Reuters: Head of House Benghazi panel says McCarthy 'screwed up'

You are deflecting by changing the subject. Anyway, you should read your links better. The one you posted doesn't support your argument nor address the issue.

Again. The link to CNN stated there was NO mob attack and that it was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with any video.
I mentioned a guy who Special Op's picked up and is currently in a US prison. His name is Khattala and I gave a link. News reports claim he is an organizer and at least one of, if not the leader(s) of the Benghazi attack and stated that the attack was instigated by the video. You have chosen to ignore that discussion and switched it to whether there was an actual demonstration, valid or fake. You conveniently ignore the statement by the captured suspect. Crap like that is why there have been so many dud hearings that have led to nothing. No one wants to play the silly huckster smoke and mirror games.

No. You fail to accept the part where CNN stated they adopted that lie to use a couple of days after the attack when they first heard it.

The same CNN that had "embedded" reporters in Iraq and treated the invasion like a football game?





Yes, thee Clinton New Network. That Liberal network.
 
Khattala and his story is the narrative that gives the lie to human-being's nonsense.
 
But the most disgusting aspect of this episode is how absolutely left-wing-corrupt journalism has become. Everything must be vetted by the consumer now.

Yet another un-American extremist rightwanker who doesn't understand the concept of the 1st Amendment that grants the press the right to keep We the People informed of the inane drivel that is all anyone now expects from the Tea Party crazies that infest the House and the Benghazi witchhunt panel.
That's a stupid post. Nothing was said about disallowing inaccurate and biased reporting.
The point I made was about the lack of integrity and the dishonesty of left wing bias in mainstream media. You fall for it. That's a reflection of your bias and/or lack of intellect.
 
The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.
Nonsense.

The only twisting going on is you and others on the right trying to keep the 'Benghazi' lies in political play.
Benghazi was an abject failure of duty. That failure was covered up by obama and HR Haldeman Clinton and then that coverup was attempted to be covered up by another coverup. Dishonest lefties, the equivalent of Nixon apologist hypocrites, make it out to be a right wing witch hunt.
Phonies.
investigation.JPG
 
But the most disgusting aspect of this episode is how absolutely left-wing-corrupt journalism has become. Everything must be vetted by the consumer now.

Yet another un-American extremist rightwanker who doesn't understand the concept of the 1st Amendment that grants the press the right to keep We the People informed of the inane drivel that is all anyone now expects from the Tea Party crazies that infest the House and the Benghazi witchhunt panel.
That's a stupid post. Nothing was said about disallowing inaccurate and biased reporting.
The point I made was about the lack of integrity and the dishonesty of left wing bias in mainstream media. You fall for it. That's a reflection of your bias and/or lack of intellect.

Ironic coming from someone who blindly swallows the extremist rightwing disinformation relating to the Benghazi boondoggle perpetrated by the House.
 
The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.
Nonsense.

The only twisting going on is you and others on the right trying to keep the 'Benghazi' lies in political play.
Benghazi was an abject failure of duty. That failure was covered up by obama and HR Haldeman Clinton and then that coverup was attempted to be covered up by another coverup. Dishonest lefties, the equivalent of Nixon apologist hypocrites, make it out to be a right wing witch hunt.
Phonies.
View attachment 51799
Don't crush that dwarf, hand me the pliers.
 
How many of those were in active war zones? There have been more attacks on US Embassies and Consulates, and their employees under Obama than Bush, in non war zone areas. And no US Ambassadors were killed under Bush. Stevens was the first since 1979.
4 dead Americans, arming AQ and ISIS through the Consulate, bumps in the road, what difference does it make?
I have to apologize. I've been saying that 24 people died under Bush at US Embassies around the world.

Turns out it was 39 attacks and 87 dead. Sorry about that. What Republicans are really mad about is that it was only 4 with Mrs. Clinton as SOT.

--------------------------------------------

On the numbers, Garamendi's actually understating the case.

Using the Global Terrorism Database and a news account that Garamendi's staff said was the source of his claim, we identified 39 attacks or attempted attacks on U.S. embassies and embassy personnel.

Of these 39 incidents, 20 resulted in at least one fatality.

Garamendi also understated the number of deaths. In the 20 incidents with at least one fatality, the total death toll was 87 — quite a few more than the 60 Garamendi cited.

PolitiFact: Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?
Of course you are unable to back that up are you?

Now only ambassadors count? You have so little regard for life
 
The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.
Nonsense.

The only twisting going on is you and others on the right trying to keep the 'Benghazi' lies in political play.
Benghazi was an abject failure of duty. That failure was covered up by obama and HR Haldeman Clinton and then that coverup was attempted to be covered up by another coverup. Dishonest lefties, the equivalent of Nixon apologist hypocrites, make it out to be a right wing witch hunt.
Phonies.
And yet, ten investigations have been unable to prove malfeasance ...maybe number 11 or 12 or 20 will
 
Head of House Benghazi panel says McCarthy 'screwed up'

Uhuh....


