TheGreatSatan
Diamond Member
- Jun 17, 2019
- 13,718
- 17,476
- 2,320
Democrats love the Ukrainian war because they see it as a bunch of white people killing each other.It’s evil
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Democrats love the Ukrainian war because they see it as a bunch of white people killing each other.It’s evil
And they’re making a bloody fortune too from itDemocrats love the Ukrainian war because they see it as a bunch of white people killing each other.
Democrats could have had a peace deal for Ukraine but they wanted to see how many white people their Spring offensive could kill.And they’re making a bloody fortune too from it
It’s so strange that the Patriot can only work with stationary ground based radar
UPDATE: 18th March Ukrainian drone development and production group Dronarnia have posted a video of their own version, a small FPV quadcopter controlled via a fiber-optic link. Current range is one kilometer, but this is likely to be extended.
It’s old tech.
ShockerMillions more of American taxpayer dollars just went up in smoke. Two Patriots destroyed by hypersonic missiles. What's the running tally on how much money our government has wasted over there now..?
A Russian Drone Spotted A Ukrainian Patriot Air-Defense Crew Convoying Near The Front Line. Soon, A Russian Hypersonic Missile Streaked Down.
A Russian drone operator’s persistence paid off when they located a Ukrainian convoy including, it seems, two truck-mounted quad-launchers for a Patriot missile battery.www.forbes.com
Everyone who says Russia and Chinese hypersonics are no threat to anything American are friggin delusional
A Cruise Missile is a Drone ( Not Slow)
OK, I am going to go over just some of the most obvious technical problems with this idea.
First of all, drones are slow and tend to have a low power to weight ratio. That means that they do not have enough excess power to haul around things like cables (unless they were designed to actually lay cable). And most fiber optic cables weigh in at around 15 pounds per 100 meters. So it should be obvious how quickly a hell of a lot of weight is going to add up there.
Second, those are normally fairly low speed objects, only moving at about the speed of a man walking. Now add in the drag involved with all that extra mass, and those things will be lucky if they can crawl.
OK, now a really big one, wind. Anybody that has ever flown a kite can tell you that the wind is going to play havoc with this. It not only moves the kite, it even moves the string as well (not to mention gravity). Soon you are having to put on it motors many times larger than needed, just to haul around that length of strong that is trying to move it in another direction due to wind resistance.
Oh, I'm not done yet.
Oh, we do use "wire guided" ordinance, we have for decades. Most notably missiles and torpedoes. However, those are also very fast, the entire flight of a missile takes place in a few seconds. And can only be operated where the person firing them has a clear unobstructed line of sight to the target. Which is why the newer generation of such weapons have done away with the wires and uses other means to track the target (which is why the DRAGON was replaced with the JAVELIN). The other is torpedoes, but those do not need the wire. The subs can "cut" the wires, and the torpedo will go into autonomous mode. But that torpedo is still traveling many times faster than a typical observation drone.
And now for the elephant in the room, how in the hell are they going to keep it from getting entangled on obstacles? That is a huge problem, and I can't think of a single way to avoid that happening very quickly.
Huh?Name any system that is anything other than short range that can operate on the move with RADAR.
A Cruise Missile is a Drone ( Not Slow)
Cruise missiles can go as far as 3000km as far as I know ( but an Expert could chime in and I would not be surprised if specific variants could double that distance ) and a cruise Missile is as fast as a Fighter jet .Then tell me, what is the real difference?
Of course, once again you are talking about a tiny short range observation drone, and not a combat drone. The two are not even close.
Huh?
Cruise missiles can go as far as 3000km as far as I know ( but an Expert could chime in and I would not be surprised if specific variants could double that distance ) and a cruise Missile is as fast as a Fighter jet .
Mach 6 ???? ( Faster than Maverick in the Secret Prototype Space Plane In the lastest Top Gun Movie ?)Yes, and? So can many of the US combat drones like the Avenger and Global Hawk. And the US has operated drones in the past that operated at up to MACH 6. So I still have absolutely no idea what you are even trying to say. But what you are trying to jump into was the claim that there are fiber optic drones, and the other trying to imply they were combat drones. They were not, that is a drone about the size of a loaf of bread, with a range of 1km for observation use only. It is absolutely nothing like a combat drone.
Apparently not per the evidence scavenger from the battlefield... Your insistence that the fiber optic controlled drones are recon only is your creation.Then tell me, what is the real difference?
Of course, once again you are talking about a tiny short range observation drone, and not a combat drone. The two are not even close.
Mach 6 ???? ( Faster than Maverick in the Secret Prototype Space Plane In the lastest Top Gun Movie ?)
Apparently not per the evidence scavenger from the battlefield... Your insistence that the fiber optic controlled drones are recon only is your creation.
Yes, MACH 6. I did not stutter.