OJ Simpson

[mikegriffith1]

Whatever your opinion of the verdict in his murder trial (mine, for the record, is: he was guilty as could be, and walked due to superb defense attorneys and a hopelessly-bungled prosecution), this is a travesty.

It is not an opinion that OJ is obviously guilty of the double murder. Any retard knows this. Unfortunately the jury at the sociopath's trial were low IQ, racists who wanted to send a message to Whitey that Afro Americans are above the White man's laws.

I think there's something much deeper playing here. The O.J. trial proves that you get as much justice as you can afford. How many people could put together the team he did? If he was a poor black man, he'd be in for life.

In other words, OJ had the means to level the playing field against the state with its virtually unlimited resources, and the LAPD got caught red-handed planting evidence, trying to silence some of their own witnesses, and ignoring evidence that didn't fit their theory. For example:

* They knew there was blood on Nicole's back that had been dripped there, most likely by the killer (or one of the killers). They photographed it, but, incredibly, never collected it, and then destroyed it. Now why on earth would they do that with such a large and obviously passively deposited/dripped blood drip?

* To this day, the LA DA's office refuses to do forensic tests on the grab-punctures on the back of Ron Goldman's shirt, an astounding avoidance of potentially decisive evidence. Even now, forensic examination of those holes could yield telling evidence. Yet, the LA DA's office has refused all requests to conduct such tests.

* There were a number of fingerprints at the crime scene that did not match OJ, Nicole, or Ron Goldman's prints. The LAPD made a token effort, at best, to find the owner of those prints. They remain unidentified.

* There were so many violations of basic police procedure, such as chain of evidence, that one loses track when trying to count them. The defense was able to establish that at least two police officers entered OJ's Bronco *before* it was examined for blood. Interestingly, the worker at the impound lot testified that he did not see any blood on the console, even though evidence photos, which were taken *two days after* at least two policemen had been in the car, show obvious blood stains on the console. I should also mention that the biggest stain could not have been made by anyone while sitting in the driver's seat, unless he was a contortionist.

* The prosecution never explained how OJ managed to avoid leaving a single speck of blood on his white carpet all the way up to and in his bedroom, yet supposedly his socks had blood on them. And when those socks were first examined, no one saw any blood on them. But, later, after Vannatter had a vile of OJ's blood for several hours, blood magically appeared on them. Oddly, the blood was soaked equally on both sides of the sock, even though OJ was wearing them and his left would have separated the sock's sides from each other. Unless he stomped on the socks after he took them off, the blood should not have evenly distributed on the two sides. But, if the blood was applied by pouring it from a blood vial, it would soak both sides nearly equally.

* The prosecution sought to explain the presence of EDTA in the sock blood by claiming that EDTA can be found in laundry detergent and even in trace amounts in many people's blood. However, there was no EDTA on the socks--not a trace. Only the blood on the socks contained EDTA. British forensic experts who have looked at the test results on the sock blood have scoffed at the idea that that amount of EDTA could have come naturally from OJ's blood, and they, too, note that no EDTA was found on the socks, only in the blood.

* Regarding the bloody gloves, it turns out that Nicole also bought a pair of that same kind of glove for OJ's violent and emotionally disturbed oldest son, Jason. My, my, what a coincidence. As for the black stocking cap found at the scene, Jason was photographed several times wearing that same kind and color of cap.

"Alright," you be thinking, "but what about the Bruno Magli shoes? Don't they prove that OJ was at the murder scene?" OJ told his longtime friend Mercury Morris that he did not commit the crimes but that he went to Nicole's house minutes after the murders occurred. Did Jason drive to OJ's house in a panic to tell him that he had killed Ron and Nicole in a fit of rage, and did OJ then go to the crime scene to see what his son had done? After all, Jason suffered from intermittent rage disorder and had committed three assaults with knives in the preceding few years. Is that why OJ hired a lawyer **for Jason** the day after murders?

Who was it who called the LAPD at around 10:30 and said they should investigate a murder on Bundy Street (Nicol's street)? None of the known witnesses could have made that call. Who made it? Incredibly, the police never attempted to trace who had made that call.

 

[Theowl32]

I am in my car listening to the radio. Do you the black people are so ridiculous that they still believe he was framed and is innocent.

