Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Months? Are you describing Benghazi or the World Trade Center?You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.
Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com
Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
Which crimes are you talking about?That's accurate, McCarthy did screw up. What he intended to say was that once Hillary's crimes are exposed her ratings plummet. It wasn't that big of a deal but the liberal media is desperate for a sound bite issue and they could attack the GOP on two fronts.
There are no crimes by HRC, but there may be Gowdy and the committee counsel.Which crimes are you talking about?That's accurate, McCarthy did screw up. What he intended to say was that once Hillary's crimes are exposed her ratings plummet. It wasn't that big of a deal but the liberal media is desperate for a sound bite issue and they could attack the GOP on two fronts.
Months? Are you describing Benghazi or the World Trade Center?You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.
Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com
Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
As well he should. Richard Clarke apologized for the administration.Months? Are you describing Benghazi or the World Trade Center?You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com
Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
Actually both. . They had some warning of 9-11. They just didn't know when or where.
9-11 was planned on Clintons watch and they had warnings as well. They just wouldn't listen to them. Of course Bush will forever get the blame because he was in office for eight months when the towers came down.
They had more than months to prepare. They had eleven years. 9-11 is the Christmas holiday for islime.You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.
Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com
Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
Truth is when he announced Bin Laden had been killed he gave credit to the special operations people who did the job and reminded the nation that the death of Bin Laden would not end the war against al Qaeda and terrorism.They had more than months to prepare. They had eleven years. 9-11 is the Christmas holiday for islime.You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.
Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com
Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
And let's not forget that HR Haldeman Clinton's state department worked for and protected obama and his campaign. This was all covered up to protect obama. After all, he was running on having personally killed Bin Laden and defeating terrorism.
I think they are targeting getting to the truth and holding the obama administration accountable for their failure and deceit in order to deter future admins from repeating the mistake. Kinda like how we thought Watergate may have prevented this one. Difference, of course, is that during Watergate, Woodward and Bernstien weren't working for Nixon the way media is working for the democrats and obama.You need to read my ensuing post. Not every egregious failure involves illegal activity.And yet, ten investigations have been unable to prove malfeasance ...maybe number 11 or 12 or 20 willBenghazi was an abject failure of duty. That failure was covered up by obama and HR Haldeman Clinton and then that coverup was attempted to be covered up by another coverup. Dishonest lefties, the equivalent of Nixon apologist hypocrites, make it out to be a right wing witch hunt.Nonsense.The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.
The only twisting going on is you and others on the right trying to keep the 'Benghazi' lies in political play.
Phonies.
Then why are you wasting our time?
What have Republican investigations done to make us safer in the future? They are all targeted at "How we can blame Hillary"
He referred to I, me and mine and when he campaigned he campaigned on his getting Bin Laden.Truth is when he announced Bin Laden had been killed he gave credit to the special operations people who did the job and reminded the nation that the death of Bin Laden would not end the war against al Qaeda and terrorism.They had more than months to prepare. They had eleven years. 9-11 is the Christmas holiday for islime.You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com
Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
And let's not forget that HR Haldeman Clinton's state department worked for and protected obama and his campaign. This was all covered up to protect obama. After all, he was running on having personally killed Bin Laden and defeating terrorism.
Kind of different from the lie you continue to spout and promote.
As well he should. Richard Clarke apologized for the administration.Months? Are you describing Benghazi or the World Trade Center?You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.
Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
Actually both. . They had some warning of 9-11. They just didn't know when or where.
9-11 was planned on Clintons watch and they had warnings as well. They just wouldn't listen to them. Of course Bush will forever get the blame because he was in office for eight months when the towers came down.
You're so easy to pwn. Do you ever sit back and think "I'm proven wrong on every thread. Maybe I'm doing something wrong here?"Truth is when he announced Bin Laden had been killed he gave credit to the special operations people who did the job and reminded the nation that the death of Bin Laden would not end the war against al Qaeda and terrorism.They had more than months to prepare. They had eleven years. 9-11 is the Christmas holiday for islime.You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com
Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
And let's not forget that HR Haldeman Clinton's state department worked for and protected obama and his campaign. This was all covered up to protect obama. After all, he was running on having personally killed Bin Laden and defeating terrorism.
Kind of different from the lie you continue to spout and promote.
