Rick Santorum Wants Your Sex Life to Be 'Special'

Legislating morality doesn't work, case in point countries like Iran and Pakistan, their governments try to do that and the people there are all fucking goats and looking up camel porn.

Morality shouldn't need to be legislated. Morality, individual morality is an internal control on one's behavior. We are becoming an amoral culture. Not immoral, amoral. The more amoral a culture is the less internal controls and the more legislation is necessary to maintain order.

That's why there is a law prohibiting someone with AIDS having sex with an uninformed partner. There is no internal control telling an infected person that spreading AIDS is wrong. They are intent on obtaining their own pleasure no matter what the cost to someone else. So, there needs to be a law.
 
Does anyone REALLY think that sex for pleasure, without any desire for procreation, is some sort of recent development? Does anyone REALLY think that in the past people kept sex within the confines of marriage and only recently have they decided that to do otherwise is acceptable?

Does Santorum REALLY think that these kinds of statements will help his presidential bid?

The more I hear from him, the nuttier he sounds.:lol:
 
Fourteen trillion in debt, too much unemployment, a housing market in the shitter and all this guy can talk about is that there's too much fucking going on in this country?

too much fucking,, cost us all money..


Especially when it's the politicians fucking We the People using our money to do it.

Besides what in the hell does a politician know about morality. A crack whore knows more about that subject than any politician. And exactly when did the GOP decide it was OK to muck around in America's bedrooms? Don't Republicans, by definition, dislike the Federal government looking over their shoulder and especially dislike BIG Federal government telling them what to do? Guess that was those other Republicans.

Rich Santorum calls himself the Jesus Candidate. I call him a sick fucking joke.
 
Last edited:
Legislating morality doesn't work, case in point countries like Iran and Pakistan, their governments try to do that and the people there are all fucking goats and looking up camel porn.

Morality shouldn't need to be legislated. Morality, individual morality is an internal control on one's behavior. We are becoming an amoral culture.

According to who? What is "moral" is defined according to a given society or sub-society. My guess is that the majority of the United States does not feel that using a rubber is in conflict with their moral code, therefore it's not. It may be in conflict with yours but that doesn't mean that it must be for everyone else.
 
This is the argument of rapists you know. Don't tell me who to fuck. Women who don't want to fuck don't want me to have a good time. This is the natural and normal extension of sexual freedom. You don't really have that freedom if someone says no, do you?

No one is telling you who to fuck, where, or when, it's that you want to. There is no feeling there for anyone else. Sex is a past time, a way to feel good and alleviate boredom. It's the new way of saying thank you for inviting me to the party. It is now a meaningless activity between two people who care nothing for one another past the orgasm. Conducting one's life in this manner certainly isn't wrong for them to do. It isn't wrong for you to do. That this is something you WANT to do needs to be taken into consideration when evaluating your character.

Do you object to pointing this out? Is that the real complaint here. After all no one is stopping you from fucking your brains out. No one is passing any laws against it, or preaching on the street to make you feel guilty. Just saying what it really is. And that is the real complaint. Suppose such revolutionary ideas take root and grow! Sex ceases to be an evening of Scrabble. Oh my how awful that would be. What an infringement on personal freedom and pleasure.

The one good thing about sexual licentiousness is that when it is allowed to grow and flourish it eventually reaches a point where the people practicing such license grow to disgust themselves. Then it stops. Then we get Victorianism, the repressive 40s and 50s after the roaring 20s. I have no problem whatsoever with letting this lastest gasp blow itself out. Santorum feels like it could be avoided. I don't have that wish. Actually Santorum still respects the people enough to nimagine they are able to make a choice between decency and licentiousness. He should be admired for not accepting reality. I am untroubled by such nonsense.

Oh please:eusa_hand: rape is non consentual and a crime, if I am hosting an orgy at my house everyone there is a willing participant, not even close to the same thing, nice try.

I honestly think he cannot tell the difference between conscentual and non-conscentual....and that makes him more likely to actually rape someone....especially if he thinks they "deserve" it.

Once the pursuit of pleasure becomes paramount, the rapist sees his victim as stopping him from enjoying himself. Interfering with his right of pursuit of pleasure.