What a complete disaster of a race.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Some folks here really need to read the other side of the story on OJ. You might start with Donald Freed and Raymond Briggs' book Killing Time. The LAPD case against OJ was riddled with gaping holes, Bruno Magli shoes or no shoes. A few facts to consider:

* Ron Goldman's autopsy proves that Goldman struck his attacker(s) very hard multiple times, hard enough to cause large, visible bruises on his knuckles. Yet, when OJ was examined head to foot within days of the murder, he had no bruises anywhere on his body--not one.

* As just one example of the problems with the blood evidence, the blood that was supposedly "found" on the back gate--three weeks after the murders--was in better condition than the blood that was collected from around the bodies the day after the murders. The back-gate blood obviously came from the OJ blood vial that Detective Vannatter had for several hours. The prosecution never could come up with a rational explanation for how blood that sat exposed to the elements for three weeks in Southern California in June and July could have been in markedly better condition than the blood that was collected from the crime scene the day after the murders.

* To expand the timeframe of the killings back to 10:15, the prosecution had to trash some of their own witnesses, who clearly put the stabbings at some point after 10:32. As Freed and Briggs show, there is a true "mountain of evidence" that the killings must have happened between 10:32 and 10:45, which blows the prosecution's timeline to pieces.

* Numerous videos exist to prove that when the limo driver was parked outside the house, lots of lights could have been on inside the house but the house still would have appeared to be dark from the outside. Yet, prosecution lawyers still cite as "evidence" the fact that the limo driver saw no lights on inside the house while he waited to take OJ to the airport.

* The police tried to hide the fact that they found golf balls on OJ's lawn when they searched the house. This is important because part of OJ's alibi was that he was practicing his golfing game on his lawn for a time during the timeframe of the murders.

* The police discarded or destroyed evidence that pointed away from OJ, such as the fact the blood found beneath Nicole Simpson's fingernails was *not* OJ's blood. Yet, the prosecution also claimed that the three minor cuts on one of OJ's fingers were made when Nicole clawed his hand to try to get away.

* The police were not interested in evidence that pointed to OJ's disturbed and violent oldest son, Jason Simpson. They claimed they verified his alibi, but PIs later found that his alibi was dubious. Jason had a history of attacking people with knives, had major issues with Nicole, suffered from intermittent rage disorder, and was known to have left his restaurant that night with several knives on his person. But, nah, the police were not interested in the evidence that pointed to Jason. Interestingly, the day after the murders, OJ hired a lawyer for Jason.

This is the tip of the iceberg.

I'm glad OJ will be free. He never should have been sentenced to so much time for a minor crime in the first place.

Dude...the guy that helped OJ get away with it explained how he did it. OJ is a killer.

 

[konradv]

Whatever your opinion of the verdict in his murder trial (mine, for the record, is: he was guilty as could be, and walked due to superb defense attorneys and a hopelessly-bungled prosecution), this is a travesty.

It is not an opinion that OJ is obviously guilty of the double murder. Any retard knows this. Unfortunately the jury at the sociopath's trial were low IQ, racists who wanted to send a message to Whitey that Afro Americans are above the White man's laws.

I think there's something much deeper playing here. The O.J. trial proves that you get as much justice as you can afford. How many people could put together the team he did? If he was a poor black man, he'd be in for life.

In other words, OJ had the means to level the playing field against the state with its virtually unlimited resources, and the LAPD got caught red-handed planting evidence, trying to silence some of their own witnesses, and ignoring evidence that didn't fit their theory. For example:

* They knew there was blood on Nicole's back that had been dripped there, most likely by the killer (or one of the killers). They photographed it, but, incredibly, never collected it, and then destroyed it. Now why on earth would they do that with such a large and obviously passively deposited/dripped blood drip?

* To this day, the LA DA's office refuses to do forensic tests on the grab-punctures on the back of Ron Goldman's shirt, an astounding avoidance of potentially decisive evidence. Even now, forensic examination of those holes could yield telling evidence. Yet, the LA DA's office has refused all requests to conduct such tests.

* There were a number of fingerprints at the crime scene that did not match OJ, Nicole, or Ron Goldman's prints. The LAPD made a token effort, at best, to find the owner of those prints. They remain unidentified.