Already answered. Richard Clarke did so. Condi Rice was pissed, so he apologized again the next day.As well he should. Richard Clarke apologized for the administration.Months? Are you describing Benghazi or the World Trade Center?Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
Actually both. . They had some warning of 9-11. They just didn't know when or where.
9-11 was planned on Clintons watch and they had warnings as well. They just wouldn't listen to them. Of course Bush will forever get the blame because he was in office for eight months when the towers came down.
Who apologized for the Clinton administration??
No one.
You're so easy to pwn. Do you ever sit back and think "I'm proven wrong on every thread. Maybe I'm doing something wrong here?"Truth is when he announced Bin Laden had been killed he gave credit to the special operations people who did the job and reminded the nation that the death of Bin Laden would not end the war against al Qaeda and terrorism.They had more than months to prepare. They had eleven years. 9-11 is the Christmas holiday for islime.You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.
Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
And let's not forget that HR Haldeman Clinton's state department worked for and protected obama and his campaign. This was all covered up to protect obama. After all, he was running on having personally killed Bin Laden and defeating terrorism.
Kind of different from the lie you continue to spout and promote.
You're so easy to pwn. Do you ever sit back and think "I'm proven wrong on every thread. Maybe I'm doing something wrong here?"Truth is when he announced Bin Laden had been killed he gave credit to the special operations people who did the job and reminded the nation that the death of Bin Laden would not end the war against al Qaeda and terrorism.They had more than months to prepare. They had eleven years. 9-11 is the Christmas holiday for islime.Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
And let's not forget that HR Haldeman Clinton's state department worked for and protected obama and his campaign. This was all covered up to protect obama. After all, he was running on having personally killed Bin Laden and defeating terrorism.
Kind of different from the lie you continue to spout and promote.
The whole speech is 12 minutes long, but even in the edited version of less than 2 minutes the President is giving credit the team that located him, the team of Americans who carried out the mission and warned that al Qaeda was not finished and would continue to plan attacks on America. That is what is in the short video you posted. Did you watch it. It backs up everything I said and proves your claims to be false. You should always read your links or watch your video links before you post them.
Head of House Benghazi panel says McCarthy 'screwed up'
Uhuh....
The head of the U.S. congressional committee investigating the attack in Benghazi, Libya, on Wednesday defended his panel's work after a fellow Republican boasted on television about its impact on Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton.
"Kevin screwed up," committee chairman Trey Gowdy told MSNBC television, referring to U.S. House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, who said in a television interview last week that the federally funded investigation had successfully dented Clinton's poll numbers as she seeks her party's presidential nomination.
Uhuh....
Telling the truth is screwing up
Yeah. Like it was a video that got them killed???
The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity
Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.
You're so easy to pwn. Do you ever sit back and think "I'm proven wrong on every thread. Maybe I'm doing something wrong here?"Truth is when he announced Bin Laden had been killed he gave credit to the special operations people who did the job and reminded the nation that the death of Bin Laden would not end the war against al Qaeda and terrorism.They had more than months to prepare. They had eleven years. 9-11 is the Christmas holiday for islime.Of course it was an attack. An attack they had months of warnings about. Warnings that the Brits and the Red Cross took seriously enough to pull out of Libya.
The CIA knew immediately it was an attack and had nothing to do with a video.
Benghazi was a fuck up by Clintons State Department plain and simple. A fuck up that killed four good men.
They didn't beef up security and they didn't pull our people out despite months of warnings about an attack to come.
Anyone who doesn't find State and Hilbat guilty of gross negligence is just lying to themselves. Hilbats State Department was at fault for Benghazi.
And let's not forget that HR Haldeman Clinton's state department worked for and protected obama and his campaign. This was all covered up to protect obama. After all, he was running on having personally killed Bin Laden and defeating terrorism.
Kind of different from the lie you continue to spout and promote.
The whole speech is 12 minutes long, but even in the edited version of less than 2 minutes the President is giving credit the team that located him, the team of Americans who carried out the mission and warned that al Qaeda was not finished and would continue to plan attacks on America. That is what is in the short video you posted. Did you watch it. It backs up everything I said and proves your claims to be false. You should always read your links or watch your video links before you post them.
I did this, I authorized that, I ordered the other. I I I. This is the most self absorbed president in history.
That's accurate, McCarthy did screw up. What he intended to say was that once Hillary's crimes are exposed her ratings plummet. It wasn't that big of a deal but the liberal media is desperate for a sound bite issue and they could attack the GOP on two fronts.
