Palestine Today

[P F Tinmore]

Israeli goons attacking Palestinian civilians.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[fncceo]

Israeli goons attacking Palestinian civilians.

Sure looks like the Palestinian goons doing the attacking in that pic. You might want to send it back for a better Photoshop.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Berlin protest against anti-Palestinian repression brings hundreds to Bundestag: “Yes, yes, BDS!”

Berlin protest against anti-Palestinian repression brings hundreds to Bundestag: “Yes, yes, BDS!”

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israeli soldiers brutally arrested Palestinian young from a hospital in the occupied Jerusalem.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Once more, we have an example of Arab Palestinian propaganda; where an untruth is coupled to false and misleading act of self-victimization.

"I willl not be silenced on Israeli Aparthied."

(COMMENT)

The first untruth is the implied claim that Israel is attempting to "silence" Hostile Arab Palestinian Propaganda.

The second untruth is the implied claim that Israel is attempting to establish an "Apartheid Program."

There is an unspoken misdirection. The separation along the border between sovereign Israel and non-sovereign disputed territory → IS NOT THE SAME AS → an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by ONE RACIAL GROUP over any OTHER RACIAL GROUP committed with the intention of maintaining the State of Israel.

The State of Israel is on one side of the border. Some other entity is on the other side of the border. It could be the PLO, Islamic Radicals, Fedayeen Activists, Arab Jihadist, Islamic Revolutionary Graud Corps advisors, or other Asymmetric Fighters.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[USAF 2023]

Israeli soldiers brutally arrested Palestinian young from a hospital in the occupied Jerusalem.

That’s right; they specifically went into a random Hospital to pick on a “ random” innocent Palestinian

 

[USAF 2023]

Israeli soldiers brutally arrested Palestinian young from a hospital in the occupied Jerusalem.

5,000 Palestinians riot on Israel-Gaza border, 3 infiltrators detained

There Israel goes again; Picking on " Innocent Palestinians"

 

[USAF 2023]

WATCH: Israel ‘Judaizes’ Palestinian Food, Commits ‘Evil Assault’ on Palestinian Heritage, PA Reporter Claims

Tinmore is Right. Just more proof that the Israelis are stealing what is NOT theirs! " International Law" should be reinforced ASAP!!

 

[USAF 2023]

Israel Will Be Destroyed in 30 Minutes If US Attacks Iran: Senior Iranian MP

Here we go; Israel causing trouble again , Why can't they abide by : "International Law?"

 

[Ropey]

Palestinian Leader Threatens Trump "If You Cut More Aid, We Will Join ISIS"

They're following the Pakistani model.

Fail.

 

[USAF 2023]

Here we go; Israel causing trouble again , Why can't they abide by : "International Law?"[/QUOTE]


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...our-if-america-attacks-iran-senior-iranian-mp

 

[USAF 2023]

Here we go; Israel causing trouble again , Why can't they abide by : "International Law?"[/QUOTE]


Israel will be destroyed in half an hour if America attacks Iran: senior Iranian MP - Reuters

 

[Shusha]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, ForeverYoung436, et al,

This is an attempt to absolve the Araab Palestinians by trying to claim a variation of non-performance.

Nonsense! Absolute nonsense!

What part of this was followed?

(COMMENT)

I hold the position that the Arab Palestinians did have and still has an implied duty not to do anything that prevents the other party from performing critical steps preparatory to independence.

When the Arab Palestinians and Arab League aggressors prevent Israel from performance of the General Assembly adopted Recommendation through the uses of armed force, neither the Arab Palestinians or the Arab League agressors may make a legitimate complaint of noncompliance or nonperformance. This same position is just as sound and valid when (as in the recent Arab Palestinians hostile activities on the southern border), disrupts the environment conducive to the maintenance of regional peace and security.

When the Arab Palestinians and Arab League aggressors disputes peace negotiations resort to Jihadism, Fedayeen Activism, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence to prevent peaceful means as may be appropriate to the circumstances and nature of the dispute THEN, (again) neither the Arab Palestinians or the Arab League aggressors may make a legitimate complaint that the Israelis are NOT pursuing in good faith negotiations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel declared independence in Palestine.

The Jewish people declared their sovereign self-determination in their homeland. That it was called “Palestine” by outsiders has no relevancy to the Jewish people.

Just as the fact that it is called Eretz Israel has no relevancy to the Arab people.

Still BOTH the Arab Palestinians and the Jewish Palestinians (now Jewish Israelis) have rights to self-determination and sovereignty within that territory.

There is no way of denying one and granting the other without being discriminatory.

There is no way of denying one and granting the other without being discriminatory.

IOW, apartheid.

Well now, that is an interesting take. You are claiming an equivalency between the self-determination and sovereignty of ethnic or cultural peoples and apartheid. ALL nations built upon an ethnic or cultural group, then, are apartheid.

Scotland, Wales, Ireland, England = apartheid.

Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovenia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Macedonia = apartheid.

Spain and Catalonia = apartheid.

Korea = apartheid.

Japan = apartheid.

Armenia, Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Belarus, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Russia = all apartheid.

Cherokee Nation = apartheid.