* There were so many violations of basic police procedure, such as chain of evidence, that one loses track when trying to count them. The defense was able to establish that at least two police officers entered OJ's Bronco *before* it was examined for blood. Interestingly, the worker at the impound lot testified that he did not see any blood on the console, even though evidence photos, which were taken *two days after* at least two policemen had been in the car, show obvious blood stains on the console. I should also mention that the biggest stain could not have been made by anyone while sitting in the driver's seat, unless he was a contortionist.

* The prosecution never explained how OJ managed to avoid leaving a single speck of blood on his white carpet all the way up to and in his bedroom, yet supposedly his socks had blood on them. And when those socks were first examined, no one saw any blood on them. But, later, after Vannatter had a vile of OJ's blood for several hours, blood magically appeared on them. Oddly, the blood was soaked equally on both sides of the sock, even though OJ was wearing them and his left would have separated the sock's sides from each other. Unless he stomped on the socks after he took them off, the blood should not have evenly distributed on the two sides. But, if the blood was applied by pouring it from a blood vial, it would soak both sides nearly equally.

* The prosecution sought to explain the presence of EDTA in the sock blood by claiming that EDTA can be found in laundry detergent and even in trace amounts in many people's blood. However, there was no EDTA on the socks--not a trace. Only the blood on the socks contained EDTA. British forensic experts who have looked at the test results on the sock blood have scoffed at the idea that that amount of EDTA could have come naturally from OJ's blood, and they, too, note that no EDTA was found on the socks, only in the blood.

* Regarding the bloody gloves, it turns out that Nicole also bought a pair of that same kind of glove for OJ's violent and emotionally disturbed oldest son, Jason. My, my, what a coincidence. As for the black stocking cap found at the scene, Jason was photographed several times wearing that same kind and color of cap.

"Alright," you be thinking, "but what about the Bruno Magli shoes? Don't they prove that OJ was at the murder scene?" OJ told his longtime friend Mercury Morris that he did not commit the crimes but that he went to Nicole's house minutes after the murders occurred. Did Jason drive to OJ's house in a panic to tell him that he had killed Ron and Nicole in a fit of rage, and did OJ then go to the crime scene to see what his son had done? After all, Jason suffered from intermittent rage disorder and had committed three assaults with knives in the preceding few years. Is that why OJ hired a lawyer **for Jason** the day after murders?

Who was it who called the LAPD at around 10:30 and said they should investigate a murder on Bundy Street (Nicol's street)? None of the known witnesses could have made that call. Who made it? Incredibly, the police never attempted to trace who had made that call.

What do we for the guy without O.J.'s resources? This is about more than just this case.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Dude...the guy that helped OJ get away with it explained how he did it. OJ is a killer.

But his story contradicts most of the physical evidence and fails to account for the evidence that surfaced after the murder trial. Are you going to try to answer any of the points of evidence that I've presented or just continue to assume that OJ "must" have done it?

And let's remember that it was the prosecution that wanted the sock blood tested for EDTA. Why? Because they said that if the blood had come from a blood vial, it would have EDTA in it, and that therefore if there were no EDTA, the blood must have come directly from OJ. In fact, the prosecution agreed in writing to accept the test results in advance. But, then, guess what? When the test results showed that the sock blood contained EDTA, the prosecution broke their agreement and suddenly claimed that EDTA did not automatically prove the blood had come from a blood vial.

Remember: The prosecution had requested the EDTA test in order to prove that the sock blood could not have been planted. They said that "there would be no question" that the blood was not planted if the test found no EDTA in the blood. They said that the absence of EDTA would remove any "lingering doubt" about how the blood got on the socks.

But, oops, when the test showed a sizable amount of EDTA in the blood, the prosecution broke their agreement and resorted to peddling the fantastic theory that OJ's blood already contained that amount of EDTA. Medical experts have pointed out that no human could live with that amount of EDTA in their blood (they would bleed to death).