This isn't the alley rapist that pulls a knife, or beats a woman into submission. This is the date rapist, the GHB rapist. Many times such a rapist is caught because he is so intent on the act of sex being nothing more than feeling good, he will call his victim and ask her out again. I recall one case in which the rapist left a note "Call me sometime" conveniently including his telephone number. Then of course there is the guy who lures women into consent by creating the artificial idea that there is something about her that he finds "special" (oh darn that word again). The classic CONSENSUAL one night stand. Naturally if the woman knew the truth it would have been NON-CONSENSUAL.

To the amoral and degenerate culture, a lie is as good as the truth. There is absolutely nothing at all wrong with a man using subtrefuge to get a woman's consent. It is certainly not illegal. It might be immoral, but it's not illegal. Since we reject morals, that behavior is perfectly acceptable. If she's the 50th woman he did this to, and she gets an incurable STD, did she deserve it, or not?
 
Tell me how Santorum is preventing you from wearing a rubber....

Well shit when he says "the dangers of contraception" and that it's an "important public policy issue" it sounds a lot to me like he is of the opinion that it's the government's business whether I wear a rubber or not.

yes dangers....some of the "contraceptives" being promoted by the secular government induces abortion....promoting all kinds of "free" contraceptives also promotes "free" sex which does society no good in the bigger picture...

Tell me how Santorum is going to prevent you from going to your local swingers group

He couldn't if he tried. That's the point. Pass all the laws you wish. Laws don't stop people from doing a damned thing, they simply punish those who do.

So then why are you so worried about what Santorum says......? :lol:

It IS the business of society to determine as to how much of your depravity gets displayed in public.....beating back the porn industry would do alot......because they constantly promote filth that weak minds like yours gobble up....

Who said anything about displaying it in public? If I walked outside with my johnson hanging out you might have a point (rubber or no rubber). But what people do in the privacy of their own home is their own fucking business. Simply because you may find their behavior unacceptable doesn't mean it is.

we have a national problem that one could label as "free sex" being promoted via all sorts of media avenues by the porn industry especially among our children......this leads to irresponsible sex, rapes and violence, abortions, children without fathers, the breakup of family, dependence on the government and poverty.....

Santorum is simply being a moral leader to help break out of this insidious pattern.....
.
 
Look pal.....if I want to have an orgy I will have one. It's no one's business but mine and those who participate. If you don't want to participate that's your business. But I will thank you not to dictate to me who and how I can fuck.

look "pal".....it's high time to beat back the degenerates like you....

our children and society in general is suffering from widespread moral depravity.....Kudos to Santorum for addressing it...

Puritans......:lol::lol::lol:

We laugh at your kind.

Pervs......:lol::lol::lol:

We laugh at your kind.
 
Oh please:eusa_hand: rape is non consentual and a crime, if I am hosting an orgy at my house everyone there is a willing participant, not even close to the same thing, nice try.

I honestly think he cannot tell the difference between conscentual and non-conscentual....and that makes him more likely to actually rape someone....especially if he thinks they "deserve" it.

Once the pursuit of pleasure becomes paramount, the rapist sees his victim as stopping him from enjoying himself. Interfering with his right of pursuit of pleasure.

This isn't the alley rapist that pulls a knife, or beats a woman into submission. This is the date rapist, the GHB rapist. Many times such a rapist is caught because he is so intent on the act of sex being nothing more than feeling good, he will call his victim and ask her out again. I recall one case in which the rapist left a note "Call me sometime" conveniently including his telephone number. Then of course there is the guy who lures women into consent by creating the artificial idea that there is something about her that he finds "special" (oh darn that word again). The classic CONSENSUAL one night stand. Naturally if the woman knew the truth it would have been NON-CONSENSUAL.

To the amoral and degenerate culture, a lie is as good as the truth. There is absolutely nothing at all wrong with a man using subtrefuge to get a woman's consent. It is certainly not illegal. It might be immoral, but it's not illegal. Since we reject morals, that behavior is perfectly acceptable. If she's the 50th woman he did this to, and she gets an incurable STD, did she deserve it, or not?

How do you know so much about how a rapists mind works?:confused:
 
Legislating morality doesn't work, case in point countries like Iran and Pakistan, their governments try to do that and the people there are all fucking goats and looking up camel porn.

Morality shouldn't need to be legislated. Morality, individual morality is an internal control on one's behavior. We are becoming an amoral culture.

According to who? What is "moral" is defined according to a given society or sub-society. My guess is that the majority of the United States does not feel that using a rubber is in conflict with their moral code, therefore it's not. It may be in conflict with yours but that doesn't mean that it must be for everyone else.