Nisga'a Nation = apartheid.

I could go on and on. In fact, one would be hard-pressed to find a nation which is not apartheid under your definition. The only ones which come to mind are those colonized lands such as Canada, US and Australia. (Oh, the irony.)



IOW, you are vastly expanding the definition of apartheid to suit your Israel (Jew) hatred. You are creating your own definition of the term expressly so you can demonize the Jewish State. You are also only speaking out about a single apartheid in a world full of apartheid nations (double standards).

Further, the self-determination of a peoples is one of the most basic principles in international law. And it is one you argue frequently.

Your own argument is inherently contradictory. How are you going to reconcile it? Oh, you won't. You'll put up a couple of your dancing men, or mark this post "funny" or if I've really hit home, I'll get the doofus emoji.

 

[Shusha]

Israeli soldiers brutally arrested Palestinian young from a hospital in the occupied Jerusalem.

A very nice, professional job of arresting and removing someone who was both resisting and assaulting the LEOs. Clearly, those are well-trained officers.

 

[Shusha]

Funny how calling Israel apartheid and claiming that Israel silences people is NOT ACTUALLY CRITICISM OF ISRAEL.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, ForeverYoung436, et al,

This is an attempt to absolve the Araab Palestinians by trying to claim a variation of non-performance.

Nonsense! Absolute nonsense!

What part of this was followed?

(COMMENT)

I hold the position that the Arab Palestinians did have and still has an implied duty not to do anything that prevents the other party from performing critical steps preparatory to independence.

When the Arab Palestinians and Arab League aggressors prevent Israel from performance of the General Assembly adopted Recommendation through the uses of armed force, neither the Arab Palestinians or the Arab League agressors may make a legitimate complaint of noncompliance or nonperformance. This same position is just as sound and valid when (as in the recent Arab Palestinians hostile activities on the southern border), disrupts the environment conducive to the maintenance of regional peace and security.

When the Arab Palestinians and Arab League aggressors disputes peace negotiations resort to Jihadism, Fedayeen Activism, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence to prevent peaceful means as may be appropriate to the circumstances and nature of the dispute THEN, (again) neither the Arab Palestinians or the Arab League aggressors may make a legitimate complaint that the Israelis are NOT pursuing in good faith negotiations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel declared independence in Palestine.

The Jewish people declared their sovereign self-determination in their homeland. That it was called “Palestine” by outsiders has no relevancy to the Jewish people.

Just as the fact that it is called Eretz Israel has no relevancy to the Arab people.

Still BOTH the Arab Palestinians and the Jewish Palestinians (now Jewish Israelis) have rights to self-determination and sovereignty within that territory.

There is no way of denying one and granting the other without being discriminatory.

There is no way of denying one and granting the other without being discriminatory.

IOW, apartheid.

Well now, that is an interesting take. You are claiming an equivalency between the self-determination and sovereignty of ethnic or cultural peoples and apartheid. ALL nations built upon an ethnic or cultural group, then, are apartheid.

Scotland, Wales, Ireland, England = apartheid.

Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovenia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Macedonia = apartheid.

Spain and Catalonia = apartheid.

Korea = apartheid.

Japan = apartheid.

Armenia, Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Belarus, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Russia = all apartheid.

Cherokee Nation = apartheid.

Nisga'a Nation = apartheid.

I could go on and on. In fact, one would be hard-pressed to find a nation which is not apartheid under your definition. The only ones which come to mind are those colonized lands such as Canada, US and Australia. (Oh, the irony.)



IOW, you are vastly expanding the definition of apartheid to suit your Israel (Jew) hatred. You are creating your own definition of the term expressly so you can demonize the Jewish State. You are also only speaking out about a single apartheid in a world full of apartheid nations (double standards).

Further, the self-determination of a peoples is one of the most basic principles in international law. And it is one you argue frequently.

Your own argument is inherently contradictory. How are you going to reconcile it? Oh, you won't. You'll put up a couple of your dancing men, or mark this post "funny" or if I've really hit home, I'll get the doofus emoji.

And you didn't even mention all the Arab and Muslim nations that surround Israel, who are the very definition of apartheid! He also likes to put up pictures of Palestinian ppl, especially women, doing Western-style things. But that is because the West Bank is so close to Israel and is influenced by Israeli society. The further away Arab and Muslim nations are from Israel, the more repressive they become!

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, ForeverYoung436, et al,

This is an attempt to absolve the Araab Palestinians by trying to claim a variation of non-performance.

Nonsense! Absolute nonsense!

What part of this was followed?

(COMMENT)

I hold the position that the Arab Palestinians did have and still has an implied duty not to do anything that prevents the other party from performing critical steps preparatory to independence.

When the Arab Palestinians and Arab League aggressors prevent Israel from performance of the General Assembly adopted Recommendation through the uses of armed force, neither the Arab Palestinians or the Arab League agressors may make a legitimate complaint of noncompliance or nonperformance. This same position is just as sound and valid when (as in the recent Arab Palestinians hostile activities on the southern border), disrupts the environment conducive to the maintenance of regional peace and security.

