Alina Habba Accidentally Admits Donald Trump Could Be Totally Bought

[Dragonlady]

"“Is there any effort on the part of your team to secure this money through another country, Saudi Arabia or Russia, as Joy Behar seems to think?” asked Fox News’s Martha MacCallum, referring to a recent episode of The View in which Behar speculated that such a move—that is, having a president bought and sold by potentially hostile foreign powers—could be a cataclysmic national security threat.

But none of that fazed Habba, who completely sidestepped answering the question and failed the very basic test of answering “no.”

“Well, there’s rules and regulations that are public,” Habba replied. “I can’t speak about strategy, that requires certain things and we have to follow those rules. Like I said, this is manifest injustice. It is impossible, it’s an impossibility. I believe they knew that.”"

That looks like a pretty solid "yes" to me.

How about you?

I mean she could have said "no" very easily, but she weaseled around it without saying they would not do it.

Alina Habba Accidentally Admits Donald Trump Could Be Totally Bought

Donald Trump is in massive debt, and his attorney admitted he’s open to other strategies to pay it off.

www.yahoo.com

Given that Trump took money from Tik Tok, it's already been done.

 

[Doc7505]

View attachment 921545

~~~~~~

 

[Mac1958]

That looks like a pretty solid "yes" to me.

How about you?

I mean she could have said "no" very easily, but she weaseled around it without saying they would not do it.

One thing we've learned since 2016 is that there is no bottom. Every time I've thought "no, he'll be above THAT" I'm disappointed.

Of course he's for sale.

 

[Natural Citizen]

One thing we've learned since 2016 is that there is no bottom. Every time I've thought "no, he'll be above THAT" I'm disappointed.

Of course he's for sale.

Statistically speaking, it's the poorest guy who is most easily bought.



Of course, he's a multi-millionaire now and coincidentally has never been anything but a politician.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

having a president bought and sold by potentially hostile foreign powers—could be a cataclysmic national security threat.

Trump has already proven to be a national security threat, he’s completely dishonest and corrupt.

 

[Synthaholic]

I'll take this real woman over that plastic tit fake lawyer ANY day.

 

[Crepitus]

Only on the pages of you commie propagandist. LMAO Eye witnesses say something very different.

.

Actually, every time you kids call a witness it tears a few more hole in that silly narrative.

 

[Seymour Flops]

"“Is there any effort on the part of your team to secure this money through another country, Saudi Arabia or Russia, as Joy Behar seems to think?” asked Fox News’s Martha MacCallum, referring to a recent episode of The View in which Behar speculated that such a move—that is, having a president bought and sold by potentially hostile foreign powers—could be a cataclysmic national security threat.

But none of that fazed Habba, who completely sidestepped answering the question and failed the very basic test of answering “no.”

“Well, there’s rules and regulations that are public,” Habba replied. “I can’t speak about strategy, that requires certain things and we have to follow those rules. Like I said, this is manifest injustice. It is impossible, it’s an impossibility. I believe they knew that.”"

That looks like a pretty solid "yes" to me.

How about you?

I mean she could have said "no" very easily, but she weaseled around it without saying they would not do it.

Alina Habba Accidentally Admits Donald Trump Could Be Totally Bought

Donald Trump is in massive debt, and his attorney admitted he’s open to other strategies to pay it off.

www.yahoo.com

If there is one (of many) things that Democrats should avoid throwing stones about, it is accepting money from foreigners. Obama himself turned down federal matching funds for his campaigns so that he could accept as much foreign money as he liked with no reporting requirements. If accepting foreign donations means being “bought and sold by potentially hostile foreign powers,” Crepitus, you would need to explain why you are cool with the Biden family being bought and sold.

I would never answer a question from a journalist who cited Joy Behar of all people, as an authoritative source on how I do my business. If I did, my answer would be, “what evidence did Joy provide you?” And of course Habba Is a lawyer, who is not expected to answer questions about what her client does. I think she could get disbarred for it, in fact.

But I can’t, so I’ll answer: I’m sure Trump does accept foreign money, as every other U.S. politician does. He ran his first campaign using out of pocket money, and small donations from Americans who care about America, because he had the funds to do it. So, we don’t need to wonder why such a big part of the Democrats’ lawfare strategy is about forcing him to spend incredible amounts of money on lawyers and forcing him to put up bonds unheard of in our history.

Now, they whine because he accepts foreign donations this time? Like every other politician?

 

[Crepitus]

Obama himself turned down federal matching funds for his campaigns so that he could accept as much foreign money as he liked with no reporting requirements.

That is a straight up lie.

 

[Dragonlady]

Only on the pages of you commie propagandist. LMAO Eye witnesses say something very different.

.

What eye witnesses??? Tony Bobalinksi?????? The American First PAC gave Tony $10,000. I wonder why.

 

[berg80]

"“Is there any effort on the part of your team to secure this money through another country, Saudi Arabia or Russia, as Joy Behar seems to think?” asked Fox News’s Martha MacCallum, referring to a recent episode of The View in which Behar speculated that such a move—that is, having a president bought and sold by potentially hostile foreign powers—could be a cataclysmic national security threat.

But none of that fazed Habba, who completely sidestepped answering the question and failed the very basic test of answering “no.”

