imawhosure
Platinum Member
- Apr 25, 2015
- 9,226
- 2,817
- 360
I have pointed out many times that lowering tax rates to zero would net zero tax revenues, and that raising tax rates to 100 percent would drastically reduce productivity.Tax revenues increased every year of Obama's regime. Without cutting taxes.Just look at the US debt clock folks. It's accelerating. No amount of bullshit from the retards can hide that fact.
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
You are a PROPAGANDIST, and it is obvious to anyone who has any logic at all!
You tie truth with YOUR opinion, and try to spin it into reality.
Here, let me use YOUR PROPAGANDA METHOD to make a point, which is as dumb as yours-----------> Stalin had to breathe. We to breathe. But, if we want to show how we are all against the ideas of Stalin, we all need to hold our breath forever, lololol.
That is YOUR propagandist logic, and it is BULLSH**!
I don't recall you or P@triot bragging about that.
Hmmm...
You see, dumb shit, tax revenues have very little correlation to tax rates.
If we went by your and P@triot's illogic, we would see maximum tax revenues if we cut tax rates to zero!
So, please. Hold your breath. That would be great, though I doubt it would do any more damage to your brains than is already apparent.
PROPAGANDA!
Want to know how to get no tax income? Tell them G-) Don't know? Let me heeeeeelllllllppppppp you!
Make the tax rate zero, or 100%! At zero you get nothing, at 100% everybody quits work.
So whenever you hear that PROPAGANDIST argument to make tax rates zero, remember to bring up the opposite of 100%-)
That's why I laugh at simplistic parroting rubes who start topics like this one.
The tax situation is far more nuanced than P@triot or you are able to grasp.
Hey, you keep repeating the same thing over and over, trying to make it fact by repetition. Where did you go to school? The college of Propagandi run by Joseff Goebbels-)