Republicans are ALWAYS wrong!

GOP always wrong ...by a mile

11204483_435064416702228_4328316875716347141_n.jpg
 
Obama tax cut: The 2010 tax cut legislation signed into law by Obama cost $797 billion, but Treasury assigns only $250 billion of that cost to Obama. Why? It excludes the cost of the legislation for fiscal year 2012 ($422.9 billion) because, as we said, the analysis only goes through 2011. In addition, Treasury assigned a portion of the 2011 cost to Bush — specifically $142 billion in tax cuts for taxpayers earning more than $250,000 — on the grounds that Obama opposed extending the tax cuts for the wealthy, even though he signed the legislation into law.

why do you losers insist on lying TO YOURSELVES???
 
View attachment 50723

Even the graph in your link shows a decline in full time jobs and a rise in the trends for part time in the last year.
There are more people working full-time now then ever in the history of this GREAT country.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

latest_numbers_LNS12500000_2005_2015_all_period_M08_data.gif

Series title: (Seas) Employed, Usually Work Full Time
Labor force status: Employed full time (persons who usually work 35 hours or more)
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over

There are more people than ever before, how does that break down per capita? Considering the work force participation rate is near all time lows I would think per capita stats would be pretty dismal.
The lies just keep on coming.
The LPR is not near all time lows.

latest_numbers_LNS11300000_1948_2015_all_period_M08_data.gif

Series title: (Seas) Labor Force Participation Rate
Labor force status: Civilian labor force participation rate
Type of data: Percent or rate
Age: 16 years and over

near
[ni(ə)r]

ADVERB
  1. at or to a short distance away; nearby:
    "a bomb exploding somewhere near"
  2. a short time away in the future:
    "the time for his retirement was drawing near"
  3. almost:
    "a near perfect fit"
Now you know what near means, 3.5 to 4% difference between all time lows and now meets the definition. Stop lying and spinning your BS.
Near is NOT about half way between the lows and highs.

Hey dipshit, we're comparing lows here, do try to stop lying and stay on point.
 
I'M posting facts; you have spoon-fed propaganda you were told to regurgitate


lol
 
what a joke this loser is!! the Left wipes their asses with $54 million in taxpayer money.
from "shovel-ready wasnt so shovel-ready" to the $20 BILLION or so doled out to "green" start-ups run by obama's corporate fatcat donors that failed to produce jobs. and if you want you can throw in the hundreds of billions Dems voted for the war they said was "based on lies" they didnt have the balls or the wills to "de-fund" like they promised
01a-bush-vs-obama-deficit.jpg

Does not look very good for Obama. His first four years are pathetic compared to Boooooshhhh's.

And I really disliked Bush.
 
what a joke this loser is!! the Left wipes their asses with $54 million in taxpayer money.
from "shovel-ready wasnt so shovel-ready" to the $20 BILLION or so doled out to "green" start-ups run by obama's corporate fatcat donors that failed to produce jobs. and if you want you can throw in the hundreds of billions Dems voted for the war they said was "based on lies" they didnt have the balls or the wills to "de-fund" like they promised
01a-bush-vs-obama-deficit.jpg

Does not look very good for Obama. His first four years are pathetic compared to Boooooshhhh's.

And I really disliked Bush.
stop drinking heavily your head will clear
 
what a joke this loser is!! the Left wipes their asses with $54 million in taxpayer money.
from "shovel-ready wasnt so shovel-ready" to the $20 BILLION or so doled out to "green" start-ups run by obama's corporate fatcat donors that failed to produce jobs. and if you want you can throw in the hundreds of billions Dems voted for the war they said was "based on lies" they didnt have the balls or the wills to "de-fund" like they promised
01a-bush-vs-obama-deficit.jpg

Does not look very good for Obama. His first four years are pathetic compared to Boooooshhhh's.

And I really disliked Bush.
stop drinking heavily your head will clear

It's your graph, chump.

Don't blame me.

Obama's best years are still close to Bush's worst.

Can't help that.
 
what a joke this loser is!! the Left wipes their asses with $54 million in taxpayer money.
from "shovel-ready wasnt so shovel-ready" to the $20 BILLION or so doled out to "green" start-ups run by obama's corporate fatcat donors that failed to produce jobs. and if you want you can throw in the hundreds of billions Dems voted for the war they said was "based on lies" they didnt have the balls or the wills to "de-fund" like they promised
01a-bush-vs-obama-deficit.jpg



LOOK AT THIS IDIOT'S CHART!!!



