No criminal charges against Biden

You got it wrong, Rambunctious, and you yelling looks funny to everyone. Will Bill has been drinking again, and he is wrong.
 
The report completely exonerated Biden. The rest is just the inappropriate BS opinion of a problematic Trump-appointee who was upset that he had to exonerate Biden.
That%27s%20just%20goofy-S.jpg
 
Hur’s report specified how Biden alerted authorities, voluntarily returned records and consented to searches, whereas special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Trump accused the former president of refusing to return records and enlisting others to destroy evidence.


“Several material distinctions between Mr. Trump’s case and Mr. Biden’s are clear,” Hur wrote
in his report released Thursday. “Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.”

 
I would bet my lunch money that Chinese Communist Government officials had first crack at the "classified documents" at Biden's residences thus the handsome pay outs to the Biden crime family.

It's interesting too because American taxpayers (who actually paid for the collection of the intelligence), were barred from seeing the "classified documents" but, Communist Chinese Officials could.
 
Hur’s report specified how Biden alerted authorities, voluntarily returned records and consented to searches, whereas special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment against Trump accused the former president of refusing to return records and enlisting others to destroy evidence.


“Several material distinctions between Mr. Trump’s case and Mr. Biden’s are clear,” Hur wrote
in his report released Thursday. “Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.”

The report also specified that the VIC illegally retained classified material and shared it with other people.
 
The report also specified that the VIC illegally retained classified material and shared it with other people.
Hur correctly assessed that “the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” As the report observed, “Historically, after leaving office, many former presidents and vice presidents have knowingly taken home sensitive materials related to national security from their administrations without being charged with crimes.”



Of particular note, Ronald Reagan “left the White House in 1989 with eight years’ worth of handwritten diaries, which he appears to have kept at his California home even though they contained Top Secret information.”



Equally important, as Hur noted, Biden’s conduct was far less egregious than what Trump is charged with in the Mar-a-Lago documents case. As much as Trump and his allies will try to conflate the two situations and claim that Trump is being unfairly prosecuted, the evidence in the two cases is very different.



As alleged in the indictment, Trump “not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it,” the report notes. “In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.”



 
Hur correctly assessed that “the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” As the report observed, “Historically, after leaving office, many former presidents and vice presidents have knowingly taken home sensitive materials related to national security from their administrations without being charged with crimes.”



Of particular note, Ronald Reagan “left the White House in 1989 with eight years’ worth of handwritten diaries, which he appears to have kept at his California home even though they contained Top Secret information.”



Equally important, as Hur noted, Biden’s conduct was far less egregious than what Trump is charged with in the Mar-a-Lago documents case. As much as Trump and his allies will try to conflate the two situations and claim that Trump is being unfairly prosecuted, the evidence in the two cases is very different.



As alleged in the indictment, Trump “not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it,” the report notes. “In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.”



Hur said that Biden couldn't be tried because he's a vegetable.
 
The report completely exonerated Biden. The rest is just the inappropriate BS opinion of a problematic Trump-appointee who was upset that he had to exonerate Biden.

You obviously have a problem with reading comprehension.

Biden "wilfully retained and disclosed classified materials"

The above is actually the announcement of an indictable offense.

Otherwise, Hur’s comments about Biden’s mental acuity is a national embarrassment for Biden and the Dems / Socialists. Somebody made the embarrassing mistake of allowing Biden to get in front of a microphone and it was another national embarrassment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top