Well, look at it truthfully and honestly. If using a rubber wasn't in conflict with someone's moral code we would not have epidemic STDs, nor mutating gonhorrea and syphyllis nor so many unintended pregnancies. Someone objects to using prophylactics. Who is this?

I accept, FULLY accept that we have few morals and desire even less. That's because this is an amoral and degenerate culture not because throwing off the confines of someone else's version of morality is freedom.
 
Not only does he want your sex life to be special. If you ass rape little kids in the shower..you'll get an award from Santorum.

Good fellow..that Rick. :thup:
 
Not only does he want your sex life to be special. If you ass rape little kids in the shower..you'll get an award from Santorum.

Good fellow..that Rick. :thup:

I'll bet you anything that guy has a whole library of porn hidden somewhere, people that crusade so hard against it usually do. If I want someone to tell me where to stick my dick, I'll move to Iran.:thup:
 
Special people need sex too

hittedit.jpg
Fuck you and your jokes about physically challenged children...just FUCK YOU!
 
Not only does he want your sex life to be special. If you ass rape little kids in the shower..you'll get an award from Santorum.

Good fellow..that Rick. :thup:

shut up you fucking degenerate....:evil:

Wasn't me that gave an ass raper an award..or supports that guy..was it now.

You support Santorum right? How 'bout his friend? Sandusky?

Degenerate fuck.
 
I honestly think he cannot tell the difference between conscentual and non-conscentual....and that makes him more likely to actually rape someone....especially if he thinks they "deserve" it.

Once the pursuit of pleasure becomes paramount, the rapist sees his victim as stopping him from enjoying himself. Interfering with his right of pursuit of pleasure.

This isn't the alley rapist that pulls a knife, or beats a woman into submission. This is the date rapist, the GHB rapist. Many times such a rapist is caught because he is so intent on the act of sex being nothing more than feeling good, he will call his victim and ask her out again. I recall one case in which the rapist left a note "Call me sometime" conveniently including his telephone number. Then of course there is the guy who lures women into consent by creating the artificial idea that there is something about her that he finds "special" (oh darn that word again). The classic CONSENSUAL one night stand. Naturally if the woman knew the truth it would have been NON-CONSENSUAL.

To the amoral and degenerate culture, a lie is as good as the truth. There is absolutely nothing at all wrong with a man using subtrefuge to get a woman's consent. It is certainly not illegal. It might be immoral, but it's not illegal. Since we reject morals, that behavior is perfectly acceptable. If she's the 50th woman he did this to, and she gets an incurable STD, did she deserve it, or not?

How do you know so much about how a rapists mind works?:confused:

Is it time for confession?

For many MANY years I practiced criminal defense. Primarily my firm specialized in murder and serial killers but we did have a lot of other crimes as well, including rape. I still maintain close ties to a Los Angeles criminal defense firm where I consult from time to time.

Let me ask you a question. Is it okay for man to induce a woman to think there is a relationship, a special relationship, between them to gain her consent for sex? Is this TRULY consensual sex where the man knows there would be no consent if she knew the truth? Or, is this wholly amoral behavior? We KNOW for a fact that it's not illegal.
 
Not only does he want your sex life to be special. If you ass rape little kids in the shower..you'll get an award from Santorum.

Good fellow..that Rick. :thup:

I'll bet you anything that guy has a whole library of porn hidden somewhere, people that crusade so hard against it usually do. If I want someone to tell me where to stick my dick, I'll move to Iran.:thup:

Please do....:eusa_pray:
 
Not only does he want your sex life to be special. If you ass rape little kids in the shower..you'll get an award from Santorum.

Good fellow..that Rick. :thup:

Hey Sallow....FYI....

When I was working I always said that anyone who said they would be bored if they retired were full of crap.

Well...as you know...I retired 2 weeks ago at the age of 54.

2 weeks later?

I am bored sick. Dont know what to do with myself.

Built a new headboard.....re-built 5 steps leading to my second level....and did about 25 loads of laundry.

Now what?
 
Not only does he want your sex life to be special. If you ass rape little kids in the shower..you'll get an award from Santorum.

Good fellow..that Rick. :thup:

I'll bet you anything that guy has a whole library of porn hidden somewhere, people that crusade so hard against it usually do. If I want someone to tell me where to stick my dick, I'll move to Iran.:thup:

Iran doesnt tell you where to stick it.

They tell you where NOT to stick it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top