ANOTHER LEFT-WING MORON THAT DIDNT BOTHER TO INSPECT HIS OWN CHART; OR THINKS NOBODY WILL BE ABLE TO SEE WHAT HE ISNT SAYING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


notice the ENORMOUS SPIKE IN BUDGET DEFICITS IN THE LAST TWO BUSH YEARS???????????????
NOW WHAT HAPPENED IN THOSE YEARS?????????????????


OH YEA DEMOCRATS WROTE THOSE BUDGETS


idiots and hypocrites
This is why sane folks laugh at idiot conservatives.

The enormous spike in the deficit was due the Great Recession...

federal-budget-deficit.jpg
 
what a joke this loser is!! the Left wipes their asses with $54 million in taxpayer money.
from "shovel-ready wasnt so shovel-ready" to the $20 BILLION or so doled out to "green" start-ups run by obama's corporate fatcat donors that failed to produce jobs. and if you want you can throw in the hundreds of billions Dems voted for the war they said was "based on lies" they didnt have the balls or the wills to "de-fund" like they promised
01a-bush-vs-obama-deficit.jpg

Does not look very good for Obama. His first four years are pathetic compared to Boooooshhhh's.

And I really disliked Bush.
stop drinking heavily your head will clear

It's your graph, chump.

Don't blame me.

Obama's best years are still close to Bush's worst.

Can't help that.
Hey chump Bush started with a looming budget surplus ...Obama started out in a Bush caused hell hole on Earth...,you have to be a moron to have missed that fact...my chart had to inform you of that? ...fking moron
 
what a joke this loser is!! the Left wipes their asses with $54 million in taxpayer money.
from "shovel-ready wasnt so shovel-ready" to the $20 BILLION or so doled out to "green" start-ups run by obama's corporate fatcat donors that failed to produce jobs. and if you want you can throw in the hundreds of billions Dems voted for the war they said was "based on lies" they didnt have the balls or the wills to "de-fund" like they promised
01a-bush-vs-obama-deficit.jpg



LOOK AT THIS IDIOT'S CHART!!!



ANOTHER LEFT-WING MORON THAT DIDNT BOTHER TO INSPECT HIS OWN CHART; OR THINKS NOBODY WILL BE ABLE TO SEE WHAT HE ISNT SAYING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


notice the ENORMOUS SPIKE IN BUDGET DEFICITS IN THE LAST TWO BUSH YEARS???????????????
NOW WHAT HAPPENED IN THOSE YEARS?????????????????


OH YEA DEMOCRATS WROTE THOSE BUDGETS


idiots and hypocrites
This is why sane folks laugh at idiot conservatives.

The enormous spike in the deficit was due the Great Recession...

federal-budget-deficit.jpg
They are mental..,.one idiot is saying "His first four years are pathetic compared to Boooooshhhh's." totally ignoring the meltdown we were in when Obama started his Presidency vs the Peace and Prosperity when Stupid Moron 43 began his Presidency..
 
The administration does not take responsibility for all of the spending in the 2010 tax act (which we will detail later). But Treasury accepts that the administration is responsible for another $410 billion in additional tax cuts and spending through 2011.
That means at a minimum the Obama administration is responsible for $2 trillion, or 39 percent of the $5.17 trillion in deficits since fiscal year 2009.
Looking ahead, Obama has promised if reelected to allow the Bush-era income tax cuts to expire for upper-income taxpayers, raising the top two tax rates from 33 percent and 35 percent to 36 percent and 39.6 percent. But he would keep the tax rates at the Bush-era levels for everyone else. Obama’s plan would cost the federal government $3 trillion over 10 years compared with $3.7 trillion if he allowed all of the Bush tax cuts to remain in place
Here we have a brain-dead conservative demonstrating the cost in revenue to the federal government by keeping taxes lower.

:lmao::lmao::lmao:

brain-dead conservative, since you showed the forum how keeping taxes lower hurts federal revenues, why doesn't the rightwing Congress increase taxes?
 

Forum List

Back
Top