“Well, there’s rules and regulations that are public,” Habba replied. “I can’t speak about strategy, that requires certain things and we have to follow those rules. Like I said, this is manifest injustice. It is impossible, it’s an impossibility. I believe they knew that.”"

That looks like a pretty solid "yes" to me.

How about you?

I mean she could have said "no" very easily, but she weaseled around it without saying they would not do it.

Alina Habba Accidentally Admits Donald Trump Could Be Totally Bought

Donald Trump is in massive debt, and his attorney admitted he’s open to other strategies to pay it off.

www.yahoo.com

I'm not sure we needed Habbadabado to tell us what has been clear from the beginning.

 

[berg80]

Obama himself turned down federal matching funds for his campaigns so that he could accept as much foreign money as he liked with no reporting requirements.

Could you identify which lying RWM source you got that from?

 

[Dragonlady]

If there is one (of many) things that Democrats should avoid throwing stones about, it is accepting money from foreigners. Obama himself turned down federal matching funds for his campaigns so that he could accept as much foreign money as he liked with no reporting requirements. If accepting foreign donations means being “bought and sold by potentially hostile foreign powers,” Crepitus, you would need to explain why you are cool with the Biden family being bought and sold.

I would never answer a question from a journalist who cited Joy Behar of all people, as an authoritative source on how I do my business. If I did, my answer would be, “what evidence did Joy provide you?” And of course Habba Is a lawyer, who is not expected to answer questions about what her client does. I think she could get disbarred for it, in fact.

But I can’t, so I’ll answer: I’m sure Trump does accept foreign money, as every other U.S. politician does. He ran his first campaign using out of pocket money, and small donations from Americans who care about America, because he had the funds to do it. So, we don’t need to wonder why such a big part of the Democrats’ lawfare strategy is about forcing him to spend incredible amounts of money on lawyers and forcing him to put up bonds unheard of in our history.

Now, they whine because he accepts foreign donations this time? Like every other politician?

It is illegal for American politicians to accept money or any other form of assistance from foreign governments. Period. End of story.

Federal law prohibits contributions, donations, expenditures(including independent expenditures) and disbursements solicited, directed, received or made directly or indirectly by or from foreign nationals in connection with any federal, state or local election.

Foreign nationals - FEC.gov

Information for committees on prohibited sources of contributions from foreign nationals

www.fec.gov

 

[Seymour Flops]

Could you identify which lying RWM source you got that from?

Sure!

https://www.npr.org/2008/10/22/95957148/did-obama-kill-public-campaign-finance

Obama Forgoes Public Funds in First for Major Candidate (Published 2008)

Senator Barack Obama became the first candidate of a major party to decline public financing, arguing that the system had collapsed and would put him at a disadvantage.

www.nytimes.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/02/09/public-campaign-funding-is-so-broken-that-candidates-turned-down-292-million-in-free-money/

McCain attacks Obama for opting out of public financing - CNN.com

Sen. John McCain on Thursday accused Sen. Barack Obama of breaking a promise when the Democrat decided to forgo public financing in this fall's campaign.

www.cnn.com

Obama, in Shift, Says He’ll Reject Public Financing (Published 2008)

Barack Obama’s decision to break a pledge to use public money will likely transform presidential campaigns, raising doubts about the future of public financing.

www.nytimes.com

Why Did Barack Obama Refuse Free Campaign Money?

John McCain attacks Barack Obama for refusing public financing of his presidential campaign, and we take a closer look at what it all means.

www.mtv.com

 

[OKTexas]

Actually, every time you kids call a witness it tears a few more hole in that silly narrative.

The only thing that got blown away are xidens LIES.

.

 

[OKTexas]

What eye witnesses??? Tony Bobalinksi?????? The American First PAC gave Tony $10,000. I wonder why.

Wow, a posturing commie. I'm not impressed, and Bobulinski isn't the only eye witness.

.

 

[Crepitus]

The only thing that got blown away are xidens LIES.

.

YOu don't get out much, do you.

 

[OKTexas]

YOu don't get out much, do you.

So are you still standing by xiden's lies, that he never discussed the crackheads and his brothers overseas businesses? Come on commie, this is an intellectual honesty test.

.

 

[Dragonlady]

Wow, a posturing commie. I'm not impressed, and Bobulinski isn't the only eye witness.

.

He's the only one who has claimed that Joe Biden was part of anything, and he has no evidence to back up his lies, but he has a LOT of money coming in from Donald Trump. Just like Kash Patel was giving money to the FBI Whistleblowers.

Bobalinksi is also a convicted felon. Didn't you say that Michael Cohen was an "unreliable witness" and not to be believed because he's a convicted felon???? The difference being that Cohen isn't being paid to testify against Trump. And Cassidy Hutchinson provided a photo as proof that Bobalinksi met with Mark Meadows in Georgia, after he called her a liar.



Devon Archer, James Biden, Jason Galanis and Hunter Biden all confirmed that Joe Biden never had any part in his son's business deals or contact with his associates, other than to say Hi when Joe called Hunter during dinner.

There isn't a single shred of evidence tying Joe Biden to anything Hunter was doing, and Bobalinksi doesn't have a shred of evidence backing up his "big guy" text.

 

[Dragonlady]

The only thing that got blown away are xidens LIES.

.

What lies would those be? Be specific.