Obama must be saying, "See what I had to deal with?"

[kaz]

Given the absolute chaos within the House republican caucus, is it really any wonder why Obama has decided that to get ANYTHING done, executive orders may be the only way forward?

Seriously, right wingers, would any of you finally admit that the House GOP membership has no clear intention of EVER sharing in their governing duties?

Yes, the job of Republicans is to get their act together and implement socialism or they aren't doing their job and Obama has every right to bypass the Constitution. I see your point

Well, dimwit, the Constitution is silent on executive orders (if that is your slam on Obama) AND when congress allows an order that they disagree with to stand, the members of congress are VIOLATING their oath of office.

By the way, what EXACTLY has Obama done that is deemed "socialistic"???? (You know, something rather than what the great constitutional lawyer, Sean Hannity, telling you what to spew.

If you have an answer, by all means tell us.

yes, obviously the founding fathers expected us to be a monarchy ruled by the President, you got me there

 

[nat4900]

Once again, you have nothing, huh, Nat? Just a "funny?"

Speaking of "nothing"......thank you for that erudite response above...very enlightening, well-researched and certainly convincing.

 

[kaz]

Given the absolute chaos within the House republican caucus, is it really any wonder why Obama has decided that to get ANYTHING done, executive orders may be the only way forward?

Seriously, right wingers, would any of you finally admit that the House GOP membership has no clear intention of EVER sharing in their governing duties?

Yes, the job of Republicans is to get their act together and implement socialism or they aren't doing their job and Obama has every right to bypass the Constitution. I see your point

Once again, you have nothing, huh, Nat? Just a "funny?"

Ditto

 

[nat4900]

yes, obviously the founding fathers expected us to be a monarchy ruled by the President, you got me there

Agreed, Obama asking for that throne to be put in that oval office was a bit over the top.

 

[kaz]

Once again, you have nothing, huh, Nat? Just a "funny?"

Speaking of "nothing"......thank you for that erudite response above...very enlightening, well-researched and certainly convincing.

You have nothing is as factually deep as it gets. Did you want your lack of content to be content?

 

[kaz]

yes, obviously the founding fathers expected us to be a monarchy ruled by the President, you got me there

Agreed, Obama asking for that throne to be put in that oval office was a bit over the top.

Didn't read the point, did you, Sparky?

 

[nat4900]

Ditto

You MUST take a rest soon, Kaz...Such insightful responses must be taxing (pardon the expression)......LOL

 

[kaz]

Ditto

You MUST take a rest soon, Kaz...Such insightful responses must be taxing (pardon the expression)......LOL

So me pointing out you have no content is depth, you commenting on my pointing out you have no depth is actually depth. Got it, thanks for that content

 

[NightFox]

The cause of gridlock is the design of the Republic not the Republicans, you want to get rid of gridlock call a constitutional convention otherwise just get used to it and try to see the upside (at least they are passing fewer BAD laws than normal).

You're ONLY hope, is that they might be enough dumb voters (like you) to re-elect the same right wing morons in congress whose only real job there is to do NOTHING.

Are you capable of offering up anything except pointless insults and vapid pronouncements... just wondering.

Now please excuse me I'm gonna head back to the land of the rational and the generally civil, see ya later alligator.

 

[nat4900]

Now please excuse me I'm gonna head back to the land of the rational and the generally civil, see ya later alligator

I can hardly express my sincerest gratitude......so I won't.

 

[nat4900]

So me pointing out you have no content is depth, you commenting on my pointing out you have no depth is actually depth. Got it, thanks for that content

I'm worried about your health, Kaz......Such thorough responses must take a lot frorm your half brain...Please do come back after a rest and DO list all of those oppressive policies that Obama has enacted that have you so damn miserable.

 

[kaz]

So me pointing out you have no content is depth, you commenting on my pointing out you have no depth is actually depth. Got it, thanks for that content

I'm worried about your health, Kaz......Such thorough responses must take a lot frorm your half brain...Please do come back after a rest and DO list all of those oppressive policies that Obama has enacted that have you so damn miserable.

Thanks for your concern about my feelings, gay boy, but you obviously don't know how I feel and even if you did I don't give a shit.

As for your question, I have two modes, serious and fun. By lacing your question with insults, you chose fun. If you want to discuss seriously what I disagree with Obama on, ask again and chose the serious category. I have no memory for that choice, that you did insult me is irrelevant. But I won't give a serious answer to posts with insults. My rules, like it or not, I don't give a fuck. But those are the choices

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Given the absolute chaos within the House republican caucus, is it really any wonder why Obama has decided that to get ANYTHING done, executive orders may be the only way forward?

Seriously, right wingers, would any of you finally admit that the House GOP membership has no clear intention of EVER sharing in their governing duties?

Yes, the job of Republicans is to get their act together and implement socialism or they aren't doing their job and Obama has every right to bypass the Constitution. I see your point

This is unsurprisingly idiotic.

 

[kaz]

Given the absolute chaos within the House republican caucus, is it really any wonder why Obama has decided that to get ANYTHING done, executive orders may be the only way forward?

Seriously, right wingers, would any of you finally admit that the House GOP membership has no clear intention of EVER sharing in their governing duties?

Yes, the job of Republicans is to get their act together and implement socialism or they aren't doing their job and Obama has every right to bypass the Constitution. I see your point

This is unsurprisingly idiotic.

It's what you bozos are arguing, Holmes. It's in the quote. Did you read it?

 

[Two Thumbs]

Given the absolute chaos within the House republican caucus, is it really any wonder why Obama has decided that to get ANYTHING done, executive orders may be the only way forward?

Seriously, right wingers, would any of you finally admit that the House GOP membership has no clear intention of EVER sharing in their governing duties?

They are not supposed to share their duties they are supposed to do their duty. Which is doing what they were voted to do not what obama tells them to do.


Why do you want to live under a dictator? Is it b/c you think it will be the dictator of your choosing?

 

[rightwinger]

Given the absolute chaos within the House republican caucus, is it really any wonder why Obama has decided that to get ANYTHING done, executive orders may be the only way forward?

Seriously, right wingers, would any of you finally admit that the House GOP membership has no clear intention of EVER sharing in their governing duties?

They are not supposed to share their duties they are supposed to do their duty. Which is doing what they were voted to do not what obama tells them to do.


Why do you want to live under a dictator? Is it b/c you think it will be the dictator of your choosing?

Well if that's the case....you lose

What they were elected to do differs from what other congressmen were elected to do. Unless they are willing to find a middle ground, nothing will get done

That means Obama is the only game in town to actually govern. Seems to be working out

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[whitehall]

What Obama had to deal with? Barry Hussein had a majority in both houses of congress for his first two years and a sycophant majority leader in the senate for the next four years and he whined about the unfairness of not being elected king. When republicans won the house majority he had to deal with a timid speaker and a a bunch of RINO's. Nobody ever complained about politics like the idiot left does these days when they can't even find a presidential candidate that isn't a Clinton.

 

[nat4900]

But I won't give a serious answer to posts with insults

You could have just as well typed......"I just like to bitch".....Would have saved you some time. LOL

 

[kaz]

But I won't give a serious answer to posts with insults

You could have just as well typed......"I just like to bitch".....Would have saved you some time. LOL

That would be you, Holmes, you just admitted it