Now the Left is trying to force that Baker to make a transgender cake.

[martybegan]

Do your fucking job
It is not up to you to judge which of your customers are worthy

That's forced acceptance, not tolerance.

The vendors already compromise on this, they aren't denying point of sale items, all they don't want to do is work for a specific event or theme.

 

[martybegan]

Same thing they used to say when they had signs that said….No Colored

That was an actual public accommodation, and race isn't the same as sexual orientation, despite the left trying to make it so.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

this is like trying to force Jewish Deli owner to make you a ham sandwich and then suing him
left wingers are dumb bigots

 

[pknopp]

it is the Baker's 1st amendment right
the left refuses to accept that they lost on this issue because they are hate filled knuttjobs

I didn't say it wasn't their right. I asked what was sinful about a blue cake?

 

[Disir]

It's pretty simple to find another baker. I'm not sure why anyone would want anything cooked by someone that doesn't like you. This is like talking crap through a drive through before you get your food.

 

[martybegan]

As an aside, what Christian biblical term is this cake violating?

It's violating free exercise, and if you do that the government has to 1) have a compelling reason to do so and 2) use the least intrusive way to mitigate the problem

 

[August West]

Hey Snowflake, stop whining and bake the fucking cake

These nuts never run out of things to be afraid of. Now it`s cakes.

 

[martybegan]

I didn't say it wasn't their right. I asked what was sinful about a blue cake?

It's the intent behind the cake, and the baker's belief that they are endorsing that intent.

 

[dblack]

Oh, boy. Another hypocrisy party. Wherein all the libs who insist that Twitter can refuse accounts to whoever they like, because they're a private business, are now very excited about clamping down on the rights of other private business owners to refuse service to whoever they like.

Everybody sing: "It's different when we do it!!"

 

[Oddball]

It's violating free exercise, and if you do that the government has to 1) have a compelling reason to do so and 2) use the least intrusive way to mitigate the problem

#3: Forced speech isn't free speech.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Jack Phillips has a business rule. He doesn't make specialty cakes for anyone regardless of the event. He is absolutely entitled to refuse to act.

 

[martybegan]

#3: Forced speech isn't free speech.

Speech, free exercise, both are being violated in this case.

 

[dblack]

The cake baking stupidity is emblematic of a broader and more general campaign by liberals to do away with the concept of equal rights, replacing it with "social equity".

 

[martybegan]

These nuts never run out of things to be afraid of. Now it`s cakes.

This coming from someone who's party's core gets the vapors when hearing words they don't like, or the wrong pronouns.

 

[pknopp]

It's the intent behind the cake, and the baker's belief that they are endorsing that intent.

Do they consider the intent with every cake they bake?


And do not get drunk with wine, for that is dissipation, but be filled with the Spirit,

Ephesians 5:18

Do you suppose they ask if there will be any wine served at the wedding?

 

[pknopp]

Oh, boy. Another hypocrisy party. Wherein all the libs who insist that Twitter can refuse accounts to whoever they like, because they're a private business, are now very excited about clamping down on the rights of other private business owners to refuse service to whoever they like.

Everybody sing: "It's different when we do it!!"

I never argued the baker couldn't do what they wanted. I'm trying to understand why.

 

[dblack]

Speech, free exercise, both are being violated in this case.

Numerous freedoms are being violated. Freedom of association, freedom from involuntary servitude, freedom of speech, freedom from being being ordered around by the state for arbitrary social engineering ambitions.

 

[martybegan]

Do they consider the intent with every cake they bake?


And do not get drunk with wine, for that is dissipation, but be filled with the Spirit,

Ephesians 5:18

Do you suppose they ask if there will be any wine served at the wedding?

Not the point of sale ones, which has been established. These are custom cakes for custom events, that are told to the baker.

what is the context of Ephesians 5:18?

 

[Oddball]

Oh, boy. Another hypocrisy party. Wherein all the libs who insist that Twitter can refuse accounts to whoever they like, because they're a private business, are now very excited about clamping down on the rights of other private business owners to refuse service to whoever they like.

Everybody sing: "It's different when we do it!!"

This is even worse.

This case could arguably fall under the rubric freedom of artistic expression, which would make the compelling of the baker to perform forced speech.....A clear violation of 1st Amendment.

 

[struth]

Same thing they used to say when they had signs that said….No Colored

Same thing they used to say when they had signs that said….No Colored

haha no, forcing a baker to violate his religious beliefs is not the same thing dems used to do to people based on their race