Rick Santorum Wants Your Sex Life to Be 'Special'

This is what we are becoming isn't it. This degnerate. Sex has no more meaning that an after dinner toast, or shaking hands. Naturally it follows that the pregnancies of such casual unions are as meaningless as the act that created them.

Santorum was only speaking a simple truth. Sexual union should not be reduced to simple pleasure and lose it's meaning and use of creating a special relationship between two people that creates a bond of trust not shared by anyone else.

Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

look "pal".....it's high time to beat back the degenerates like you....

our children and society in general is suffering from widespread moral depravity.....Kudos to Santorum for addressing it...
 
This is what we are becoming isn't it. This degnerate. Sex has no more meaning that an after dinner toast, or shaking hands. Naturally it follows that the pregnancies of such casual unions are as meaningless as the act that created them.

Santorum was only speaking a simple truth. Sexual union should not be reduced to simple pleasure and lose it's meaning and use of creating a special relationship between two people that creates a bond of trust not shared by anyone else.

Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

:clap2:
 
Fortunately natural forces have a way of stepping in and exacting terrible punishments on those who think they can get away with hedonistic and licentious lives. We see this in the most sexually libertine countries of Africa. We see this in the epidemic of disease in this country that mutates into being more deadly faster than we can find treatment.

I was only having fun is no defense in the Court of Biology.

So? still doesn't make it any of your business who I fuck.
 
This is what we are becoming isn't it. This degnerate. Sex has no more meaning that an after dinner toast, or shaking hands. Naturally it follows that the pregnancies of such casual unions are as meaningless as the act that created them.

Santorum was only speaking a simple truth. Sexual union should not be reduced to simple pleasure and lose it's meaning and use of creating a special relationship between two people that creates a bond of trust not shared by anyone else.

Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

look "pal".....it's high time to beat back the degenerates like you....

our children and society in general is suffering from widespread moral depravity.....Kudos to Santorum for addressing it...

1) Tell me how society suffers from someone wearing a rubber for Christ's sake.

2) Tell me how society suffers from your friendly local swingers group.

3) Tell me how legislating morality can be effective.
 
Fortunately natural forces have a way of stepping in and exacting terrible punishments on those who think they can get away with hedonistic and licentious lives. We see this in the most sexually libertine countries of Africa. We see this in the epidemic of disease in this country that mutates into being more deadly faster than we can find treatment.

I was only having fun is no defense in the Court of Biology.

Well maybe if more people used rubbers STDs wouldn't spread so rapidly.
 
Legislating morality doesn't work, case in point countries like Iran and Pakistan, their governments try to do that and the people there are all fucking goats and looking up camel porn.
 
Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

look "pal".....it's high time to beat back the degenerates like you....

our children and society in general is suffering from widespread moral depravity.....Kudos to Santorum for addressing it...

1) Tell me how society suffers from someone wearing a rubber for Christ's sake.
Tell me how Santorum is preventing you from wearing a rubber....

2) Tell me how society suffers from your friendly local swingers group.
Tell me how Santorum is going to prevent you from going to your local swingers group

3) Tell me how legislating morality can be effective.
It IS the business of society to determine as to how much of your depravity gets displayed in public.....beating back the porn industry would do alot......because they constantly promote filth that weak minds like yours gobble up....
.
 
This is what we are becoming isn't it. This degnerate. Sex has no more meaning that an after dinner toast, or shaking hands. Naturally it follows that the pregnancies of such casual unions are as meaningless as the act that created them.

Santorum was only speaking a simple truth. Sexual union should not be reduced to simple pleasure and lose it's meaning and use of creating a special relationship between two people that creates a bond of trust not shared by anyone else.

Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

look "pal".....it's high time to beat back the degenerates like you....

our children and society in general is suffering from widespread moral depravity.....Kudos to Santorum for addressing it...

Puritans......:lol::lol::lol:

We laugh at your kind.
 
