Rick Santorum Wants Your Sex Life to Be 'Special'

[Jarhead]

"One of the things I will talk about that no president has talked about before is I think the dangers of contraception in this country, the whole sexual libertine idea... It's not okay because it's a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be. They're supposed to be within marriage, for purposes that are, yes, conjugal... but also procreative.

That's the perfect way that a sexual union should happen. We take any part of that out, we diminish the act. And if you can take one part out that's not for purposes of procreation, that's not one of the reasons, then you diminish this very special bond between men and women, so why can't you take other parts of that out? And all of a sudden, it becomes deconstructed to the point where it's simply pleasure. And that's certainly a part of it--and it's an important part of it, don't get me wrong--but there's a lot of things we do for pleasure, and this is special, and it needs to be seen as special. Again, I know most presidents don't talk about those things, and maybe people don't want us to talk about those things, but I think it's important that you are who you are. I'm not running for preacher.

I'm not running for pastor, but these are important public policy issues."

Rick Santorum Wants Your Sex Life to Be 'Special' - Conor Friedersdorf - Politics - The Atlantic

Every Sperm is Sacred - YouTube

OK, so Rick Santorum has his own personal beliefs about sex. Big deal. I don't see him trying to impose his beliefs onto the rest of us by proposing some sort of legislation.

Apparently, Rick Santorum is not allowed to express his personal beliefs on various topics that aren't related to economics, wars, welfare, social "injustice", racial divide, etc.

Always interesting to see how all of these "freedom of speech" people don't want to allow people with differing beliefs from theirs, to exercise THEIR "freedom of speech".

Freedom of speech is fine. But when someone is proposing to have government dictate to you what you can and can't do in the bedroom between consenting adults..it gives you pause to think. Especially if that person is running for the highest government office in the land.

but it doesnt give you reason to pause and think when someone who is IN the highest office in the land wants to tell a private company what they MUST sell if they want to remain in business?

 

[Katzndogz]

Am I to understand that Santorum claiming that a sexual relationship between a man and a woman that supports the family structure AUTOMATICALLY makes him support child molesters?

Good luck with that one.

Naw...

Santorum sponsored honor for accused PSU Coach

Giving awards to child ass rapers..does that...just fine.

OHHHH in 2002! Well, darn it, Santorum should have KNOWN 10 years ago what Sandusky was like. So should the college, but they can be forgiven.

 

[Jarhead]

Am I to understand that Santorum claiming that a sexual relationship between a man and a woman that supports the family structure AUTOMATICALLY makes him support child molesters?

Good luck with that one.

Naw...

Santorum sponsored honor for accused PSU Coach

Giving awards to child ass rapers..does that...just fine.

OHHHH in 2002! Well, darn it, Santorum should have KNOWN 10 years ago what Sandusky was like. So should the college, but they can be forgiven.

So lets see....

Based on that logic....

USC should be reprimanded for admitting a future killer into their school
The Heisman trophy award committee should be reprimanded for offering the award to a future killer
The NFL should be reprimanded for allowing a future killer to play

I can go on and on

 

[ScreamingEagle]

we have a national problem that one could label as "free sex" being promoted via all sorts of media avenues by the porn industry especially among our children......this leads to irresponsible sex, rapes and violence, abortions, children without fathers, the breakup of family, dependence on the government and poverty.....

Santorum is simply being a moral leader to help break out of this insidious pattern.....

What's wrong with free sex? Personally, I have no problem with it and it seems that the majority of America tends to agree with me since there's a whole lot of fucking going on in this nation. Now you may personally have a problem with that and it's your right to feel that way, but suggesting that a society which embraces sexual freedom endorses rape and violence is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard someone say (or at least in the top five).

If more people used rubbers you might see a significant decrease in abortions, children without fathers, and dependence upon government. I have also noticed that people who are opposed to using rubbers tend to change their opinion once they get a good solid case of the clap.

we've become a society which demands instant "free" gratification.......that leads to date rape and aggravation if denied.....

nobody is stopping you from wearing rubbers......least of all Santorum.....

however Obama is PROMOTING rubbers and all kinds of other "free" contraceptives and abortifacients........what gives HIM the right to shove HIS morality upon us......?

