SniperFire
Senior Member
From 1949 to 1980, EVERYONE did better.
If you think we are going to return to that brief, unique post-WW2 boom when the rest of the industrialized world lay in ruin, you are sadly mistaken.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
From 1949 to 1980, EVERYONE did better.
The hypocrisy of the state of NJ allowing farm lands to be exempt from most property taxes?
The hypocrisy that rich people own farms? Should only poor people be allowed to own farms in NJ?
Ohhhhh Lord!!!
Nothing is more trying on one's patience than trying to explain the obvious to a libtard.
Go ahead, please explain how rich people claiming a perfectly legal tax exemption is wrong.
Should only poor people claim the farm exemption in NJ?
As per Racist Rabbi reasoning "and some of 'em are negros!"
Seriously. You got your ass kicked, so you figured you would just play the race card?
Eh, no - that's not the race card. Rabbi's not a racist because we apparently disagree on who should claim the NJ farm exemption. He's a racist because he believes black people are incapable of leading.
Ohhhhh Lord!!!
Nothing is more trying on one's patience than trying to explain the obvious to a libtard.
Go ahead, please explain how rich people claiming a perfectly legal tax exemption is wrong.
Should only poor people claim the farm exemption in NJ?
This is hilarious. Now that I've made it clear that the left takes advantage of deductions you want flip sides and defend them.
You're cracking me up here.
It just shows that you don't know your facts, only talking-points.
How can you support Obama and the rich with a straight face?
Are you really this stupid?
Can you people live in the Here and Now?
I've never seen people cheer for having OTHERS taxes raised...
what a sick country we have become
Why shouldn't we cheer?
Some of the burden is taken off of the middle class.
In 1964 the top tax rate was 91%
Today it's at 35% and you have the GALL to WHINE like a little girl about raising them?
What happened to all the JOBS those tax cuts were supposed to deliver?
What happened to the economic gains that were supposed to TRICKLE DOWN?
From 1949 to 1980, EVERYONE did better.
From 1980 to now, the rich have seen their incomes grow by over 200%...the middle class? 8%.
If the rich are going to keep all the money, then they can bloodly fucking well pay all the fucking taxes.
As per Racist Rabbi reasoning "and some of 'em are negros!"
Seriously. You got your ass kicked, so you figured you would just play the race card?
Eh, no - that's not the race card. Rabbi's not a racist because we apparently disagree on who should claim the NJ farm exemption. He's a racist because he believes black people are incapable of leading.
From 1949 to 1980, EVERYONE did better.
If you think we are going to return to that brief, unique post-WW2 boom when the rest of the industrialized world lay in ruin, you are sadly mistaken.
WASHINGTON (AP) A bill designed to enact President Barack Obamas plan for a Buffett rule tax on the wealthy would rake in just $31 billion over the next 11 years, according to an estimate by Congress official tax analysts obtained by The Associated Press.
That figure would be a drop in the bucket of the over $7 trillion in federal budget deficits projected during that period. It is also miniscule compared to the many hundreds of billions it would cost to repeal the alternative minimum tax, which Obamas budget last month said he would replace with the Buffett rule tax.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57401005/buffett-rule-would-garner-$31-billion-in-taxes/
For math-challenged LIbtards, that amounts to three days of government spending over 11 years.
Yes, this thread is spam.
Can you people live in the Here and Now?
I've never seen people cheer for having OTHERS taxes raised...
what a sick country we have become
WASHINGTON (AP) A bill designed to enact President Barack Obamas plan for a Buffett rule tax on the wealthy would rake in just $31 billion over the next 11 years, according to an estimate by Congress official tax analysts obtained by The Associated Press.
That figure would be a drop in the bucket of the over $7 trillion in federal budget deficits projected during that period. It is also miniscule compared to the many hundreds of billions it would cost to repeal the alternative minimum tax, which Obamas budget last month said he would replace with the Buffett rule tax.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57401005/buffett-rule-would-garner-$31-billion-in-taxes/
For math-challenged LIbtards, that amounts to three days of government spending over 11 years.
Yes, this thread is spam.
So billions is not worth fooling with?
Ths conservative thought process I suppose. Just one answer for the overspending?
Can you people live in the Here and Now?
I've never seen people cheer for having OTHERS taxes raised...
what a sick country we have become
No? You've never heard all the conservatives around here that want taxes on the poor/low income Americans raised?
Can you people live in the Here and Now?
