Reuters: Head of House Benghazi panel says McCarthy 'screwed up'

The Republicans should stop playing political games with his death, then. They are apparently willing to say anything without regard to the truth on the back of a good man's demise.
Good man? You mean that "bump in the road"?
Seems like that's what the Republicans think of him. They keep trying to make the bump bigger, not to honor the man, but in an attempt to create a roadblock for Hillary. It's obvious he's nothing more than a political tool for the right. DISGUSTING!!!
 

Yeah. Like it was a video that got them killed???

The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.
Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

Here: http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/video-maker-blamed-for-benghazi-remains-jailed/
 
Eight committees have found nothing.

Neither will a ninth.

A Jason Chaffetz HoR speakership will contribut to a massive Dem sweep.

I don't think it will matter

A Do Nothing Congress still does nothing
Republicans in Congress are incapable of compromisng with fellow Republicans let alone the Democrats and the President

John Boehner found that out
 

Yeah. Like it was a video that got them killed???

The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.
Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

Without the video....there is no crowd
Without the crowd shielding them...there is no terrorist attack
 
Telling the truth is screwing up

Yeah. Like it was a video that got them killed???

The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.
Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

Here: Video maker blamed for Benghazi remains jailed
That link YOU posted is to the guy who made the video. I gave you the name of Khattala, one of the Benghazi attackers described as one of the leaders of the assault. He is the one who claims to have been influenced by the video. Why are you deflecting away from that?
 
4 dead Americans, arming AQ and ISIS through the Consulate, bumps in the road, what difference does it make?
I have to apologize. I've been saying that 24 people died under Bush at US Embassies around the world.

Turns out it was 39 attacks and 87 dead. Sorry about that. What Republicans are really mad about is that it was only 4 with Mrs. Clinton as SOT.

--------------------------------------------

On the numbers, Garamendi's actually understating the case.

Using the Global Terrorism Database and a news account that Garamendi's staff said was the source of his claim, we identified 39 attacks or attempted attacks on U.S. embassies and embassy personnel.

Of these 39 incidents, 20 resulted in at least one fatality.

Garamendi also understated the number of deaths. In the 20 incidents with at least one fatality, the total death toll was 87 — quite a few more than the 60 Garamendi cited.

PolitiFact: Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?
 
"McCarthy later said he had not meant to suggest the committee's purpose was to harm the former secretary of state's chance of winning the November 2016 election."

Well it sure as shit didn't attempt to do anything else now did it, boys.
It wasn't.
 
Yeah, Garamendi understated the deaths under Bush's watch by almost a quarter.
 
still waiting for those SOLID facts from Trey Gowdy that will convict Clinton ... or ANYONE ELSE .. there's your screw up, so he's retiring.

LOL
 
The talk is that if the Dems can get the House, they will open hearings against Gowdy for criminally proceeding with hearings he knows where not based on any credible evidence.
 
Eight committees have found nothing.

Neither will a ninth.

A Jason Chaffetz HoR speakership will contribut to a massive Dem sweep.

I don't think it will matter

A Do Nothing Congress still does nothing
Republicans in Congress are incapable of compromisng with fellow Republicans let alone the Democrats and the President

John Boehner found that out

:clap:
 
4 dead Americans, arming AQ and ISIS through the Consulate, bumps in the road, what difference does it make?
I have to apologize. I've been saying that 24 people died under Bush at US Embassies around the world.

Turns out it was 39 attacks and 87 dead. Sorry about that. What Republicans are really mad about is that it was only 4 with Mrs. Clinton as SOT.

--------------------------------------------

On the numbers, Garamendi's actually understating the case.

Using the Global Terrorism Database and a news account that Garamendi's staff said was the source of his claim, we identified 39 attacks or attempted attacks on U.S. embassies and embassy personnel.

Of these 39 incidents, 20 resulted in at least one fatality.

Garamendi also understated the number of deaths. In the 20 incidents with at least one fatality, the total death toll was 87 — quite a few more than the 60 Garamendi cited.

PolitiFact: Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?

None of them were US Embassy employees.
 
4 dead Americans, arming AQ and ISIS through the Consulate, bumps in the road, what difference does it make?
I have to apologize. I've been saying that 24 people died under Bush at US Embassies around the world.

Turns out it was 39 attacks and 87 dead. Sorry about that. What Republicans are really mad about is that it was only 4 with Mrs. Clinton as SOT.

--------------------------------------------

On the numbers, Garamendi's actually understating the case.

Using the Global Terrorism Database and a news account that Garamendi's staff said was the source of his claim, we identified 39 attacks or attempted attacks on U.S. embassies and embassy personnel.

Of these 39 incidents, 20 resulted in at least one fatality.

Garamendi also understated the number of deaths. In the 20 incidents with at least one fatality, the total death toll was 87 — quite a few more than the 60 Garamendi cited.

PolitiFact: Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?

None of them were US Embassy employees.
Nor were Woods and Doherty. Do they not count anymore?
 
That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

Yeah. Like it was a video that got them killed???

The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.
Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.
 
That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.
Telling the truth is screwing up

Yeah. Like it was a video that got them killed???

The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.
Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

Republicans are concerned with heresay evidence now?

That is all they have been acting on for three years
 
How many of those were in active war zones? There have been more attacks on US Embassies and Consulates, and their employees under Obama than Bush, in non war zone areas. And no US Ambassadors were killed under Bush. Stevens was the first since 1979.
4 dead Americans, arming AQ and ISIS through the Consulate, bumps in the road, what difference does it make?
I have to apologize. I've been saying that 24 people died under Bush at US Embassies around the world.

Turns out it was 39 attacks and 87 dead. Sorry about that. What Republicans are really mad about is that it was only 4 with Mrs. Clinton as SOT.

--------------------------------------------

On the numbers, Garamendi's actually understating the case.

Using the Global Terrorism Database and a news account that Garamendi's staff said was the source of his claim, we identified 39 attacks or attempted attacks on U.S. embassies and embassy personnel.

Of these 39 incidents, 20 resulted in at least one fatality.

Garamendi also understated the number of deaths. In the 20 incidents with at least one fatality, the total death toll was 87 — quite a few more than the 60 Garamendi cited.

PolitiFact: Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?
 
The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.
 

Forum List

Back
Top