The head of the U.S. congressional committee investigating the attack in Benghazi, Libya, on Wednesday defended his panel's work after a fellow Republican boasted on television about its impact on Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton.

"Kevin screwed up," committee chairman Trey Gowdy told MSNBC television, referring to U.S. House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, who said in a television interview last week that the federally funded investigation had successfully dented Clinton's poll numbers as she seeks her party's presidential nomination.

Uhuh....

I mean you have to sit back a second and think about what conservatives have become.

They use the bodies of 4 dead Americans as a political football.

It is disgusting to a disgusting degree. These are the same people who lie through their gums about pro-life, then use the dead bodies of 4 Americans simply to further their political agenda.

It doesn't matter who you vote for conservatives, this is who YOU have become.
 
But the most disgusting aspect of this episode is how absolutely left-wing-corrupt journalism has become. Everything must be vetted by the consumer now.

Yet another un-American extremist rightwanker who doesn't understand the concept of the 1st Amendment that grants the press the right to keep We the People informed of the inane drivel that is all anyone now expects from the Tea Party crazies that infest the House and the Benghazi witchhunt panel.
That's a stupid post. Nothing was said about disallowing inaccurate and biased reporting.
The point I made was about the lack of integrity and the dishonesty of left wing bias in mainstream media. You fall for it. That's a reflection of your bias and/or lack of intellect.

Ironic coming from someone who blindly swallows the extremist rightwing disinformation relating to the Benghazi boondoggle perpetrated by the House.
I don't get any info from right wing sites. I follow new reports, vet and draw conclusions from that collective.
Benghazi was an abject failure of duty. It doesn't mean it involved any criminal negligence or illegal activity. It was a failure of responsibility that left four Americans dead. The ensuing coverups are the potentially illegal activities and the entire episode is a reflection of the completely un-American lack of character of this president and his then SoS.
 
The twisting of McCarthy's gaffe was for the benefit of dishonest, stupid and gullible left wing sheeple like the OP.
McCarthy was responding to claims hat the current crop of repubs were not effectively stopping left wing agendas so he pointed out one result of the Benghazi investigation is that it has hurt HR Haldeman Clinton's poll numbers.
Corrupt media, in the tank for neocon lefties, then intentionally misconstrued the essence of McCarthy's point in order to rile up you gullible, stupid lefty sheeple.
Nonsense.

The only twisting going on is you and others on the right trying to keep the 'Benghazi' lies in political play.
Benghazi was an abject failure of duty. That failure was covered up by obama and HR Haldeman Clinton and then that coverup was attempted to be covered up by another coverup. Dishonest lefties, the equivalent of Nixon apologist hypocrites, make it out to be a right wing witch hunt.
Phonies.
And yet, ten investigations have been unable to prove malfeasance ...maybe number 11 or 12 or 20 will
You need to read my ensuing post. Not every egregious failure involves illegal activity.
 
4 dead Americans, arming AQ and ISIS through the Consulate, bumps in the road, what difference does it make?
I have to apologize. I've been saying that 24 people died under Bush at US Embassies around the world.

Turns out it was 39 attacks and 87 dead. Sorry about that. What Republicans are really mad about is that it was only 4 with Mrs. Clinton as SOT.

--------------------------------------------

On the numbers, Garamendi's actually understating the case.

Using the Global Terrorism Database and a news account that Garamendi's staff said was the source of his claim, we identified 39 attacks or attempted attacks on U.S. embassies and embassy personnel.

Of these 39 incidents, 20 resulted in at least one fatality.

Garamendi also understated the number of deaths. In the 20 incidents with at least one fatality, the total death toll was 87 — quite a few more than the 60 Garamendi cited.

PolitiFact: Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?

None of them were US Embassy employees.
Oh,

well,

shit,

That's OK then.
 
Seems to me the DemocRATs and their lapdog media did a very similar job on Trump with his MEXICAN COMMENTS.... Anyone with a brain knew he was talking about ILLEGAL MEXICANS, but that didn't matter. Seems McCarthy didn't mention the SECONDARY effect of the Benghazi hearings was the drastic drop in the Hildebeasts poll numbers. Yes, he did word it , STUPIDLY, but most citizens that vote, AND have a functioning brain, realize that was what he meant to say.... But, this will play with the MSM, and the LAP DOG Subversive DemocRATS here and in the underground, Salon, and Daily Kos for awhile...I mean, after all LOOK who they are defending!

6GqDjx8.jpg
 
Time to investigate the Benghazigate Republicans.
Is that possible? Can the country insist on an investigation of the GOP for recklessly spending tax payer money to fraudulently attack an innocent person? Is that defamation of character? Can Hillary sue?
 

Forum List

Back
Top