Remind us again how the dems will compromise?

[JakeStarkey]

Define "socialism", steph, and show us exactly how that is being applied by the government.

I am tired on nut cases far right and far left using terms they don't understand.

 

[Stephanie]

Define "socialism", steph, and show us exactly how that is being applied by the government.

I am tired on nut cases far right and far left using terms they don't understand.

awwww you're tired, and I don't jump through your hoops, so go lay down or something

 

[JakeStarkey]

So you have no idea about what you are yammering. You are yammering because you are unhappy.

OK.

 

[Stephanie]

So you have no idea about what you are yammering. You are yammering because you are unhappy.

OK.

what eva dude, I'll yammer for whatever reason I wish, just like you do

 

[konradv]

So you have no idea about what you are yammering. You are yammering because you are unhappy.

OK.

what eva dude, I'll yammer for whatever reason I wish, just like you do

Will you go away like you tell us, too?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nah, we need steph and frank and daveman, because they are the dark to the sensible ones' light.

They bring our goodness into clarity by the darkness of their unhappiness.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's not healtchare for seniors. The seniors bought and paid for it and bami stole it. so no, your moronic ass FAILS.

If you keep them healthier when they are younger, doesn't that mean you save money treating them when they are older?

I know this is reasoning you probably don't quite get.

bamie stole 716 billion dollars from seniors, there's no way around that. he's a thief.

So your position is that the Democrats already compromised on Medicare.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Boehner said of the sequester deal that the Republicans got 98% of what they wanted.

Now, the Republicans are hanging that deal on the neck of the President, as if he owns it, and they're complaining that the Democrats won't compromise?

Compromise how? By getting rid of 48% of what the Republicans wanted???

lol

 

[billyerock1991]

Elections have consequences, republicans have put themselves in a situation where all their sacred cows are at peril at a time when they cannot possibly feel that confident taking a hardline stand. Democrats just do not have that much at stake in this mess so prepare your anus.

In other words, Democrats have no intention of cutting anything, despite what they said before the election. But we already knew that. Only the suckers who voted for them believed otherwise.

I see you don't pay attention they said they would cut 3 or 4 trillion and have a 1.6 trillion revenue increase ... are you not listening???

 

[jillian]

Elections have consequences, republicans have put themselves in a situation where all their sacred cows are at peril at a time when they cannot possibly feel that confident taking a hardline stand. Democrats just do not have that much at stake in this mess so prepare your anus.

In other words, Democrats have no intention of cutting anything, despite what they said before the election. But we already knew that. Only the suckers who voted for them believed otherwise.

I see you don't pay attention they said they would cut 3 or 4 trillion and have a 1.6 trillion revenue increase ... are you not listening???

he hears... he just doesn't comprehend.

 

[billyerock1991]

Elections have consequences, republicans have put themselves in a situation where all their sacred cows are at peril at a time when they cannot possibly feel that confident taking a hardline stand. Democrats just do not have that much at stake in this mess so prepare your anus.

In other words, Democrats have no intention of cutting anything, despite what they said before the election. But we already knew that. Only the suckers who voted for them believed otherwise.

Do you know who Republican strategist Jude Wanniski IS ???read up on him and you will understand why cutting taxes is a bad*thing

 

[billyerock1991]

Something tells me that compromise doesn't have the same meaning for both RGS and me. Obama won and is implementing his agenda into any negotiations. The Repub House either needs to work with him or risk losing 2014.

that's it in a nut shell ... you see the republicans started in the 1970s a policy of lets spend as much as we can and cut taxes at the same time ... if we lose control over the congress lets start screaming the national debt is out of control by these tax and spend liberals ... that has been their policy from day one ... they should not cut taxes to much but should raise taxes as high as the can without damaging the economy or the country...

 

[JakeStarkey]

I for one would allow the tax cuts to expire while making serious reform in the code.

 

[billyerock1991]

Thankfully just by Obama winning it doesn't give him a green light to just DO ANYTHING he wishes..

The people put the Republicans back in the house for A REASON.

and lets pray they stop this Socialist dreaming idiot from transforming our country even further

actually they lost seats ...yes the dems didn't win control, but is a matter of 2 years time ...that will change which depends on how these republicans vote on obama policies ... if they are against it, they will be voted out ....its that's simple

 

[WillowTree]

Elections have consequences, republicans have put themselves in a situation where all their sacred cows are at peril at a time when they cannot possibly feel that confident taking a hardline stand. Democrats just do not have that much at stake in this mess so prepare your anus.

In other words, Democrats have no intention of cutting anything, despite what they said before the election. But we already knew that. Only the suckers who voted for them believed otherwise.

Do you know who Republican strategist Jude Wanniski IS ???read up on him and you will understand why cutting taxes is a bad*thing

then reverse the Bush tax cuts on everyone and end your class warfare.

 

[konradv]

In other words, Democrats have no intention of cutting anything, despite what they said before the election. But we already knew that. Only the suckers who voted for them believed otherwise.

Do you know who Republican strategist Jude Wanniski IS ???read up on him and you will understand why cutting taxes is a bad*thing

then reverse the Bush tax cuts on everyone and end your class warfare.

That would tank the economy. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Disgusting.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The fundamental problem is that nothing that needs to be done is popular.

 

[Greenbeard]

Because the Republicans control the House, dumb fuck.

That's too bad for them.

If the U.S. government ends up careening off the "fiscal cliff," Republicans in Congress stand to shoulder most of the blame, according to a new poll released Tuesday.

well of course, that is what the poll is for..
leave it to nbc

Maybe you should get Dean Chambers on the case. That's worked out for you in the past, I'm sure.

 

[WillowTree]

Do you know who Republican strategist Jude Wanniski IS ???read up on him and you will understand why cutting taxes is a bad*thing

then reverse the Bush tax cuts on everyone and end your class warfare.

That would tank the economy. You'd like that, wouldn't you? Disgusting.

but but but yer buddy up there said tax cuts were a vewy bad thang. tha't what he said alright, so reverse those old bad tax cuts on everyone and end your class warfare.. oh I see that's what you want a real war on the classes. good joby ugly democrat.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Elections have consequences, republicans have put themselves in a situation where all their sacred cows are at peril at a time when they cannot possibly feel that confident taking a hardline stand. Democrats just do not have that much at stake in this mess so prepare your anus.

In other words, Democrats have no intention of cutting anything, despite what they said before the election. But we already knew that. Only the suckers who voted for them believed otherwise.

Are your really as stupid as all of your posts suggest?