That's evident by your lack of substance. When you have something to back up your charges, let us know.So says one of USMB prime Islamapologists, if not Islamists, If not flat-out JIHADIST. Are you these things ? (all with your phony American-sounding name.) I'm ready to accept your full confession.Pam Geller is in the business to create as many Muslim haters as can be, its her life quest. She is hatred and has hate organizations. All this Islamophobic stuff is spread by her kind. Of course there are some radical Muslims just like the Jewish Defense League, and Pam Geller taunted Muslims and is the instigator of the happenings in Texas. She is the one who should be charged.
PS - there is no such thing as Islamaphobia. Not after 20,000 jihadist attacks around the world since 2001, and over 100 here in the USA and Canada.
PPS - there is nothing wrong with hating hatred (Islam/the Koran), and everything right with it.
I am not an islamophile. but pam geller does no one any good.
and your pretense that she is, is so wrong that i don't even know where to start.
Jillian----I kinda agree with Protectionist-----he presents a POV ----which cannot be termed "extremist" He simply justifies some of Pan Geller's POV------I have to admit---I am
not expert on Pam Geller .........BUT TO ME----a cartoon
contest knocking muslim symbols is justified by the filth
promulgated by muslims for more then 60 years-----VERY
FREQUENTLY in the form of really OFFENSIVE KORANIC GALVANIZED KARTOOOONS (you may not be aware)
In any case right now a WHOLE MUSLIM COUNTRY----which itself claims to ACT IN THE NAME OF ISLAM ---
has been conducting a "lets see who can produce the
most obscene anti-jewish KARTOON and award that person
a BIG PRIZE"" I consider Pam Geller's action a very mild ""here's back at you"" move. Unless you can come up with a large scale grass roots, organized campaign
against the " IRANIAN LET'S SHIT ON DA JOOOOS"
contest. can you? the holy Mahdi in the well in Qom is waiting................
justifying pam geller's hatred IS, by definition, extremist.
i don't deal with the kind of stuff you and he post. and i think i probably have a more vested interest in it than either of you. but that is neither here nor there. he accused me of not presenting evidence when all he did was go full out wacko.
you don't deal with "the kind of stuff" I post? What kind of "stuff" is that? You have a "more vested interest in 'it' " ???? what is "it"? "all he did was go full out wacko" ??? From your post I can conclude only that you have a "vested interest" in DOUBLE TALK. You do it well.