 

[Sallow]

No i wouldn't......i believe in the Constitution.......unlike you and the Left.....

And where in the Constitution does it say that government has the right to tell me what to do with my dick?

It's right there under STATES RIGHTS......

Apparently you skipped a couple of things..

Article VI - Debts, Supremacy, Oaths
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

[BlindBoo]

Fourteen trillion in debt, too much unemployment, a housing market in the shitter and all this guy can talk about is that there's too much fucking going on in this country?

too much fucking,, cost us all money..

i'd say if rightwingnuts had more, they wouldn't be so angry and wouldn't be so busy worrying about what normal people do.

just saying.

But then they probably wouldn't be rightwingnuts anymore.

 

[Sallow]

Naw...

Santorum sponsored honor for accused PSU Coach

Giving awards to child ass rapers..does that...just fine.

OHHHH in 2002! Well, darn it, Santorum should have KNOWN 10 years ago what Sandusky was like. So should the college, but they can be forgiven.

So lets see....

Based on that logic....

USC should be reprimanded for admitting a future killer into their school
The Heisman trophy award committee should be reprimanded for offering the award to a future killer
The NFL should be reprimanded for allowing a future killer to play

I can go on and on

This is the kind of political environment that people like Lee Atwater and Karl Rove inspired. Kinda late to put the genie back in the bottle. If you don't think this is going to come up..well..good luck with that.

 

[Jarhead]

OHHHH in 2002! Well, darn it, Santorum should have KNOWN 10 years ago what Sandusky was like. So should the college, but they can be forgiven.

So lets see....

Based on that logic....

USC should be reprimanded for admitting a future killer into their school
The Heisman trophy award committee should be reprimanded for offering the award to a future killer
The NFL should be reprimanded for allowing a future killer to play

I can go on and on

This is the kind of political environment that people like Lee Atwater and Karl Rove inspired. Kinda late to put the genie back in the bottle. If you don't think this is going to come up..well..good luck with that.

I never said it will never come up.

I am just laughing at the logic behind it.

It is pathetic.

 

[Jarhead]

too much fucking,, cost us all money..

i'd say if rightwingnuts had more, they wouldn't be so angry and wouldn't be so busy worrying about what normal people do.

just saying.

But then they probably wouldn't be rightwingnuts anymore.

Im a "rightwingnut"...and believe me...I cant keep it in my pants. I have plenty of porn. My wife likes the girls....and...well....I may not be able to run for public office, but I should have no problem getting into hell when I die.

 

[bodecea]

Legislating morality doesn't work, case in point countries like Iran and Pakistan, their governments try to do that and the people there are all fucking goats and looking up camel porn.

Morality shouldn't need to be legislated. Morality, individual morality is an internal control on one's behavior. We are becoming an amoral culture. Not immoral, amoral. The more amoral a culture is the less internal controls and the more legislation is necessary to maintain order.

That's why there is a law prohibiting someone with AIDS having sex with an uninformed partner. There is no internal control telling an infected person that spreading AIDS is wrong. They are intent on obtaining their own pleasure no matter what the cost to someone else. So, there needs to be a law.

Oh yes...this is something TOTALLY NEW with AIDS....people, in the GOOD OLD MORAL DAYS were very considerate about Syphalis, Gonerrea, and Herpes.

 

[bodecea]

look "pal".....it's high time to beat back the degenerates like you....

our children and society in general is suffering from widespread moral depravity.....Kudos to Santorum for addressing it...

Puritans......

We laugh at your kind.

Pervs......

We laugh at your kind.

You can laugh all you want, we're not the repressed ones.

 

[bodecea]

I honestly think he cannot tell the difference between conscentual and non-conscentual....and that makes him more likely to actually rape someone....especially if he thinks they "deserve" it.

Once the pursuit of pleasure becomes paramount, the rapist sees his victim as stopping him from enjoying himself. Interfering with his right of pursuit of pleasure.

