? All except for writing the check part. If obama keeps up his "only failures are qualified to be president" monologue it's not likely his support will advance much beyond the ghetto.

By wealth you mean taxx evasion?

As much as you repeat the lie, it's not going to be come true. You cant evade taxes by telling the government all your holdings. The only reason you know about any of this stuff is precisely because Romney declared it.

And your a freakin hypocrite if you are going to complain about tax evasion after the President appointed countless tax evaders to his administration and you had zero problem with their appointment. Timothy Gietner ring a bell?
 
either he attended meetings at a bain holding or he had NOTHING to do with Bain at the time.

he cant have it both ways
 
romney is getting destroyed with all this bain stuff. open the convention so we can choose a better candidate.

romney is getting destroyed with all this bain stuff
obama needs to step down with all this unconstitutional stuff. If you're stupid enough to think anything Romney has done out weighs what obama has done you are truly a stupid bitch.
what's been unconstitutional that obama has done, that other presidents haven't done? can you give a few examples of something new that has never been done by other presidents that obama has done, that is unconstitutional?
 
A Cain Palin ticket would STILL be better than obama. A Putin/Jintao ticket would be better than obama. I'd be tempted to say a Bin Laden/Hussein ticket would be the only one worse, but we already have a Hussein on the ballot.
 
The Bain thing is backfiring on the Obama camp.
Obama spent $100's millions of stimulus money on green projects that were produced overseas.

romney should be 15 ahead right now. his problem is he has no natural base of support to defend him.

Romney's base is 1% of our population + those brainwashed by their propaganda and the former dixiecrats.

Yea, see Obama forgot about that, he's attacking the 1% and his campaign contributions are drying up!! Just like the Dems, never think about the future and what impact their policies are going to have on the kids and grandkids. Whoops!!

Next thing they're gonna accuse Romney of is drinking coffee :eek: or worse than that, smoking cigarettes :eek:
 
romney is getting destroyed with all this bain stuff. open the convention so we can choose a better candidate.

romney is getting destroyed with all this bain stuff
obama needs to step down with all this unconstitutional stuff. If you're stupid enough to think anything Romney has done out weighs what obama has done you are truly a stupid bitch.
what's been unconstitutional that obama has done, that other presidents haven't done? can you give a few examples of something new that has never been done by other presidents that obama has done, that is unconstitutional?

Killing a US citizen??
 
Wait until the media starts investigating and reporting all the inconsistencies and mystery surrounding Obamas past. HAHAHAHAHAAH. Just kidding.

while the truth of Obama would certainly shift the polls in Romney's favor, I think it will be a cold day in hell before the media starts reporting on those things. We have to get the info out otherwise.
 
romney is getting destroyed with all this bain stuff. open the convention so we can choose a better candidate.

romney is getting destroyed with all this bain stuff
obama needs to step down with all this unconstitutional stuff. If you're stupid enough to think anything Romney has done out weighs what obama has done you are truly a stupid bitch.
what's been unconstitutional that obama has done, that other presidents haven't done? can you give a few examples of something new that has never been done by other presidents that obama has done, that is unconstitutional?

For one, recess appointments without there actually being a recess. Passing a tax by lying about it and saying it wasn't really a tax. obama made the argument that his tax was legal under both the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause both of which were held to be unconstitutional.

Here's a whole list.

McNaughton Fine Art: What Did Obama Do That Is Unconstitutional?
 
Disagree on the Bain thing. Emphatically agree with replacing Romney as the candidate.

in sworn testimony he says he went to a bain holding meetings in those years.


In the sec filing he swore he had NOTHING to do with bain or its holdings.


Its a clear lie in one of those cases
 
obama needs to step down with all this unconstitutional stuff. If you're stupid enough to think anything Romney has done out weighs what obama has done you are truly a stupid bitch.
what's been unconstitutional that obama has done, that other presidents haven't done? can you give a few examples of something new that has never been done by other presidents that obama has done, that is unconstitutional?

Killing a US citizen??
Three of them, actually. He was judge, jury, and executioner. Sorta not what our Founders designed.
 
what's been unconstitutional that obama has done, that other presidents haven't done? can you give a few examples of something new that has never been done by other presidents that obama has done, that is unconstitutional?

Killing a US citizen??
Three of them, actually. He was judge, jury, and executioner. Sorta not what our Founders designed.
so, are you saying there has never been a case previous to this?
 
what's been unconstitutional that obama has done, that other presidents haven't done? can you give a few examples of something new that has never been done by other presidents that obama has done, that is unconstitutional?

Killing a US citizen??
Three of them, actually. He was judge, jury, and executioner. Sorta not what our Founders designed.
all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president...it wasn't done on a whim....have you read anything on it that the advisers said? of course, Bush's advisors said he too had done nothing unconstitutional with preemptive war....going to war against a country that was not at our door step, trying to kill us.... that was a new precedence for us.....but apparently not unconstitutional according to his advisers...
 
Killing a US citizen??
Three of them, actually. He was judge, jury, and executioner. Sorta not what our Founders designed.
all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president...it wasn't done on a whim....have you read anything on it that the advisers said? of course, Bush's advisors said he too had done nothing unconstitutional with preemptive war....going to war against a country that was not at our door step, trying to kill us.... that was a new precedence for us.....but apparently not unconstitutional according to his advisers...

all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president

I guess you and those lawyers and advisers and the "Constructional Scholar" obama himself never heard of DUE PROCESS.

The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. These words have as their central promise an assurance that all levels of American government must operate within the law ("legality") and provide fair procedures. Most of this essay concerns that promise. We should briefly note, however, three other uses these words have had in American constitutional law.
Due process | LII / Legal Information Institute
 
Killing a US citizen??
Three of them, actually. He was judge, jury, and executioner. Sorta not what our Founders designed.
all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president...it wasn't done on a whim....have you read anything on it that the advisers said? of course, Bush's advisors said he too had done nothing unconstitutional with preemptive war....going to war against a country that was not at our door step, trying to kill us.... that was a new precedence for us.....but apparently not unconstitutional according to his advisers...
As I said, judge, jury, and executioner. It's unconstitutional. We have three branches, and that's to ensure that one branch does not usurp the responsibilities and powers of the others. It protects all of our rights. Except when we have a POTUS who doesn't know what the Constitution is.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top