This is what we are becoming isn't it. This degnerate. Sex has no more meaning that an after dinner toast, or shaking hands. Naturally it follows that the pregnancies of such casual unions are as meaningless as the act that created them.

Santorum was only speaking a simple truth. Sexual union should not be reduced to simple pleasure and lose it's meaning and use of creating a special relationship between two people that creates a bond of trust not shared by anyone else.

Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

This is the argument of rapists you know. Don't tell me who to fuck. Women who don't want to fuck don't want me to have a good time. This is the natural and normal extension of sexual freedom. You don't really have that freedom if someone says no, do you?

No one is telling you who to fuck, where, or when, it's that you want to. There is no feeling there for anyone else. Sex is a past time, a way to feel good and alleviate boredom. It's the new way of saying thank you for inviting me to the party. It is now a meaningless activity between two people who care nothing for one another past the orgasm. Conducting one's life in this manner certainly isn't wrong for them to do. It isn't wrong for you to do. That this is something you WANT to do needs to be taken into consideration when evaluating your character.

Do you object to pointing this out? Is that the real complaint here. After all no one is stopping you from fucking your brains out. No one is passing any laws against it, or preaching on the street to make you feel guilty. Just saying what it really is. And that is the real complaint. Suppose such revolutionary ideas take root and grow! Sex ceases to be an evening of Scrabble. Oh my how awful that would be. What an infringement on personal freedom and pleasure.

The one good thing about sexual licentiousness is that when it is allowed to grow and flourish it eventually reaches a point where the people practicing such license grow to disgust themselves. Then it stops. Then we get Victorianism, the repressive 40s and 50s after the roaring 20s. I have no problem whatsoever with letting this lastest gasp blow itself out. Santorum feels like it could be avoided. I don't have that wish. Actually Santorum still respects the people enough to nimagine they are able to make a choice between decency and licentiousness. He should be admired for not accepting reality. I am untroubled by such nonsense.
 
look "pal".....it's high time to beat back the degenerates like you....

our children and society in general is suffering from widespread moral depravity.....Kudos to Santorum for addressing it...

1) Tell me how society suffers from someone wearing a rubber for Christ's sake.
Tell me how Santorum is preventing you from wearing a rubber....

2) Tell me how society suffers from your friendly local swingers group.
Tell me how Santorum is going to prevent you from going to your local swingers group

3) Tell me how legislating morality can be effective.
It IS the business of society to determine as to how much of your depravity gets displayed in public.....beating back the porn industry would do alot......because they constantly promote filth that weak minds like yours gobble up....
.

You might want to consider moving to Iran, the Mullahs there agree with alot that you have to say.
 
This is what we are becoming isn't it. This degnerate. Sex has no more meaning that an after dinner toast, or shaking hands. Naturally it follows that the pregnancies of such casual unions are as meaningless as the act that created them.

Santorum was only speaking a simple truth. Sexual union should not be reduced to simple pleasure and lose it's meaning and use of creating a special relationship between two people that creates a bond of trust not shared by anyone else.

Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

This is the argument of rapists you know. Don't tell me who to fuck. Women who don't want to fuck don't want me to have a good time. This is the natural and normal extension of sexual freedom. You don't really have that freedom if someone says no, do you?

No one is telling you who to fuck, where, or when, it's that you want to. There is no feeling there for anyone else. Sex is a past time, a way to feel good and alleviate boredom. It's the new way of saying thank you for inviting me to the party. It is now a meaningless activity between two people who care nothing for one another past the orgasm. Conducting one's life in this manner certainly isn't wrong for them to do. It isn't wrong for you to do. That this is something you WANT to do needs to be taken into consideration when evaluating your character.

Do you object to pointing this out? Is that the real complaint here. After all no one is stopping you from fucking your brains out. No one is passing any laws against it, or preaching on the street to make you feel guilty. Just saying what it really is. And that is the real complaint. Suppose such revolutionary ideas take root and grow! Sex ceases to be an evening of Scrabble. Oh my how awful that would be. What an infringement on personal freedom and pleasure.