When the Arab Palestinians and Arab League aggressors disputes peace negotiations resort to Jihadism, Fedayeen Activism, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence to prevent peaceful means as may be appropriate to the circumstances and nature of the dispute THEN, (again) neither the Arab Palestinians or the Arab League aggressors may make a legitimate complaint that the Israelis are NOT pursuing in good faith negotiations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel declared independence in Palestine.

The Jewish people declared their sovereign self-determination in their homeland. That it was called “Palestine” by outsiders has no relevancy to the Jewish people.

Just as the fact that it is called Eretz Israel has no relevancy to the Arab people.

Still BOTH the Arab Palestinians and the Jewish Palestinians (now Jewish Israelis) have rights to self-determination and sovereignty within that territory.

There is no way of denying one and granting the other without being discriminatory.

There is no way of denying one and granting the other without being discriminatory.

IOW, apartheid.

Well now, that is an interesting take. You are claiming an equivalency between the self-determination and sovereignty of ethnic or cultural peoples and apartheid. ALL nations built upon an ethnic or cultural group, then, are apartheid.

Scotland, Wales, Ireland, England = apartheid.

Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovenia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Macedonia = apartheid.

Spain and Catalonia = apartheid.

Korea = apartheid.

Japan = apartheid.

Armenia, Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Belarus, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Russia = all apartheid.

Cherokee Nation = apartheid.

Nisga'a Nation = apartheid.

I could go on and on. In fact, one would be hard-pressed to find a nation which is not apartheid under your definition. The only ones which come to mind are those colonized lands such as Canada, US and Australia. (Oh, the irony.)



IOW, you are vastly expanding the definition of apartheid to suit your Israel (Jew) hatred. You are creating your own definition of the term expressly so you can demonize the Jewish State. You are also only speaking out about a single apartheid in a world full of apartheid nations (double standards).

Further, the self-determination of a peoples is one of the most basic principles in international law. And it is one you argue frequently.

Your own argument is inherently contradictory. How are you going to reconcile it? Oh, you won't. You'll put up a couple of your dancing men, or mark this post "funny" or if I've really hit home, I'll get the doofus emoji.

Nobody talks about the Jewish people who were kicked out of their : Native Country"

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, ForeverYoung436, et al,

This is an attempt to absolve the Araab Palestinians by trying to claim a variation of non-performance.

Nonsense! Absolute nonsense!

(COMMENT)

I hold the position that the Arab Palestinians did have and still has an implied duty not to do anything that prevents the other party from performing critical steps preparatory to independence.

When the Arab Palestinians and Arab League aggressors prevent Israel from performance of the General Assembly adopted Recommendation through the uses of armed force, neither the Arab Palestinians or the Arab League agressors may make a legitimate complaint of noncompliance or nonperformance. This same position is just as sound and valid when (as in the recent Arab Palestinians hostile activities on the southern border), disrupts the environment conducive to the maintenance of regional peace and security.

When the Arab Palestinians and Arab League aggressors disputes peace negotiations resort to Jihadism, Fedayeen Activism, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence to prevent peaceful means as may be appropriate to the circumstances and nature of the dispute THEN, (again) neither the Arab Palestinians or the Arab League aggressors may make a legitimate complaint that the Israelis are NOT pursuing in good faith negotiations.

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel declared independence in Palestine.

The Jewish people declared their sovereign self-determination in their homeland. That it was called “Palestine” by outsiders has no relevancy to the Jewish people.

Just as the fact that it is called Eretz Israel has no relevancy to the Arab people.

Still BOTH the Arab Palestinians and the Jewish Palestinians (now Jewish Israelis) have rights to self-determination and sovereignty within that territory.

There is no way of denying one and granting the other without being discriminatory.

There is no way of denying one and granting the other without being discriminatory.

IOW, apartheid.

Well now, that is an interesting take. You are claiming an equivalency between the self-determination and sovereignty of ethnic or cultural peoples and apartheid. ALL nations built upon an ethnic or cultural group, then, are apartheid.

Scotland, Wales, Ireland, England = apartheid.

Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovenia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Macedonia = apartheid.

Spain and Catalonia = apartheid.

Korea = apartheid.

Japan = apartheid.

Armenia, Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Belarus, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Russia = all apartheid.

Cherokee Nation = apartheid.

Nisga'a Nation = apartheid.

I could go on and on. In fact, one would be hard-pressed to find a nation which is not apartheid under your definition. The only ones which come to mind are those colonized lands such as Canada, US and Australia. (Oh, the irony.)



IOW, you are vastly expanding the definition of apartheid to suit your Israel (Jew) hatred. You are creating your own definition of the term expressly so you can demonize the Jewish State. You are also only speaking out about a single apartheid in a world full of apartheid nations (double standards).

Further, the self-determination of a peoples is one of the most basic principles in international law. And it is one you argue frequently.

Your own argument is inherently contradictory. How are you going to reconcile it? Oh, you won't. You'll put up a couple of your dancing men, or mark this post "funny" or if I've really hit home, I'll get the doofus emoji.

Nobody talks about the Jewish people who were kicked out of their : Native Country"

Or that they were kicked out because of Israel.