I've never seen people cheer for having OTHERS taxes raised...
what a sick country we have become
No? You've never heard all the conservatives around here that want taxes on the poor/low income Americans raised?
WASHINGTON (AP) A bill designed to enact President Barack Obamas plan for a Buffett rule tax on the wealthy would rake in just $31 billion over the next 11 years, according to an estimate by Congress official tax analysts obtained by The Associated Press.
WASHINGTON (AP) A bill designed to enact President Barack Obamas plan for a Buffett rule tax on the wealthy would rake in just $31 billion over the next 11 years, according to an estimate by Congress official tax analysts obtained by The Associated Press.
That figure would be a drop in the bucket of the over $7 trillion in federal budget deficits projected during that period. It is also miniscule compared to the many hundreds of billions it would cost to repeal the alternative minimum tax, which Obamas budget last month said he would replace with the Buffett rule tax.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57401005/buffett-rule-would-garner-$31-billion-in-taxes/
For math-challenged LIbtards, that amounts to three days of government spending over 11 years.
Yes, this thread is spam.
So billions is not worth fooling with?
Ths conservative thought process I suppose. Just one answer for the overspending?
WASHINGTON (AP) A bill designed to enact President Barack Obamas plan for a Buffett rule tax on the wealthy would rake in just $31 billion over the next 11 years, according to an estimate by Congress official tax analysts obtained by The Associated Press.
This is why we have 15 trillion in debt and a trillion dollar deficit. Every special interest defends itself by pointing out how 'small' an amount is involved.
Can you people live in the Here and Now?
I've never seen people cheer for having OTHERS taxes raised...
what a sick country we have become
No? You've never heard all the conservatives around here that want taxes on the poor/low income Americans raised?
Nope.
I hear them say "how is it that the wealthier are not paying their fair share when 47% of the people pay no ioncome tax at all"
And I hear them say "dont increase taxes on the wealthy. Just cut spending."
But I dont hear them say "make the poor even poorer....raise their taxes"
I sometimes here them talk about a flat tax for ALL americans.....with the floor being at a point where the poorest still do not have to pay taxes.
But no...I dont see anyone championing raising the taxes on the poor.
WASHINGTON (AP) A bill designed to enact President Barack Obamas plan for a Buffett rule tax on the wealthy would rake in just $31 billion over the next 11 years, according to an estimate by Congress official tax analysts obtained by The Associated Press.
This is why we have 15 trillion in debt and a trillion dollar deficit. Every special interest defends itself by pointing out how 'small' an amount is involved.
Deficits are caused by spending more than you take in, not by not taxing enough.
Hope that helps.
No? You've never heard all the conservatives around here that want taxes on the poor/low income Americans raised?
Nope.
I hear them say "how is it that the wealthier are not paying their fair share when 47% of the people pay no ioncome tax at all"
And I hear them say "dont increase taxes on the wealthy. Just cut spending."
But I dont hear them say "make the poor even poorer....raise their taxes"
I sometimes here them talk about a flat tax for ALL americans.....with the floor being at a point where the poorest still do not have to pay taxes.
But no...I dont see anyone championing raising the taxes on the poor.
So you've never heard anyone here complain about the 47% who pay no federal income taxes.
You've never heard anyone here who supports a flat tax that would raise taxes on low income Americans.
You've never heard anyone here say that everyone should have some 'skin in the game' when it comes to taxes.
Never, ever, ever?
WASHINGTON (AP) A bill designed to enact President Barack Obamas plan for a Buffett rule tax on the wealthy would rake in just $31 billion over the next 11 years, according to an estimate by Congress official tax analysts obtained by The Associated Press.
That figure would be a drop in the bucket of the over $7 trillion in federal budget deficits projected during that period. It is also miniscule compared to the many hundreds of billions it would cost to repeal the alternative minimum tax, which Obamas budget last month said he would replace with the Buffett rule tax.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57401005/buffett-rule-would-garner-$31-billion-in-taxes/
For math-challenged LIbtards, that amounts to three days of government spending over 11 years.
Yes, this thread is spam.
So billions is not worth fooling with?
Ths conservative thought process I suppose. Just one answer for the overspending?
if you think that is just a conservative way of thinking, I believe you are dead wrong.
The left sees a "billion dollars" in medicare fraud as "nothing"....welfare fraud..."nothing" and unemployment fraud as "nothing".
UIt is a conditioning thing. We hear a billion dollars in goivernment and it means squat to us.
I wonder how many winter coats for poor children can be bought for 1 billion dollars.