The one good thing about sexual licentiousness is that when it is allowed to grow and flourish it eventually reaches a point where the people practicing such license grow to disgust themselves. Then it stops. Then we get Victorianism, the repressive 40s and 50s after the roaring 20s. I have no problem whatsoever with letting this lastest gasp blow itself out. Santorum feels like it could be avoided. I don't have that wish. Actually Santorum still respects the people enough to nimagine they are able to make a choice between decency and licentiousness. He should be admired for not accepting reality. I am untroubled by such nonsense.


Ah...I remember you saying that female reporter in Egypt deserved what she got. This is the kind of person YOU are.
 
This is what we are becoming isn't it. This degnerate. Sex has no more meaning that an after dinner toast, or shaking hands. Naturally it follows that the pregnancies of such casual unions are as meaningless as the act that created them.

Santorum was only speaking a simple truth. Sexual union should not be reduced to simple pleasure and lose it's meaning and use of creating a special relationship between two people that creates a bond of trust not shared by anyone else.

Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

This is the argument of rapists you know. Don't tell me who to fuck. Women who don't want to fuck don't want me to have a good time. This is the natural and normal extension of sexual freedom. You don't really have that freedom if someone says no, do you?

No one is telling you who to fuck, where, or when, it's that you want to. There is no feeling there for anyone else. Sex is a past time, a way to feel good and alleviate boredom. It's the new way of saying thank you for inviting me to the party. It is now a meaningless activity between two people who care nothing for one another past the orgasm. Conducting one's life in this manner certainly isn't wrong for them to do. It isn't wrong for you to do. That this is something you WANT to do needs to be taken into consideration when evaluating your character.

Do you object to pointing this out? Is that the real complaint here. After all no one is stopping you from fucking your brains out. No one is passing any laws against it, or preaching on the street to make you feel guilty. Just saying what it really is. And that is the real complaint. Suppose such revolutionary ideas take root and grow! Sex ceases to be an evening of Scrabble. Oh my how awful that would be. What an infringement on personal freedom and pleasure.

The one good thing about sexual licentiousness is that when it is allowed to grow and flourish it eventually reaches a point where the people practicing such license grow to disgust themselves. Then it stops. Then we get Victorianism, the repressive 40s and 50s after the roaring 20s. I have no problem whatsoever with letting this lastest gasp blow itself out. Santorum feels like it could be avoided. I don't have that wish. Actually Santorum still respects the people enough to nimagine they are able to make a choice between decency and licentiousness. He should be admired for not accepting reality. I am untroubled by such nonsense.

Oh please:eusa_hand: rape is non consentual and a crime, if I am hosting an orgy at my house everyone there is a willing participant, not even close to the same thing, nice try.
 
This is what we are becoming isn't it. This degnerate. Sex has no more meaning that an after dinner toast, or shaking hands. Naturally it follows that the pregnancies of such casual unions are as meaningless as the act that created them.

Santorum was only speaking a simple truth. Sexual union should not be reduced to simple pleasure and lose it's meaning and use of creating a special relationship between two people that creates a bond of trust not shared by anyone else.

Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

This is the argument of rapists you know. Don't tell me who to fuck. Women who don't want to fuck don't want me to have a good time. This is the natural and normal extension of sexual freedom. You don't really have that freedom if someone says no, do you?

No one is telling you who to fuck, where, or when, it's that you want to. There is no feeling there for anyone else. Sex is a past time, a way to feel good and alleviate boredom. It's the new way of saying thank you for inviting me to the party. It is now a meaningless activity between two people who care nothing for one another past the orgasm. Conducting one's life in this manner certainly isn't wrong for them to do. It isn't wrong for you to do. That this is something you WANT to do needs to be taken into consideration when evaluating your character.

