- Thread starter
- #261
And my response was clear. Try reading through the series again. That should resolve your confusion.The books are a part of your post. It falls to you to explain their relevancy.None of the above is in any meaningful way relevant to your cutting and pasting of the Islamo-book club of the month material.You're on a cut and paste gee-had, Habib.
If you do a bit of research, you will find that Judaism and Jews existed for several thousand years before Mo' (swish) stole ruthlessly from Judaism and Christianity for the invention of the hateful politico-religious ideology he burdened the planet with.
No, just citing sources. Were you to do a bit of research you'd find that "Judaism" and "Jews" didn't exist before the Babylonian conquest; prior to that, there were several competing monotheistic and polytheistic cults based in and around the Judean hills, the Jerusalem temple cult being one of them. Judaism emerged as a coherent religion at the very earliest, in the 5th century BCE and was probably "finalised" in it's modern form in the first centuries of the Common Era.
As for Mohammed "stealing ruthlessly fom Judaism and Christianity", I think you'll find that Judaism stole concepts from Babylonia and Persia, Christanity from Judaism, Mithraism and Paganism. All religions "steal" from each other, it's called Syncretism.
Really? Care to explain why it isn't relevant to your series of posts?
My post is quite clear as far as I can see; it is a response to your post #241,directly addressing its content. Hence my question, "Care to explain why it isn't relevant to your series of posts?"