Reuters: Head of House Benghazi panel says McCarthy 'screwed up'

[Vigilante]

Watch and learn, grass hopper.

THIS is why we call you the JakeASS!

 

[rdean]

That will have about as much effect as the ethics complaint against Barney Frank!

What did Barney do?

 

[Vigilante]

That will have about as much effect as the ethics complaint against Barney Frank!

What did Barney do?

Look it up , I'm tired of explaining things that anyone into politics should already know!

 

[rdean]

Seems to me the DemocRATs and their lapdog media did a very similar job on Trump with his MEXICAN COMMENTS.... Anyone with a brain knew he was talking about ILLEGAL MEXICANS, but that didn't matter. Seems McCarthy didn't mention the SECONDARY effect of the Benghazi hearings was the drastic drop in the Hildebeasts poll numbers. Yes, he did word it , STUPIDLY, but most citizens that vote, AND have a functioning brain, realize that was what he meant to say.... But, this will play with the MSM, and the LAP DOG Subversive DemocRATS here and in the underground, Salon, and Daily Kos for awhile...I mean, after all LOOK who they are defending!

When Republicans said they want to kill gays, we knew what they meant.

GOP says kill gays - Google Search

 

[rdean]

That will have about as much effect as the ethics complaint against Barney Frank!

What did Barney do?

Look it up , I'm tired of explaining things that anyone into politics should already know!

You make an accusation and when challenged, you tell them to do your research. Sweet gig if you can get it.

 

[Political Junky]

The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC

 

[Derideo_Te]

But the most disgusting aspect of this episode is how absolutely left-wing-corrupt journalism has become. Everything must be vetted by the consumer now.

Yet another un-American extremist rightwanker who doesn't understand the concept of the 1st Amendment that grants the press the right to keep We the People informed of the inane drivel that is all anyone now expects from the Tea Party crazies that infest the House and the Benghazi witchhunt panel.

That's a stupid post. Nothing was said about disallowing inaccurate and biased reporting.
The point I made was about the lack of integrity and the dishonesty of left wing bias in mainstream media. You fall for it. That's a reflection of your bias and/or lack of intellect.

Ironic coming from someone who blindly swallows the extremist rightwing disinformation relating to the Benghazi boondoggle perpetrated by the House.

I don't get any info from right wing sites. I follow new reports, vet and draw conclusions from that collective.
Benghazi was an abject failure of duty. It doesn't mean it involved any criminal negligence or illegal activity. It was a failure of responsibility that left four Americans dead. The ensuing coverups are the potentially illegal activities and the entire episode is a reflection of the completely un-American lack of character of this president and his then SoS.

First you denigrate the news and then you admit to reading them and believing them.

Does your cognitive dissonance hurt?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

But the most disgusting aspect of this episode is how absolutely left-wing-corrupt journalism has become. Everything must be vetted by the consumer now.

Yet another un-American extremist rightwanker who doesn't understand the concept of the 1st Amendment that grants the press the right to keep We the People informed of the inane drivel that is all anyone now expects from the Tea Party crazies that infest the House and the Benghazi witchhunt panel.

That's a stupid post. Nothing was said about disallowing inaccurate and biased reporting.
The point I made was about the lack of integrity and the dishonesty of left wing bias in mainstream media. You fall for it. That's a reflection of your bias and/or lack of intellect.

Ironic coming from someone who blindly swallows the extremist rightwing disinformation relating to the Benghazi boondoggle perpetrated by the House.

I don't get any info from right wing sites. I follow new reports, vet and draw conclusions from that collective.
Benghazi was an abject failure of duty. It doesn't mean it involved any criminal negligence or illegal activity. It was a failure of responsibility that left four Americans dead. The ensuing coverups are the potentially illegal activities and the entire episode is a reflection of the completely un-American lack of character of this president and his then SoS.

First you denigrate the news and then you admit to reading them and believing them.

Does your cognitive dissonance hurt?

You obviously missed the part about vetting.

 

[Claudette]

That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.

Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.

The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.

Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.

They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.

Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And so many House committee meetings have exculpated the State Department.

 

[rightwinger]

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

Nonsense.

The only twisting going on is you and others on the right trying to keep the 'Benghazi' lies in political play.

Benghazi was an abject failure of duty. That failure was covered up by obama and HR Haldeman Clinton and then that coverup was attempted to be covered up by another coverup. Dishonest lefties, the equivalent of Nixon apologist hypocrites, make it out to be a right wing witch hunt.
Phonies.

And yet, ten investigations have been unable to prove malfeasance ...maybe number 11 or 12 or 20 will

You need to read my ensuing post. Not every egregious failure involves illegal activity.

Then why are you wasting our time?

What have Republican investigations done to make us safer in the future? They are all targeted at "How we can blame Hillary"

 

[rightwinger]

That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.

Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.

The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.

Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.

They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.

Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.

Yet ten investigations have not provided any evidence of your wild conspiracy claims

 

[bedowin62]

YAWN

the Left is so desperate to get this off of Hillary's back.

Benghazi and the email server scandal are tied together. Despite what left-wing losers say nobody can make a claim this has been investigated and nothing found when her server was wiped clean.

 

[rightwinger]

YAWN

the Left is so desperate to get this off of Hillary's back.

Benghazi and the email server scandal are tied together. Despite what left-wing losers say nobody can make a claim this has been investigated and nothing found when her server was wiped clean.

Republicans kept Whitewater going for seven years with no findings of fault....why should this be any different?

 

[Claudette]

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.

Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.

The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.

Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.

They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.

Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.

Yet ten investigations have not provided any evidence of your wild conspiracy claims

Nothing wild about it. They had months of warnings and did nothing. If you don't see a problem with that even if they had 100 hearings then you are dumber that I thought you were.

The Brits and the Red Cross got those same warnings and took them seriously enough to pull out of LIbya which exactly what we should have done.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Claudette, the GOP investigation tell you that your "feelings" are not grounded in reality.

 

[rightwinger]

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.

Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.

The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.

Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.

They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.

Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.

Yet ten investigations have not provided any evidence of your wild conspiracy claims

Nothing wild about it. They had months of warnings and did nothing. If you don't see a problem with that even if they had 100 hearings then you are dumber that I thought you were.

The Brits and the Red Cross got those same warnings and took them seriously enough to pull out of LIbya which exactly what we should have done.

Yea and George Bush had warnings about 9-11

That investigation lasted about two weeks

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

There are no transcripts or recording of what Creep 43 and his even creepier vice President had to say about 9 11 in the superficial investigation of the Bushy disaster ...but they are using Public resources in their war against the Hillary candidacy...

 

[Political Junky]

The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC

Rachel covered Kevin McCarthy's speech problems very well on Wednesday night.

 

[Claudette]

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.

Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.

The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.

Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.

They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.

Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.

Yet ten investigations have not provided any evidence of your wild conspiracy claims

Nothing wild about it. They had months of warnings and did nothing. If you don't see a problem with that even if they had 100 hearings then you are dumber that I thought you were.

The Brits and the Red Cross got those same warnings and took them seriously enough to pull out of LIbya which exactly what we should have done.

Yea and George Bush had warnings about 9-11

That investigation lasted about two weeks

So did Clinton. The whole thing was planned on his watch.