Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
no i don't believe she does. She has empathy for the state of the conditions of other countries. She doesn't understand that THAT is not our problem or an excuse for illegal immigration and the use of anchor babies to stay here illegally.
syrenn, it's one hell of an assumption that anyone who does not denigrate the citizenship of a child born here to illegal aliens is somehow less patriotic than you are. The children do pose serious problems and I don't claim to have all the answers -- except that I think dumping American citizens into a third world country is wrong.
They are citizens, just as you are. All this bellyaching about what to do about the assault of illegals on Americans CANNOT begin to be debated by selecting "unwanted" American citizens to eject, especially not children. I'm not overly fond of some of the neighbor's kidlets, but I wouldn't dream of suggesting we deport them.
I have never made any claims or comments of patriotism about myself or the illegals, where did you get that from?
We are talking about anchor babies. Right now at this time those anchor babies are citizens. I am not suggesting forcing American citizens to leave the country. I am saying the illegal parents need to go, and if they take their citizen children with them or leave them behind, that is their choice.
Do they have any natural resources we might want for cheap?no i don't believe she does. She has empathy for the state of the conditions of other countries. She doesn't understand that THAT is not our problem or an excuse for illegal immigration and the use of anchor babies to stay here illegally.
If the US is going to be expected to be responsible for the conditions in Mexico and mitigate them, then we should get the real estate that goes with the people. If we don't get to run Mexico, then I see no reason to feel responsible for what happens there.
tsalkonocii wrote in part:
I think I'll not trust a coyote' when it comes to illegal crossings of the border of the motivations of those who do so.
Birthright citizens are not going to permit their parents to be rounded up and shipped off. Birthright citizens will outnumber the nativist wackos within ten to fifteen years. The immigrant naturalized citizens now equal or outnumber the nativists here. This subject is a non-issue.
Get rid of the anchor baby perk - it causes way too many problems for the USA.
You are right, Intense, that an amendment would be require, and I am right that such an amendment would be wrong.
Looks like Arizona legislators aren't done yet;
Arizona's Next Immigration Target: Children of Illegals - Yahoo! News
Anchor babies" isn't a very endearing term, but in Arizona those are the words being used to tag children born in the U.S. to illegal immigrants. While not new, the term is increasingly part of the local vernacular because the primary authors of the nation's toughest and most controversial immigration law are targeting these tots - the legal weights that anchor many undocumented aliens in the U.S. - for their next move.
Buoyed by recent public opinion polls suggesting they're on the right track with illegal immigration, Arizona Republicans will likely introduce legislation this fall that would deny birth certificates to children born in Arizona - and thus American citizens according to the U.S. Constitution - to parents who are not legal U.S. citizens. The law largely is the brainchild of state Sen. Russell Pearce, a Republican whose suburban district, Mesa, is considered the conservative bastion of the Phoenix political scene. He is a leading architect of the Arizona law that sparked outrage throughout the country: Senate Bill 1070, which allows law enforcement officers to ask about someone's immigration status during a traffic stop, detainment or arrest if reasonable suspicion exists - things like poor English skills, acting nervous or avoiding eye contact during a traffic stop.
So is Arizona going to far or is this another step in the right direction?
Looks like Arizona legislators aren't done yet;
Arizona's Next Immigration Target: Children of Illegals - Yahoo! News
Anchor babies" isn't a very endearing term, but in Arizona those are the words being used to tag children born in the U.S. to illegal immigrants. While not new, the term is increasingly part of the local vernacular because the primary authors of the nation's toughest and most controversial immigration law are targeting these tots - the legal weights that anchor many undocumented aliens in the U.S. - for their next move.
Buoyed by recent public opinion polls suggesting they're on the right track with illegal immigration, Arizona Republicans will likely introduce legislation this fall that would deny birth certificates to children born in Arizona - and thus American citizens according to the U.S. Constitution - to parents who are not legal U.S. citizens. The law largely is the brainchild of state Sen. Russell Pearce, a Republican whose suburban district, Mesa, is considered the conservative bastion of the Phoenix political scene. He is a leading architect of the Arizona law that sparked outrage throughout the country: Senate Bill 1070, which allows law enforcement officers to ask about someone's immigration status during a traffic stop, detainment or arrest if reasonable suspicion exists - things like poor English skills, acting nervous or avoiding eye contact during a traffic stop.
So is Arizona going to far or is this another step in the right direction?
an excellent next step.
Looks like Arizona legislators aren't done yet;
So is Arizona going to far or is this another step in the right direction?
an excellent next step.
A federal court, upon application, will immediately quash such a law, on the grounds that a state birth document certifies officially the individual, the date, and the location of the birth. The state law would have to provide an other equally effective method in identifying and verifying such a birth. If such a law existed, then it would defeat the intent of the proposed law.
Such a law will never survive federal judicial review.
More importantly in political consequences, such a law sponsored by the GOP and endorsed by folks like Bachmann, Palin, McCain, Boehner, McConnell would immediately brand the GOP a nativist party that hates minorities and immigrants. The GOP would be relegated to minority status forever until it changed its stance.
Anything else you want to get paid to not do???? Anything else out there to obstruct and over burden??? Maybe you can construct a scheme to regulate breast milk under Interstate Commerce???
The USA is the only country that allows those born of illegal parents to be considered U.S. citizens.....what is wrong with this picture?
The USA is the only country that allows those born of illegal parents to be considered U.S. citizens.....what is wrong with this picture?
A false assumption by Intense. I wrote, ". . . forever until it changed its stance." [my bolded italics]
The great majority of the nation has not indicated any interested whatsoever in the anchor baby argument other than to ask its collective self, "why do the loonies keep talking about this? It's a non-issue."
We are not here at your pleasure Jake, We are not here to serve your whims. I know it's a shock, but you will some time learn to appreciate your own individual role as a human being outside of your role in society. There is more to life than power and control.
You're screwing up your own argument.
Thus far you make no distinction between legal Mexican immigrants, illegal Mexican immigrants, and Mexican nationals in Mexico.
Only of you think that those who come here legally are also ignoring our border
You think illegal immigrants come here for shits and giggles to "spit on our sovereignity
They spit on our sovereignty by refusing to recognize our sovereignty and our borders and to recognize and respect them. As for why they come ehre- it's because they're drug runners, coyotes [
], gangbangers, and murderers, rapists, and thieves, who don't want to risk being detected and identified by coming here legally.
], gangbangers, and murderers, rapists, and thieves..." - do you have anything to back up this claim or is it just more popcorn farts 
Yes. They call the region Atzlan, speak of The Race [La Raza], and refuse to respect our borders and our laws regarding who may cross them and how they are to do so.
Border patrol agents are radicals?
Those are the only pictures I've posted.
No, they come here for opportunities and/or freedoms they can't get at home.
Like raping Americans, stealing from our homes, and selling drugs in America. Those who come here to work legally, pay their taxes, and earn an honest life for themselves come here legally- and in rather large numbers. They're called 'immigrants' and they're an entirely different group of persons than those illegals who sneak across the border.
It is you who refuses to distinguish between legal and illegal, between criminals and those who come to earn an honest dollar and better things for themselves and their families.
Whether right or wrong it seldom has anything to do with how they regard our sovereignity
except for despising it, ignoring it, and speaking of a reconquest
I think I'll not trust a coyote' when it comes to illegal crossings of the border of the motivations of those who do so.