Do you object to pointing this out? Is that the real complaint here. After all no one is stopping you from fucking your brains out. No one is passing any laws against it, or preaching on the street to make you feel guilty. Just saying what it really is. And that is the real complaint. Suppose such revolutionary ideas take root and grow! Sex ceases to be an evening of Scrabble. Oh my how awful that would be. What an infringement on personal freedom and pleasure.

The one good thing about sexual licentiousness is that when it is allowed to grow and flourish it eventually reaches a point where the people practicing such license grow to disgust themselves. Then it stops. Then we get Victorianism, the repressive 40s and 50s after the roaring 20s. I have no problem whatsoever with letting this lastest gasp blow itself out. Santorum feels like it could be avoided. I don't have that wish. Actually Santorum still respects the people enough to nimagine they are able to make a choice between decency and licentiousness. He should be admired for not accepting reality. I am untroubled by such nonsense.

Sounds like you haven't been laid in a long time.
 
Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

This is the argument of rapists you know. Don't tell me who to fuck. Women who don't want to fuck don't want me to have a good time. This is the natural and normal extension of sexual freedom. You don't really have that freedom if someone says no, do you?

No one is telling you who to fuck, where, or when, it's that you want to. There is no feeling there for anyone else. Sex is a past time, a way to feel good and alleviate boredom. It's the new way of saying thank you for inviting me to the party. It is now a meaningless activity between two people who care nothing for one another past the orgasm. Conducting one's life in this manner certainly isn't wrong for them to do. It isn't wrong for you to do. That this is something you WANT to do needs to be taken into consideration when evaluating your character.

Do you object to pointing this out? Is that the real complaint here. After all no one is stopping you from fucking your brains out. No one is passing any laws against it, or preaching on the street to make you feel guilty. Just saying what it really is. And that is the real complaint. Suppose such revolutionary ideas take root and grow! Sex ceases to be an evening of Scrabble. Oh my how awful that would be. What an infringement on personal freedom and pleasure.

The one good thing about sexual licentiousness is that when it is allowed to grow and flourish it eventually reaches a point where the people practicing such license grow to disgust themselves. Then it stops. Then we get Victorianism, the repressive 40s and 50s after the roaring 20s. I have no problem whatsoever with letting this lastest gasp blow itself out. Santorum feels like it could be avoided. I don't have that wish. Actually Santorum still respects the people enough to nimagine they are able to make a choice between decency and licentiousness. He should be admired for not accepting reality. I am untroubled by such nonsense.

Oh please:eusa_hand: rape is non consentual and a crime, if I am hosting an orgy at my house everyone there is a willing participant, not even close to the same thing, nice try.

I honestly think he cannot tell the difference between conscentual and non-conscentual....and that makes him more likely to actually rape someone....especially if he thinks they "deserve" it.
 
Tell me how Santorum is preventing you from wearing a rubber....

Well shit when he says "the dangers of contraception" and that it's an "important public policy issue" it sounds a lot to me like he is of the opinion that it's the government's business whether I wear a rubber or not.
Tell me how Santorum is going to prevent you from going to your local swingers group

He couldn't if he tried. That's the point. Pass all the laws you wish. Laws don't stop people from doing a damned thing, they simply punish those who do.
It IS the business of society to determine as to how much of your depravity gets displayed in public.....beating back the porn industry would do alot......because they constantly promote filth that weak minds like yours gobble up....

Who said anything about displaying it in public? If I walked outside with my johnson hanging out you might have a point (rubber or no rubber). But what people do in the privacy of their own home is their own fucking business. Simply because you may find their behavior unacceptable doesn't mean it is.
 
This is the argument of rapists you know. Don't tell me who to fuck. Women who don't want to fuck don't want me to have a good time. This is the natural and normal extension of sexual freedom. You don't really have that freedom if someone says no, do you?