This isn't the alley rapist that pulls a knife, or beats a woman into submission. This is the date rapist, the GHB rapist. Many times such a rapist is caught because he is so intent on the act of sex being nothing more than feeling good, he will call his victim and ask her out again. I recall one case in which the rapist left a note "Call me sometime" conveniently including his telephone number. Then of course there is the guy who lures women into consent by creating the artificial idea that there is something about her that he finds "special" (oh darn that word again). The classic CONSENSUAL one night stand. Naturally if the woman knew the truth it would have been NON-CONSENSUAL.

To the amoral and degenerate culture, a lie is as good as the truth. There is absolutely nothing at all wrong with a man using subtrefuge to get a woman's consent. It is certainly not illegal. It might be immoral, but it's not illegal. Since we reject morals, that behavior is perfectly acceptable. If she's the 50th woman he did this to, and she gets an incurable STD, did she deserve it, or not?

How do you know so much about how a rapists mind works?

Remember...she believes that reporter in Egypt deserved what she got. That tells us a lot.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

And where in the Constitution does it say that government has the right to tell me what to do with my dick?

It's right there under STATES RIGHTS......

Apparently you skipped a couple of things..

Article VI - Debts, Supremacy, Oaths
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

what does contraception have to do with the Constitution or treaties.....? ....except of course the 1st Amendment.....

Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

tell that to the Lefie Food Nazis who are searching your childrens' sack lunches from home....and replacing turkey/cheese sandwiches with their "nuggets".....

tell that to the Lefties like Obama who want to insert their fat noses under your tent wherever....and then arrest you if they don't like what they see or hear......[/quote].

 

[bodecea]

Not only does he want your sex life to be special. If you ass rape little kids in the shower..you'll get an award from Santorum.

Good fellow..that Rick.

I'll bet you anything that guy has a whole library of porn hidden somewhere, people that crusade so hard against it usually do. If I want someone to tell me where to stick my dick, I'll move to Iran.

Please do....

Ah, but you seem to be more the type to want to tell people when, where, and how they have sex. Iran is more your kind of place.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Special people need sex too

Fuck you and your jokes about physically challenged children...just FUCK YOU!

What's your problem? I said he was special.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Puritans......

We laugh at your kind.

Pervs......

We laugh at your kind.

You can laugh all you want, we're not the repressed ones.

that's true......you just splat your filth anywhere and everywhere.....

 

[ScreamingEagle]

I'll bet you anything that guy has a whole library of porn hidden somewhere, people that crusade so hard against it usually do. If I want someone to tell me where to stick my dick, I'll move to Iran.

Please do....

Ah, but you seem to be more the type to want to tell people when, where, and how they have sex. Iran is more your kind of place.

Iran is a country with one person(s) dictating what you do.......very much like Obama......

 

[bodecea]

Please do....

Nope, I'm staying here in the USA. You should move to Iran, you would fit in perfectly over there.

No i wouldn't......i believe in the Constitution.......unlike you and the Left.....

OK, Mr. "I believe in the Constitution"...show us where it allows the government to control our sex.

 

[oreo]

No i wouldn't......i believe in the Constitution.......unlike you and the Left.....

And where in the Constitution does it say that government has the right to tell me what to do with my dick?

It's right there under STATES RIGHTS......

NOPE--NO STATE has the RIGHT to intervene between the intimacy shared between a husband and wife--and or their PERSONAL decision on how many children they have.

Rick Santorum is one special social freak nut-case for making that statement--and Jesus needs to kick his ass through the goal posts of life right back into the 17th century--where he belongs."

He is trying to impose his RELIGOUS beliefs on the rest of us--and there is a constitutional amendment regarding "separation" of church and state.

 

[Jarhead]

Nope, I'm staying here in the USA. You should move to Iran, you would fit in perfectly over there.

No i wouldn't......i believe in the Constitution.......unlike you and the Left.....

OK, Mr. "I believe in the Constitution"...show us where it allows the government to control our sex.

Im with you on this topic....

But....

Exactly where in the constitution does it say that the government can demand a company give a product away to a consumer for free?