And who was the "expert" whom the prosecution found to peddle the claim that human blood contains that amount of EDTA? Roger Martz, an FBI toxicologist who was later accused by FBI forensic chemist Frederic Whitehurst of tampering with evidence and misrepresenting test results. The defense refuted Martz's claim by calling one of the world's leading forensic toxicologists, Dr. Fredric Rieders, who testified that human blood could not safely contain that amount of EDTA.

Finally, when is anyone going to explain how the bloody glove that Fuhrman said he found behind OJ's house could have still been damp after lying outside for at least 7 hours? The defense proved with a reenactment that the glove would have been dry by the time Fuhrman supposedly found it. They took two gloves, put the same amount of blood on both that was apparently on the Rockingham gloves, left one glove on the ground in similar weather conditions, and put the other glove in a plastic bag. After seven hours, the glove that was outdoors was bone dry, but the glove that was in the bag was still moist.

Incidentally, regarding the claim that Fuhrman would not have planted the glove because he did not yet know if OJ had an alibi, as a matter of fact, Fuhrman did not claim he found the glove until **after** he had talked with Kato Kaelin, who lived in Simpson's house and had gone to McDonald's with him earlier in the evening. Once Fuhrman spoke with Kaelin, he knew that OJ had no alibi.

 

[dannyboys]

After OJ gets released he'll be back serving the rest of his full sentence within six months.

 

[tigerred59]

This guy is Trump in black skin, arrogant, narcissistic, thinks everybody loves his black ass and is so removed from reality, its sickening....I hope both he and Trump rot in hell someday

 

[tigerred59]

Out of all the evidence put forth for this trail, one thing never ever came up and here it is.....

This shit about being framed, never made sense....these cops didn't need to frame OJ, as a matter of fact, it was the cops and their admiration for this murderer that got Nicole and Ron killed. Had they done their jobs and locked that black mf up on day one for beating this woman, both of them would be alive today. They didn't have to frame this guy, the cops could have ruined OJ Simpson with one release of those phone calls, one release of the photo's...they didn't have to frame that nigga, they could have ruined him with one phone call to a national news paper...his stance in society would have been stripped, his endorsement deals, shattered, they could have ruined his life just like that, if they wanted to.

 

[Theowl32]

Out of all the evidence put forth for this trail, one thing never ever came up and here it is.....

This shit about being framed, never made sense....these cops didn't need to frame OJ, as a matter of fact, it was the cops and their admiration for this murderer that got Nicole and Ron killed. Had they done their jobs and locked that black mf up on day one for beating this woman, both of them would be alive today. They didn't have to frame this guy, the cops could have ruined OJ Simpson with one release of those phone calls, one release of the photo's...they didn't have to frame that nigga, they could have ruined him with one phone call to a national news paper...his stance in society would have been stripped, his endorsement deals, shattered, they could have ruined his life just like that, if they wanted to.

Whoa ho, we agree!!!!!!

Free at last!!!

 

[tigerred59]

Out of all the evidence put forth for this trail, one thing never ever came up and here it is.....

This shit about being framed, never made sense....these cops didn't need to frame OJ, as a matter of fact, it was the cops and their admiration for this murderer that got Nicole and Ron killed. Had they done their jobs and locked that black mf up on day one for beating this woman, both of them would be alive today. They didn't have to frame this guy, the cops could have ruined OJ Simpson with one release of those phone calls, one release of the photo's...they didn't have to frame that nigga, they could have ruined him with one phone call to a national news paper...his stance in society would have been stripped, his endorsement deals, shattered, they could have ruined his life just like that, if they wanted to.

Whoa ho, we agree!!!!!!

Free at last!!!

OMG.....just for the record and being a victim of domestic violence when I was young.....anytime a woman comes up missin, dead or lost, chances are its hubby....it was a no brainer. The guys a murderer and will die a murderer.....but while alive, you white folk will treat this negro like a effin king, starting with the fool who was robbed vouchin for the guy!!

 

[Votto]

If he gets out after 8 then he did not pay for murdering two people. By the way, this is what a murderer looks like.

Because of our Constitution we have to accept it, just as we've had to accept Trump as president despite his receiving fewer votes.

Accept a court ruling?

You mean except for the Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby that gave corporations rights like individuals?

You accept that do you?

 

[sealybobo]

If he gets out after 8 then he did not pay for murdering two people. By the way, this is what a murderer looks like.

