New gay school board chair sworn in on stack of banned porno books

Here is a couple pages of one of the books from the OP
View attachment 876671



This right here folks, is what perverted leftists are gaslighting you over. For being against this sick shit in our schools.
These people are fuckin FREAKS.
Never EVER trust a leftist. Especially around your kids or grandkids.
Okay, if one of those two characters had been a woman, would you be as upset about it?

Or are you just upset that it's two dudes?
 
Yep.

Those in this thread who support this nambla shit KNOW that this is what they are supporting because it is brought up every single time they indulge in their apologia.

They only pretend it is other books entirely that people are reacting to as a way to distance themselves from what they are actually supporting.
So, what about all the books that are fairly explicit that portray straight relationships?

Particularly garbage like the Twilight Series, which give young women very unhealthy examples of what a relationship should be like.
 
Hilarious


Everyone should be a racist bigot
Otto my friend, you can puff all you want and pirate all the butt you want. Just please keep your homosexual freakness away from me.
 
Okay, if one of those two characters had been a woman, would you be as upset about it?

Or are you just upset that it's two dudes?
Joey, you can have your pick of two queers if that will placate you.
 
Otto my friend, you can puff all you want and pirate all the butt you want. Just please keep your homosexual freakness away from me.
You and your sexual insecurities are duly noted fuckup
 
What makes you think I wouldnt care if it was a girl? Im not a pervert like your ilk.
Kids are exposed to far more damaging material with heterosexual characters.

The Twilight Saga, for instance, is about a 90 year old vampire in a relationship with a 17 year old girl he doesn't know if he wants to fuck or eat. (And let's be honest, a vampire is just a cannibal with table manners!)
 
So, what about all the books that are fairly explicit that portray straight relationships?

Particularly garbage like the Twilight Series, which give young women very unhealthy examples of what a relationship should be like.
Slut training books depicting underage girls giving blow jobs do not belong in schools any more than the NAMBLA materials
 
Slut training books depicting underage girls giving blow jobs do not belong in schools any more than the NAMBLA materials

Not sure how this qualifies as "NAMBLA", when it looks like the two cartoon characters are the same age.

Is there some conservative brain disease where you all just forget your teenage years? Or do you think High School kids all wait until the 18th birthday to have sex for the first time?

1703191152985.png
 
Your brain does not work the way human brains are designed to work, child

I am not this imaginary bogeyman that you call "maga" and there is nothing in the least bit implicit in anything I have said indicating I want no books in libraries.
See? Gaslighting. And a bunch of deflecting as well.
"wwwaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh twilight wwwwwwaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh"
Its fucked up
 
Okay, if one of those two characters had been a woman, would you be as upset about it?
Or are you just upset that it's two dudes?

Either way, it is not appropriate material to be providing to minors.

The idea that it is acceptable and proper for minors to be engaging in sexual activity with one another, or with adults, is not something we should ever be encouraging children to think. I happens to be about young boys engaging in sexual activity with grown men, presented in a manner to portray it as normal, desirable activity. Even you cannot possibly think that is appropriate, can you?

If it was about a young girl engaging in sexual activity with a grown man, or a young boy engaging in sexual activity with a grown woman, it would still be inappropriate and unacceptable.

There is only one kind of subhuman piece of shit that wants to teach children that it is OK for them to engage in sexual activity with adults. Only one kind. We're not allowed to call any of the obvious examples of such by name, on this forum, but we all know.
 
Either way, it is not appropriate material to be providing to minors.

The idea that it is acceptable and proper for minors to be engaging in sexual activity with one another, or with adults, is not something we should ever be encouraging children to think. I happens to be about young boys engaging in sexual activity with grown men, presented in a manner to portray it as normal, desirable activity. Even you cannot possibly think that is appropriate, can you?

As always, Bob, there's ideal world and real world. Ideally, everyone should wait until they are mature enough to have sex.

Real world... teenagers (especially boys) are horny. They think about sex six times a day. Girls are less so, but they see sex as a way to get love, and frankly, our divorce-happy culture hasn't helped that.

The illustration, as near as I can tell, is of two gay teens in a sexual relationship. Not sure if they are over 18 or not (they are cartoons, so it's moot point). Some teens are going to be gay, not because an adult told them to be gay, but because that's how nature programmed them.



If it was about a young girl engaging in sexual activity with a grown man, or a young boy engaging in sexual activity with a grown woman, it would still be inappropriate and unacceptable.
So when are you going to advocate banning the Twilight Saga from school libraries, then?

There is only one kind of subhuman piece of shit that wants to teach children that it is OK for them to engage in sexual activity with adults. Only one kind. We're not allowed to call any of the obvious examples of such by name, on this forum, but we all know.
Mormons?

So are you going to condemn Joseph Smith for having sex with:

Fanny ALger (age 16)
Sarah Ann Whitney (age 17)
Lucy Walker (Age 17)
Sarah Wallace (Age 17)
Helen Mar Kimball (age 14!)
Nancy Marie Winchester (14)

 

Forum List

Back
Top