Rebutting Annoying Democrat Lies

[Mr. Shaman]

They'll keep saying them because annoying Republicans is more important than credibility, but here are some rebuttals for starters ....

A. Rush Limbaugh did not wish that America would fail. Hoping that Obama would fail to pass what we believe to be destructive policies is the complete opposite of hoping that America will fail. Did you Democrat dweebs hope that Bush would succeed in passing Social Security reform?

B. Joe Wilson didn't yell "you lie" at a State of the Union address. He shouldn't have said it during Obama's speech, but the speech wasn't an SOTU address, and if you don't know the difference maybe you shouldn't be posting on political forums.

C. Mitch McConnell's statement about Obama being a one-term president was not made before Obama was inaugurated. It wasn't even made in 2009. And there was no implication that the Republican party's goal is to defeat Obama even if it hurts America. Again, exactly the opposite.

McConnell's statement was an acknowledgement of the reality that even if Republicans had managed to gain control in the Senate they wouldn't be able to repeal Obamacare until 2013 at the earliest. Obama would veto any repeal legislation. When Scott Brown was elected from Massachusetts that should have been a clue. It should have sent Obama a message to rethink his approach, but instead it made him double down.

McConnell correctly stated that the only way we can undo some of Obama's worst legislation is to elect a Republican president in 2012. Well, we can still hope that the Supreme Court will declare Obamacare unconstitutuional, but in general, the way to get the nation set back on what we as Republicans feel is the correct track is to get a Republican president.





I know this won't stop the lies and careless claims but I feel better for saying it. People who can't even tell 2008 from 2010 are probably incapable of learning.

Carry on.

Obama knows he will lose the whitehouse in 2012......

Yeah.....Porky Limbaugh said the same thing about Bill Clinton, back in '06.

It's probably not a good idea to make any bets, referencing EIBS.

 

[Amelia]

Here's another one Democrats think that they can make true if they say it over and over:


"Republicans are against stem cell research."

 

[tinydancer]

They'll keep saying them because annoying Republicans is more important than credibility, but here are some rebuttals for starters ....

A. Rush Limbaugh did not wish that America would fail. Hoping that Obama would fail to pass what we believe to be destructive policies is the complete opposite of hoping that America will fail. Did you Democrat dweebs hope that Bush would succeed in passing Social Security reform?

B. Joe Wilson didn't yell "you lie" at a State of the Union address. He shouldn't have said it during Obama's speech, but the speech wasn't an SOTU address, and if you don't know the difference maybe you shouldn't be posting on political forums.

C. Mitch McConnell's statement about Obama being a one-term president was not made before Obama was inaugurated. It wasn't even made in 2009. And there was no implication that the Republican party's goal is to defeat Obama even if it hurts America. Again, exactly the opposite.

McConnell's statement was an acknowledgement of the reality that even if Republicans had managed to gain control in the Senate they wouldn't be able to repeal Obamacare until 2013 at the earliest. Obama would veto any repeal legislation. When Scott Brown was elected from Massachusetts that should have been a clue. It should have sent Obama a message to rethink his approach, but instead it made him double down.

McConnell correctly stated that the only way we can undo some of Obama's worst legislation is to elect a Republican president in 2012. Well, we can still hope that the Supreme Court will declare Obamacare unconstitutuional, but in general, the way to get the nation set back on what we as Republicans feel is the correct track is to get a Republican president.





I know this won't stop the lies and careless claims but I feel better for saying it. People who can't even tell 2008 from 2010 are probably incapable of learning.

Carry on.

Well it is from the top down with liberals.

A POTUS who is the mother and father of all liars with a dung heap at the White House of bullshit a mile wide with his administration of left wing maniacs who feel that no lie is to great to tell as long as it is a means to an end, the peons aka liberal voters just follow suit.

Take for example Obama's huge lie about "no lobbyists" in his administration.

Talk about a blatant freaking lie. And to boot, not only does he have a slew of lobbyists in his administration, now he just went and hired a lobbyist to be a senior adviser on his campaign.

 

[jillian]

wow... still posting on the rightwingnut hack thread...

you guys ever do anything else?

didn't think so.

thanks.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I personally enjoy this one, Harry boy, exposed yet again for the Hypocricy which is the left of the democrat party.

I always preferred the one where Daddy Bush was slobbering & crying....when he realized his Kennedy-style Dynasty was never gonna happen.....'cause Lil' Dumbya was such a fuck-up....


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWJHCRVs4AY]Bush Sr. cries while talking about son - YouTube[/ame]

.

.

.

.

 

[Amelia]

wow... still posting on the rightwingnut hack thread...

you guys ever do anything else?

didn't think so.

thanks.

Jillian/English translation:

Rightwingnut hack = someone who speaks the truth

 

[Old Rocks]

Poor fruitcake babies, their candidates are making asses of themselves before the primary election. By the time they get done, the Dems will just play reruns from their debates where they are either taking dingbat stands, or doing a 180 degree from the last debate.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Progressives lie about absolutely everything

You mean like referring to themselves as progressives rather than liberals?

Theres no difference, they just change the terminology after people catch on to what they are really trying to do. Liberal was fun for them for awhile, and when people figured out exactly what a liberal was and it became unpopular amongst the masses.....

Actually, the terminology was changed by "conservatives", once more-and-more o' their fan-base began wearing shoes (full-time) & learned to read.

Their book-larnin' taught them......​

Liberal: not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms. : of or constituting a political party advocating or associated with the principles of political liberalism; especially : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectives.

Then, their book-larnin' taught them how LAZY (and, afraid o' change) "conservatives" were....​

Conservative : tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : marked by moderation or caution : marked by or relating to traditional norms of taste, elegance, style, or manners.

Eventually, they're gonna learn.......​

Progressive: making use of or interested in new ideas, findings, or opportunities : of, relating to, or characterized by progression : moving forward or onward : advancing

.....and, realize "conservatives" are primarily a herd o' lazy-chickenshits.​

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

wow... still posting on the rightwingnut hack thread...

you guys ever do anything else?

didn't think so.

thanks.

Jillian/English translation:

Rightwingnut hack = someone who speaks the truth that I can't rebut any other way

I fixed it

 

[Amelia]

Next one up: Liberals, how many times do we need to remind you -- "Obama the Magic Negro" came from YOUR side!

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-ehrenstein19mar19,0,3391015.story

Like a comic-book superhero, Obama is there to help, out of the sheer goodness of a heart we need not know or understand. For as with all Magic Negroes, the less real he seems, the more desirable he becomes. If he were real, white America couldn't project all its fantasies of curative black benevolence on him.

If you know that and you're just pretending to be ignorant because you know it annoys us to have to correct you OVER and OVER and OVER ... well, I feel sad for you that you have to resort to this strategy to try to "win" your version of a "debate".