Because of our Constitution we have to accept it, just as we've had to accept Trump as president despite his receiving fewer votes.

Accept a court ruling?

You mean except for the Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby that gave corporations rights like individuals?

You accept that do you?

But a corporation doesn't have feelings. They don't die. They don't care if they pollute. All they care about is profit.

So why would you let a corporation decide how much it pollutes?

the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. FEC and related cases has fabricated unprecedented rights and power for corporations and money, at the expense of human beings and democracy itself. Now, five years after Citizens United, this new, updated edition shows how Americans are coming together to overturn the decision and renew the promise of freedom and democracy for people everywhere.

CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE

 

[Votto]

If he gets out after 8 then he did not pay for murdering two people. By the way, this is what a murderer looks like.

Because of our Constitution we have to accept it, just as we've had to accept Trump as president despite his receiving fewer votes.

Accept a court ruling?

You mean except for the Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby that gave corporations rights like individuals?

You accept that do you?

But a corporation doesn't have feelings. They don't die. They don't care if they pollute. All they care about is profit.

So why would you let a corporation decide how much it pollutes?

the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. FEC and related cases has fabricated unprecedented rights and power for corporations and money, at the expense of human beings and democracy itself. Now, five years after Citizens United, this new, updated edition shows how Americans are coming together to overturn the decision and renew the promise of freedom and democracy for people everywhere.

CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE

Now I'm confused. Now we don't accept court decisions?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

He expressed no remorse for his actions. I refuse to believe anyone else would have received parole under those circumstances

 

[Votto]

He expressed no remorse for his actions. I refuse to believe anyone else would have received parole under those circumstances

He could run for political office.

 

[sealybobo]

If he gets out after 8 then he did not pay for murdering two people. By the way, this is what a murderer looks like.

Because of our Constitution we have to accept it, just as we've had to accept Trump as president despite his receiving fewer votes.

Accept a court ruling?

You mean except for the Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby that gave corporations rights like individuals?

You accept that do you?

But a corporation doesn't have feelings. They don't die. They don't care if they pollute. All they care about is profit.

So why would you let a corporation decide how much it pollutes?

the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. FEC and related cases has fabricated unprecedented rights and power for corporations and money, at the expense of human beings and democracy itself. Now, five years after Citizens United, this new, updated edition shows how Americans are coming together to overturn the decision and renew the promise of freedom and democracy for people everywhere.

CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE

Now I'm confused. Now we don't accept court decisions?

Not if the judge is mexican. Just as Trump.

 

[Redfish]

A murderer will be walking free amidst the people of south florida. Anyone who calls this justice is living in a parallel universe.

There is absolutely no question that he killed those two people with a knife. there is also no question that the jury let him off because of who he is and to make a "get even" racial statement.

He is a psychopathic killer, a narcissistic liar, and should never be let out of prison. But he will be in October. What more must this country do to pay back for slavery?

 

[JimBowie1958]

I have read numerous times that under normal circumstances a man with his record would have gotten maybe two to five years for what he did.

I am glad OJ got out, and I hope he goes somewhere and retires to the anonymity of a mediocre life in quiet.

 

[JimBowie1958]

A murderer will be walking free amidst the people of south florida. Anyone who calls this justice is living in a parallel universe.

There is absolutely no question that he killed those two people with a knife. there is also no question that the jury let him off because of who he is and to make a "get even" racial statement.

He is a psychopathic killer, a narcissistic liar, and should never be let out of prison. But he will be in October. What more must this country do to pay back for slavery?

Yeah, but thank God we base sentencing on laws and not on TV trumped up emotional opinions.

 

[Redfish]

A murderer will be walking free amidst the people of south florida. Anyone who calls this justice is living in a parallel universe.

There is absolutely no question that he killed those two people with a knife. there is also no question that the jury let him off because of who he is and to make a "get even" racial statement.

He is a psychopathic killer, a narcissistic liar, and should never be let out of prison. But he will be in October. What more must this country do to pay back for slavery?

Yeah, but thank God we base sentencing on laws and not on TV trumped up emotional opinions.

his acquittal in the murder case was based on TV trumped up emotional opinions. It was a travesty of justice that our country is still reeling from.