No one is telling you who to fuck, where, or when, it's that you want to. There is no feeling there for anyone else. Sex is a past time, a way to feel good and alleviate boredom. It's the new way of saying thank you for inviting me to the party. It is now a meaningless activity between two people who care nothing for one another past the orgasm. Conducting one's life in this manner certainly isn't wrong for them to do. It isn't wrong for you to do. That this is something you WANT to do needs to be taken into consideration when evaluating your character.

Do you object to pointing this out? Is that the real complaint here. After all no one is stopping you from fucking your brains out. No one is passing any laws against it, or preaching on the street to make you feel guilty. Just saying what it really is. And that is the real complaint. Suppose such revolutionary ideas take root and grow! Sex ceases to be an evening of Scrabble. Oh my how awful that would be. What an infringement on personal freedom and pleasure.

The one good thing about sexual licentiousness is that when it is allowed to grow and flourish it eventually reaches a point where the people practicing such license grow to disgust themselves. Then it stops. Then we get Victorianism, the repressive 40s and 50s after the roaring 20s. I have no problem whatsoever with letting this lastest gasp blow itself out. Santorum feels like it could be avoided. I don't have that wish. Actually Santorum still respects the people enough to nimagine they are able to make a choice between decency and licentiousness. He should be admired for not accepting reality. I am untroubled by such nonsense.

Oh please:eusa_hand: rape is non consentual and a crime, if I am hosting an orgy at my house everyone there is a willing participant, not even close to the same thing, nice try.

I honestly think he cannot tell the difference between conscentual and non-conscentual....and that makes him more likely to actually rape someone....especially if he thinks they "deserve" it.

Katz is a female.
 
"One of the things I will talk about that no president has talked about before is I think the dangers of contraception in this country, the whole sexual libertine idea... It's not okay because it's a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be. They're supposed to be within marriage, for purposes that are, yes, conjugal... but also procreative.

That's the perfect way that a sexual union should happen. We take any part of that out, we diminish the act. And if you can take one part out that's not for purposes of procreation, that's not one of the reasons, then you diminish this very special bond between men and women, so why can't you take other parts of that out? And all of a sudden, it becomes deconstructed to the point where it's simply pleasure. And that's certainly a part of it--and it's an important part of it, don't get me wrong--but there's a lot of things we do for pleasure, and this is special, and it needs to be seen as special. Again, I know most presidents don't talk about those things, and maybe people don't want us to talk about those things, but I think it's important that you are who you are. I'm not running for preacher.

I'm not running for pastor, but these are important public policy issues.
"

Rick Santorum Wants Your Sex Life to Be 'Special' - Conor Friedersdorf - Politics - The Atlantic

Every Sperm is Sacred - YouTube

So as running for POTUS--Rick Santorum--wants to jump in bed with you---to show you how it's done--:lol::lol:

Rick Santorum stated that STATES have the right to ban birth control contraceptives.
That means condoms for men and all female birth control pills and devices.

NO STATE--has the right to intervene between the intimacy shared between a man or woman or husband and wife--who make the personal decision on how many children they have and can afford.

Only RICK SANTORUM--has the audacity to bring it up. This guy is one social freak NUT-CASE. Jesus needs to drop kick him through the goal posts of life right back into the 17th century.
 
Didn't read this whole thread but can't understand why people would be against at least minimal contraceptive techniques like birth control pills and condoms. I'd rather that parent's explain and provide for their children's sex education and contraception but government creates an atmosphere where parents don't have to take care of children, so what can you do? Contraception is a good thing. Extremely intrusive government isn't.
 
Oh please:eusa_hand: rape is non consentual and a crime, if I am hosting an orgy at my house everyone there is a willing participant, not even close to the same thing, nice try.

I honestly think he cannot tell the difference between conscentual and non-conscentual....and that makes him more likely to actually rape someone....especially if he thinks they "deserve" it.

Katz is a female.

IMO that makes it worse.
 

Forum List

Back
Top