Reuters: Head of House Benghazi panel says McCarthy 'screwed up'

[depotoo]

It was still stupid and political.

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

 

[Camp]

That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

Telling the truth is screwing up

Yeah. Like it was a video that got them killed???

The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.

Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

 

[Camp]

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

Maybe the Tea Party should consider spokespeople who know how to actually speak. Just saying, since he wants to be top dog speaker.

 

[Sallow]

Chris Steven's family might not think its funny

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It was still stupid and political.

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

It was most definitely a gaffe. But it was in no way the admission that our corrupt lefty media has 'reported' it to be.

 

[Siete]

It was still stupid and political.

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

It was most definitely a gaffe. But it was in no way the admission that our corrupt lefty media has 'reported' it to be.

lefty media huh?

LOL

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

Maybe the Tea Party should consider spokespeople who know how to actually speak. Just saying, since he wants to be top dog speaker.

I watched that interview.
It was not nearly as unclear as left wing corrupt media have made it out to be.
I'm no fan of McCarthy and I do hope this prevents him from landing the speakership. That would make him third in line for president. What we have as the first two are bad enough.
But the most disgusting aspect of this episode is how absolutely left-wing-corrupt journalism has become. Everything must be vetted by the consumer now.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It was still stupid and political.

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

It was most definitely a gaffe. But it was in no way the admission that our corrupt lefty media has 'reported' it to be.

lefty media huh?

LOL

Yes. HR Haldeman Clinton is even using their distorted 'reporting' to her advantage. When you have HR Haldeman Clinton using your reportage to her advantage, that's as corrupt as anyone can get.

 

[Siete]

It was still stupid and political.

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

It was most definitely a gaffe. But it was in no way the admission that our corrupt lefty media has 'reported' it to be.

lefty media huh?

LOL

Yes. HR Haldeman Clinton is even using their distorted 'reporting' to her advantage. When you have HR Haldeman Clinton using your reportage to her advantage, that's as corrupt as anyone can get.

so you're saying Republicans are corrupt when Fox reports to their advantage?

I agree, totally corrupt.

Rep. Trey Gowdy on Hillary Clinton's widening email scandal

 

[the_human_being]

That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

Yeah. Like it was a video that got them killed???

The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.

Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

Nonsense.

The only twisting going on is you and others on the right trying to keep the 'Benghazi' lies in political play.

 

[Derideo_Te]

But the most disgusting aspect of this episode is how absolutely left-wing-corrupt journalism has become. Everything must be vetted by the consumer now.

Yet another un-American extremist rightwanker who doesn't understand the concept of the 1st Amendment that grants the press the right to keep We the People informed of the inane drivel that is all anyone now expects from the Tea Party crazies that infest the House and the Benghazi witchhunt panel.

 

[Camp]

That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.

Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

 

[the_human_being]

That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.

Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.

 

[Camp]

That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.

I mentioned a guy who Special Op's picked up and is currently in a US prison. His name is Khattala and I gave a link. News reports claim he is an organizer and at least one of, if not the leader(s) of the Benghazi attack and stated that the attack was instigated by the video. You have chosen to ignore that discussion and switched it to whether there was an actual demonstration, valid or fake. You conveniently ignore the statement by the captured suspect. Crap like that is why there have been so many dud hearings that have led to nothing. No one wants to play the silly huckster smoke and mirror games.

 

[the_human_being]

That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.

I mentioned a guy who Special Op's picked up and is currently in a US prison. His name is Khattala and I gave a link. News reports claim he is an organizer and at least one of, if not the leader(s) of the Benghazi attack and stated that the attack was instigated by the video. You have chosen to ignore that discussion and switched it to whether there was an actual demonstration, valid or fake. You conveniently ignore the statement by the captured suspect. Crap like that is why there have been so many dud hearings that have led to nothing. No one wants to play the silly huckster smoke and mirror games.

No. You fail to accept the part where CNN stated they adopted that lie to use a couple of days after the attack when they first heard it.

 

[Sallow]

That is the claim of an NYT reporter, that wasn't even there, stating Libyans said he said that in 'private' conversations. It is nothing more than heresay. And I suspect trying to save some credibility of Clinton. A he said, she said, sort of thing. Ridiculous, and yet gullible people hoping their hero Clinton will be vindicated by it. Heresay.

The video got the crowds there
Terrorists were just looking for the opportunity

Well, they interviewed a lot of folks there after the attack and none of them were aware of the video.

Bull shit, we caught one and he is sitting in an American prison. His name is Atmed Abu Khattala and he has stated that one of the reason for the attack was revenge for the video. You can look up his name and get the story from whatever source you want.

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/w...egin-to-answer-questions-on-assault.html?_r=1

 

[Sallow]

I offered the information in response to the comment that no person in the crowd outside of the Benghazi facility mentioned the video. Now that the statement is shown the be false, the bar has been moved. The NYT reporter is not to be trusted. There was also a Libyan newspaper story that attributed the attack in part to the video. That has been labeled by the rw to be part of a conspiracy. It is all one big conspiracy to make the rw accusers look wrong and like nut jobs. Over 20 demonstrations at Embassies all over the Muslim world, all part of the 2012 conspiracy to make rw'ers look nutty and protect Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Presidential campaign.

Again: No mob, no video: Benghazi Mission Attack Fast Facts - CNN.com

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.

I mentioned a guy who Special Op's picked up and is currently in a US prison. His name is Khattala and I gave a link. News reports claim he is an organizer and at least one of, if not the leader(s) of the Benghazi attack and stated that the attack was instigated by the video. You have chosen to ignore that discussion and switched it to whether there was an actual demonstration, valid or fake. You conveniently ignore the statement by the captured suspect. Crap like that is why there have been so many dud hearings that have led to nothing. No one wants to play the silly huckster smoke and mirror games.

No. You fail to accept the part where CNN stated they adopted that lie to use a couple of days after the attack when they first heard it.

The same CNN that had "embedded" reporters in Iraq and treated the invasion like a football game?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

It was still stupid and political.

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

It was most definitely a gaffe. But it was in no way the admission that our corrupt lefty media has 'reported' it to be.

lefty media huh?

LOL

Yes. HR Haldeman Clinton is even using their distorted 'reporting' to her advantage. When you have HR Haldeman Clinton using your reportage to her advantage, that's as corrupt as anyone can get.

so you're saying Republicans are corrupt when Fox reports to their advantage?

I agree, totally corrupt.

Rep. Trey Gowdy on Hillary Clinton's widening email scandal

If you want to start a thread about Fox News intentionally misreporting something for the purpose of aiding the repubs and not retracting their mistake, go ahead. It does nothing to change the fact that mainstream media has misrepresented this incident in order to help HR Haldeman Clinton. So much so that she is now using this misreporting as a campaign advantage.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.

Nonsense.

The only twisting going on is you and others on the right trying to keep the 'Benghazi' lies in political play.

Benghazi was an abject failure of duty. That failure was covered up by obama and HR Haldeman Clinton and then that coverup was attempted to be covered up by another coverup. Dishonest lefties, the equivalent of Nixon apologist hypocrites, make it out to be a right wing witch hunt.
Phonies.