Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We do have proof. A few years ago, Trump claimed on social media that he declassified a bunch of information. So a journalist asked to see the information and Trump’s chief of staff had to swear before a court that Trump lied about declassifying the information.Not so..................Jackie hasn't had his day in court yet.
You do realize the Trump team would have been revealing information they would be using when the issue got to trial, don't you? You think that would be a good idea?In Cannon's REVERSAL (and chewed new butt hole) by the 11th circuit for her wrong judgement of ordering a magistrate to determine if the presidential records and classified documents were Trump's personal stuff vs. the government's because he allegedly declassified the documents blah blah blah,
said that the Trump team showed zero, zip no evidence to the court to support he declassified any of them and ALL marked classified RECORDS must be handed over to the govt. immediately, without a Magistrate.
Then what are you guys jabbering about?An argument that hasn't been presented yet........?
SMFH
You're a great fiction writer.How about accepting 'the truth' that trump took these documents, LIED about taking them, Wouldn't return them, moved them, LIED again about retuning all of them.
The dude is a compulsive LIAR.
Quit making excuses for him and hoping to find some 'flaw' to save this POS.
Lied? How about 'claimed' he wasn't aware of a standing order about declassification.We do have proof. A few years ago, Trump claimed on social media that he declassified a bunch of information. So a journalist asked to see the information and Trump’s chief of staff had to swear before a court that Trump lied about declassifying the information.
Sucks when you destroy your own credibility.
Stick with your hypothetical. A third grader can figure out defense would be attacking every bit of evidence prosecution had.Then what are you guys jabbering about?
Nope. Meadows told the judge that he talked to Trump about it and Trump admitted to not actually declassifying the material.Lied? How about 'claimed' he wasn't aware of a standing order about declassification.
What judge and specifically, what was his testimony?Meadows told the judge that he talked to Trump about it and Trump admitted to not actually declassifying the material.
We will worry about it when Trump tries to actually claim he declassified these documents.What judge and specifically, what was his testimony?
thepostmillennial.com
Ahh........so you're caught in a lie.....................We will worry about it when Trump tries to actually claim he declassified these documents.
Sucks when you destroy your own credibility.
Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz weighed in on the recent revelation, explaining that, “Prosecutors and investigators should never tamper with or alter evidence in their possession, including the order of documents in a box because one never knows what may become relevant or crucial to a court or jury later in a case," as reported by Just the News.Boxes of material not being in the same order is a pretty lame case.
Np prosecution of Trump can succeed until the Scotus can declare what is personal business as separate from official business.
That will only be decided after the election!
Thoughts and prayers to the fanding fouthers for their granting of complete immunity for America's king!
Ya can't make this shit up folks!
What lie?Ahh........so you're caught in a lie.....................
And you were saying:
What lie?
It does. Which is why Trump is going to have a hard time before a jury.Sucks when you destroy your own credibility.
